Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
5,738
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
5,738 results for “Standardization”
Sand content in % (kg / kg) at 6 standard depths (0, 10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm) at 250 m resolution
<p>Sand content in % (kg / kg) at 6 standard depths (0, 10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm) at 250 m resolution. Based on machine learning predictions from global compilation of soil profiles and samples. Processing steps are described in detail <strong><a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/tree/master/soil">here</a></strong>. Antarctica is not included.</p> <p>To access and visualize maps use: <a href="http://www.openlandmap.org/">OpenLandMap.org</a></p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact or inconsistency in the maps, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels:</p> <ul> <li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/issues">https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/issues</a> </li> <li>General questions and comments: <a href="https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/">https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/</a></li> </ul> <p>All files internally compressed using "COMPRESS=DEFLATE" creation option in GDAL. File naming convention:</p> <ul> <li>sol = theme: soil,</li> <li>sand.wfraction = variable: sand weight fraction,</li> <li>usda.3a1a1a = determination method: laboratory method code,</li> <li>m = mean value,</li> <li>250m = spatial resolution / block support: 250 m,</li> <li>b10..10cm = vertical reference: 10 cm depth below surface,</li> <li>1950..2017 = time reference: period 1950-2017,</li> <li>v0.2 = version number: 0.2,</li> </ul>
Soil bulk density (fine earth) 10 x kg / m-cubic at 6 standard depths (0, 10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm) at 250 m resolution
<p>Soil bulk density (fine earth) 10 x kg / m<sup>3</sup> at 6 standard depths (0, 10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm) at 250 m resolution. Processing steps are described in detail <strong><a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/tree/master/soil">here</a></strong>. Antarctica is not included.</p> <p>To access and visualize maps use: <a href="http://www.openlandmap.org/">OpenLandMap.org</a></p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact or inconsistency in the maps, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels:</p> <ul> <li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/issues">https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/issues</a> </li> <li>General questions and comments: <a href="https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/">https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/</a></li> </ul> <p>All files internally compressed using "COMPRESS=DEFLATE" creation option in GDAL. File naming convention:</p> <ul> <li>sol = theme: soil,</li> <li>bulkdens.fineearth = variable: soil bulk density,</li> <li>usda.4a1h = determination method: laboratory method code,</li> <li>m = mean value,</li> <li>250m = spatial resolution / block support: 250 m,</li> <li>b10..10cm = vertical reference: 10 cm depth below surface,</li> <li>1950..2017 = time reference: period 1950-2017,</li> <li>v0.2 = version number: 0.2,</li> </ul>
Soil organic carbon stock in kg/m2 for 5 standard depth intervals (0–10, 10–30, 30–60, 60–100 and 100–200 cm) at 250 m resolution
<p>Soil organic carbon stock in kg/m<sup>2</sup> for 5 standard depth intervals (0–10, 10–30, 30–60, 60–100 and 100–200 cm) at 250 m resolution. To convert to t/ha multiply by 10. Derived using soil organic carbon content (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1475457">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1475457</a>), bulk density (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1475970">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1475970</a>) and coarse fragments (<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2525681">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2525681</a>), predicted from point data at 6 standard depths. Depth to bed rock has been ignored, hence total stocks might be about 10–15% lower then reported. Processing steps are described in detail <strong><a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/tree/master/soil">here</a></strong>. Antarctica is not included.