Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Fig 3 in Nutritional characteristics and costs of diets based on fish, spirulina, maggot and earthworm meals at the larval phase of rearing tilapia Oreochromis niloticus

Fig 3: Earthworm

Fig 1 in Water quality, yield and cost-benefit analysis of rain water ponds of Cuttack district: A comparison between Indian major carp and GIFT Tilapia

Fig 1: Location of the experimental side, Jodamu, Cuttack, Odisha

Table 4 in Water quality, yield and cost-benefit analysis of rain water ponds of Cuttack district: A comparison between Indian major carp and GIFT Tilapia

<p><b>Table 4:</b> Growth and production of IMC poly-culture & GIFT mono-sex tilapia in T1 & T2 (2018-19)</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Parameters</b></th><th><b>Growth-production data T1 T2</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Initial avg. weight (g)</th><td>19</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><th>Final avg. weight (g)</th><td>816</td><td>1333</td></tr><tr><th>Survival rate (%)</th><td>91</td><td>93.75</td></tr><tr><th>Production (kg/pond/9 months)</th><td>3383</td><td>8000</td></tr><tr><th>Total production (kg/ha/9 months)</th><td>8457.5</td><td>20000</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 2 in Water quality, yield and cost-benefit analysis of rain water ponds of Cuttack district: A comparison between Indian major carp and GIFT Tilapia

<p><b>Table 2:</b> Fish stocking & production data-IMC poly-culture & GIFT Tilapia mono-sex culture in T1 & T2 (2018-19)</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Tank Pond Area Stocking Date of No. (ha) (no) Stocking</b></th><th><b>Types of fish Stocking</b></th><th><b>Growth estimate during stocking (August-2018)</b></th><th><b>Growth estimate during final Total FCR harvest (May-June-2020) production (kg)</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><b>Length in (cm) Weight (g) Length in (cm)</b></td><td><b>Weight (g)</b></td><td><b>Weight in (kg)</b></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>T1</th><td></td><td>4000</td><td></td><td><i>Catla</i></td><td>9-12 18-23</td><td>28.3-39.6</td><td>980-1070</td><td>1682</td><td>1.7</td></tr><tr><td>0.4</td><td>05.09.2020 <i>Rohu</i></td><td>10-12 18-24</td><td>28.0-41.3</td><td>700-750</td><td>880</td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td><i>Mrigala</i></td><td>8-11 15-19</td><td>29.4-37.6</td><td>680-720</td><td>821</td></tr><tr><th>T2</th><td>0.4</td><td>6400</td><td>GIFT tilapia 15.09.2020 (<i>O. niloticus</i>)</td><td>6-7 8-9</td><td>28.3-32.1</td><td>1333</td><td>8000</td><td>1.2</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 3 in Water quality, yield and cost-benefit analysis of rain water ponds of Cuttack district: A comparison between Indian major carp and GIFT Tilapia

