Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in The effect of environmental enrichment on Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae) under captivity conditions

Fig. 5. Representation of the interactions between individuals in each enclosure, R1 and R2, with (R2 WE) and without enrichment (R2 W/O-E) based on the recorded chase and flight events.MWM: male without mark, MWP: male white point, MYP; male yellow point, F: female. Fig. 5. Representación de las interacciones entre individuos en cada recinto, R1 y R2, con (R2 WE) y sin enriquecimiento (R2 W/O-E) en base a los eventos de persecución y huida registrados. MWM: macho sin marca, MWP: macho punto blanco, MYP; punto amarillo macho, F: hembra.

Fig. 3 in The effect of environmental enrichment on Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae) under captivity conditions

Fig. 3. Comparison in the frequency of Reproductive Behavior in Males between R1 and R2 during the 3 months of the experiment. Fig. 3. Comparación en la frecuencia del Comportamiento Reproductivo en Machos entre R1 y R2 durante los 3 meses del experimento.

Fig. 2 in The effect of environmental enrichment on Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae) under captivity conditions

Fig. 2. Comparison of cumulative proportions of behavioral categories in R1 and R2, with and without enrichment (inner circle: females, outer circle: males). Fig. 2. Comparación de proporciones acumuladas de categorías de comportamiento en R1 y R2, con y sin enriquecimiento (círculo interior: mujeres, círculo exterior: hombres).

Fig. 4 in The effect of environmental enrichment on Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae) under captivity conditions

Fig. 4. Tables of sociometric matrices for each enclosure R1 and R2, with (R2 WE) and without enrichment (R2 W/O-E). MWM: male without mark, MWP: male white point, MYP; male yellow point, F: female. Fig. 4. Cuadros de matrices sociométricas para cada recinto R1 y R2, con (R2 WE) y sin enriquecimiento (R2 W/O-E). MWM: macho sin marca, MWP: macho punto blanco, MYP; punto amarillo macho, F: hembra.

Fig. 1 in The effect of environmental enrichment on Salvator merianae (Squamata: Teiidae) under captivity conditions

Fig. 1. Examples of different environmental enrichment activities carried out in the R2. Fig. 1. Ejemplos de diferentes actividades de enriquecimiento ambiental realizadas en el R2.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →

Fig. 5 in Effects Of The Environmental Variables On The Alien Amphipod Pontogammarus Robustoides In The Daugava River And Its Reservoirs

Fig. 5. Ordination diagramm of RDA between data of the individual size groups of P. robustoides and environmental variables identified as significant (p<0.05) by Monte Carlo permutation test for study area. PR, P – Pļaviņas Reservoir, Pikstere, PR, VB - Pļaviņas Reservoir, Vārpu backwater, PR, GB - Pļaviņas Reservoir, Gobena backwater, PR, US - Pļaviņas Reservoir, upper stretch, DK – Daugava River, Klidziņa, KR, N – Ķegums Reservoir, Ņega, KR, G – Ķegums Reservoir, Graužupīte, RR, T – Riga Reservoir, Tome, RR, O - Riga Reservoir, Ogre, DR – Daugava River, Riga; ORP – oxred potential

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →

Fig. 3 in Effects Of The Environmental Variables On The Alien Amphipod Pontogammarus Robustoides In The Daugava River And Its Reservoirs

Fig. 3. Seasonal changes of the physico-chemical parameters and relative water level in the Pļaviņas Reservoir.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →

Fig. 2 in Effects Of The Environmental Variables On The Alien Amphipod Pontogammarus Robustoides In The Daugava River And Its Reservoirs

Fig. 2. Seasonal changes of the water level in the Daugava River (the hydrological station at Jēkabpils) and the Pļaviņas Reservoir (the hydrological station at Pļaviņas).

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2018View details →

The effects of environmental history and thermal stress on coral physiology and immunity

This dataset has all data for the manuscript (Wall CB,  CA Ricci, GE Foulds, LD Mydlarz, RD Gates, HM Putnam (2018) The effects of environmental history and thermal stress on coral physiology and immunity. Marine Biology). Data included a zipped archive shape file for creating Kāne'ohe Bay map, physical data (light and temperature) from Kāne'ohe Bay and laboratory experiments, pCO2 data for Kāne'ohe Bay reef sites dowloaded from NOAA PMEL, and biological responses (PAM fluorometry, physiology, immune activity and oxidative profile).