</p> <p>To access and visualize maps use: <a href="https://openlandmap.org"><strong>https://openlandmap.org</strong></a></p> <p>If you discover a bug, artifact or inconsistency in the maps, or if you have a question please use some of the following channels:</p> <ul> <li>Technical issues and questions about the code: <a href="https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/issues">https://gitlab.com/openlandmap/global-layers/issues</a> </li> <li>General questions and comments: <a href="https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/">https://disqus.com/home/forums/landgis/</a></li> </ul> <p>All files internally compressed using "COMPRESS=DEFLATE" creation option in GDAL. File naming convention:</p> <ul> <li>sol = theme: soil,</li> <li>organic.carbon.stock = variable: soil organic carbon stock in kg/m2,</li> <li>msa.kgm2 = determination method: derived from organic carbon content, bulk density and coarse fragments,</li> <li>m = mean value,</li> <li>250m = spatial resolution / block support: 250 m,</li> <li>b0..10cm = vertical reference: 0-10 cm layer below surface,</li> <li>1950..2017 = time reference: period 1950-2017,</li> <li>v0.2 = version number: 0.2,</li> </ul>
Standardized map of habitat types and regionally important biotopes in Flanders
<p>The <code>habitatmap_stdized.gpkg</code> file is a processed version of the <a href="https://www.vlaanderen.be/datavindplaats/catalogus/biologische-waarderingskaart-en-natura-2000-habitatkaart-toestand-2023">Natura 2000 habitat map of Flanders</a> (De Saeger et al., 2023; see also De Saeger et al. 2017). It contains all polygons with Natura 2000 habitat types or regional important biotopes (RIB). This file is used as a basis for designing monitoring schemes in Flanders. </p> <p>In the original habitat map, every polygon can consist of maximum 5 different types (habitat (sub)types and regionally important biotopes). This information is stored in the columns <code>HAB1</code>, <code>HAB2</code>,..., <code>HAB5</code> of the attribute table. The fraction of each type within the polygons is stored in the columns <code>PHAB1</code>, <code>PHAB2</code>, ..., <code>PHAB5</code>.</p> <p>The <code>habitatmap_stdized.gpkg</code> file is a GeoPackage that contains:</p> <ul> <li><code>habitatmap_polygons</code>: a spatial layer with every habitat map polygon that contains a Natura 2000 habitat or RIB type.</li> <li><code>habitatmap_types</code>: a table with information on the habitat and RIB types (HAB1, HAB2,..., HAB5) that occur within each polygon of <code>habitatmap_polygons.</code></li> </ul> <p>The processing of the habitatmap_types table included following adjustments:</p> <ul> <li>For some polygons the type is uncertain, and the type code in the raw habitatmap data source consists of 2 or 3 possible types, separated with a ','. The different possible types are split up and one row is created for each of them, with <code>phab</code> for each new row simply set to the original value of <code>phab</code>. The variable <code>certain</code> will be <code>FALSE</code> if the original type code consists of 2 or 3 possible types, and <code>TRUE</code> if only one type is provided.</li> <li>Some polygons contain both a standing water habitat type and <code>rbbmr</code>: <ul> <li><code>3130_rbbmr</code>,</li> <li><code>3140_rbbmr</code>,</li> <li><code>3150_rbbmr</code>, and</li> <li><code>3160_rbbmr</code>.</li> </ul> </li> <li>Since <code>habitatmap_stdized_2020_v1</code>, the two types <code>31xx</code> and <code>rbbmr</code> are split up and one row is created for each of them, with <code>phab</code> for each new row simply set to the original value of <code>phab</code>. The variable certain in this case will be <code>TRUE</code> for both types.</li> <li>After those steps, a given polygon could contain the same type with the same value for <code>certain</code> repeated several times, e.g. when <code>31xx_rbbmr</code> is present with <code>phab</code> = yy% and <code>31xx</code> is present with <code>phab</code> = zz%. In that case the rows with the same <code>polygon_id</code>, <code>type</code> and <code>certain</code> were gathered into one row and the respective phab values were added up.