Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
210
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
210 results for “citizen data”
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA TO: Using a citizen science approach to assess nanoplastics pollution in remote high-altitude glaciers
<p>This is the repository of the supplementary data, and it contains the following files: </p> <p>Raw data files as the original output of TD-PTR-ToF-MS for all the samples, all the blanks, all the spikes and all the calibration runs (.h5 files in three zip arcives)</p> <p>Polymer library files (a zip archive including csv files.</p> <p>A data analysis file including raw data, blank subtraction and LOD correction of all measurements (xlsx file).</p> <p>A fingerprinting result file for each plastic type (xlsx file)</p> <p>A data analysis file after plastic fingerprinting (xlsx file). </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Citizen science at public libraries: Data on librarians and users perceptions of participating in a citizen science project in Catalunya, Spain
<p>As libraries struggle to keep pace with the changing societal landscape, emerging practices such as citizen science (CS) initiatives are being incorporated to reinforce the idea of public libraries as gathering, meeting, and collaboration spaces within the context of shared community and shared learning resources. However, there is little empirical evidence of whether the most open and participatory ways that CS puts forward can converge with and be nurtured by the essence of public libraries. Also, the roles of librarians and users in the ‘next generation public library’ have been under-developed. As the number of CS initiatives at public libraries grows, so does the need to collect evidence on the impact and the capacity of assimilation of CS practices. The data describes librarians and users' perceptions of participating in a citizen science project. Two hands-on activities for librarians of the Barcelona Network of Public Libraries were implemented. One was a training course for 30 librarians from 24 libraries which allowed them to envisage citizen science implementation in each library. The second activity consisted in the co-creation of a citizen social science project. 40 library users, 7 librarians from 3 different cities, and professional scientists, were involved. The data on librarians and users' perception was collected through participant observation, surveys, and a focus group to identify strengths and challenges of implementing citizen science at public libraries. The data covers librarians and users attitudes towards citizen science, their motivations to participate, their perceived ability to implement a citizen science project (as for librarians) or to contribute to science (as for library users), and the participants intention to keep engaged with citizen science, drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Responses to closed-ended survey questions are analyzed at a descriptive level. The qualitative feedback from the focus group and the open-ended survey question on motivations is subjected to a thematic analysis. The data offers interesting insights to identify opportunities and challenges of implementing citizen science at public libraries, contributing to the debate over the public library's mission as local community hub.</p> <p>The dataset is formed by 5 tables:</p> <ol> <li>Librarians_pre.csv: data on librarians profiles, attitudes towards citizen science, expected impact of the project and self-efficacy collected at the beginning of the Citizen Science Lab.</li> <li>Librarians_post.csv: data on librarians profiles, attitudes towards citizen science, perceived impact of the project and self-efficacy collected at the end of the Citizen Science Lab.</li> <li>Users_first_phase.csv: data on users profiles, motivation, attitudes towards the library, confidence to perform scientific tasks and self-efficacy collected at the beginning of the Science and Citizen Action.</li> <li>Users_second_phase.csv: data on users profiles and motivation collected at the middle of the Science and Citizen Action.</li> <li>Users_last_phase.csv: data on users profiles, attitudes towards the library, confidence to perform scientific tasks and perceived impact of the project collected at the end of the Science and Citizen Action.</li> </ol> <p><strong>Citizen Science Lab Questionnaire (Librarians_pre)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [rol_1] What is your role at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Director</li> <li>Library technician</li> <li>Support technician</li> <li>Service support</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [years_1] How long have you been working at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>2 or less</li> <li>3 to 5 years</li> <li>6 to 10 years</li> <li>11 to 20 years</li> <li>more than 20 years</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [back_1] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [know_1] Have you already heard about citizen science?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>5. [part_1] Have you already participated in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Attitudes towards users engagement</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>6. [att_lib_pre1] Do you believe that library users are able to participate in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>7. [att_lib_pre2] Do you believe that library users will commit to participating in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Expected impacts</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>8. [exp_lib_pre] To what extent do you believe that citizen science may bring positive impacts to your library?</p> <p> </p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Self-efficacy</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>9. [se_lib_pre1] Right now, do you feel able to recommend any citizen science project to library users?