Figure 7 in Effect of environmental change after the 2011 tsunami on the population dynamics of Japanese tubesnout Aulichthys japonicus (Gasterosteiformes)

Figure 7. – Photographs showing scraped an ascidian Halocynthia roretzi (A) and an egg mass (B) of the Japanese tubesnout Aulichthys japonicus, which was spawned and developed within the ascidians.

Figure 4 in Effect of environmental change after the 2011 tsunami on the population dynamics of Japanese tubesnout Aulichthys japonicus (Gasterosteiformes)

Figure 4. – Relationship between the occurrence of larvae of Aulichthys japonicus collected from 2012 to 2013 and water temperature (°C).

Figure 3 in Effect of environmental change after the 2011 tsunami on the population dynamics of Japanese tubesnout Aulichthys japonicus (Gasterosteiformes)

Figure 3. – Monthly changes in the number of individuals for larva, juvenile and young Aulichthys japonicus and water temperature collected at the seagrass bed in Namiita beach in 2012.

Figure 6 in Effect of environmental change after the 2011 tsunami on the population dynamics of Japanese tubesnout Aulichthys japonicus (Gasterosteiformes)

Figure 6. – Changes in the surface of the seagrass bed area (m2) since before Tsunami (according to Yamaki, 2009) to 2014.

Figure 5 in Effect of environmental change after the 2011 tsunami on the population dynamics of Japanese tubesnout Aulichthys japonicus (Gasterosteiformes)

Figure 5. – Changes of number of Japanese tubesnouts Aulichthys japonicus and ascidians Halocynthia roretzi from 2007 to 2008 and from 2012 to 2016.

Figure 1 in Effect of environmental change after the 2011 tsunami on the population dynamics of Japanese tubesnout Aulichthys japonicus (Gasterosteiformes)

Figure 1. – Location of study area in Okirai Bay and position of the sampling site in Namiita Beach. The white dotted area shows the seagrass bed's area (m2) in August 2014.

FIGURE 6 in Effects of urbanization and environmental heterogeneity on fish assemblages in small streams

FIGURE 6 | Ordination of fish species composition by distance-based redundancy analysis (dbRDA) in relation to environmental heterogeneity (EH; estimated from environmental data and transformed by loge(x) prior to dbRDA) and the proportion of impervious surfaces (ImpSurf). Species codes, 1: Poecilia reticulata; 2: Corydoras aeneus; 3: Phenacogaster jancupa; 4: Astyanax abramis; 5: Hoplias malabaricus; 6: Hypostomus khimaera; 7: Serrapinnus calliurus; 8: S. microdon; 9: Hemigrammus tridens; 10: A. lacustris.

FIGURE 5 in Effects of urbanization and environmental heterogeneity on fish assemblages in small streams

FIGURE 5 | Relationship between the local contribution to beta diversity (LCBD) and the proportion of impervious surfaces in urban streams in Cuiabá. The line indicates fitted values.

FIGURE 4 in Effects of urbanization and environmental heterogeneity on fish assemblages in small streams

FIGURE 4 | Relationship between rarefied species richness (Srarefied) and the proportion of impervious surfaces in urban streams in Cuiabá. The line indicates fitted values.

FIGURE 3 in Effects of urbanization and environmental heterogeneity on fish assemblages in small streams

FIGURE 3 | Spatial variation in rarefied species richness (Srarefied; A) and the local contribution to beta diversity (LCBD; B) in urban streams in Cuiabá (Mato Grosso, Brazil). The circle sizes in the legend indicate the minimum, mean, and maximum values of Srarefied and the LCBD. The arrow in "A" indicates flow direction.

FIGURE 2 in Effects of urbanization and environmental heterogeneity on fish assemblages in small streams

FIGURE 2 | Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of local environmental variables of streams from the urban area of Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, midwestern Brazil. The symbol sizes are proportional to the environmental heterogeneity (EH); PlaMat: plant matter; GraRoc: gravel and rocks; CanCov: canopy cover.