</li> </ul> <p>The R-code for creating the <code>habitatmap_stdized</code> data source can be found in the GitHub repository <a href="https://github.com/inbo/n2khab-preprocessing/tree/abf596e/src/generate_habitatmap_stdized">'n2khab-preprocessing' at commit abf596e</a>.</p> <p>A reading function to return the data source in a standardized way into the R environment is provided by the R-package <a href="https://github.com/inbo/n2khab">n2khab</a>.</p> <p>Attributes of <code>habitatmap_polygons</code>:</p> <ul> <li><code>polygon_id</code></li> <li><code>description_orig</code>: polygon description based on the original type codes in the raw habitatmap </li> </ul> <p>Attributes of <code>habitatmap_types</code>:</p> <ul> <li><code>polygon_id</code></li> <li><code>type</code>: the interpreted habitat or RIB type</li> <li><code>certain</code>: <code>TRUE</code> when type is certain and <code>FALSE</code> when type is uncertain</li> <li><code>code_orig</code>: original type code in raw habitatmap</li> <li><code>phab</code>: proportion of polygon covered by type, as a percentage.</li> </ul> <p>Since version <code>habitatmap_stdized_2020_v1</code>, rows are unique only by the combination of the <code>polygon_id</code>, <code>type</code> and <code>certain</code> columns.</p>
FTICR MS data for standards and mixtures for quantitative peak intensity investigation
<p>This upload contains raw (Bruker .d format) FTICR mass spectrometry data (direct infusion, negative mode ESI) for standards in different mixtures and matrices for the purposes of investigating the (non)quantitative nature of the data. <br>Processed data (Excel format), and Python scripts used for data processing are also included. </p> <p>Note - the Python scripts used CoreMS version prior to V2.0 for analysis - to re-run these scripts with a more recent release likely requires syntax updates. </p>
Perturbative gravitational wave predictions for the real scalar extended Standard Model, dataset
<p>This deposit contains data from a perturbative study of cosmological phase transitions in the real singlet scalar extension of the Standard Model (xSM). The data relates to the paper "Perturbative gravitational wave predictions for the real scalar extended Standard Model". Everything is contained within the archive file <em>xsm_results.tar.gz</em>, a tarball compressed with Gzip.</p> <p>The data covers phase transition properties for a scan of 100,000 parameter points in the xSM. Further details on the contents of the dataset are explained in the <em>README.md</em> within the tarball.</p>
Data for: A tool based on the Industry Foundation Classes standard for dynamic data collection and automatic generation of Building Automation Control Networks
<p>This dataset shows the results obtained for a case study at TRL4 for the research paper title <em><strong>A tool based on the Industry Foundation Classes standard for dynamic data collection and automatic generation of Building Automation Control Networks</strong></em>, with DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.107625</p> <p>This dataset is an enhanced IFC (Industry Foundation Classes) file with the creation of the BACN (Building Automation Control Network). This IFC file includes the devices created automatically by the BACN2BIM tool (developed by CARTIF Technology Centre) for the case study validated at TRL4. The original IFC was obtained from the Institute for Automation and Applied Informatics (IAI) / Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) https://www.ifcwiki.org/images/e/e3/AC20-FZK-Haus.ifc, under an unrestricted license, as served as one of the case studies for this research.</p> <p>*Depending on the IFC viewer used, the included sensors may not be represented correctly. In this case, it is recommended to try with another IFC viewer, for example xBIM explorer https://docs.xbim.net/downloads/xbimxplorer.html or BimCollab Zoom Free https://www.bimcollab.com/en/support/downloads/</p>
Interlaboratory testing of CuSO4 toxicity in the “Standardized Aquatic Microcosm” protocol consisting of multiple phytoplankton and animals in a chemically defined medium.
