Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
58
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
58 results for “corrigenda”
FIGURE 16 in PE Note: Corrigenda to Murphey et al. 2018
FIGURE 16. Schematic stratigraphic column of Washakie Formation, Washakie Basin, Wyoming, showing correlations of biochrons of the late Bridgerian through middle Uintan North American Land Mammal ages to the magnetostratigraphy. Alternative magnetostratigraphic correlation D of McCarroll et al. (1996a) as preferred by Walsh (1996a) and Tsukui (2016). Marker beds after Roehler (1973). Adobe Town Member upper subunit not included because its polarity is undetermined. Note that no Ui1a faunas are currently recognized from the Washakie Formation of the Washakie Basin due to the lack of diagnostic mammal fossils (see text for discussion). Abbreviations are: BC, biochron; GRFm, Green River Formation; MS, magnetostratigraphy; REBM, Robin's Egg Blue marker bed.
FIGURE 12 in PE Note: Corrigenda to Murphey et al. 2018
FIGURE 12. Lower cheek teeth of Herpetotherium knighti from TBM: 1, Rdp3?, UCM 68902; 2, Rm2-3, UCM 68574; 3, Rm1, UCM 95792; 4, Lm3-4, UCM 95780; 5, Lm2 or 3, SDSNH 110339; 6, partial Rm2 or 3, SDSNH 110427; 7, Lm2 or 3, UCM 70977; 8, Rm2 or 3, UCM 95785; 9, Rm4, UCM 67896; 10, Rm4, UCM 95793. All occlusal views. Scale bar = 1 mm.
FIGURE 15 in PE Note: Corrigenda to Murphey et al. 2018
FIGURE 15. Schematic stratigraphic columns of west central and eastern sections of Uinta Formation, Uinta Basin, Utah, showing correlations of magnetostratigraphy to biochrons of the Uintan North American Land Mammal age. Sections modified after Prothero (1996a) and Kelly and Murphey (2012). Note that no Ui1a faunas are currently recognized from the Uinta Formation due to the lack of diagnostic mammal fossils (see text for discussion). Abbreviations are: BC, biochron; Cyn, Canyon; Du, Duchesnean North American Land Mammal age; Fm., formation; GRFm, Green River Formation; Mbr, member; MS, magnetostratigraphy.
FIGURE 11 in PE Note: Corrigenda to Murphey et al. 2018
FIGURE 11. Upper molars of Herpetotherium knighti: 1, LM1, SDSNH 110429; 2, RM1, DMNH 75286; 3, LM2, UCM 68793; 4, LM2, UCM 70637; 5, RM2, UCM 95783; 6, RM2, UCM 70639; 7, RM3, UCM 68794; 8, RM3, UCM 73770; 9, RM4, UCM 95784. All occlusal views. Scale bar = 1 mm.
FIGURE 8 in PE Note: Corrigenda to Murphey et al. 2018
FIGURE 8. Comparison of weighted mean 206Pb/238U dates of two samples from the TBM, Bridger Formation. Precisions exclude tracer and decay constant uncertainties as these are systematic for both samples. Dates require a minimum of 174 kyr between deposition of these two strata and a maximum of 572 kyr.
FIGURE 4. Concordia Age plot for sample PCM3Aug14-04. Data have been corrected for 230 in PE Note: Corrigenda to Murphey et al. 2018
FIGURE 4. Concordia Age plot for sample PCM3Aug14-04. Data have been corrected for 230Th disequilibrium.
FIGURE 3 in PE Note: Corrigenda to Murphey et al. 2018
FIGURE 3. Examples of zircon subpopulations recovered from TBM tuff sample PCM3 Aug14-07, shown in their approximate abundances. Elongate, ash-type zircons were only a minor component in the total zircon yield. CA-TIMS dating was limited to single zircons from the elongate and euhedral subpopulations. Most of these analyses gave dates ca. 47.0 Ma, but two single-grain analyses, sK (47.8 Ma) and sM (612 Ma) demonstrated that some older, euhedral, detrital grains were incorporated into the tuff during deposition. Scale bars in micrometers (μm).
FIGURE 7. Weighted mean 206 in PE Note: Corrigenda to Murphey et al. 2018
FIGURE 7. Weighted mean 206Pb/238U plot for CA-TIMS U-Pb zircon data from sample PCMAug14-07. Data from gray boxes (sG, sK, sI) were excluded from calculation, as they do not overlap the weighted mean (green bar) from the youngest six analyses.
