Find research datasets worth reusing

Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) is a statistical ordination technique commonly applied to morphology-based cladistic matrices to study macroevolutionary patterns, morphospace occupation and disparity. However, PCoA-based morphospaces are dissociated from the original data; therefore, whether such morphospaces accurately reflect body plan disparity or extrinsic factors, such as body size, remains uncertain. We collated nine character-taxon matrices of dinosaurs together with body mass estimates for all taxa and tested for relationships between body size and both the principal ordinated axis of variation (PCo1) and the entire set of PCo scores. The possible effects of body size on macroevolutionary hypotheses derived from ordinated matrices were tested by re-evaluating evidence for the accelerated accumulation of avian-type traits indicated by a strong directional shift in PCo1 scores in hypothetical ancestors of modern birds. Body mass significantly accounted for, on average, approximately 50 and 16 per cent of the phylogenetically corrected variance in PCo1 and all PCo scores, respectively. Along the avian stem lineage, approximately 30 per cent of the morphological variation is attributed to the reconstructed body masses of each ancestor. When the effects of body size are adjusted, the period of accelerated trait accumulation is replaced by a more gradual, additive process. Our results indicate that even at low proportions of variance, body size can noticeably effect macroevolutionary hypotheses generated from ordinated morphospaces. Future studies should thoroughly explore the nature of their character data in association with PCoA-based morphospaces and use a residual/covariate approach to account for potential correlations with body size.

opencc-zeroMay 2020View details →

zenodo36/100

Discrete Element Model for subglacial till: code and data

This is a permanent archive of the code and data for the Discrete Element Model, Sphere, developed by Anders Damsgaard, and used for simulations of deforming subglacial till. File is compressed in the tar.bz2 format. The Sphere code and documentation can be found at <a href="https://src.adamsgaard.dk/sphere/">https://src.adamsgaard.dk/sphere/</a> . Run sphere/python/MyVisualization.py to generate the figures in sphere/Images/.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2021View details →

dryad36/100

Data from: A Bayesian approach for inferring the impact of a discrete character on rates of continuous-character evolution in the presence of background-rate variation

Understanding how and why rates of character evolution vary across the Tree of Life is central to many evolutionary questions; e.g., does the trophic apparatus (a set of continuous characters) evolve at a higher rate in fish lineages that dwell in reef versus non-reef habitats (a discrete character)? Existing approaches for inferring the relationship between a discrete character and rates of continuous-character evolution rely on comparing a null model (in which rates of continuous-character evolution are constant across lineages) to an alternative model (in which rates of continuous-character evolution depend on the state of the discrete character under consideration). However, these approaches are susceptible to a "straw-man" effect: the influence of the discrete character is inflated because the null model is extremely unrealistic. Here, we describe MuSSCRat, a Bayesian approach for inferring the impact of a discrete trait on rates of continuous-character evolution in the presence of alternative sources of rate variation ("background-rate variation"). We demonstrate by simulation that our method is able to reliably infer the degree of state-dependent rate variation, and show that ignoring background-rate variation leads to biased inferences regarding the degree of state-dependent rate variation in grunts (the fish group Haemulidae).

opencc-zeroOct 2019View details →

dryad36/100

Data from: Inferring continuous and discrete population genetic structure across space

A classic problem in population genetics is the characterization of discrete population structure in the presence of continuous patterns of genetic differentiation. Especially when sampling is discontinuous, the use of clustering or assignment methods may incorrectly ascribe differentiation due to continuous processes (e.g., geographic isolation by distance) to discrete processes, such as geographic, ecological, or reproductive barriers between populations. This reflects a shortcoming of current methods for inferring and visualizing population structure when applied to genetic data deriving from geographically distributed populations. Here, we present a statistical framework for the simultaneous inference of continuous and discrete patterns of population structure. The method estimates ancestry proportions for each sample from a set of two-dimensional population layers, and, within each layer, estimates a rate at which relatedness decays with distance. This thereby explicitly addresses the "clines versus clusters" problem in modeling population genetic variation, and remedies some of the overfitting to which nonspatial models are prone. The method produces useful descriptions of structure in genetic relatedness in situations where separated, geographically distributed populations interact, as after a range expansion or secondary contact. We demonstrate the utility of this approach using simulations and by applying it to empirical datasets of poplars and black bears in North America.

