Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2014View details →

Fig. 3 in On the activity of two medium-sized canids: the Golden Jackal (Canis aureus) and the Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes) in the Natural Bark "Sinite Kamani" (Bulgaria) revealed by camera traps

Fig. 3. Number of all pictures of Golden Jackal (Canis aureus) taken during 24h (expressed for one hour time interval) during seasons.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2013View details →

Fig. 1. A in Endoparasites of the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides) and the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in Denmark 2009-2012 - A comparative study

Fig. 1. A map of Denmark showing the regions where the animals were sampled from 2009 to 2012. The grey shading indicates the mainland (Jutland), and the black shading the islands (Zealand, Funen, MØn, Lolland). Numbers above the bars are the sample sizes of each host species in each region.

Fig. 5 in Repeated inoculations with the lung and heartworm nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum result in increasing larval excretion and worm burden in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)

Fig. 5. Absolute counts of Eosinophils. The dotted horizontal lines represent reference ranges based on average values ± 2 × S.D. of values of foxes from groups A3, B and D at 0 wpi. Error bars (S.E.M).

Fig. 2 in Repeated inoculations with the lung and heartworm nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum result in increasing larval excretion and worm burden in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)

Fig. 2. Arithmetic mean worm burden at necropsy per group. Foxes of groups A were inoculated once and necropsied at 9 wpi (A1), 13 wpi (A2) or 23 wpi (A3), while foxes of groups challenged once (B) or twice (D) and the control foxes of the first (C) and second challenge (E) were necropsied 23 wpi. Bar indicates mean with outlier excluded. Error bars = S.E.M.

Fig. 3 in Repeated inoculations with the lung and heartworm nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum result in increasing larval excretion and worm burden in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)

Fig. 3. Arithmetic mean worm fecundity (expressed as final LPG/number female worms at necropsy) per group. Foxes of groups A were inoculated once and necropsied at 9 wpi (A1), 13 wpi (A2) or 23 wpi (A3), while foxes of groups challenged once (B) or twice (D) and the control foxes of the first (C) and second challenge (E) were necropsied 23 wpi. Bar indicates mean with outlier excluded. Error bars = S.E.M.

Fig. 1 in Repeated inoculations with the lung and heartworm nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum result in increasing larval excretion and worm burden in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)

Fig. 1. Experimental design: inoculations with 100 third stage larvae (L3) of Angiostrongylus vasorum are indicated by triangles, challenge inoculations (also with 100 L3) by circles and the differing group termination times by squares.

Fig. 4 in Repeated inoculations with the lung and heartworm nematode Angiostrongylus vasorum result in increasing larval excretion and worm burden in the red fox (Vulpes vulpes)

Fig. 4. Arithmetic mean larval counts (first stage larvae per gram of feces) of foxes dogs experimentally inoculated at 0 wpi and challenged once (group B) or twice (group D) with 100 third stage larvae of Angiostrongylus vasorum from 6 to 22 wpi. Y-axis log10 transformed. Arrows indicate the challenge time points.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2015View details →

Figure. Constrained ordination plot as produced from canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). The variability of environmental variables is summarized on Axis 1 and Axis 2 of the constrained biplot, explaining the variability of the trophic groups included in the red fox's diet. Trophic groups are shown with black line (unfilled) pyramids, whereas environmental variables are shown with black filled pyramids. Proximity and distance of response centroids to predictor centroids indicate positive and negative correlations between them, respectively. in Factors affecting the diet of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in a heterogeneous Mediterranean landscape

Figure. Constrained ordination plot as produced from canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). The variability of environmental variables is summarized on Axis 1 and Axis 2 of the constrained biplot, explaining the variability of the trophic groups included in the red fox's diet. Trophic groups are shown with black line (unfilled) pyramids, whereas environmental variables are shown with black filled pyramids. Proximity and distance of response centroids to predictor centroids indicate positive and negative correlations between them, respectively.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2016View details →

Figure 2 in Phylogenetic status and genetic diversity of corsac fox (Vulpes corsac) in Golestan Province, Iran

Figure 2. Bayesian phylogenetic tree reconstructed from the genus Vulpes and the position of corsac fox.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2016View details →

Figure 3 in Phylogenetic status and genetic diversity of corsac fox (Vulpes corsac) in Golestan Province, Iran

Figure 3. Haplotype network of corsac fox samples. Haplotype A included samples existing in GenBank from northern China (KJ140137 and NC0239580); other haplotypes belong to Iranian samples.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2017View details →

Figure 2 in High genetic distinctiveness of wild and farm fox (Vulpes vulpes L.) populations in Poland: evidence from mitochondrial DNA analysis

Figure 2. Neighbor-joining haplotype network based on frequencies showing relationships between concatenated MT-CO1 and MTATP6 sequences of fur farm and wild red foxes.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2017View details →

Figure 1 in High genetic distinctiveness of wild and farm fox (Vulpes vulpes L.) populations in Poland: evidence from mitochondrial DNA analysis

Figure 1. Distribution of sampling sites of wild and fur-farm red foxes in Poland: light gray areas represent the provinces from which samples of wild foxes were taken; the darker gray area indicated with a black circle shows the location of investigated fox farms; the numbers represent fox fur-farms in particular voivodeships.