FIGURE 10 in PE Note: Corrigenda to Murphey et al. 2018
FIGURE 10. Schematic stratigraphic columns of the upper part of the Twin Buttes Member and Turtle Bluff Member (TBM), Bridger Formation, on Sage Creek and Cedar Mountains showing magnetostratigraphy and radioisotopic dates relative to biochrons Br3 (late Bridgerian) and Ui1a (earliest Uintan). Sage Creek Mountain magnetostratigraphic section (shown on left) with key stratigraphic levels from Tsukui (2016, figure 2.5). Paleomagnetic sample, PCM7Sept15-01, analyzed in this paper was collected from uppermost Twin Buttes Member tuff, which occurs about 8 m below the Basal E limestone (= base of the TBM) on Sage Creek Mountain, and corroborates the Sage Creek Mountain magnetostratigraphic section of Tsukui (2016). Paleomagnetic samples (PCM6Sept15-02 and PCM6Sept15-03) analyzed in this paper were collected from the tuffaceous white sandstone, which occurs at 74-75 m above the Basal E limestone (= base of the TBM) on Cedar Mountain. Most recent competing dates for boundary between Chrons C21r and C21n are also shown (Ogg, 2012 [GPTS]; Westerhold et al., 2015; Tsukui, 2016). Abbreviations are: Brid, Bridger; Congl, conglomerate; BC, biochron; MS, magnetostratigraphy. 40Ar/39Ar dates are from Smith et al. (2008, 2010).
FIGURE 46 in On the morphology of Procryptocerus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Some comments and corrigenda
FIGURE 46. (Corrected). Male wings. Veins: C (Costa), Sc+R (Subcostal+Radial), Sc+R1 (Subcostal+Radial 1), R1 (Radial 1), Rs (Radial Sectorial), 2r-rs (second radial-radiosectorial), M+Cu (Media+Cubital), M (Media), Rs+M (Radial sectorial+ Media), 1 m-cu (first media-cubital), Cu (Cubital), cu-a (cubital-anal), A (Anal), rs-m+M (radial sectorial-media + Media). Cells: CC (Costal Cell), BC (Basal Cell) (or Radial), SBC (Subbasal Cell) (or Cubital), SMC1 + SMC2 (Submarginal Cell 1 + Submarginal Cell 2), SMC3 (Submarginal Cell 3), DC1 (Discal Cell 1), DC2 (Discal Cell 2); pst: pterostigma tg: tegula.
Figure 9 from: Shirley XA, Woolley JB, Hopper KR (2017) Corrigenda: Revision of the asychis species group of Aphelinus (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 54: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.54.10457. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 57: 167-177. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.57.13506
Figure 9 - Aphelinus sinensis sp. n., paratypes in 95% ethanol. a male, antennae and face, anterior view (TAMU-ENTO X0856562) b female, antennae and face, anterior view (TAMU- ENTO X0856563) c male, habitus, lateral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856562) d female, habitus, lateral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856563) e male, habitus, ventral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856562) f female, habitus, ventral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856563).
Figure 8 from: Shirley XA, Woolley JB, Hopper KR (2017) Corrigenda: Revision of the asychis species group of Aphelinus (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 54: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.54.10457. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 57: 167-177. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.57.13506
Figure 8 - Aphelinus semiflavus, slide-mounted specimens. a male, antenna, lateral view (paralectotype) b female, antenna, lateral view (paralectotype) c male, fore wing, dorsal view (paralectotype) d female, fore wing, dorsal view (paralectotype) e female, hind wing, dorsal view (paralectotype) f female, metasoma, ventral view (UCRC ENT 326827) g female, mesosoma, dorsal view (CNC 00122803) h male, genitalia, ventral view (UCRC ENT 326826).
Figure 4 from: Shirley XA, Woolley JB, Hopper KR (2017) Corrigenda: Revision of the asychis species group of Aphelinus (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 54: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.54.10457. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 57: 167-177. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.57.13506
Figure 4 - Aphelinus asychis, slide-mounted specimens. a male, antenna, lateral view (BMNH 1039637) b female, antenna, lateral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856569) c male, fore wing, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0856303) d female, fore wing, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0856301) e female, hind wing, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0856301) f female, metasoma, ventral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856301) g female, mesosoma, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0856301) h male, genitalia, ventral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856303).