opencc-zeroDec 2017View details →

zenodo36/100

CiP Discrete Manufacturing Dataset (CNC Miling Machine (Process Data))

Dataset recorded in the process learning factory CiP at the Institute for Production Management, Technology and Machine Tools, TU Darmstadt for the purpose of demonstrating and testing InterQ developed solutions. It was used to demonstrate the framework's effectiveness in a case study, involving process monitoring of a real-world Computer Numerical Control milling process. The dataset includes accelerometer data and multiple types of realistic concept drifts. The uploaded file includes the link and password for accessing the dataset in PTW's cloud infrastructure.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2023View details →

zenodo36/100

CiP Discrete Manufacturing Dataset (CNC Miling Machine (Process Data))

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2023View details →

zenodo36/100

The steered discrete molecular dynamics simulation data of amyloids with EC1 and EC12 cadherin dimer

The steered discrete molecular dynamics (sDMD) simulation parameters are provided. Binding frequency of amyloids with EC1 and EC1-2 cadherin dimer. Trajectories of sDMD simulations of EC1 cadherin dimer with Abeta species.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2023View details →

dryad36/100

Data from: When can model-based estimates replace surveys of wildlife populations that span many discrete management units?

Monitoring widely distributed species on a budget presents challenges for the spatio-temporal allocation of survey effort. When there are multiple discrete units to monitor, survey alternatives such as model-based estimates can be useful to fill information-gaps but may not reliably reflect biological complexity and change. The spatio-temporal allocation of survey effort that minimizes uncertainty for the greatest number of units within a budget can help to ensure monitoring efforts are optimized. We used aerial survey-based population estimates of moose (Alces alces) across 30 Wildlife Management Units (WMUs) in Ontario, Canada to parameterize simulated populations and test the performance of different monitoring scenarios in capturing WMU-specific annual variation and trends. Firstly, we tested scenarios that prioritized conducting a survey for a unit based on one of three management criteria: population state, population uncertainty, or number of years between surveys. Also incorporated in the decision framework were WMU-specific costs and annual budget constraints. Secondly, we tested how using model-based estimates to fill information-gaps improved population and trend estimates. Lastly, we assessed how the utility (based on minimizing population uncertainty) of using a model-based estimate rather than conducting a survey was impacted by population density, severity of environmental stressors, and years since the last survey. Interval-based monitoring that minimized the number of years between surveys captured accurate trends for the highest number of WMUs, but annual variation was poorly captured regardless of management criteria prioritized. Using model-based estimates to fill information gaps improved trend estimation. Further, the utility of conducting a survey increased with time since the last survey and was greater for populations with low densities when the severity of environmental stressors was high, while being greater for populations with high densities when environmental severity was low. Overall, the utility of aerial survey monitoring was strongly associated with WMU-specific monitoring precision and the predictive power of model-based estimates. If long-term trends are evident then there is greater value in using alternatives such as model-based predictions to replace surveys, but model-based estimates may be a poor substitute when there is strong annual variation and when using a simple model.

opencc-zeroMay 2022View details →

dryad36/100

Discrete fire events, their severity, and their ignitions, as derived from MODIS MCD 14ML active-fire detection data for Indonesia, 2002-2019

