Find research datasets worth reusing

Рис. 8. 3D–диаграммы пространственного распределениЯ обилиЯ моллюска M. catrusiana (А), фитомассы (В), твердости грунта на глубине 5–10 см (C) и доли агрегатных фракций 3–5 мм (D) на участке № 2 в 2011 г. (единицы иЗмерениЯ осей Х и Y даны в метрах). Fig. 8. 3D–diagrams of the abundance spatial distribution of the land snail M. catrusiana (A), phytomass (B), 0–10 cm layer soil penetration resistance (C), aggregate particle size 3–5 mm (D) at the site 1 in 2011 (axes X and Y presented in meters). in Analysis of the spatial distribution patterns of the land snail populations: a geostatistic method approach

Рис. 8. 3D–диаграммы пространственного распределениЯ обилиЯ моллюска M. catrusiana (А), фитомассы (В), твердости грунта на глубине 5–10 см (C) и доли агрегатных фракций 3–5 мм (D) на участке № 2 в 2011 г. (единицы иЗмерениЯ осей Х и Y даны в метрах). Fig. 8. 3D–diagrams of the abundance spatial distribution of the land snail M. catrusiana (A), phytomass (B), 0–10 cm layer soil penetration resistance (C), aggregate particle size 3–5 mm (D) at the site 1 in 2011 (axes X and Y presented in meters).

Рис. 5. Коррелограммы покаЗателей обилиЯ наЗемных моллюсков раЗных воЗрастных групп (1 – ювенильные; 2 – вЗрослые; 3 – все вместе): A – H. lucorum, участок № 1, 2010 г.; B – Ch. tridens, участок № 2, 2011 г.; C – Ch. tridens, участок № 4, 2012 г.); D – Ch. tridens, участок № 5, 2012 г. (достоверные оценки индекса Морана отмечены Залитыми Значками). Fig. 5. Spatial correlogram of the land snail different age groups abundance (1 – juvenile; 2 – adult; 3 – total): A – H. lucorum, site 1, 2010; B – Ch. tridens, site 2, 2011; C – Ch. tridens, site 4, 2012; D – Ch. tridens, site 5, 2012 (Moran index confidence value presented by filled signs). in Analysis of the spatial distribution patterns of the land snail populations: a geostatistic method approach

Рис. 5. Коррелограммы покаЗателей обилиЯ наЗемных моллюсков раЗных воЗрастных групп (1 – ювенильные; 2 – вЗрослые; 3 – все вместе): A – H. lucorum, участок № 1, 2010 г.; B – Ch. tridens, участок № 2, 2011 г.; C – Ch. tridens, участок № 4, 2012 г.); D – Ch. tridens, участок № 5, 2012 г. (достоверные оценки индекса Морана отмечены Залитыми Значками). Fig. 5. Spatial correlogram of the land snail different age groups abundance (1 – juvenile; 2 – adult; 3 – total): A – H. lucorum, site 1, 2010; B – Ch. tridens, site 2, 2011; C – Ch. tridens, site 4, 2012; D – Ch. tridens, site 5, 2012 (Moran index confidence value presented by filled signs).

Рис. 4. Коррелограммы покаЗателей обилиЯ наЗемного моллюска M. cartusiana раЗных воЗрастных групп (1 – ювенильные; 2 – вЗрослые; 3 – все вместе): A – участок № 1, 2010 г.; B – участок № 2, 2011 г.; C – участок № 4, 2012 г.); D – участок № 5, 2012 г. (достоверные оценки индекса Морана отмечены Залитыми Значками). Fig. 4. Spatial correlogram of land snail M. cartusiana age groups abundance (1 – juvenile; 2 – adult; 3 – total): A – site 1, 2010; B – site 2, 2011; C – site 4, 2012; D – site 5, 2012 (Moran index confidence value presented by filled sings). in Analysis of the spatial distribution patterns of the land snail populations: a geostatistic method approach

Рис. 4. Коррелограммы покаЗателей обилиЯ наЗемного моллюска M. cartusiana раЗных воЗрастных групп (1 – ювенильные; 2 – вЗрослые; 3 – все вместе): A – участок № 1, 2010 г.; B – участок № 2, 2011 г.; C – участок № 4, 2012 г.); D – участок № 5, 2012 г. (достоверные оценки индекса Морана отмечены Залитыми Значками). Fig. 4. Spatial correlogram of land snail M. cartusiana age groups abundance (1 – juvenile; 2 – adult; 3 – total): A – site 1, 2010; B – site 2, 2011; C – site 4, 2012; D – site 5, 2012 (Moran index confidence value presented by filled sings).