Four different laboratories conducted a total of ten experiments of the “Standardized Aquatic Microcosm” to test the reproducibility of results to control, low, medium, and high concentrations of CuSO4. In nine experiments, treatments consisted of six replicates of 0, 500, 1000, and 2000 ppb Cu++. One experiment, ME74, used 0, 127, 255, 509 ppb. The purpose was to test a chemically defined medium (thus negating differences due to local water supplies) and the same 10 species of phytoplankton and 5 animals, including Daphnia. Microbes were undefined. The protocol included the weekly re-introduction of small numbers of each species to allow potential recovery from toxicity. Control microcosms had a “spring algal bloom” terminated by zooplankton grazing and multiple competitive interactions. The copper inhibited some phytoplankton more than others and killed many grazers, especially Daphnia. The data set presented several interesting statistical properties that would yield new insights. (a) The results were very similar, but the timing varied— the higher the concentration of copper, the longer the inhibition and mortality of organisms, so those at 500 ppb recovered earlier, the 1000 ppb recovered later, and at 2000 ppb most never recovered. But if compared on each sampling day, e.g., 10, 14, … to 64, results appear highly variable. (b) In at least one experiment, the toxicity of copper was challenging to demonstrate statistically because high variability in the timing of recovery of the intermediate concentration increased pooled variances. (c) The elimination of highly-sensitive dominant organisms allowed less-sensitive organisms to increase in abundance. Within natural environments, the observation that some species increase in the presence of toxic substances has been used to discredit toxicity testing without considering the relative sensitivities of competing or predatory species. (d) The competitive interactions among organisms, e.g., cyanobacteria and green alga
CALCOFI fish larvae at 66 standard stations, 1966 - ongoing
The fish larvae (ichthyoplankton) survey is conducted through the California Cooperative Fisheries Investigations program (CALCOFI, http://www.calcofi.org/). These data are a time series of fish larvae counts (or density, as number per 10 square meter of ocean surface) collected in the area of the California Current between San Diego and Avila Beach, California. Original data were filtered to facilitate consistent comparisons over time and space. The original CalCOFI fish larvae count data is available from the CoastWatch West Coast Regional Node (WCRN) at NOAA’s Pacific Fisheries Environmental Laboratory, http://coastwatch.pfeg.noaa.gov/erddap/tabledap/index.html. The dataset presented here is an aggregation of 31 data files, originally divided alphabetically by taxon (named “CalCOFI Larvae Counts, Scientific Names * to *”). The data were filtered to include only the 66 core stations with a maximum of 1 cruise per season. These 66 core stations have been most frequently sampled in the past and sampling is ongoing. CalCOFI sampling began in 1949. However, the dataset presented here begins in 1966 to include only samples that were analyzed with techniques that apply the most current and accurate identification of larvae to the species level. As the backlog of samples (i.e., before 1966) is re-examined, this dataset will be augmented with that additional, earlier data.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Reef Performance Standard - Benthic Algae and Macroinvertebrate Cover, Abundance, and Richness
These data describe annual estimates of the percent cover, abundance, and species richness (evaluated as species density) of benthic macroalgae and macroinvertebrates from replicate transects at three subtidal reefs. Data collection began in 2009 at an artificial reef (Wheeler North Reef in Orange County, CA) and two natural reference reefs (San Mateo Kelp in Orange County, CA and Barn Kelp in San Diego County, CA) to evaluate the ability of Wheeler North Reef to compensate for losses of kelp forest habitat and associated biota caused by the operation of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS).
SGS-LTER Standard Production Data: 1983-2008 Annual Aboveground Net Primary Production on the Central Plains Experimental Range, Nunn, Colorado, USA 1983-2008, ARS Study Number 6 (Reformatted to the ecocomDP Design Pattern)
This data package is formatted as an ecocomDP (Ecological Community Data Pattern). For more information on ecocomDP see https://github.com/EDIorg/ecocomDP. This Level 1 data package was derived from the Level 0 data package found here: https://pasta.lternet.edu/package/metadata/eml/knb-lter-sgs/700/1. The abstract below was extracted from the Level 0 data package and is included for context: This data package was produced by researchers working on the Shortgrass Steppe Long Term Ecological Research (SGS-LTER) Project, administered at Colorado State University. Long-term datasets and background information (proposals, reports, photographs, etc.) on the SGS-LTER project are contained in a comprehensive project collection within the Digital Collections of Colorado (http://digitool.library.colostate.edu/R/?func=collections&collection_id=3429). The data table and associated metadata document, which is generated in Ecological Metadata Language, may be available through other repositories serving the ecological research community and represent components of the larger SGS-LTER project collection. The objective of the long-term ANPP study is to monitor long-term net above ground primary production of the shortgrass steppe community by species. There are 6 sites: ridgetop (ridge), midslope (mid), swale, ESA (replicate 1 not 2), Section 25 (SEC 25), and owl-creek (OC). Each site is located in a different landscape position or soil type on the shortgrass steppe and may be grazed or not. Ridgetop, midslope and swale are grazed and are sampled along a catena. Section 25 is grazed and is located in an upload grassland. ESA is an ungrazed upland grassland an is the control from the Ecosystem Stress Area experiment. Owl Creek is ungrazed and is located in the lowland along the owl creek drainage. There are 3 transects with 5 plots in each transect. Plots in the grazed locations are protected by cages. Because this is a monitoring effort, true replicates across the landscape are not