1. PUBLICATION CORRESPONDING TO THESE DATA Sloan, Sean*; Locatelli, Bruno; Andela, Niels; Cattau, Megan E.; Gaveau, David; Tacconi, Luca. 2022 'Declining Severe Fire Activity on Managed Lands in Equatorial Asia'. Communications Earth & Environment. DOI: 10.1038/s43247-022-00522-6. *Corresponding author email: sean.sloan@viu.ca 2. ABSTRACT OF THE DATA The GIS data and corresponding attribute data described here pertain to discrete fire events, their severity, and their ignitions, as derived on the basis of daily MODIS Collection 6 MCD14ML active-fire detections (AFDs). Data on fire events and their ignitions are provided separately, as two data files. These data files on fire events and ignitions may however be linked to each other by the data user. Fire-event severity is quantified per fire event and reported in the data file for fire events. A fire event is a cluster of MODIS Collection 6 MCD14ML active-fire detections (AFDs) wherein each AFD has a spatial (<=1-km) and temporal (<=4-day) proximity to another AFD in the same fire event, inferring thus a relational co-occurrence amongst AFDs in time and space. In other words, a fire event is considered a likely occasion of burning wherein all constituent AFDs are related to each other in time and space, either directly (as for proximate AFDs) or indirectly (as in the case of a large area of fire activity that spread progressively over time and space from an initial source). Each fire event has a designated ignition AFD, being the AFD of the fire event with the earliest detection date. A given fire event can have more than one ignition AFD if the ignitions all share same earliest detection date. The ignition AFD(s) is the nominal initial source of the burning described by the corresponding fire event. All other, non-ignition AFDs of a fire event are deemed its 'propagation' AFDs, since these AFDs follow from the ignitions, temporally and spatially. See Figure 4 in the publication by Sloan et al. for an illustration of the geography of fire events and their ignition AFDs. Fire events and their ignitions were derived from standard science-quality MODIS Collection 6 MCD 14ML AFD data, commonly referred to as fire 'hotspot' data. Data were detected by both the Terra and Aqua satellite sensors daily for Indonesia between July 2002 and December 2019. Information on these input data are provide by the two citations below. The publication of Sloan et al. provides methodological details on how the MODIS Collection 6 MCD 14ML AFD data were processed into discrete fire events and ignitions. EarthData. MODIS Collection 6 Active-Fire Detections standard scientific data (MCD14ML), NASA EarthData, https://earthdata.nasa.gov/firms (2019). Giglio, L., Schroeder, W. & Justice, C. O. The Collection 6 MODIS active fire detection algorithm and fire products. Remote Sensing of Environment 178, 31-41, (2016). 3. DATA FILES Two data files are distributed here – one for discrete fire events, and another for the ignition AFDs of each fire event. The data files are provided in a GIS-compatible format, and also as a generic text format, as described below. 3.1 GIS VERSION Data files in GIS-compatible format are provided as 'feature classes' within an ArcGIS file geodatabase 'Sloan_MODIS_FireEvents_Ignitions_2002_2019.gdb'. These data files can be viewed and manipulated using either ArcGIS Desktop or ArcGIS Pro software. There is one feature class for fire events, and another file for ignitions. Sloan_MODIS_FireEvents_Ignitions_2002_2019.gdb\nfire4_all_spatial_fire_2002_2019_joins_sp_LC This file pertains to fire events. All AFDs of a given fire event are included, without differentiation as to whether the AFDs are ignition AFDs or other (propagation) AFDs. Fire events are assigned unique ID values and basic attribute data. Sloan_MODIS_FireEvents_Ignitions_2002_2019.gdb\nfire4_all_spatial_fire_2002_2019_igs_sp_LC This file pertains to ignitions. Only ignition AFDs are included for a given fire event. Fire events corresponding to the ignitions are assigned unique ID values and basic attribute data. 3.2 CSV TEXT VERSION Both data files are also supplied as comma-separated value (CSV) text files for viewing and manipulation in non-GIS software, such as Excel, text editors, or any statistical software. The text files can also be read into various GIS software. CSV-formatted files have the same file name and attribute fields as the corresponding GIS-formatted data files. These CSV-formatted data files (as well as the GIS-formatted data files) include attribute data on the latitude and the longitude of each AFD. Attribute field names are included as the first row of values in a CSV file. No 'text qualifiers' like quotations (" ") or inverted commas ('') are used to designate text/string values within the CSV file. Text values appear directly between commas in the CSV data file, e.g., …,Kalimantan_Southern,… . Note two points of caution for working with these CSV data: i) Microsoft Excel may be used for a partial view of the data file nfire4_all_spatial_fire_2002_2019_joins_sp_LC.csv, but it is not recommended for working with this data file. This is because the number of records/rows in this csv file slightly exceeds that maximum that may be read by Excel, which is just over 1 million. This limitation does not apply to the other csv file, however. ii) The GIS-formatted data files employ 'null values' in their attribute tables, and so the corresponding 'values' in the CSV-formatted data files are similarly null. For null values, no value whatsoever is ascribed, not even 0. In the syntax of a CSV file (apparent upon opening the file in any text editor like Microsoft Notepad), a null value is denoted by two consecutive commas without any value, text, or space between them. If a CSV file were opened in Excel, a cell assigned a null value would be blank, not 0 or otherwise. This denotes the correct transcription of the GIS-formatted data. This feature will not impede the correct reading of these CSV data by whatever software. Users are made aware of this feature merely to ensure the proper input of these data into whatever software. 