Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
294
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
294 results for “Vole”
Fig. 1 in Morphometric Differences Among Root Vole (Muridae: Microtus Oeconomus) Populations In Hungary
Fig. 1. Distribution of Microtus oeconomus in Europe (from MITCHELL-JONES et al. 1999) (A= main population, B= Dutch populations, C= Norwegian populations, D= Central European populations)
Fig. 7 in Morphometric Differences Among Root Vole (Muridae: Microtus Oeconomus) Populations In Hungary
Fig. 7. Minimum spanning tree showing morphometric similarity among populations calculated from pair-wise procrustes distances between consensus configuration of each populations. a = simi-
Fig. 6 in Morphometric Differences Among Root Vole (Muridae: Microtus Oeconomus) Populations In Hungary
Fig. 6. Scatterplots of the first two canonical variate scores calculated from landmarks: a (top) = on the dorsal view of the cranium, b (bottom) = on the mandible. Lines connect the closest laying centroids of each group. Deformation grids were generated using tpsRegr (ROHLF 2000) and show the
Рис. 4. Нора поΑземной поΛевки (компΛекс KS-11, октябрь 1984 г., «Αес на ВорскΛе»). А — горизонтаΛьная проекция; Б — боковая реконструкция Fig. 4. A common pine vole burrow (complex No. KS-11, October, 1984; "Forest on the Vorskla"). A — horizontal projection; Б — lateral projection in Spatial Organization Of Common Pine Vole (Microtus Subterraneus Selys-Longchamps, 1836) Colonies
Рис. 4. Нора поΑземной поΛевки (компΛекс KS-11, октябрь 1984 г., «Αес на ВорскΛе»). А — горизонтаΛьная проекция; Б — боковая реконструкция Fig. 4. A common pine vole burrow (complex No. KS-11, October, 1984; "Forest on the Vorskla"). A — horizontal projection; Б — lateral projection
Рис. 1. Пространственное распреΑеΛение скопΛений земΛяных выбросов поΑземной поΛевки в преΑеΛах пΛощаΑи поΛигона 1 га (октябрь 1985 г., «Αес на ВорскΛе») in Spatial Organization Of Common Pine Vole (Microtus Subterraneus Selys-Longchamps, 1836) Colonies
Рис. 1. Пространственное распреΑеΛение скопΛений земΛяных выбросов поΑземной поΛевки в преΑеΛах пΛощаΑи поΛигона 1 га (октябрь 1985 г., «Αес на ВорскΛе»)
Fig. 1 in Reduced helminth parasitism in the introduced bank vole (Myodes glareolus): More parasites lost than gained
Fig. 1. Frequency distribution of intestinal helminth species richness in wood mice and bank voles examined in 2011 and 2012.
Fig. 4 in Parasite community dynamics in an invasive vole ‾ From focal introduction to wave front
Fig. 4. Statistical associations between ectoparasites and endoparasites infecting bank voles, Myodes glareolus. All associations are due to the presence of a coinfecting species, positive relationships are shown in black and negative relationships are in grey. The predicted absolute percentage change (see Methods for definition) of the dependent variable is given for each interaction. Parentheses identify whether the relationship is based on body mass (BM), host sex (S) or at the mid-point along the invasion wave (WM). Lice had a prevalence of less than 10% so were excluded from analyses.
Fig. 1 in Parasite community dynamics in an invasive vole ‾ From focal introduction to wave front
Fig. 1. Sampling sites of the invasive bank vole, Myodes glareolus, across the Republic of Ireland. Curraghchase and Adare are the focal point of introduction, Gort, Nenagh and Cashel are mid-wave, and Tuam, Birr and New Ross represent the invasion front. For all trapping sites along the invasion gradient (black = focal point of introduction, grey = mid-wave, and white = invasion front), bar charts depict the prevalence of each parasite and boxplots indicate the mean parasite abundance (log x +1), where boxes indicate the mean, and lines the 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 3 in Parasite community dynamics in an invasive vole ‾ From focal introduction to wave front
Fig. 3. Parasite interactivity index from eight sampling sites at three points along an invasion gradient (black = focal point of introduction, grey = mid-wave, and white = invasion front) in the Republic of Ireland. Boxes represent upper and lower quartile, with median indicated, with bars representing maximum and minimum range.
