Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

51

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

51 results for “PCR test”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Borderline COVID-19 PCR Test Result

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04636294. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Buccal Screening Evaluation Using an RT-PCR Assay and a Rapid ELISA Test Among Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05074745. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Self-Collected Saliva Samples Without Viral Transport Media for COVID-19 Testing Via RT-PCR

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04604145. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: An examination of the accuracy of a sequential PCR and sequencing test used to detect the incursion of an invasive species: the case of the red fox in Tasmania

1. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) diagnostic tests are increasingly applied to the identification of wildlife. Yet rigorous verification is rare and the estimation of test accuracy (the probability that true positive and true negative samples are correctly identified – test sensitivity and specificity, respectively), particularly in combination with sequencing, is uncommon. This is important because PCR-based tests are prone to contamination in sampling and the laboratory. 2. Here, we use an experimental case–control approach to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of a sequential PCR-based wildlife detection test used to identify incursions of red foxes into Tasmania from predator faeces (scats). 3. Our results show that the sensitivity of the fox test is high (~94%) for the PCR-based test on its own, but this decreases to ~84% when combined with the DNA sequencing step. In contrast, the specificity increases from ~96% in the PCR only test to ~99.6% after inclusion of the DNA sequencing step. 4. The intense public scrutiny of the fox eradication program in Tasmania, has undoubtedly influenced the application of a sequential PCR test that maximises specificity at the expense of sensitivity and so increases the risk that scats containing fox DNA would not be detected. This could lead to the establishment of foxes in Tasmania as a consequence. 5. Synthesis and applications. Importantly, the estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of sequential tests enables decisions about the risk associated with mistaken identification (i.e. false negatives vs false positives) to be quantified for decision makers. The cost of false negative errors should be balanced against the costs of false positive errors, which could include the expenditure incurred in the application of unnecessary management actions were foxes not in fact present. Understanding the risks and costs associated with both false negative and false positive errors is therefore a key component to the decision making process for the management of the Tasmanian fox incursion.

opencc-zeroDec 2014View details →
zenodo28/100

Fig. 3 in Testing The Microsatellites-Pcr Markers For Genetic Diversity Research Of Alien Ponto-Caspian Amphipod Pontogammarus Robustoides G. O. Sars, 1894

Fig. 3. Microsatellites amplification of Pontogammarus robustoides from Pļaviņas Reservoir used primer Gapu-17.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 1. A, B in A multiplex PCR method for identification of two common true cutworm species (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) tested in the central plain of Guilan province, Iran

FIGURE 1. A, B, Maize and green pepper fields damaged by true cutworm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2018View details →
dryad28/100

Concordance between PCR-based extraction-free saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing

<p><b>Introduction</b>: Saliva represents a less invasive alternative to nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection. SalivaDirect is a nucleic acid extraction-free method for detecting SARS-CoV2 in saliva specimens. <span>Studies evaluating the concordance of gold standard NPS and newly developed SalivaDirect protocols are limited</span>. The aim of our study was to assess SalivaDirect as an alternative method for COVID-19 testing.</p> <p><b>Methods</b>: Matching NPS and saliva samples were analysed from a cohort of symptomatic (n=127) and asymptomatic (n=181) participants recruited from hospital and university settings respectively. RNA was extracted from NPS while saliva samples were subjected to the SalivaDirect protocol before RT-qPCR analysis. The presence of SARS-Cov-2 was assessed using <i>RdRP</i> and <i>N1</i> gene targets in NPS and saliva respectively.</p> <p><b>Results</b>: Overall we observed 94.3% sensitivity (95% CI 87.2-97.5%), and 95.9% specificity (95% CI 92.4-97.8%) in saliva when compared to matching NPS samples. Analysis of concordance demonstrated 95.5% accuracy overall for the saliva test relative to NPS, and a very high level of agreement (κ coefficient = 0.889, 95% CI 0.833–0.946) between the two sets of specimens. Fourteen of 308 samples were discordant, all from symptomatic patients. Ct values were &gt;30 in 13/14 and &gt;35 in 6/14 samples. No significant difference was found in the Ct values of matching NPS and saliva sample (<i>p</i>=0.860). A highly significant correlation (r = 0.475, <i>p</i>&lt;0.0001) was also found between the Ct values of the concordant positive saliva and NPS specimens.</p> <p><b>Conclusions</b>: Use of saliva processed according to the SalivaDirect protocol represents a valid method to detect SARS-CoV-2. Less invasive and accurate saliva screening is an attractive alternative to current testing methods based on NPS and would afford greater capacity to test asymptomatic populations especially in the context of frequent testing.</p>

opencc-zeroJul 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Hughes KW, Morris SD, Reboredo-Segovia A (2015) Cloning of ribosomal ITS PCR products creates frequent, non-random chimeric sequences – a test involving heterozygotes between Gymnopus dichrous taxa I and II. MycoKeys 10: 45-56. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.10.5126

Figure 1 - The ITS2 region of two haplotypes of Gymnopus dichrous: Haplotypes DI (represented by TENN68084) and DII (represented by TENN68078). The TC pair at position 15 and the indel at position 25 were used to determine which the haplotype was represented by the 5' end of a cloned sequence. Bases in red are points where DI and DII haplotypes differ in sequence and were used to determine if template switching had occurred in a cloned PCR product. Eight base pairs at which template switching can be detected are indicated by numbers 1-8. The possible area in which template switching (ts) could have occurred is indicated by vertical arrows and the number of observed template switching events is given above the vertical arrow. Bases that may be involved in intra-strand base pairing as determined by MFOLD are outlined with black boxes. Ambiguity codes indicate intraspecific variation.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2015View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Routine Application of Point-of-care PCR Test to Identify and Direct Therapy for Acute Respiratory Infection in the Emergency Department Trial

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06780566. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Clinical Utility of a PCR Compared to Culture and Sensitivity Testing for the Management of cUTI in Adults.

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06996301. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

The Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Impact of Rapid Diagnostic Test (Multiplex PCR FilmArray) on Antimicrobial Decision Making Compared to Conventional Decision Making Among Critically Ill Patients

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05759494. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 0. Publications: 4.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Clinical Evaluation of the Sentosa SA HSV1/2 Qualitative PCR Test

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02685956. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
dryad28/100

Sex identification PCR-RFLP assay tested in eight species of Sebastes rockfish

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2021View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: An examination of the accuracy of a sequential PCR and sequencing test used to detect the incursion of an invasive species: the case of the red fox in Tasmania

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2016View details →
dryad28/100

Concordance between PCR-based extraction-free saliva and nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2021View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Evaluation of Clinical Performance and IVD Test of LifeOS Digital PCR Liquid Biopsy Kits for EGFR T790M Mutation

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06573073. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Performances of a H. Pylori Stool PCR Test

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03566004. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

This Trial is a Clinical Performance Validation Study That Will Evaluate the Clinical Agreement of the Sky Medical™ Rapid Antigen Test Comparing the Antigen Rapid Test to RT-PCR

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05491993. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Evaluation of Concordance Between Exhaled Air Test (eBAM-CoV) and RT-PCR to Detect SARS-CoV-2

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06099795. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

The Effect of Video Information on Anxiety in Adolescents Having rRT-PCR Test During Corona Virus Pandemic

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05265390. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record