Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 11 in A synthesis of the evolutionary history of erymoid lobsters (Crustacea, Decapoda, Erymoidea)

FIG. 11. — Distribution of Erymoidea during the Cretaceous: A, palaeobiogeography of the Early Cretaceous; B, palaeobiogeography of the Late Cretaceous. Colors: blue, Erymidae; orange, Enoploclytiidae. Abbreviations: En., Enoploclytia; Er., Eryma; Pal., Palaeastacus; Pu., Pustulina; S., Stenodactylina; T., Tethysastacus. Source of maps: Scotese 2014a, b.

FIG. 9 in A synthesis of the evolutionary history of erymoid lobsters (Crustacea, Decapoda, Erymoidea)

FIG. 9. — Erymoid fauna from Madagascar: A, B, Stenodactylina granulifera (Secrétan, 1964) from the Kimmeridgian of Antsalova: holotype MNHN.F.R03975 (A), specimen MNHN.F.R.03974, holotype of Eryma madagascariensis Secrétan, 1964 (B); C, D, Stenodactylina australis (Secrétan, 1964), from the Tithonian: specimen MNHN.F.A33228 from Marolalitra (C), holotype MNHN.F.R03972 from Analavelona Massif (D); E, F, Pustulina spinulata (Secrétan, 1964), from the Valanginian-Hauterivian of Soromaraina, holotype MNHN.F.R03961 (E), paratype MNHN.F.A33189 (F); G, H, paratype MNHN.F.A33132 of Enoploclytia collignoni Secrétan, 1964, from the Campanian of Bevaho; I, holotype MNHN.F.R03913 of Stenodactylina armata (Secrétan, 1964), from the Campanian of Belo-sur-Tsiribihina. Scale bars: 1 cm. Preparation: C. Bouillet (G-H). Photographs: L. Cazes (C, G, H), C. Lemzaouda (A, B, D, E, I).

FIG. 13 in A synthesis of the evolutionary history of erymoid lobsters (Crustacea, Decapoda, Erymoidea)

FIG. 13. — Early Cretaceous erymoid fauna from the South-East Basin (France): A, cast MNHN.F.R10204 of the holotype of Eryma glaessneri (Van Straelen, 1936), from the Hauterivian of Escragnolles; B, C, specimens of Eryma vocontii Devillez, Charbonnier, Hyžný & Leroy, 2016 from the Albian of Rosans: holotype MNHN.F.A57457 (B), paratype MNHN.F.A57458 (C); D, original figure of Van Straelen (1923: fig. 10) of the holotype of Palaeastacus loryi (Van Straelen, 1923) from the Valanginian of Malleval; E, original figure of Van Straelen (1936: pl. 2, fig. 3) of the holotype of Pustulina victori Devillez, Charbonnier, Hyžný & Leroy, 2016, from the Berriasian of Leysse; F, holotype MNHN.F.A57459 of Pustulina colossea Devillez, Charbonnier, Hyžný & Leroy, 2016, from the Hauterivian of Castellane; G, holotype MNHN.F.A57460 of Pustulina occitana Devillez, Charbonnier, Hyžný & Leroy, 2016, from the Berriasian of Laciterne-Boisset; H, holotype OSUG.UJF-ID 11152 of Stenodactylina delphinensis (Moret, 1946), from the Berriasian of Noyarey; I, holotype MNHN.F.J03351 of Tethysastacus tithonius (Van Straelen, 1936), from the Valanginian of Laciterne-Boisset. Scale bars: 1 cm. Photographs: L. Cazes.

FIG. 4 in A synthesis of the evolutionary history of erymoid lobsters (Crustacea, Decapoda, Erymoidea)

FIG. 4. — Erymoid lobster palaeobiodiversity: A, specific diversity for each genus during the Jurassic; B, specific diversity for each genus during the Cretaceous; C, evolution of the specific diversity during the Mesozoic for each genus across the globe (left) and in Europe (right). These graphs do not include those species that are exclusively found in the Solnhofen Lagerstätten.

FIG. 10 in A synthesis of the evolutionary history of erymoid lobsters (Crustacea, Decapoda, Erymoidea)