<p><b>Table 3:</b> Comparision of operational cost, production and economic profit of IMC polyculture & GIFT mono-sex tilapia culture during 2018-19 at Jodamu village of district Ciuttack, Odisha</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Parameters</b></th><th><b>T1-IMC culture (area-.4 ha)</b></th><th><b>T2-GIFT Tilapia culture (area-.4 ha)</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Operational Cost</b></th><td><b>Expenditure Expenditure (Rs/0.4ha/yr) (Rs/ha/yr)</b></td><td><b>Expenditure (Rs/0.4ha/yr)</b></td><td><b>Expenditure (Rs/ha/yr)</b></td></tr><tr><th><b>I. Expenditure</b></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Watering/de-watering charges</th><td>3,000</td><td>7,500</td><td>3,000</td><td>7,500</td></tr><tr><th>Bleaching Powder 50kg@Rs30/kg</th><td>1,500</td><td>3,750</td><td>1,500</td><td>3,750</td></tr><tr><th>Organic Manure 1000kg@Rs 0.5/kg</th><td>500</td><td>1,250</td><td>500</td><td>1,250</td></tr><tr><th>DAP fertilizer 20kg@ 20/kg</th><td>400</td><td>1,000</td><td>400</td><td>1,000</td></tr><tr><th>Lime-800kg (IMC), 1000kg (GIFT tilapia) @ Rs 10/kg</th><td>8,000</td><td>20,000</td><td>10,000</td><td>25,000</td></tr><tr><th>GNOC-25kg (IMC), 42kg (GIFT tilapia) @ Rs 22/kg</th><td>550</td><td>1325</td><td>924</td><td>2310</td></tr><tr><th>Soyabin 21kg @Rs 30/kg</th><td>630</td><td>1,575</td><td>630</td><td>1,575</td></tr><tr><th>Curd 120 kg @ 40/kg</th><td>4800</td><td>12000</td><td>4800</td><td>12000</td></tr><tr><th>Yeast 5kg @ Rs 200/kg</th><td>1000</td><td>2500</td><td>1000</td><td>2500</td></tr><tr><th>Ricebran 80kg @ Rs 15.5/kg</th><td>1,240</td><td>3,100</td><td>1,240</td><td>3,100</td></tr><tr><th>Joggery-100kg (IMC), 208kg (GIFT tilapia) @ Rs 23/kg</th><td>2,300</td><td>5,750</td><td>4,784</td><td>11,960</td></tr><tr><th>IMC seed4000pc @ Rs 5/pc and GIFT seed cost 6400pc @ Rs 2/pc</th><td>20,000</td><td>50,000</td><td>12,800</td><td>32,000</td></tr><tr><th>IMC-F. Feed 5500kg @ Rs 40/kg and GIFT tilapia F. Feed 9800kg @ Rs 40/kg</th><td>2,20,000</td><td>5.50,000</td><td>3,92,000</td><td>9,80,000</td></tr><tr><th>Transport @ Rs10000/time</th><td>20,000</td><td>50,000</td><td>30,000</td><td>75,000</td></tr><tr><th>Man power for pond preparation, bio-security installation, Management, Feeding, 10,000 netting, watch and ward, marketing etc. @ 200/man day (IMC & GIFT)</th><td>25,000</td><td>30,000</td><td>75,000</td></tr><tr><th>Miscellaneous expenditure (medicine, aeration, transaction and coordination)</th><td>5,000</td><td>12,500</td><td>10,000</td><td>25,000</td></tr><tr><th>Total expenditure</th><td>2,98,920</td><td>7,47,300</td><td>5,03,578</td><td>15,22,070</td></tr><tr><th><b>IMC poly-culture & GIFT mono-sex tilapia Production and economic profit (2018-19)</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>II. Gross Income from GIFT tilapia</b></th><td>0.4 ha/yr</td><td>ha/yr</td><td>0.4 ha/yr</td><td>ha/yr</td></tr><tr><th>Total production (kg/yr)</th><td>3383</td><td>8457.5</td><td>8000</td><td>20000</td></tr><tr><th>IMC & GIFT Cost of fish @ Rs 160 & 140/kg (Rs)</th><td>5,41,280</td><td>13,53,300</td><td>11,20,000</td><td>28,00,000</td></tr><tr><th>Net income from fish (Gross income-expenditure) (Rs)</th><td>2,42,360</td><td>6,05,900</td><td>6,31,172</td><td>15,77,930</td></tr><tr><th>Return on expenditure (%)</th><td>81.07</td><td>0.81</td><td>125.33</td><td>103.67</td></tr><tr><th>Cost benefit ratio (C:B)</th><td>0.810</td><td>0.81</td><td>1.25</td><td>1.25</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 1 in Water quality, yield and cost-benefit analysis of rain water ponds of Cuttack district: A comparison between Indian major carp and GIFT Tilapia

<p><b>Table 1:</b> Ranges and mean values (± SD) of water parameters in T1 &T2</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Parameters</b></th><th><b>T1-IMC poly-culture</b></th><th><b>T2-GIFT tilapia mono-sex</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td><b>Min</b></td><td><b>Max</b></td><td><b>Mean ± SD</b></td><td><b>Min</b></td><td><b>Max</b></td><td><b>Mean ± SD</b></td></tr><tr><th>Temp (°C)</th><td>21.1</td><td>33</td><td>26.3±4.56</td><td>21.2</td><td>34.1</td><td>27.7±6.5</td></tr><tr><th>Transparency (cm)</th><td>24.33</td><td>35.67</td><td>27.71± 0.86</td><td>25.00</td><td>36.00</td><td>29.29± 0.81</td></tr><tr><th>DO (ppm)</th><td>4.3</td><td>7.5</td><td>6.07±1.35</td><td>4.5-</td><td>6.0</td><td>5.3±0.51</td></tr><tr><th>pH</th><td>7.0</td><td>8.4</td><td>7.5±0.55</td><td>6.0</td><td>8.0</td><td>7.5±0.35</td></tr><tr><th>Alkalinity mg/l</th><td>86.7</td><td>114.7</td><td>100.4±12.8</td><td>80.1</td><td>114.0</td><td>98.3±14.2</td></tr><tr><th>Ammonia mg/l</th><td>0.51</td><td>0.61</td><td>0.55±0.05</td><td>0.55</td><td>0.64</td><td>0.58±0.04</td></tr></tbody></table>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2024View details →

Production of Marine Shrimp Integrated with Tilapia at High Densities and in a Biofloc System: Choosing the Best Spatial Configuration

<p>Dataset with experimental results.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →

Fig. 106. Red Tilapia, 132.0 in The non-native freshwater fishes of Singapore: an annotated compilation

Fig. 106. Red Tilapia, 132.0 mm SL, Pangsua Pond.