Fig. 1 in Morphological and molecular analyses of Taenia and Mesocestoides species from red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in northwestern China

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic relationships of Taenia and Mesocestoides species from red foxes based on cox1 sequences.

Fig. 5 in Host and geographic differences in prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal helminths of foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans) and wolves (Canis lupus) in Quebec´, Canada

Fig. 5. On the left, whole mounted Cryptocotyle lingua adult trematode stained with borax carmine (credit: Brent Wagner). On the right, distribution of foxes (Vulpes vulpes) infected with C. lingua in the Subarctic (samples (n) collected along James Bay and the St Lawrence estuary) and Humid Continental climate collected during winter 2016–2017 by trappers from Qu´ebec, Canada. Arrows indicate major waterways.

Fig. 2. A in Host and geographic differences in prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal helminths of foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans) and wolves (Canis lupus) in Quebec´, Canada

Fig. 2. A) Parasite genus richness in foxes (Vulpes vulpes, blue), coyotes (Canis latrans, orange), and wolves (Canis lupus, gray) from Qu´ebec, Canada, determined by gross examination and fecal flotation combined (N = 250). Fewer foxes were uninfected than coyotes (p = 0.006). More foxes were infected by two parasite genera than coyotes (p = 0.004). B) Parasite genus richness between Subarctic (yellow) and Humid Continental climate (green) in foxes from Qu´ebec, Canada, determined by gross examination and fecal flotation combined (N = 155). No significant difference in parasite genera was seen in foxes between Subarctic and Humid Continental climate regions. Parasites counted in both histograms were: diphyllobothriids (likely Dibothriocephalus spp.), Echinococcus spp., Taenia spp., Capillaria spp., Toxascaris sp., Toxocara sp., Trichuris sp., Uncinaria sp., Alaria sp., Cryptocotyle sp., and Metorchis sp. Parasites observed in both fecal and gross examination were only counted once. Bars represent 95% confidence intervals. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 6 in Host and geographic differences in prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal helminths of foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans) and wolves (Canis lupus) in Quebec´, Canada

Fig. 6. Distribution of foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans), and wolves (Canis lupus) infected with Toxascaris leonina (left, N = 55) and Toxocara canis (right, N = 19) in the Subarctic and Humid Continental climate collected during winter 2016–2017 by hunters and trappers from Qu´ebec, Canada.

Fig. 1. K in Host and geographic differences in prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal helminths of foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans) and wolves (Canis lupus) in Quebec´, Canada

Fig. 1. K¨oppen climate regions and sampling distribution of foxes (Vulpes vulpes, N = 176), coyotes (Canis latrans, N = 77), and wolves (Canis lupus, N = 23) collected during winter 2016–2017 by hunters and trappers from Qu´ebec, Canada. Arrows indicate major waterways.

Fig. 4 in Host and geographic differences in prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal helminths of foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans) and wolves (Canis lupus) in Quebec´, Canada

Fig. 4. Mixed taeniid infections in the Humid Continental climate in coyotes (Canis latrans) and wolves (Canis lupus) from Qu´ebec, Canada, following molecular analyses. Abbreviations on x-axis: E. can, Echinococcus canadensis; T. hyd, Taenia hydatigena; T. twi, T. twitchelli; T. kra, T. krabbei; T. pis, T. pisiformis-"like"; T. cra, T. crassiceps.

Fig. 3 in Host and geographic differences in prevalence and diversity of gastrointestinal helminths of foxes (Vulpes vulpes), coyotes (Canis latrans) and wolves (Canis lupus) in Quebec´, Canada

Fig. 3. Neighbour-joining tree of Jukes-Cantor distances among sequences of CO1 (alignment 450 bp using all sites) from Alaria available on GenBank as of 7 July 2021. Data from Alaria americana, including data from the present study, indicated by darker shaded cluster and white font. Sequences from A. alata are HM022221-3, KF751233-4, KP123416-20, KP123422-5, KX962374, KX962392, KX962395, KX962397-8, KX962402, KX962406, KX962415, KX962421, KX962433, KX962437, KX962454-5, KX962471-2, KX962481, KX962491, KY012317, MT103215-31; from Alaria sp. in Argentina KF572949, MH892076, MT328804-6; from Alaria sp. in Wisconsin, USA KT223036; from A. americana MZ605217-33 (present study) and MH536507 (indicated with an asterisk).