FIG. 10. — Erymoid fauna from the Kimmeridgian-Tithonian "Plattenkalk" of Bavaria (Germany): A, specimen MFN 2236 P1383/3 MB.A.2891 of Eryma modestiforme (Schlotheim, 1822) from Solnhofen; B, holotype SMNS 3682 of Eryma major Oppel, 1861, from Nusplingen; C, holotype SMNS 24227 of Eryma westphali Schweigert, Dietl & RÖper, 2000, from Nusplingen; D, holotype BSPG AS VII 186 of Eryma veltheimii (Münster, 1839), from Kehlheim; E, specimen SMNS 64681 of Eryma punctatum Oppel, 1861, from Nusplingen; F, specimen SMNS 64521 of Palaeastacus fuciformis (Schlotheim, 1822), from Zandt; G, holotype BSPG 1993 XXVIII 200 of Palaeastacus rothgaengerae Schweigert & RÖper, 2001, from Brunn; H, holotype SMNS 70507 of Stenodactylina geigerae Schweigert & Härer, 2020, from Marxheim; I, holotype SMNS 64872 of Stenodactylina devillezi Schweigert & Härer, 2020, from Nusplingen; J, specimen SMNS 64319 of Pustulina suevica Quenstedt, 1857, from Nusplingen; K, specimen BSPG AS I 619 of Pustulina minuta (Schlotheim, 1822), from Solnhofen. Scale bars: 1 cm. Photographs: J. Devillez (A-F, J-K), G. Schweigert (G-I).

FIG. 7 in A synthesis of the evolutionary history of erymoid lobsters (Crustacea, Decapoda, Erymoidea)

FIG. 7. — African, Middle East and Far East erymoid lobsters, excepting E. moriedaorum: A, specimen MFN 2236 P1383/2 MB.A.1537 of Eryma ventrosum (Meyer, 1835), from the Upper Jurassic of Tanzania;B, original figure of FÖrster & Seyed-Emami (1982: fig. 3) of the specimen of Eryma compressum Eudes-Deslongchamps, 1842, from the Aalenian of the Imamzadeh Hashim Pass northeast of Teheran (Iran); C, holotype WMNH-Ge-1140320056 of Eryma nippon Karasawa, Ohara & Kato, 2008 from the Barremian of Suhara (Japan); D, specimen MSNM i 12292 of Pustulina cretacea (Roger, 1946), from the Cenomanian of Hakel (Lebanon); E, holotype MNHN.F.B18902 of Eryma oscari Charbonnier, Audo, Garassino & Hyžný, 2017, from the Cenomanian of Hadjoula (Lebanon). Scale bars: 1 cm. Photographs: J. Devillez (A), H. Karasawa (C), G. Teruzzi (D), D. Audo (E).

opencc-zeroJun 2022View details →

dryad40/100

The evolutionary history and mechanistic basis of female ornamentation in a tropical songbird

Ornamentation, such as the showy plumage of birds, is widespread among female vertebrates, yet the evolutionary pressures shaping female ornamentation remain uncertain. In part this is due to a poor understanding of the mechanistic route to ornamentation in females. To address this issue, we evaluated the evolutionary history of ornament expression in a tropical passerine bird, the White-shouldered Fairywren, whose females, but not males, strongly vary between populations in occurrence of ornamented black-and-white plumage. We first use phylogenomic analysis to demonstrate that female ornamentation is derived and that female ornamentation evolves independently of changes in male plumage. We then use exogenous testosterone in a field experiment to induce partial ornamentation in naturally unornamented females. By sequencing the transcriptome of experimentally induced ornamented and natural feathers, we identify genes expressed during ornament production and evaluate the degree to which female ornamentation in this system is associated with elevated testosterone, as is common in males. We reveal that some ornamentation in females is linked to testosterone and that sexes differ in ornament-linked gene expression. Lastly, using genomic-outlier analysis we identify a candidate melanogenesis gene that lies in a region of high genomic divergence among populations that is also differentially expressed in feather follicles of different female plumages. Taken together, these findings are consistent with sex-specific selection favoring the evolution of female ornaments and demonstrate a key role for testosterone in generating population divergence in female ornamentation through gene regulation. More broadly, our work highlights similarities and differences in how ornamentation evolves in the sexes.

Supplementary data for Plutniak, S. 2022. "What makes the identity of a scientific method? A history of the 'Structural and analytical typology' in the growth of evolutionary and digital archaeology in southwestern Europe (1950s–2000s)", Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology, vol. 5, 10.

Supplementary data for Plutniak, S. 2022. “What makes the Identity of a Scientific Method? A History of the  ‘Structural and analytical typology’ in the Growth of Evolutionary and Digital Archaeology in Southwestern Europe (1950s–2000s)”, Journal of Paleolithic Archaeology. vol 5, 10. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s41982-022-00119-7">10.1007/s41982-022-00119-7</a>.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

FIGURE 3 in Bayesian inference reveals a complex evolutionary history of belemnites

FIGURE 3. Cladogram showing the here suggested systematics of the Belemnitida based on the Bayesian tip-dated analysis. Sketches show the general outer morphological features of a typical representative of the groups in either dorsal (d), ventral (v), or lateral (l) view.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

FIGURE 2 in Bayesian inference reveals a complex evolutionary history of belemnites

FIGURE 2. Maximum clade credibility tree of the Bayesian tip-dated analysis. Numbers at nodes represent posterior probability, while the blue bars indicate the 95% highest posterior density interval of the divergence time estimates. The small black dot represents the constrained clade. Tips with zero-length branches represent sampled ancestors.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →

