Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
53
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
53 results for “halophyte”
Fig. 1 in Balance of Δ -and Δ -sterols and stanols in halophytes in connection with salinity tolerance
Fig. 1. Representative GC–MS chromatograms of silylated free sterols from C. crassa (A) and S. linifolia (B). Peaks: cholesterol (1), lathosterol (cholest-7-en- 3β-ol) (2), campesterol (3), campestanol (4), stigmasterol (5), lophenol (4- methylcholest-7-en-3β-ol) (6), 22-stigmastenol (stigmast-22-en-3β-ol) (7), unknown sterol X1 with m/z 484 (8), β-sitosterol (9), spinasterol (stigmasta-7,22- dien-3β-ol) (10), sitostanol (11), β-amyrin (12), Δ5-avenasterol (13), unknown sterol X2 with m/z 484 (14), α-amyrin (15), Δ7-stigmastenol (=Δ7-sitosterol) (16), Δ7-avenasterol (17). * – nonsteroid component.
Fig. 5 in Balance of Δ -and Δ -sterols and stanols in halophytes in connection with salinity tolerance
Fig. 5. Principal component analysis of the relationship between the composition of ST and soil characteristics of Chenopodiaceae. Vector designations: M – mineralization, Н О – moisture, pH – soil acidity; Δ5, Δ7 and Δ0 are the sums of 2 Δ5 -, Δ7-and Δ0-STs, respectively; Сhol, Camp, β-sito, Stig are the contents of cholesterol, campesterol, β-sitosterol, and stigmasterol. The dots indicate the names of the species: A. aphyla – I, C. arenarius – II, C. crassa – III, H. strobilaceum – IV, B. prostrata – V, S sedoides – VI, S. perennans – VII, S. eltonica –VIII, S. linifolia – IX, S. physophora – X, S. salsa –XI, A. cana – XII, H. verucifera – XIII. The content of mineral residue, moisture and acidity of the soil in the root zone of plants of the Chenopodiaceae are shown in Table 3.
Fig. 4 in Balance of Δ -and Δ -sterols and stanols in halophytes in connection with salinity tolerance
Fig. 4. The content of molecular types of sterols (% of the total) in the halophyte groups: Ex – excluders (n = 5), Re – recretophytes (n = 5), Eu – euhalophytes (n 11); A – sum of Δ5-STs, B – sum of Δ7-STs, C – sum of Δ0-STs; D – = stigmast-5-en-3β-ol, E stigmast-7-en-3β-ol, F – stigmastan-3β-ol, G – stigmasta-5,22-dien-3β-ol, H – stigmasta- 7,22-dien-3β-ol, I – stigmast-22-en-3β-ol. Data are presented as the mean values in each group and the error of the mean (mean ± SE).
Fig. 6 in Undescribed glucosylceramide, flavonol triglycoside, and oleanane saponin from the halophyte Agathophora alopecuroides: Promising candidates for stimulating ceramide synthesis
Fig. 6. Effect of isolated compounds (1–11) and methanol extract of A. alopecuroides (12) on mRNA expression levels of CerS3 involved in ceramide synthesis in HaCaT cells. HaCaT cells were cultured in the presence or absence of tested samples at 10–400 μg/mL for 24 h. RT-PCR analysis was performed as described in Material and methods part. Data are expressed as means ± SD of at least three independent experiments; *p <0.05, **p <0.01.
Fig. 5 in Undescribed glucosylceramide, flavonol triglycoside, and oleanane saponin from the halophyte Agathophora alopecuroides: Promising candidates for stimulating ceramide synthesis
Fig. 5. Effect of extract and isolated compounds on viability of HaCaT cells. A: Compounds 1–3; B: Compounds 4–6; C: Compounds 7–9; D: Compounds 10–11 and methanol extract (12). Cell viability was measured by MTT assay. HaCaT cells (1 105 cells/well) were seeded to a 96-well plate and incubated overnight. The cell × viability was performed after treatment with extract and isolated compounds (1–400 μg/mL) for 24 h. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD of three wells; *p <0.05, **p <0.01.
