Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

58

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

58 results for “auditory processing”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Auditory Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients With Auditory Processing Disorders

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02889107. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

A Treatment for a Form of Age-Related Central Auditory Processing Disorder Consisting of Clemastine Fumarate Plus Engineered Sound

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07304024. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 9.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Effects of Remote Microphone Hearing Aids on Children With Auditory Processing Disorder

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02353091. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 7.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Brain Imaging, Attention, and Auditory Processing in Schizophrenia

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03068806. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 41.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Using Nicotine to Reverse Age-related Auditory Processing Deficits

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04971954. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Auditory Temporal Processes in Aging

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03468660. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 11.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Contribution of Functional MRI in Assessment of Auditory Processing Disorders

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03887182. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 23.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Characterization of Auditory Processing Involved in the Encoding of Speech Sounds

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02574299. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Hereditary Deficits in Auditory Processing Leading to Language Impairment

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00004570. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Role of Auditory Cortical Oscillations in Speech Processing and Dyslexia

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04277351. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Subjective Evaluation of a Sound Processing Method for Hearing Aids on Auditory Distance Perception

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03512951. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Long-term use benefits of personal frequency-modulated systems for speech in noise perception in patients with stroke with auditory processing deficits: a non-randomised controlled trial study

Objectives: Approximately one in five stroke survivors suffer from difficulties with speech reception in noise, despite normal audiometry. These deficits are treatable with personal Frequency Modulated systems (FMs). This study aimed to evaluate long term benefits in speech reception in noise, after daily 10 week use of personal FMs, in non-aphasic stroke patients with auditory processing deficits. Design: This was a prospective non randomised controlled trial study. Patients were allocated to an intervention care group or standard care subjects group according to their willingness to use the intervention or not. Setting: Tertiary care setting. Participants: Nine non-aphasic subjects with ischemic stroke, normal/near normal audiometry, and auditory processing deficits and with reported difficulties understanding speech in background noise were recruited in the subacute stroke stage (3-12 months after stroke). Interventions: Four patients (intervention care subjects) used the FMs in their daily life over 10 weeks. Five patients (standard care subjects) received standard care. Primary outcome measures: All subjects were tested at baseline (visit 1) and 10 weeks later (visit 2) on a sentences in noise test with the FMs (aided) and without the FMs (unaided). Results: Speech reception thresholds showed clinically and statistically significant improvements in intervention but not in standard care subjects at 10 weeks in both aided and unaided conditions. Conclusions: 10 week use of FM systems by adult stroke patients may lead to benefits in unaided speech in noise perception. Our findings may indicate auditory plasticity type changes and require further investigation.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging in dogs – normalization and group analysis and the processing of pitch in the canine auditory pathways

Background: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is an advanced and frequently used technique for studying brain functions in humans and increasingly so in animals. A key element of analyzing fMRI data is group analysis, for which valid spatial normalization is a prerequisite. In the current study we applied normalization and group analysis to a dataset from an auditory functional MRI experiment in anesthetized beagles. The stimulation paradigm used in the experiment was composed of simple Gaussian noise and regular interval sounds (RIS), which included a periodicity pitch as an additional sound feature. The results from the performed group analysis were compared with those from single animal analysis. In addition to this, the data were examined for brain regions showing an increased activation associated with the perception of pitch. Results: With the group analysis, significant activations matching the position of the right superior olivary nucleus, lateral lemniscus and internal capsule were identified, which could not be detected in the single animal analysis. In addition, a large cluster of activated voxels in the auditory cortex was found. The contrast of the RIS condition (including pitch) with Gaussian noise (no pitch) showed a significant effect in a region matching the location of the left medial geniculate nucleus. Conclusion: By using group analysis additional activated areas along the canine auditory pathways could be identified in comparison to single animal analysis. It was possible to demonstrate a pitch-specific effect, indicating that group analysis is a suitable method for improving the results of auditory fMRI studies in dogs and extending our knowledge of canine neuroanatomy.

opencc-zeroDec 2015View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Investigating Auditory Processing in the Users of Auditory Brainstem and Cochlear Implants

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05810220. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Efficacy of Personalizing Cognitive Remediation for Schizophrenia by Targeting Impairments in Early Auditory Processing

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04554121. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Auditory functional magnetic resonance imaging in dogs – normalization and group analysis and the processing of pitch in the canine auditory pathways

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2017View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Long-term use benefits of personal frequency-modulated systems for speech in noise perception in patients with stroke with auditory processing deficits: a non-randomised controlled trial study

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2017View details →
geo24/100

Molecular logic for cellular specializations that initiate the auditory parallel processing pathways

GEO Series GSE273145. Mus musculus. 398 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.

openGEO-OpenNov 2024View details →
dryad24/100

Data from: Concurrent temporal channels for auditory processing: oscillatory neural entrainment reveals segregation of function at different scales

Natural sounds convey perceptually relevant information over multiple timescales, and the necessary extraction of multi-timescale information requires the auditory system to work over distinct ranges. The simplest hypothesis suggests that temporal modulations are encoded in an equivalent manner within a reasonable intermediate range. We show that the human auditory system selectively and preferentially tracks acoustic dynamics concurrently at 2 timescales corresponding to the neurophysiological theta band (4–7 Hz) and gamma band ranges (31–45 Hz) but, contrary to expectation, not at the timescale corresponding to alpha (8–12 Hz), which has also been found to be related to auditory perception. Listeners heard synthetic acoustic stimuli with temporally modulated structures at 3 timescales (approximately 190-, approximately 100-, and approximately 30-ms modulation periods) and identified the stimuli while undergoing magnetoencephalography recording. There was strong intertrial phase coherence in the theta band for stimuli of all modulation rates and in the gamma band for stimuli with corresponding modulation rates. The alpha band did not respond in a similar manner. Classification analyses also revealed that oscillatory phase reliably tracked temporal dynamics but not equivalently across rates. Finally, mutual information analyses quantifying the relation between phase and cochlear-scaled correlations also showed preferential processing in 2 distinct regimes, with the alpha range again yielding different patterns. The results support the hypothesis that the human auditory system employs (at least) a 2-timescale processing mode, in which lower and higher perceptual sampling scales are segregated by an intermediate temporal regime in the alpha band that likely reflects different underlying computations.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov24/100

Creation of Auditory Processing Disorder Screening Tool in French

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04363580. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record