Рис. 3. Коррелограммы покаЗателей обилиЯ наЗемного моллюска B. cylindrica раЗных воЗрастных групп (1 – ювенильные; 2 – вЗрослые; 3 – все вместе): A – участок № 1, 2010 г.; B – участок № 2, 2011 г.; C – участок № 4, 2012 г.); D – участок №5, 2012 г. (достоверные оценки индекса Морана отмечены Залитыми Значками). Fig. 3. Spatial correlogram of the land snail B. cylindrica age groups abundance (1 – juvenile; 2 – adult; 3 – total): A – site 1, 2010; B – site 2, 2011; C – site 4, 2012; D – site 5, 2012 (Moran index confidence value presented by filled signs). in Analysis of the spatial distribution patterns of the land snail populations: a geostatistic method approach

Рис. 3. Коррелограммы покаЗателей обилиЯ наЗемного моллюска B. cylindrica раЗных воЗрастных групп (1 – ювенильные; 2 – вЗрослые; 3 – все вместе): A – участок № 1, 2010 г.; B – участок № 2, 2011 г.; C – участок № 4, 2012 г.); D – участок №5, 2012 г. (достоверные оценки индекса Морана отмечены Залитыми Значками). Fig. 3. Spatial correlogram of the land snail B. cylindrica age groups abundance (1 – juvenile; 2 – adult; 3 – total): A – site 1, 2010; B – site 2, 2011; C – site 4, 2012; D – site 5, 2012 (Moran index confidence value presented by filled signs).

Рис. 7. 3D–диаграммы пространственного распределениЯ обилиЯ моллюска B. cylindrica (А), фитомассы (В), проективного покрытиЯ (С), твердости грунта на глубине 5–10 см (D) на участке № 1 в 2010 г. (единицы иЗмерениЯ осей Х и Y даны в метрах). Fig. 7. 3D–diagrams of the abundance spatial distribution of the snail B. cylindrica (A), phytomass (B), plants projective cover (C), 0–10 cm layer soil penetration resistance (D) at the site 1 in 2010. (axes X and Y presented in meters). in Analysis of the spatial distribution patterns of the land snail populations: a geostatistic method approach

Рис. 7. 3D–диаграммы пространственного распределениЯ обилиЯ моллюска B. cylindrica (А), фитомассы (В), проективного покрытиЯ (С), твердости грунта на глубине 5–10 см (D) на участке № 1 в 2010 г. (единицы иЗмерениЯ осей Х и Y даны в метрах). Fig. 7. 3D–diagrams of the abundance spatial distribution of the snail B. cylindrica (A), phytomass (B), plants projective cover (C), 0–10 cm layer soil penetration resistance (D) at the site 1 in 2010. (axes X and Y presented in meters).

Рис. 2. Диаграммы распределениЯ обилиЯ наЗемного моллюска M. cartusiana: A – участок № 1, 2010 г.; B – участок № 2, 2011 г.; C – участок № 4, 2012 г.; D – участок № 5, 2012 г. (единицы иЗмерениЯ осей Х и Y даны в метрах; численность особей пропорциональна раЗмерам Шариков). Fig. 2. Diagram of the abundance distribution of the land snail M. cartusiana: A – site 1, 2010; B – site 2, 2011; C – site 4, 2012; D – site 5, 2012 (Х and Y axes presented in meters; abundance proportional to sphere sizes). in Analysis of the spatial distribution patterns of the land snail populations: a geostatistic method approach