Variation in salinity tolerance and water use strategies in an introduced woody halophyte (Tamarix spp.)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Manipulating saltmarsh microtopography modulates the effects of elevation on sediment redox potential and halophyte distribution
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Demographic expansion and genetic load of the halophyte model plant Eutrema salsugineum
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Figure 6 from: Li J-L, Sun X, Zheng Y, Lü P-P, Wang Y-L, Guo L-D (2020) Diversity and community of culturable endophytic fungi from stems and roots of desert halophytes in northwest China. MycoKeys 62: 75-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.62.38923
Figure 6 Preferences observed in the plant-fungus associations. A Preference scores. The standardized d' estimate of preferences for fungal taxon is shown for each halophyte (column), and the standardized d' estimate of preferences for plant species is indicated for each of the fungal taxon (row). Each cell in the matrix indicates a two-dimensional preference (2DP) estimate, which measures to what extent the association of a focal plant-fungus pair was observed more/less frequently than expected by chance. P values were shown as false discovery rates (FDRs) in the plant/fungus analysis. B Relationship between 2DP and FDR-adjusted P values, 2DP values larger than 2.5 and those smaller than -2.5 represented strong preference and avoidance, respectively (PFDR < 0.05). Significance: *, P < 0.05, **, P < 0.01, ***, P < 0.001.
Figure 5 from: Li J-L, Sun X, Zheng Y, Lü P-P, Wang Y-L, Guo L-D (2020) Diversity and community of culturable endophytic fungi from stems and roots of desert halophytes in northwest China. MycoKeys 62: 75-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.62.38923
Figure 5 Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) ordination plot of endophytic fungal communities of stem and root tissues (A) and halophyte species (B). Dotted ellipses indicate 95% confidence intervals around centroids of tissue type (A) and plant species (B), B. dasyphylla = Bassia dasyphylla, C. arenarius = Ceratocarpus arenarius, K. foliatum = Kalidium foliatum, Sa. nitraria = Salsola nitraria, Su. acuminata = Suaeda acuminata, Su. salsa = Suaeda salsa, E. minor = Eragrostis minor, R. songarica = Reaumuria songarica, Se. santolinum = Seriphidium santolinum, and P. harmala = Peganum harmala.
Figure 3 from: Li J-L, Sun X, Zheng Y, Lü P-P, Wang Y-L, Guo L-D (2020) Diversity and community of culturable endophytic fungi from stems and roots of desert halophytes in northwest China. MycoKeys 62: 75-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.62.38923
Figure 3 Relative abundance of endophytic fungi in the stem and root tissues of the ten halophyte species.
Figure 4 from: Li J-L, Sun X, Zheng Y, Lü P-P, Wang Y-L, Guo L-D (2020) Diversity and community of culturable endophytic fungi from stems and roots of desert halophytes in northwest China. MycoKeys 62: 75-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.62.38923
Figure 4 Relative abundance of endophytic fungi in the stem and root of different halophyte species.
Figure 2 from: Li J-L, Sun X, Zheng Y, Lü P-P, Wang Y-L, Guo L-D (2020) Diversity and community of culturable endophytic fungi from stems and roots of desert halophytes in northwest China. MycoKeys 62: 75-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.62.38923
Figure 2 Endophytic fungal richness in stem, root and total (stem + root) tissues of the ten halophyte species. Data are means ± SE (n = 10). Columns without shared lowercase, uppercase, and italic letters denote significant difference in the stem, root, and total tissues among the plant species, respectively. Asterisks above bars indicate the significant difference between stem and root tissues for each halophyte species (* P<0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001).
Figure 1 from: Li J-L, Sun X, Zheng Y, Lü P-P, Wang Y-L, Guo L-D (2020) Diversity and community of culturable endophytic fungi from stems and roots of desert halophytes in northwest China. MycoKeys 62: 75-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.62.38923
Figure 1 Colonization rate of endophytic fungi in stem, root, and total (stem + root) tissues of the ten halophyte species. Data are means ± SE (n = 10). Columns without shared lowercase, uppercase, and italic letters denote the significant difference in the stem, root, and total tissues among the halophyte species, respectively. Asterisks above bars indicate significant difference between stem and root tissues for each plant species (** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001).
Supplementary material 1 from: Palchetti MV, Cantero JJ, Morales-Fierro V, Barboza GE, Moreira-Muñoz A (2021) Living in extreme environments: distribution of Lycium humile (Solanaceae), an endemic halophyte from the Altiplano-Puna region, South America. PhytoKeys 185: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.185.71377
Occurences of Lycium humile in South America
Figure 4 from: Palchetti MV, Cantero JJ, Morales-Fierro V, Barboza GE, Moreira-Muñoz A (2021) Living in extreme environments: distribution of Lycium humile (Solanaceae), an endemic halophyte from the Altiplano-Puna region, South America. PhytoKeys 185: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.185.71377
Figure 4 Saline environments of the Altiplano-Puna region (South America) in which Lycium humile grows A Salar del Hombre Muerto (Catamarca, Argentina) B Los Colorados (Salta, Argentina) C Salar de Uyuni (Potosí, Bolivia).