Figure 3 from: Shirley XA, Woolley JB, Hopper KR (2017) Corrigenda: Revision of the asychis species group of Aphelinus (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 54: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.54.10457. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 57: 167-177. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.57.13506
Figure 3 - Aphelinus asychis, card-mounted specimens. a male, antennae and head, lateral view (BMNH 1038770) b female, antennae and face, anterior view (BMNH 1038772) c male, habitus, lateral view (BMNH 1038770) d female, habitus, lateral view (BMNH 1038772) e male, habitus, dorsal view (BMNH 1038770) f female, habitus, dorsal view (BMNH 1038772).
Figure 1 from: Shirley XA, Woolley JB, Hopper KR (2017) Corrigenda: Revision of the asychis species group of Aphelinus (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 54: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.54.10457. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 57: 167-177. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.57.13506
Figure 1 - Measurements and terminology. a Aphelinus kazakhstanensis sp. n. female, head, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0856040) (fvl: frontovertex length; hl: head length; hw: head width; ocp: posterior ocellus to occipital margin distance; ool: posterior ocellus to eye margin distance; ow: posterior ocellus width; pol: posterior interocellar distance) b Aphelinus sinensis sp. n. female, fore wing, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0852875) (cc: costal cell length; mv: marginal vein length; wl: wing length; ww: wing width; lms: longest marginal seta length) c Aphelinus certus male genitalia, ventral view (TAMU-ENTO X0616479) (adg = aedeagus; dig = digiti; dnt = denticles; phl = phallobase) d Aphelinus atriplicis female, metasoma, ventral view (TAMU-ENTO X0616471) (ovp = ovipositor).
Figure 7 from: Shirley XA, Woolley JB, Hopper KR (2017) Corrigenda: Revision of the asychis species group of Aphelinus (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 54: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.54.10457. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 57: 167-177. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.57.13506
Figure 7 - Aphelinus semiflavus, point-mounted specimens. a male, antennae and face, lateral view (CNC 00122807) b female, antennae and face, anterior view (CNC 00122818) c male, habitus, lateral view (USNM ENT 2076436) d female, habitus, lateral view (paralectotype) e male, habitus, dorsal view (USNM ENT 2076436) f female, habitus, dorsal view (paralectotype).
Figure 6 from: Shirley XA, Woolley JB, Hopper KR (2017) Corrigenda: Revision of the asychis species group of Aphelinus (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 54: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.54.10457. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 57: 167-177. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.57.13506
Figure 6 - Aphelinus kazakhstanensis, slide-mounted paratypes. a male, antenna, lateral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856044) b female, antenna, lateral view (TAMU-ENTO X0855782) c male, fore wing, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0856072) d female, fore wing, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0616386) e female, hind wing, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0852956) f female, metasoma, ventral view (TAMU-ENTO X0616386) g female, mesosoma, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0852880) h male, genitalia, ventral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856075).
Figure 5 from: Shirley XA, Woolley JB, Hopper KR (2017) Corrigenda: Revision of the asychis species group of Aphelinus (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 54: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.54.10457. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 57: 167-177. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.57.13506
Figure 5 - Aphelinus kazakhstanensis, paratypes in 95% ethanol. a male, antennae and face, anterior view (TAMU-ENTO X0856689) b female, antennae and face, anterior view (TAMU- ENTO X0856403) c male, habitus, lateral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856689) d female, habitus, lateral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856400) e male, habitus, ventral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856689) f female, habitus, ventral view (TAMU-ENTO X0856403).
Figure 2 from: Shirley XA, Woolley JB, Hopper KR (2017) Corrigenda: Revision of the asychis species group of Aphelinus (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 54: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.54.10457. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 57: 167-177. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.57.13506
Figure 2 - Aphelinus sinensis sp. n., male, scape, ventral view. Note the five linearly arranged exocrine gland pores.
Figure 10 from: Shirley XA, Woolley JB, Hopper KR (2017) Corrigenda: Revision of the asychis species group of Aphelinus (Hymenoptera, Aphelinidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research 54: 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.54.10457. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 57: 167-177. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.57.13506
Figure 10 - Aphelinus sinensis sp. n., slide-mounted paratypes. a male, antenna, lateral view (TAMU-ENTO X0852885) b female, antenna, lateral view (TAMU-ENTO X0852877) c male, fore wing, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0852885) d female, fore wing, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0852875) e female, hind wing, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0852869) f female, metasoma, ventral view (TAMU-ENTO X0852880) g female, mesosoma, dorsal view (TAMU-ENTO X0852880) h male, genitalia, ventral view (TAMU-ENTO X0852885).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.