4. DATA STRUCTURE / GEOGRAPHY The GIS-formatted data files are 'point data', i.e., they map the geography of AFDs as individual 'points', in keeping with how these MODIS MCD14ML AFD data were originally structured. For the GIS-formatted data files, each record/row in its corresponding attribute tables corresponds geographically to single AFD 'point', regardless of whether that AFD belongs to a fire event comprised of many AFDs. In the parlance of GIS files, the files depict 'single-part' point features. The unique ID field [nfireID2] serves to denote the fire event to which a given AFD belongs. Similarly, for the CSV-formatted data files, each record/row of values corresponds to a single AFD. There are 1,232,377 records for the data file 'nfire4_all_spatial_fire_2002_2019_joins_sp_LC'. There are 720795 records for the data file 'nfire4_all_spatial_fire_2002_2019_igs_sp_LC'. 5. ATTRIBUTE FIELDS In the data files, while some attribute fields pertain to the individual AFD as the unit of observation (e.g., the land-cover class coincident with the AFD), other attribute fields correspond to the larger 'fire event' to which the individual AFD belongs (e.g., the total duration of fire activity for the fire event). Accordingly, for certain attribute fields pertaining to the fire event as a whole, their values will appear 'duplicated' in the data file amongst those individual AFDs (records) that constitute the fire event in question. Whether a given attribute field pertains to the individual AFD or to its constituent fire event is denoted below for each field. Each AFD is assigned a unique ID field denoting its constituent fire event, [nfireID2]. This field is consistent between both data files, so that attribute data for a given fire event may be 'matched' to attribute data for its corresponding ignition AFD(s), and vice versa, on the basis of the common value of the field [nfireID2]. Note that many attributes below are as originally defined/measured by the input MCD 14ML data, or are derived directly thereof. 5.1 DATASET nfire4_all_spatial_fire_2002_2019_joins_sp_LC <table class="MsoTableGrid"> <tbody> <tr> <td> Field Name </td> <td> Geography of Attribute Value </td> <td> Definition </td> </tr> <tr> <td> OID </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Object ID value. Unique values for each AFD (record) in the GIS-formatted data file when viewed in ArcGIS. Field values are -1 in the CSV-formatted data file. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Peat </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Denotes whether the AFD occurs on peatlands (value=1) as defined in Sloan et al. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MIN_CONFIDE </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The minimum detection confidence of all AFDs in the fire event, where confidence ranges from 1-100%. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MAX_CONFIDE </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The maximum detection confidence of all AFDs in the fire event, where confidence ranges from 1-100%. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MEAN_CONFIDE </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The mean detection confidence of all AFDs in the fire event, where confidence ranges from 1-100%. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> STD_CONFIDE </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The standard deviation of detection confidence of all AFDs in the fire event, where confidence ranges from 1-100%. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> SUM_FRP </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The sum total of all fire-radiative power (FRP) measures for all AFDs in the fire event. Units are megawatts. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MEAN_FRP </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The mean of all fire-radiative power (FRP) measures for all AFDs in the fire event. Units are megawatts. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MIN_FRP </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The minimum of all fire-radiative power (FRP) measures for all AFDs in the fire event. Units are megawatts. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MAX_FRP </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The maximum of all fire-radiative power (FRP) measures for all AFDs in the fire event. Units are megawatts. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MEAN_LATITUD </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The mean latitude of all AFDs in the fire event. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MEAN_LONGITU </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The mean longitude of all AFDs in the fire event. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MIN_ACQ_DAT </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The minimum acquisition date of all AFDs in the fire event (i.e., the ignition AFD detection date). </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MAX_ACQ_DAT </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The maximum acquisition date of all AFDs in the fire event (i.e., the ignition AFD detection date). </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MIN_acq_yer </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The year in which the earliest AFD of the fire event was detected. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MIN_acq_mnt </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The month in which the earliest AFD of the fire event (i.e., ignition AFD) was detected. Months are coded numerically, e.g., 1=January, 12=December. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MAX_acq_mnt </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The month in which the latest AFD of the fire event was detected. Months are coded numerically, e.g., 1=January, 12=December. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MIN_yday </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The detection day of year of the earliest AFD of the fire event, i.e., ignition AFD. Day of year is denoted numerically, where 1=January 1 and 365=December 31. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MAX_yday </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The detection day of year of the latest AFD of the fire event, i.e., ignition AFD. Day of year is denoted numerically, where 1=January 1 and 365=December 31. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> RANGE_yday </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The number of days of duration of the fire event, defined as [MAX_yday]-[MIN_yday] </td> </tr> <tr> <td> FIRST_subst_r </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Text labels denoting the Indonesian island/region of data processing, e.g., Kalimantan, Papua. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> AF_Count </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> Number of AFDs in the fire event. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> nfireID2 </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The unique ID of the fire event to which the AFD belongs. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Island </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Numerical values coding for major Indonesian islands/region: 1000000=Sumatra; 2000000=Kalimantan; 3000000=Sulawesi; 4000000=Papua. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> FRP_Days </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The severity of the fire event, as defined by Sloan et al., equal to [Sum_FRP] * ([Range_yday]+1). </td> </tr> <tr> <td> IG_Count </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> Number of ignition AFDs in the fire event </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2002 </td> <td> </td> <td> The land-cover class coincident with the AFD. The class is coded by a numerical value as per the left-most column in the table in Section 5.3. The class is that observed for the calendar year in which the AFD occurred, where the year #### is denoted in the field name 'CCI_LC####'. The land-cover data source is as described in Section 5.3. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2003 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2004 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2005 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2006 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2007 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2008 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2009 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2010 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2011 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2012 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2013 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2014 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2015 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2016 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2017 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2018 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2019 </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Region </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Text labels denote whether the AFD occurs within one of the two focal regions of Sloan et al.: Southern Kalimantan, or Central South Sumatra. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> POINT_X </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Longitude, given as decimal degrees with WGS84 datum. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> POINT_Y </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Latitude, given as decimal degrees with WGS84 datum. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> POINT_Z </td> <td> -- </td> <td> Ignore. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> POINT_M </td> <td> -- </td> <td> Ignore. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> 5.2 DATASET nfire4_all_spatial_fire_2002_2019_igs_sp_LC <table class="MsoTableGrid"> <tbody> <tr> <td> Field Name </td> <td> Geography of Attribute Value </td> <td> Definition </td> </tr> <tr> <td> OID </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Object ID value. Unique values for each AFD (record) in the GIS-formatted data file when viewed in ArcGIS. Field values are -1 in the CSV-formatted data file. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> IG_Count </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> Number of ignition AFDs in the fire event. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MIN_acq_yer </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The year in which the earliest AFD of the fire event was detected. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MIN_acq_mnt </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The month in which the earliest AFD of the fire event (i.e., ignition AFD) was detected. Months are coded numerically, e.g., 1=January, 12=December. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> FIRST_subst_r </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Text labels denoting the Indonesian island/region of data processing, e.g., Kalimantan, Papua. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> MIN_yday </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The detection day of year of the earliest AFD of the fire event, i.e., ignition AFD. Day of year is denoted numerically, where 1=January 1 and 365=December 31. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> nfireID2 </td> <td> Fire Event </td> <td> The unique ID of the fire event to which the AFD belongs. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2002 </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> The land-cover class coincident with the AFD. The class is coded by a numerical value as per the left-most column in the table in Section 5.3. The class is that observed for the calendar year in which the AFD occurred, where the year #### is denoted in the field name 'CCI_LC####'. The land-cover data source is as described in Section 5.3. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2003 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2004 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2005 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2006 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2007 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2008 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2009 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2010 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2011 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2012 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2013 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2014 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2015 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2016 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2017 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2018 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> CCI_LC2019 </td> <td> AFD </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Region </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Text labels denote whether the AFD occurs within one of the two focal regions of Sloan et al.: Southern Kalimantan, or Central South Sumatra. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> Peat </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Denotes whether the AFD occurs on peatlands (value=1) as defined in Sloan et al. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> POINT_X </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Longitude, given as decimal degrees with WGS84 datum. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> POINT_Y </td> <td> AFD </td> <td> Latitude, given as decimal degrees with WGS84 datum. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> POINT_Z </td> <td> -- </td> <td> Ignore. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> POINT_M </td> <td> -- </td> <td> Ignore. </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> 5.3. LAND-COVER ATTRIBUTE DATA As noted in Section 5.1 and Section 5.2, the nominal values of the attribute fields 'CCI_LC####' correspond to column 1 of the table below. These hierarchical values, and their corresponding land-cover classes labels in column 2 of the table, pertain to the land-cover classification of the Copernicus Climate Change Initiative Land-Cover Product of the European Space Agency. This classification has an annual temporal resolution and 300-meter spatial resolution. Pertinent citations for these land-cover data are below: ESA. Annual land-cover product, 1992 to 2019/present, based on MERIS 300-m and ancillary SPOT, AVHRR, Sentinel-3 and PROB-V satellite data. European Space Agency (ESA) European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMFW) Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Change Initiative (CCI), <a href="https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/satellite-land-cover?tab=overview">https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/satellite-land-cover?tab=overview</a>; <a href="http://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download.php">http://maps.elie.ucl.ac.be/CCI/viewer/download.php</a>; <a href="http://www.esa-landcover-cci.org/">http://www.esa-landcover-cci.org/</a> (2020). Pérez-Hoyos, A., Rembold, F., Kerdiles, H. & Gallego, J. Comparison of global land cover datasets for cropland monitoring. Remote Sensing 9, (2017). Columns 3 and 4 in the table below illustrate how the original land-cover classes of the Copernicus Climate Change Initiative Land-Cover Product were reclassified for analysis in Sloan et al. <table class="MsoNormalTable"> <tbody> <tr> <td> 1. CCI-LC Class Value </td> <td> 2. CCI-LC Class Label </td> <td> 3. New Class Value for Sloan et al. </td> <td> 4. New Class Label for Sloan et al. </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 0 </td> <td> No Data </td> <td> 0 </td> <td> No Data </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 