Рис. 2. Диаграммы распределениЯ обилиЯ наЗемного моллюска M. cartusiana: A – участок № 1, 2010 г.; B – участок № 2, 2011 г.; C – участок № 4, 2012 г.; D – участок № 5, 2012 г. (единицы иЗмерениЯ осей Х и Y даны в метрах; численность особей пропорциональна раЗмерам Шариков). Fig. 2. Diagram of the abundance distribution of the land snail M. cartusiana: A – site 1, 2010; B – site 2, 2011; C – site 4, 2012; D – site 5, 2012 (Х and Y axes presented in meters; abundance proportional to sphere sizes).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Рис. 4. РаспреΔеΛение чисΛенности и биомассы зоопΛанктона гиΔротермаΛьной зоны Харанорского воΔохраниΛища в июΛе 2019 г. Fig. 4. Distribution of zooplankton abundance and biomass in the hydrothermal zone of the Kharanor reservoir in July 2019 in Zooplankton Structure And Distribution In The Hydrothermal Zone Of Cooling Reservoirs (Trans-Baikal Territory)

Рис. 4. РаспреΔеΛение чисΛенности и биомассы зоопΛанктона гиΔротермаΛьной зоны Харанорского воΔохраниΛища в июΛе 2019 г. Fig. 4. Distribution of zooplankton abundance and biomass in the hydrothermal zone of the Kharanor reservoir in July 2019

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Рис. 2. РаспреΔеΛение чисΛенности и биомассы зоопΛанктона гиΔротермаΛьной зоны оз. Кенон в июΛе 2019 г. Fig. 2. Distribution of zooplankton abundance and biomass in the hydrothermal zone of Lake Kenon in July 2019 in Zooplankton Structure And Distribution In The Hydrothermal Zone Of Cooling Reservoirs (Trans-Baikal Territory)

Рис. 2. РаспреΔеΛение чисΛенности и биомассы зоопΛанктона гиΔротермаΛьной зоны оз. Кенон в июΛе 2019 г. Fig. 2. Distribution of zooplankton abundance and biomass in the hydrothermal zone of Lake Kenon in July 2019

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 3 in Distribution and abundance of dinoflagellates from the coastal waters of Karachi, Pakistan, northern part of the Arabian Sea

Figure 3. Monthly distribution of Phytoplankton and dinoflagellate species in offshore (MI-1 and MV-1) and nearshore (MI-2 and MV-2) waters along the Sindh coast of Pakistan. Abbreviations are as: MI: Manora Island; MV: Mubarak Village.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 4 in Distribution and abundance of dinoflagellates from the coastal waters of Karachi, Pakistan, northern part of the Arabian Sea

Figure 4. Principal Component analysis (PCA) of hydro-biological variables, such as, phytoplankton (Phy) and dinoflagellates (Dino) abundance, chlorophyll a (Chl a), dissolved oxygen (DO), salinity (Sal), water temperature (W.tem), pH and transparency (trans) recorded for the coastal and near-shore waters (combined data)

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2024View details →

Fig. 2 Parasite abundance and distribution statistics. A in Hardly Venus's servant-morphological adaptations of Veneriserva to an endoparasitic lifestyle and its phylogenetic position within Dorvilleidae (Annelida)

Fig. 2 Parasite abundance and distribution statistics. A total of 58 Aphrodita longipalpa were dissected and examined for parasite presence. The upper horizontal bars graphically depict the proportional parasitism rates and the corresponding distribution among male, female, and juvenile parasites, along with various cohabitation configurations. The box plots show the relationship between host size and the occurrence of parasites, presented collectively and then individually for female, male, and juvenile parasites

Figure 6 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord

Figure 6. Estimated area of Disenchantment Bay (km2) containing three different ice cover types: scattered (1–3 tenths), intermediate (4–6 tenths), and dense (7–10 tenths), and all types combined (i.e., ice-covered area [ICA]) from 3 May to 4 August 2002. Estimates of ice cover were averaged within grid cells (when n> 1) and the areas of cells with each type of ice cover were summed (Jansen et al. 2006)) and then scaled upward (proportionately) based on the percent of the study area that was sampled on a given day.