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Fish Abundance and Species Richness
These data describe the annual estimates of density of wetland fish (all species combined) and the species richness (as the number of unique species) in six main channel and six tidal creek locations at four coastal wetlands as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration monitoring program to track long-term patterns in species abundance and diversity. This study began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetland in San Diego County, CA, Carpinteria Salt Marsh in Santa Barbara County, CA, and Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County, CA. Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County was added in 2013. Beginning in 2024, Tijuana Estuary was replaced with Los Penasquitos Lagoon in San Diego County, CA.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Bird Abundance and Species Richness
These data describe the annual estimates of bird density and richness (as a species density) in twenty plots at four coastal wetlands as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration monitoring program to track long-term patterns in species abundance and diversity. This study began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetlands and Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County, CA, Carpinteria Salt Marsh in Santa Barbara County, CA, and Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County, CA. Beginning in 2024, Tijuana Estuary was replaced with Los Penasquitos Lagoon in San Diego County, CA.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Bird Food Chain Support
These data describe annual estimates of the density of feeding birds at four coastal wetlands as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration monitoring program to track long-term patterns in food chain support provided to birds. This study began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetlands and Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County, CA, Carpinteria Salt Marsh in Santa Barbara County, CA, and Point Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County. Beginning in 2024, Tijuana Estuary was replaced with Los Penasquitos Lagoon in San Diego County, CA.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Invertebrate Abundance and Richness
These data contain annual estimates of the density of wetland macroinvertebrates (all species combined) and species richness (as a species density) in six main channel and six tidal creek locations at four coastal wetlands as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration monitoring program to track long-term patterns in species abundance and diversity. This study began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetland and Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County, CA, Carpinteria Salt Marsh in Santa Barbara County, CA, and Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County, CA. Beginning in 2024, Tijuana Estuary was replaced with Los Penasquitos Lagoon in San Diego County, CA.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Spartina Canopy
These data describe annual estimates of Spartina foliosa canopy architecture (measured as proportion of stems > 3 ft long) from four locations at two coastal wetlands as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration mitigation monitoring program to track long-term patterns in Spartina size structure. This study began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetlands and Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County, CA. Beginning in 2024, Tijuana Estuary was replaced with Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County, CA.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Water Quality
These data describe annual estimates of wetland water quality, measured as the average duration of hypoxia (time dissolved oxygen concentration below 3 mg/l), collected as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration mitigation monitoring program designed to evaluate compliance of the restoration project with conditions of the SONGS permit. This study began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetlands and Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County, CA, Carpinteria Salt Marsh in Santa Barbara County, CA, and Point Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County, CA. Beginning in 2024, Tijuana Estuary was replaced with Los Penasquitos Lagoon in San Diego County, CA.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Tidal Prism
These data describe estimates of tidal prism at the San Dieguito Wetland as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration mitigation monitoring program to track long-term patterns of tidal prism. This study began in 2012.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Plant Reproductive Success
These data describe annual estimates reproductive success (measured by seed set) of salt marsh plants at the San Dieguito Wetland as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration mitigation monitoring program designed to track long-term patterns in reproductive success of wetland plants. Monitoring began in 2012.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Reef Performance Standard - Kelp Acres
These data describe annual estimates of the area (in acres) of medium-to-high density adult giant kelp, Macrocystis pyrifera, supported by the artificial reef polygons of Wheeler North Reef in Orange County, CA (33.40210N, 117.62420W). Data collection began in 2009 to evaluate the ability of Wheeler North Reef to compensate for losses of kelp forest habitat and associated biota caused by the operation of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.