10 </td> <td> Cropland, rainfed </td> <td> 1 </td> <td> Cleared/Cultivated </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 11 </td> <td> Herbaceous cover </td> <td> 1 </td> <td> Cleared/Cultivated </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 12 </td> <td> Tree or shrub cover </td> <td> 1 </td> <td> Cleared/Cultivated </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 20 </td> <td> Cropland, irrigated or post‐flooding </td> <td> 1 </td> <td> Cleared/Cultivated </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 30 </td> <td> Mosaic cropland (>50%) / natural vegetation (tree, shrub, herbaceous cover) (<50%) </td> <td> 2 </td> <td> Mosaic Cropland </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 40 </td> <td> Mosaic natural vegetation (tree, shrub, herbaceous cover) (>50%) / cropland (<50%) </td> <td> 3 </td> <td> Mosaic Natural Veg </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 50 </td> <td> Tree cover, broadleaved, evergreen, closed to open (>15%) </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> Forest </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 60 </td> <td> Tree cover, broadleaved, deciduous, closed to open (>15%) </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> Forest </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 61 </td> <td> Tree cover, broadleaved, deciduous, closed (>40%) </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> Forest </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 62 </td> <td> Tree cover, broadleaved, deciduous, open (15‐40%) </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> Forest </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 70 </td> <td> Tree cover, needleleaved, evergreen, closed to open (>15%) </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> Forest </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 71 </td> <td> Tree cover, needleleaved, evergreen, closed (>40%) </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> Forest </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 72 </td> <td> Tree cover, needleleaved, evergreen, open (15‐40%) </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> Forest </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 80 </td> <td> Tree cover, needleleaved, deciduous, closed to open (>15%) </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> Forest </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 81 </td> <td> Tree cover, needleleaved, deciduous, closed (>40%) </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> Forest </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 82 </td> <td> Tree cover, needleleaved, deciduous, open (15‐40%) </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> Forest </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 90 </td> <td> Tree cover, mixed leaf type (broadleaved and needleleaved) </td> <td> 4 </td> <td> Forest </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 100 </td> <td> Mosaic tree and shrub (>50%) / herbaceous cover (<50%) </td> <td> 5 </td> <td> Mosaic Shrubland </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 110 </td> <td> Mosaic herbaceous cover (>50%) / tree and shrub (<50%) </td> <td> 5 </td> <td> Mosaic Shrubland </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 120 </td> <td> Shrubland </td> <td> 6 </td> <td> Low/Sparse Vegetation </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 121 </td> <td> Evergreen shrubland </td> <td> 6 </td> <td> Low/Sparse Vegetation </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 122 </td> <td> Deciduous shrubland </td> <td> 6 </td> <td> Low/Sparse Vegetation </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 130 </td> <td> Grassland </td> <td> 6 </td> <td> Low/Sparse Vegetation </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 140 </td> <td> Lichens and mosses </td> <td> 6 </td> <td> Low/Sparse Vegetation </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 150 </td> <td> Sparse vegetation (tree, shrub, herbaceous cover) (<15%) </td> <td> 6 </td> <td> Low/Sparse Vegetation </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 151 </td> <td> Sparse tree (<15%) </td> <td> 6 </td> <td> Low/Sparse Vegetation </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 152 </td> <td> Sparse shrub (<15%) </td> <td> 6 </td> <td> Low/Sparse Vegetation </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 153 </td> <td> Sparse herbaceous cover (<15%) </td> <td> 6 </td> <td> Low/Sparse Vegetation </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 160 </td> <td> Tree cover, flooded, fresh or brakish water </td> <td> 7 </td> <td> Flooded Vegetation </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 170 </td> <td> Tree cover, flooded, saline water </td> <td> 7 </td> <td> Flooded Vegetation </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 180 </td> <td> Shrub or herbaceous cover, flooded, fresh/saline/brakish water </td> <td> 7 </td> <td> Flooded Vegetation </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 190 </td> <td> Urban areas </td> <td> 8 </td> <td> Other </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 200 </td> <td> Bare areas </td> <td> 8 </td> <td> Other </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 201 </td> <td> Consolidated bare areas </td> <td> 8 </td> <td> Other </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 202 </td> <td> Unconsolidated bare areas </td> <td> 8 </td> <td> Other </td> </tr> <tr> <td> 210 </td> <td> Water bodies </td> <td> 8 </td> <td> Other </td> </tr> </tbody> </table>