Sargassum sp extract improve Hematological profile of Tilapia fish (Oreochromis niloticus)

<p>Strategies to increase body resistance and prevent disease in cultivation include using vaccines, antibiotics, and probiotics. Today, the use of antibiotics with natural ingredients is becoming a trend. One of the natural ingredients that contain high antioxidants and antibiotics is <em>Sargassum</em> sp. This research was conducted from March to May 2022 at the Biotechnology Laboratory, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine, Universitas Riau. This research was conducted in two stages, namely 1) the sensitivity of extracts of <em>Sargassum</em> sp. and 2) the application of <em>Sargassum</em> sp. extract orally in tilapia (<em>O. niloticus</em>). The results showed that the extract of <em>Sargassum</em> sp. was able to inhibit the growth o<em>f Aeromonas hydrophila </em>bacteria with a clear zone of 6.5-15.0 mm, which is classified as resistant. At doses of 2000, 2500, and 3000 ppm, it did not cause death in fish for 96 hours (LD<sub>50</sub>). Hematological parameters can be a sign of the health status of fish. Tilapia given to the addition of <em>Sargassum</em> sp. with different doses gave an effect between treatments, both after 30 days of rearing and post-test against <em>A.hydrophila</em> bacteria (p<0.05). The results showed that the hematology of fish fed with <em>Sargassum</em> sp. extract was in the normal or healthy range. Healthy tilapia had erythrocyte counts ranging from 1.34-2.11 x10<sup>6</sup> cells/mm<sup>3</sup>, hematocrit 26.17-33.19%, hemoglobin 6.26-11.2 g/dL and total leukocytes 1.01-1.50 x10<sup>4</sup> cells/mm<sup>3</sup> and total erythrocytes 5.88-9.13x10<sup>4</sup> cells/ mm<sup>3</sup>. A dose of 3000 ppm provided the highest health improvement against <em>A.hydrophila</em> bacterial infection</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Figure 4 in Reproduction, age and growth of Tilapia zillii (Cichlidae) in Oued Righ wetland (southeast Algeria)

Figure 4. – Length at first sexual maturity of T. zillii in females and males.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Figure 1 in Reproduction, age and growth of Tilapia zillii (Cichlidae) in Oued Righ wetland (southeast Algeria)

Figure 1. – Location of the study area (●).

publicJun 2019View details →

Data from: Losing cichlid fish biodiversity: genetic and morphological homogenization of tilapia following colonization by introduced species

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2025View details →

Data from: Effects of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) cage aquaculture on water quality in the world’s largest tropical lake

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2020View details →

Multi-omics analysis reveals the glycolipid metabolism response mechanism in the liver of Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (GIFT, Oreochromis niloticus) under hypoxia stress

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2022View details →

Dataset to study the population genomics of introduced Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758)) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: repeated introductions since colonial times with multiple sources

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

Florida Coastal Everglades site, station Shark Slough Trexler Site 37A, study of animal abundance of Tilapia mariae in units of numberPerEffort on a yearly timescale

The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Florida Coastal Everglades (FCE) contains animal abundance of Tilapia mariae measurements in numberPerEffort units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

Florida Coastal Everglades site, station Shark Slough Trexler Site 37A, study of animal density of Tilapia mariae in units of numberPerMeterSquared on a yearly timescale

The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Florida Coastal Everglades (FCE) contains animal density of Tilapia mariae measurements in numberPerMeterSquared units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

Florida Coastal Everglades site, station Shark Slough Trexler Site 37B, study of animal abundance of Tilapia mariae in units of numberPerEffort on a yearly timescale

Florida Coastal Everglades site, station Shark Slough Trexler Site 37B, study of animal density of Tilapia mariae in units of numberPerMeterSquared on a yearly timescale

The EcoTrends project was established in 2004 by Dr. Debra Peters (Jornada Basin LTER, USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range) and Dr. Ariel Lugo (Luquillo LTER, USDA-FS Luquillo Experimental Forest) to support the collection and analysis of long-term ecological datasets. The project is a large synthesis effort focused on improving the accessibility and use of long-term data. At present, there are ~50 state and federally funded research sites that are participating and contributing to the EcoTrends project, including all 26 Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) sites and sites funded by the USDA Agriculture Research Service (ARS), USDA Forest Service, US Department of Energy, US Geological Survey (USGS) and numerous universities. Data from the EcoTrends project are available through an exploratory web portal (http://www.ecotrends.info). This web portal enables the continuation of data compilation and accessibility by users through an interactive web application. Ongoing data compilation is updated through both manual and automatic processing as part of the LTER Provenance Aware Synthesis Tracking Architecture (PASTA). The web portal is a collaboration between the Jornada LTER and the LTER Network Office. The following dataset from Florida Coastal Everglades (FCE) contains animal density of Tilapia mariae measurements in numberPerMeterSquared units and were aggregated to a yearly timescale.

Florida Coastal Everglades site, station Shark Slough Trexler Site 37C, study of animal abundance of Tilapia mariae in units of numberPerEffort on a yearly timescale