Fig. 11 in A pinworm's tale: The evolutionary history of Lemuricola (Protenterobius) nycticebi

Fig. 11. Comparison between (A) primate phylogeny, (B) pinworm phylogeny derived from cladistics, and (C) 28S rDNA gene sequences (outgroup not shown). Female pinworm cephalic ends shown in B correspond to (top to bottom): Trypanoxyuris (Trypanoxyuris) microon(Linstow 1907),Trypanoxyuris (Buckleyenterobius) atelis (Cameron 1929), Enterobius (Enterobius) vermicularis(Linnaeus 1758),Lemuricola (Protenterobius) nycticebi(Baylis 1928),Lemuricola (Madoxyuris) bauchoti(Chabaud et al. 1965),Lemuricola (Madoxyuris) vauceli (Chabaud et al. 1965). Scale: 20 µm. Line drawings reprinted with permission of Cambridge University Press from Hasegawa (2009), Methods of collection and identification of minute nematodes from the feces of primates, with special application to coevolutionary study of pinworms. In: Huffman Chapman (eds.) Primate Parasite Ecology. Cambridge University Press, pp. 29–46.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →

Fig. 10. Phylogenetic relationship among primate pinworms inferred from 18S in A pinworm's tale: The evolutionary history of Lemuricola (Protenterobius) nycticebi

Fig. 10. Phylogenetic relationship among primate pinworms inferred from 18S rDNA gene sequences. Numbers at the nodes represent ML/NJ bootstrap values, respectively.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →

Fig. 9. Phylogenetic relationships among primate pinworms inferred from cox1 in A pinworm's tale: The evolutionary history of Lemuricola (Protenterobius) nycticebi

Fig. 9. Phylogenetic relationships among primate pinworms inferred from cox1 gene sequences. Numbers at the nodes represent ML/NJ bootstrap values, respectively.

Fig. 4. A in Life history strategies of Cotylurus spp. Szidat, 1928 (Trematoda, Strigeidae) in the molecular era - Evolutionary consequences and implications for taxonomy

Fig. 4. A median-joining network of COI haplotype of Cotylurus. Each circle represents a unique haplotype where the diameter is proportional to the number of DNA sequences represented.

Fig. 1 in Life history strategies of Cotylurus spp. Szidat, 1928 (Trematoda, Strigeidae) in the molecular era - Evolutionary consequences and implications for taxonomy

Fig. 1. The phylogenetic relationships within genus Cotylurus based on the concatenated COI mtDNA and 28S rDNA markers. The analysis was performed by the use of Bayesian inference, diamond symbol indicates posterior probability greater than 90%.

Fig. 3 in Life history strategies of Cotylurus spp. Szidat, 1928 (Trematoda, Strigeidae) in the molecular era - Evolutionary consequences and implications for taxonomy

Fig. 3. The phylogenetic relationships within the genus Cotylurus based on COI mtDNA marker. The analysis was performed by the use of Bayesian inference, diamond symbol indicates posterior probability greater than 90%.

Fig. 2 in Life history strategies of Cotylurus spp. Szidat, 1928 (Trematoda, Strigeidae) in the molecular era - Evolutionary consequences and implications for taxonomy

Fig. 2. The phylogenetic relationships within the genus Cotylurus based on 28S rDNA marker. The analysis was performed by the use of Bayesian inference, diamond symbol indicates posterior probability greater than 90%.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2006View details →

Fig. 6 in Phylogeny and Evolutionary History of Old World Suboscine Birds (Aves: Eurylaimides)

Fig. 6. Diversification of Old World suboscines. Maximum likelihood estimate of phylogeny from RAG- 1 and RAG-2 combined data set with thickened branches supported by parsimony bootstrap proportions above 80 and Bayesian posterior probability greater than 0.95 (see figs. 2, 3 for all support values). Date estimates derived with penalized likelihood (Sanderson, 2003) and a calibration of 90–82 Ma between Acanthisitta and all other passerines. Horizontal gray bars on nodes indicate ±2 standard deviations of age estimates from bootstrap analysis. The two multicolored species names indicate that the taxon is found in more than one region. Bird images of pittas (C. Rose), broadbills (I. Lewington), asities (J. Cox) and Sapayoa (J. Wilczur) are from Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vols. 8 and 9, copyright Lynx Ediciones (Josep del Hoyo).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2006View details →

Fig. 5 in Phylogeny and Evolutionary History of Old World Suboscine Birds (Aves: Eurylaimides)

Fig. 5. Parsimonious reconstruction of the evolution of diet in the Eurylaimides. Key: black branches, insectivorous; dark gray branches, frugivorous; light gray branches, nectivorous; and dotted branches, polymorphic/equivocal.