opencc-zeroAug 2022View details →

dryad36/100

Data for continuous and discrete measurements of carbonate parameters in a productive coastal region in the Northwestern Pacific (36°09'13.5''N, 129°24'04.9''E) from January to September in 2019 and from March to December in 2020

Photosynthetic organisms shift the dynamics of surface pCO2 driven by the sea surface temperature change (thermodynamic driver) by assimilating C from seawater. Here we measured net C uptake in a macroalgal habitat of coastal Korea for two years (2019–2020) and found that the macroalgal habitat contributed 5.8 g C m-2 month-1 of the net C uptake during the growing period (the cooling period, September-May). This massive C uptake changed the thermodynamics-driven seasonal dynamics such that the air-sea equilibrium of pCO2 was pushed into disequilibrium. The surface pCO2 dynamics during the cooling period were mostly influenced by the seasonal decrease in temperature and the proliferation of macroalgae, while the dynamics during the warming period (the stagnant period, June-August) closely followed that predicted based solely on the change in sea surface temperature only (thermodynamic driver). In contrast to the phytoplankton-dominated offshore waters (where phytoplankton populations are large in spring and summer), the impact of coastal water macroalgae on surface pCO2 dynamics was most pronounced during the cooling period, when the magnitude of pCO2 change was as much as twice that resulting from temperature change. Our study shows that the distinctive features of the macroalgal habitat—in particular the seasonal temperature extremes (~18°C difference), the active macroalgal metabolism, and anthropogenic nutrient inputs—collectively influenced the seasonal decoupling of seawater and air pCO2 dynamics.

opencc-zeroOct 2022View details →

zenodo36/100

Discretized bulk data by the discretization step of rFASTCORMICS used in in the publication scFASTCORMICS: A contextualization algorithm to reconstruct metabolic multi-cell population models from single-cell RNAseq data

Bulk data RNAseq data were downloaded from GEO, GTEX, and other sources (see below) and discretized by the discretization step of rFASTCORMICS (Pacheco et al, 2019) used in the optimization step in scFASTCORMICS: CRC bulk RNAseq data were obtained from Lee et al(2020)  CRC control (NM) was downloaded from GSE81861  (GTEX, Healthy colon from) Pancreatic  Human islet bulk RNAseq data was downloaded from EBI Expression Atlas (Pancreatic islet cells) Immune cells in pancreatic carcinoma bulk data were obtained from GEO (GSE156278) liver and breast cancer bulk RNAseq data were obtained from the TCGA (GSE62944)   rFASTCORMICS and tutorial on rFASTCORMICS can be found: https://github.com/sysbiolux

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →

dryad36/100

Mygalomorph spiders: Discrete data matrix of burrow construction behavior and somatic morphology

Mygalomorph spiders (trapdoor spiders and their kin) have long been associated with high levels of homoplasy, and many convergent features can be intuitively associated with different behavioral niches. This dataset includes two discrete behavioral characters and 55 somatic morphological characters (scored from adult females), for 110 genera of mygalomorph spiders, along with a complete reference list and exemplar list used when constructing the dataset. This dataset was used to reconstruct the evolution of burrowing behavior in the Mygalomorphae, compare the influence of behavior and evolutionary history on somatic morphology, and test hypotheses of correlated evolution between specific morphological features and behavior. The results revealed the simplicity of the mygalomorph adaptive landscape, with opportunistic, web-building taxa at one end, and burrowing/nesting taxa with structurally-modified burrow entrances (e.g., a trapdoor) at the other. Shifts in behavioral niche, in both directions, are common across the evolutionary history of the Mygalomorphae, and several major clades include taxa inhabiting both behavioral extremes. Somatic morphology is heavily influenced by behavior, with taxa inhabiting the same behavioral niche often more similar morphologically than more closely-related but behaviorally-divergent taxa.

opencc-zeroNov 2022View details →

zenodo36/100

Combining formal methods and Bayesian approach for inferring discrete-state stochastic models from steady-state data

Model, data, and a script to a paper of respective name

opencc-by-4.0May 2023View details →

dryad36/100

Buzz pollination: Investigations of pollen expulsion using the discrete element method data

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2024View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas

neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.

Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage

behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.

Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb

electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.

Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl

behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.

Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro

neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.

Last verified 2026-04-29Open record