Figure 2 from: Palchetti MV, Cantero JJ, Morales-Fierro V, Barboza GE, Moreira-Muñoz A (2021) Living in extreme environments: distribution of Lycium humile (Solanaceae), an endemic halophyte from the Altiplano-Puna region, South America. PhytoKeys 185: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.185.71377
Figure 2 Lectotype of Lycium humile Phil. (SGO 055683). Digital image by courtesy of the Museo Nacional de Historia Natural.
Table 2 in Nitrogen fertilization: Effect on Cd-phytoextraction by the halophytic plant quail bush [Atriplex lentiformis (Torr.) S. Wats] *
<p><b>Table 2</b> Transfer of Cd from soil to roots and from root to shoot of <i>A. lentiformis</i>.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>N rates</th><th>Soil–root transfer</th><th>Root–shoot transfer</th><th>% Removed Cd</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>C</th><td>85 ± 4.25 e</td><td>0.68 ± 0.02 a</td><td>4.09 ± 1.22 d</td></tr><tr><th>100</th><td>122 ± 5.46 d</td><td>0.64 ± 0.04 a</td><td>5.60 ± 1.44 c</td></tr><tr><th>200</th><td>144 ± 6.78 c</td><td>0.60 ± 0.05 a</td><td>6.33 ± 1.75 b</td></tr><tr><th>300</th><td>165 ± 5.08b</td><td>0.63 ± 0.06 a</td><td>7.56 ± 2.00 a</td></tr><tr><th>400</th><td>175 ± 6.12 a</td><td>0.63 ± 0.04 a</td><td>7.93 ± 2.02 a</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Root–shoot transfer = Cd concentrations in shoot ∕ Cd concentrations in roots. Soil–root transfer = Cd concentrations in roots ∕ available soil Cd (mg kg).</p><p>% Removed Cd = Cd uptake by shoot ∕ total soil Cd.</p><p>Means (±standard deviation, n = 4) denoted by different letters are significantly different at <i>P</i> <0.05.</p>
Table 1 in Nitrogen fertilization: Effect on Cd-phytoextraction by the halophytic plant quail bush [Atriplex lentiformis (Torr.) S. Wats] *
<p><b>Table 1</b> Growth parameters of <i>A.lentiformis</i> when treated with different rates of nitrogen fertilizer.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>N rates</th><th>Roots (g/pot)</th><th>Shoots (g/pot)</th><th>Leaf number/ plant</th><th>Leaf area/plant (cm2)</th><th>Plant length (cm)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>C</th><td>20 ± 1.52 d</td><td>80 ± 3.2 c</td><td>30 ± 1.82 d</td><td>80 ± 3.52 d</td><td>100 ± 5.25 c</td></tr><tr><th>100</th><td>25 ± 1.54 c</td><td>90 ± 3.0 b</td><td>35 ± 1.94 c</td><td>85 ± 4.33 d</td><td>115 ± 5.22 b</td></tr><tr><th>200</th><td>28 ± 1.45 b</td><td>95 ± 4.0 b</td><td>38 ± 2.00 b</td><td>92 ± 5.00 c</td><td>120 ± 5.12 b</td></tr><tr><th>300</th><td>33 ± 1.43 a</td><td>100 ± 4.5 a</td><td>40 ± 2.40 a</td><td>100 ± 5.46 b</td><td>130 ± 5.55 a</td></tr><tr><th>400</th><td>35 ± 1.48 a</td><td>102 ± 3.1 a</td><td>42 ± 2.40 a</td><td>120 ± 5.44 a</td><td>133 ± 5.62 a</td></tr></tbody></table><p>Means (±standard deviation, n = 4) denoted by different letters are significantly different at <i>P</i> <0.05.</p>
Figure 27 in Radiation in the halophytic coenoses of the Peri-Tethys: taxonomy and biogeography of the genus Ita (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Figure 27. Phylogenetic hypothesis for the species of Ita based on Bayesian Inference.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.