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>10. [se_lib_pre2] Right now, do you feel able to implement yourself and lead a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Citizen Science Lab Questionnaire (Librarians_post)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [years_2] How long have you been working at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>2 or less</li> <li>3 to 5 years</li> <li>6 to 10 years</li> <li>11 to 20 years</li> <li>more than 20 years</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [back_2] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [sat_1] To what extent does the project meet your initial expectations?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Attitudes towards users engagement</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [att_lib_post1] Do you believe that library users will commit to participating in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>5. [att_lib_post2] What are/could be the potential barriers to users engagement in citizen science?</p> </td> <td> <p>[open]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Perceived impact</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>6. [imp_lib] What do you believe that citizen science may bring to public libraries and users?</p> <p>1 [Not at all] …… 5 [Totally]</p> <p> </p> </td> <td> <p>a. Knowledge of the scientific process</p> <p>b. New connections among participants </p> <p>c. Fun</p> <p>d. New knowledge of the local environment</p> <p>e. Scientific evidence on a common concern</p> <p>f. Social cohesion</p> <p>g. Positive attitudes towards science</p> <p>h. Willingness to learn</p> <p>i. Critical thinking and self-efficacy</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Self-efficacy</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>8. [se_lib_post1] Right now, do you feel able to recommend any citizen science project to library users?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>9. [se_lib_post2] Right now, do you feel able to implement yourself and lead a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Intention to keep engaged</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>10. [eng_lib] To what extent are you motivated to keep engaged with citizen science?</p> <p> </p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p><strong>Science and Citizens Action Focus group guide (Librarians)</strong></p> <p><strong>Opening questions</strong></p> <p><strong>1.</strong> To start with…. Are you satisfied with the project?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> Yes, no, why? Was it fun/interesting/challenging/enriching….</p> <p><strong>2.</strong> Do you feel you have learned something new?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> About your library’s environment, users, science and citizen science... Is there anything special that you will take with you after the project?</p> <p><strong>Reflections on the cocreation process</strong></p> <p><strong>3.</strong> At what time during the project have you felt most comfortable?</p> <p><strong>Probe:</strong> For example, has it been easier to lead the activity and/or involve and retain the community? Did you find it entertaining?</p> <p><strong>4.</strong> At what time during the project have you felt less at ease?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> What was challenging during the cocreation process?</p> <p><strong>5.</strong> To what extent do you feel more capable of implementing and leading a citizen science project in your library right now?</p> <p><strong>Probe: </strong>For example, in the case of both more crowdsourcing and of cocreated projects that actively involve the community</p> <p><strong>Reflections on the perceived impact</strong></p> <p><strong>6. </strong>To what extent does the project meet your initial expectations?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> in line with what you discussed at the beginning of the project, you expected it to promote participation, new connections among participants, improve the library perceptions and stimulate the participants’ critical thinking...Do you think that citizen science may meet these expectations?</p> <p><strong>Reflections on citizen science at public libraries</strong></p> <p><strong>7.</strong> To what extent can citizen science (in its most ‘extreme’ form of participation) be imagined as an activity within the library that promotes more active user participation?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> Through for example cocreation, experimentation, and hands-on learning activities...</p> <p><strong>8. </strong>Do you think that the activity has brought new knowledge? What new knowledge has the activity brought from your perspective?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> Knowledge of the scientific process, knowledge of the community or new users...</p> <p>9. What could be the opportunities and barriers of introducing citizen science at public libraries? And the barriers?</p> <p><strong>Probe:</strong> Like for example improving the perception of the library, actively involving certain users...What could be the ‘return’ for the community? What impact can citizen science projects have on making the environment more dynamic from libraries?</p> <p><strong>10. </strong>More generally, what could be the ‘added value’ of the introduction of citizen science within the library’s range of activities?</p> <p><strong>Probe:</strong> Is it a fun activity that promotes socialization, for example? Or that allows to generate new knowledge? Or that highlights the library’s social value? Or, also, that may offer new uses and new roles to the library? Can it foster a sense of community with the library as a connector? What other impacts can be generated in your environment?</p> <p><strong>Closing</strong></p> <p><strong>11.