Fig. 2 in Parasite community dynamics in an invasive vole ‾ From focal introduction to wave front
Fig. 2. Parasite abundance of the invasive bank vole, Myodes glareolus, from eight locations at three points along an invasion gradient (black = focal point of introduction, grey = mid-wave, and white = invasion front) in the Republic of Ireland. Boxes represent upper and lower quartile, with median indicated, with bars representing maximum and minimum range.
Figure 1 in Selective predation on common voles by Tawny Owls and Long-eared Owls in winter and spring
Figure 1. Distribution of the body mass of Microtus arvalis individuals, trapped in October–April and preyed upon by both Strix aluco and Asio otus in winter and spring, as estimated from mandibles.
Figure 3 in A new species of voles, Microtus elbeyli sp. nov., from Turkey with taxonomic overview of social voles distributed in southeastern Anatolia
Figure 3. Dentition of M. elbeyli sp. nov. A) Upper tooth row, B) lower tooth row. M1: First upper molars, M2: second upper molars, M3: third upper molars. M1: First lower molars, M2: second lower molars, M3: third lower molars. La.: Labial side, Li.: lingual side. Type specimen, No: 2919, ♂, collected 10 km east of Kilis.
Figure 4 in A new species of voles, Microtus elbeyli sp. nov., from Turkey with taxonomic overview of social voles distributed in southeastern Anatolia
Figure 4. The metaphase plate (A) and karyotype (B) of the type specimen of M. elbeyli sp. nov. 2n = 46, NF = 50, NFa = 46.
Figure 1 in A new species of voles, Microtus elbeyli sp. nov., from Turkey with taxonomic overview of social voles distributed in southeastern Anatolia
Figure 1. Record locations of the specimens evaluated: M. elbeyli (●10 km east of Kilis and ⦿ Elbeyli), M. cfr. irani (▲ Ermenek, ✸ Nusaybin), M. guentheri (■ Türkoğlu and △ Nemrut), M. socialis (□ Muş), M. irani (★ Shiraz/Iran).
Figure 2 in A new species of voles, Microtus elbeyli sp. nov., from Turkey with taxonomic overview of social voles distributed in southeastern Anatolia
Figure 2. Skulls (dorsal and lateral views) and mandible (labial views) of species: A) M. elbeyli, B) M. cfr. irani, C) M. guentheri.
Figure 4 in Comparison of the chromosome banding patterns in three species of social voles (Microtus irani karamani, M. schidlovskii, M. anatolicus) from Turkey
Figure 4. Silver-stained karyotypes of M. irani karamani (1), M. schidlovskii (2), and M. anatolicus (3).
Figure 1 in Comparison of the chromosome banding patterns in three species of social voles (Microtus irani karamani, M. schidlovskii, M. anatolicus) from Turkey
Figure 1. Collecting sites of M. irani karamani (1), M. schidlovskii (2), and M. anatolicus (3) in Turkey. The numbering of sampling localities corresponds to data in Table 1. Table 1. Studied localities of three Microtus species in Turkey. The numbering of the sampling sites corresponds to data in Figure 1.
Figure S2 in Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities
Figure S2. ABGD results of COXI gene. The histogram shows distribution of genetic distances among M. arvalis samples; yellow columns show mean intralineage distances and red columns show interlineage distances. The diagram implies the lineages according to initial partitions = Group 1 (n: 21): Anatolia, China, Asian and European parts of Russia; Group 2 (n: 16): Serbia, Hungary.
Figure S1 in Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities
Figure S1. ABGD results of CYTB gene region. The histogram shows distribution of genetic distances among M. arvalis samples; yellow columns show mean intralineage distances and red columns show interlineage distances. The diagram implies the lineages according to initial partitions = Group 1 (n: 56): Anatolia, Georgia, Armenia, Iran, Siberia, China, Asian parts of Russia and one sample from Ukraine; Group 2 (n: 31): European parts of Russia, three samples from Ukraine, Western, Central and Eastern Europe.
Figure 7 in Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities
Figure 7. Bayesian tree obtained from IRBP sequences based on HKY + G parameter (Hasegawa et al., 1985). Numbers on branches show posterior probability (pb) values above 50%.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.