Figure 7 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord

Figure 7. Patterns of ship movement and visitation time in Disenchantment Bay, Alaska, in 2002 (n = 56 cruise ships of 105 total during study). Shading of cells represents the cumulative time that visiting ships spent within that cell for each of three months: May, June, and July (including early August). Four distinct shades, from gray to black, reflect increasing residence: <5 min, 5–10 min, 10–20 min,>20 min, respectively. Refer to Figure 1 for geographical points and scale.

Figure 5 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord

Figure 5. Standardized resource selection coefficient by harbor seals for ice cover class in Disenchantment Bay, Alaska, 3 May to 4 August 2002, for the Bernoulli part of the P1B model (i.e., for the cell-based abundance of seals). The solid circles and lines are for all seals, and the open circles and dashed lines are for mother-pup pairs. Confidence intervals (95%) are shown by the vertical bars. The thin horizontal line represents equal selection for all ice cover classes.

Figure 4 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord

Figure 4. Standardized resource selection coefficient by harbor seals for ice cover class in Disenchantment Bay, Alaska, 3 May to 4 August 2002, for the Bernoulli part of the P1B model (i.e., for the cell-based spatial distribution of seals). The solid circles and lines are for all seals, and the open circles and dashed lines are for mother-pup pairs. Confidence intervals (95%) are shown by the vertical bars. The thin horizontal line represents equal selection for all ice cover classes.

Figure 3 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord

Figure 3. Spatial distribution of harbor seals, ice cover zones, and maximum penetration of cruise ships on the day of surveys () and the previous day () in Disenchantment Bay, Alaska, on (A) 6 May, (B) 16 May, (C) 31 May, (D) 20 June, (E) 18 July, and (F) 4 August 2002 (figures for all 18 survey dates are available as supplemental material online). The time of day that ships reached their maximum penetration appears near the location symbol. The range of seal counts summed per grid cell is shown in three levels: small dot (<5 seals), medium dot (5–20 seals), and large dot (>20 seals). A small, overlying white dot indicates the presence of at least one mother-pup pair within that grid cell. Ice cover is represented by a gradient in cell-color shading: light gray (scattered), medium gray (intermediate), dark gray (dense). For this graphic, if cells with no ice data were bounded on three sides by cells with ice measures, the average of neighboring cells was used as an estimate. Refer to Figure 1 for geographical points and scale.

Figure 2 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord

Figure 2. Counts of all seals and pups along video sampling transects (relative abundance) in Disenchantment Bay, May to August 2002. Raw counts for all seals are shown as solid circles, and raw counts for pups are shown as open circles. The thick solid curve is the fitted GAM model for all seals, with the 95% prediction intervals shown by the thinner solid lines. The thick dashed curve is the fitted GAM model for pups, with the 95% prediction intervals shown by the thinner dashed lines.

Figure 1 in Natural and human effects on harbor seal abundance and spatial distribution in an Alaskan glacial fjord

Figure 1. Map of Disenchantment Bay study areas near Yakutat, Alaska. Major tidewater glaciers are labeled. The location of the terminus of Hubbard Glacier was mapped in early June 2002 as part of this study. The extent of snow and ice-covered terrain (stippled area) was derived from a NOAA Coastal Service satellite photo taken in 1993. Icy Bay, an adjacent tidewater glacial fjord with a seal population (see Discussion), is shown for reference.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2017View details →

Fig. 1. Photographs taken with a in Diptilomiopus floridanus (Acari: Eriophyoidea: Diptilomiopidae): its distribution and relative abundance with other eriophyoid species on dooryard, varietal block, and commercial citrus in Florida

Fig. 1. Photographs taken with a scanning electron microscope of the new species of Diptilomiopus floridanus Craemer & Amrine on Florida citrus. (A) Dorsal view of prodorsum, legs, and well developed chelicerae. (B) Dorsal view of the mite. (C) Lateral view of the mite. (D) Dorso–lateral view of the mite with extended, downward gnathosome.