</strong> Do you see yourselves the next year, implementing a citizen science project as part of the library’s range of activities? And adopting an existing one?</p> <p><strong>Probe: </strong>Are you motivated to get more involved with citizen science projects? What kind of projects? What level of user involvement do you expect? What barriers do you see to users’ involvement? What benefits and opportunities do you think you can bring to the library?</p> <p><strong>12.</strong> We have now reached the end of the discussion. Anyone want to add anything else?</p> <p><strong>Science and Citizens Action Questionnaire (Users_first_phase)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [gen_1] Are you..?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Woman</li> <li>Man</li> <li>NA</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [years_3] How old are you?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>18-25</li> <li>26-35</li> <li>36-45</li> <li>46-55</li> <li>56-65</li> <li>66+</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [rol_2] What is your role at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Library user not associated with local associations</li> <li>Library technician</li> <li>Member of a local association</li> <li>Representative of public administrations</li> <li>Representative of the private sector</li> <li>Others:</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [back_3] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>5. [part_2] Have you already participated in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Motivations to participate</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>6. [mot_us] What did motivate you to participate in the project?</p> </td> <td> <p>[open]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Attitudes towards the library</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>7. [att_us_pre1] To what extent do you believe that your library is responsive to the community needs?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>8. [att_us_pre2] To what extent to you believe your library is able to face local challenges based on users' active participation?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Confidence to perform scientific tasks</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>9. [conf_us_pre] To what extent do you feel able to contribute to perform the following scientific tasks:</p> <p>1 [Not at all] …… 4 [Totally]</p> </td> <td> <p>a. Formulate the research question</p> <p>b. Data collection</p> <p>c. Analysis and interpretation of the results</p> <p>d. Propose concrete actions based on scientific evidence</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Self-efficacy</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>10. [se_us_pre] To what extent do you feel able to positively contribute to the library and your community?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Science and Citizens Action Questionnaire (Users_second_phase)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [gen_3] Are you..?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Woman</li> <li>Man</li> <li>NA</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [years_5] How old are you?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>18-25</li> <li>26-35</li> <li>36-45</li> <li>46-55</li> <li>56-65</li> <li>66+</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [rol_4] What is your role at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Library user or technician not associated with local associations</li> <li>Member of a local association</li> <li>Representative of public administrations</li> <li>Representative of the private sector</li> <li>Others:</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [back_5] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [mot_us2] To what extent are you motivated to carry out the experiment?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Science and Citizens Action Questionnaire (Users_last_phase)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [gen_2] Are you..?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Woman</li> <li>Man</li> <li>NA</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [years_4] How old are you?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>18-25</li> <li>26-35</li> <li>36-45</li> <li>46-55</li> <li>56-65</li> <li>66+</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [rol_3] What is your role at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Library user or technician not associated with local associations</li> <li>Member of a local association</li> <li>Representative of public administrations</li> <li>Representative of the private sector</li> <li>Others:</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [back_4] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [part_3] To how many cocreation sessions have you participated?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>None</li> <li>1</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>5. [sat_2] To what extent are you satisfied with the experiment?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Attitudes towards the library</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>6. [att_us_post] To what extent do you believe that the project has positively changed your perception of the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Confidence to perform scientific tasks</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>7. [conf_us_post] To what extent do you feel able to contribute to perform the following scientific tasks:</p> <p>1 [Not at all] …… 5 [Totally]</p> </td> <td> <p>a. Formulate the research question</p> <p>b. Data collection</p> <p>c. Analysis and interpretation of the results</p> <p>d. Propose concrete actions based on scientific evidence</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Perceived impact</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>8. [imp_us] What do you believe that citizen science may bring to public libraries and users?</p> <p>1 [Not at all] …… 5 [Totally]</p> <p> </p> </td> <td> <p>a. Knowledge of the scientific process</p> <p>b. New connections among participants </p> <p>c. Fun</p> <p>d. New knowledge of the local environment</p> <p>e. Scientific evidence on a common concern</p> <p>f. Social cohesion</p> <p>g. Positive attitudes towards science</p> <p>h. Willingness to learn</p> <p>i. Critical thinking and self-efficacy</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p>
Quantitative raw data for D1.3 - "Requirements and motivations of quadruple helix stakeholders for active engagement in the Citizen Science"
<p>This dataset presents the quantitative raw data that was collected under the H2020 INCENTIVE project for the D1.3 - “Requirements and motivations of quadruple helix stakeholders for active engagement in the Citizen Science Hubs”. The dataset includes the answers that were provided by almost 2,000 participants from 4 pilot European countries (Greece, Lithuania, Spain, and the Netherlands) regarding the general public's perceptions, attitudes, concerns, motivational factors and obstacles with regard to participation in Citizen Science activities. The original survey questionnaire was created and disseminated through the EUSurvey platform, and data collection took place from April to June 2021. For the statistical analysis of the data and the conclusions drawn from the analysis, you can access the D1.3 - "Requirements and motivations of quadruple helix stakeholders for active engagement in the Citizen Science Hubs”.</p> <p>Under INCENTIVE, four Citizen Science Hubs will be established and tested during the life-span of the project in the facilities of four Research Performing and Funding Organisations (RPFOs): University of Twente (the Netherlands), Autonomous University of Barcelona (Spain), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (Greece) and Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (Lithuania). Essentially, the Hubs will aim to bring different stakeholders together and bridge society with science under the emerging paradigm of Citizen Science, in an institutionalised way.</p>
Quantitative raw data for "Large scale regional citizen surveys report" (D1.4)
<p>This dataset presents the quantitative raw data that was collected under the H2020 RRI2SCALE project for the D1.4 - “Large scale regional citizen surveys report”. The dataset includes the answers that were provided by almost 8,000 participants from 4 pilot European regions (Kriti, Vestland, Galicia, and Overijssel) regarding the general public's views, concerns, and moral issues about the current and future trajectories of their RTD&I ecosystem. The original survey questionnaire was created by White Research SRL and disseminated to the regions through supporting pilot partners. Data collection took place from June 2020 to September 2020 through 4 different waves – one for each region. Based on the conclusion of a consortium vote during the kick-off meeting, it was decided that instead of resource-intensive methods that would render data collection unduly expensive, to fill in the quotas responses were collected through online panels by survey companies that were used for each region. For the statistical analysis of the data and the conclusions drawn from the analysis, you can access the "Large scale regional citizen surveys report" (D1.4).</p>
Data supporting "Large-scale citizen science programs can support ecological and climate change assessments"
<p>Text file of phenology observations pulled from the USA National Phenology Network's database (www.usanpn.org) and used in this analysis. </p>
Figure S1 in Capelin beach spawning diaries: an analysis of 30 years of citizen science data from the island of Newfoundland, Canada
Figure S1. – Histograms of permutation test statistics testing the null hypothesis that the timing of first day of spawning was random amongst the three NAFO divisions (3KLPs). A) First day of spawning in Div. 3Ps was significantly earlier than in Div. 3L (two-tailed permutation test statistic: p = 0.0005) and B) Div. 3K (two-tailed permutation test statistic: p = 0.0005). C) There was no significant difference in first spawning day between Div. 3L and Div. 3K (two-tailed permutation test statistic: p = 0.588). The vertical line in each panel is the original test statistic.
Figure 1. – The 56 in Capelin beach spawning diaries: an analysis of 30 years of citizen science data from the island of Newfoundland, Canada
Figure 1. – The 56 capelin spawning beaches (red dots) that were monitored as part of the citizen science capelin spawning diary program along the southeastern and eastern coasts of Newfoundland, Canada (NAFO Divs. 3KLPs) for the years 1991-2021. FB (Fortune Bay), WB (White Bay), SPM (St. Pierre and Miquelon). There are four capelin stocks in the Northwest Atlantic: NAFO Divs. 2J3KL, NAFO Div. 3Ps, NAFO Div. 4RST, NAFO Divs. 3NO. Grey contours are 100 m and dark grey contours are 500 m bathymetry.
FIGURE 8 in An analysis of fossil identification guides to improve data reporting in citizen science programs
FIGURE 8. Cluster analyses of all subjects as individuals. Subject labels denote which field guide the subject tested, a red 'C' for color photos, a black 'G' for grayscale photos, and a blue 'I' for illustrations. Author names are abbreviated "DaBu" for Dava Butler, "DoEs" for Donald Esker and "KrJu" for Kristopher Juntunen.
FIGURE 1 in An analysis of fossil identification guides to improve data reporting in citizen science programs
FIGURE 1. Map of the United States and surrounding regions, showing the location of the state of Florida and FMMS (Google 2017). 1B: Geologic map of the State of Florida, showing the geographic distribution of rocks and the location of the FMMS (Google 2017; Scott et al. 2001). 1C: Geologic map of the region around the FMMS, showing the distribution of rocks and location of the site (Google 2017; Scott et al. 2001). 1D: Photograph of FMMS, taken by Fred Mazza.
Illustrative Darwin core archive to input data on a citizen science platform from a collection management system
<p>Illustrative DwC archive to send data from a collection management system to a citizen sciences platform. This illustrative archive displays the specimens used for the trans-institutional and trans-platform pilot project held in the frame of ICEDIG.</p> <p>Further description of its content in the milestone28 document, worpackage 5.2 of the ICEDIG project.</p>
Example structure of data sent from a citizen science platformback to a collection management system, multi-determined case
<p>Illustrative example of data format following Darwin Core sent back from a citizen science platform to the relevant collection management system. Multi-determined herbarium sheet case : http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p01978557</p> <p>Illustration of the milestone28 document, worpackage 5.2 of the ICEDIG project.</p>
Example structure of data sent from a citizen science platformback to a collection management system, simple case
<p>Illustrative example of data format following Darwin Core sent back from a citizen science platform to the relevant collection management system. Simple case : http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p03558024</p> <p>Illustration of the milestone28 document, worpackage 5.2 of the ICEDIG project.</p>
Example structure of data sent from a collection management system to a citizen science platform, multi-imaged case
<p>Illustrative example of data format following Darwin Core to send from a collection management system to a citizen science platform. Multi-imaged vertebrate specimen case : http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/zo/2013-152</p> <p>Illustration of the milestone28 document, worpackage 5.2 of the ICEDIG project.</p>
Example structure of data sent from a collection management system to a citizen science platform, simple case
<p>Illustrative example of data format following Darwin Core to send from a collection management system to a citizen science platform. Simple case : http://coldb.mnhn.fr/catalognumber/mnhn/p/p03558024</p> <p>Illustration of the milestone28 document, worpackage 5.2 of the ICEDIG project.</p>
Data for "On the impact of Citizen Science-derived data quality on deep learning based classification in marine images"
<p>This dataset contains all the annotations done by either citizen scientists or experts of the publication: "On the impact of Citizen Science-derived data quality on deep learning based classification in marine images"</p> <p><strong>CSP.csv</strong> -> CS annotations of the Citizen Science Primer-experiment</p> <p><strong>CSPExpert.csv</strong> -> Expert annotations of the Citizen Science Primer-experiment</p> <p><strong>CSS.csv</strong> -> CS annotations of the Citizen Science Study</p> <p><strong>CSSExpert.csv</strong> -> Expert annotations of the Citizen Science Study</p> <p>Visual exploration of the image data is possible in the BIIGLE 2.0 image annotation system at <a href="https://biigle.de/projects/139">https://biigle.de/projects/159</a> using the login <em><a href="mailto:cs@example.com">cs@example.com</a></em> and the password <em>plosonecs</em>.</p>
PERCEIVE: WP1: Framework for comparative analysis of the perception of Cohesion Policy and identification with the European Union at citizen level in different European countries: Survey at citizen level and data relative to regional performance of the Cohesion Policy and institutional quality
<p>1. Orignal PERCEIVE survey data (STATA file)</p> <p>2. description of survey questions, descriptive results (word file)</p> <p>3. EU Deliverable document with descriptive analysis of survey questions</p> <p> </p> <p>***please cite the following when using the microdata:</p> <p>Bauhr, M., & Charron, N. (2020). The EU as a savior and a saint? Corruption and public support for redistribution. <em>Journal of European Public Policy</em>, <em>27</em>(4), 509-527.</p> <p>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13501763.2019.1578816</p>
Assessment of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in frogs using large-scale citizen science data
<p>This is the data required to reproduce the results of the manuscript "Assessment of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in frogs using large-scale citizen science data", including measurements of tree canopy cover extracted from the Global Forest Cover Change dataset (Townshend 2016).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Reference</strong></p> <p>Gillard, G. L. & Rowley, J. J. L. (2023). Assessment of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in frogs using large-scale citizen science data. <em>Journal of Zoology</em>. [In publication].</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Global Forest Cover Change Dataset</strong></p> <p>Townshend J. 2016. Global Forest Cover Change (GFCC) Tree Cover Multi-Year Global 30 m V003 [Data set]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. Accessed June 22, 2022. doi:10.5067/MEaSUREs/GFCC/GFCC30TC.003.Townshend J. 2016. Global Forest Cover Change (GFCC) Tree Cover Multi-Year Global 30 m V003 [Data set]. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes DAAC. Accessed June 22, 2022. doi:10.5067/MEaSUREs/GFCC/GFCC30TC.003.</p>
Data from: Utilising citizen science data to rapidly assess changing associations between wild birds and avian influenza outbreaks in poultry
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Fun surveys? Developing an innovative approach to assessing learning through citizen science
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
All site data for Citizen Science (Guildford case study)
<p>The collected data during citizen science activities in Guildford using low-cost sensors.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.