Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
298
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
298 results for “invasion biology”
Fig. 3 in Novel aspects of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) biology and an improved method for culturing this invasive species with a modified D. melanogaster diet
Fig. 3. Effect of triethylamine anesthetic exposure on the recovery of Drosophila adults: D. melanogaster (white circles, n = 181 adults), D. suzukii (black circles, n = 175 adults).
Fig. 2 in Novel aspects of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) biology and an improved method for culturing this invasive species with a modified D. melanogaster diet
Fig. 2. Effects of dietary ethanol (normal environmental ethanol range ≈ 0– 9% ethanol) on Drosophila suzukii survival when compared with D. melanogaster tolerance to ethanol (top graph) and sex-specific sensitivities of D. suzukii adults to ethanol (bottom graph). Summary of probit analyses are provided and statistics with bo = intercept estimate, b1 = estimated slope estimate for each fly species, with b1 = 0 for the baseline control in each graph (D. suzukii [top graph], D. suzukii males [bottom graph]).
Fig. 1 in Novel aspects of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) biology and an improved method for culturing this invasive species with a modified D. melanogaster diet
Fig. 1. Dietary manipulation of Drosophila suzukii cultures based on the use of 5 berry species (blackberry, strawberry, black cherry, blueberry, and grape) with a no-fruit (No Fruit) control (grey bars), and cultures to which yeast was added (+Y) or omitted (−Y) from 4-24® drosophila media (white bars). Asterisks indicate mean differences from 2 respective baseline controls (B), i.e., Blackberry−Y (14 d) and Blackberry+Y (21 d), according to multiple Wilcoxon 2-sample tests.
Fig. 2 in Biology and food habits of the invasive snail Allopeas gracile (Gastropoda: Subulinidae)
Fig. 2. Change in height (top) and mass (bottom) of Allopeas gracile over a 280 d period of culture.
Fig. 1 in Biology and food habits of the invasive snail Allopeas gracile (Gastropoda: Subulinidae)
Fig. 1. Lateral view of Allopeas gracile, showing the characteristic elongate spire and aperature, and small size. Photo by L. Buss, University of Florida.
Fig. 5 in Biology and food habits of the invasive snail Allopeas gracile (Gastropoda: Subulinidae)
Fig. 5. Growth curves of Allopeas gracile when cultured for 49 d on selected weed or flower foliage, animal tissue, or other potential food. Soil and lime-agar served as controls, as these were available to all snails.
Fig. 10 in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts
Fig. 10. Comparisons of inflammatory cells recruited to inflammatory foci in cane toads, Rhinella marina (a) and native frogs, Cyclorana australis (b). Each anuran species was exposed to infective larvae of Rhabdias hylae (white bars) and Rhabdias pseudosphaerocephala (grey bars). Graphs show average values ± 1 S.E.M.
Fig. 7 in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts
Fig. 7. Histological investigation of lungworm infection in anurans. Graphs show the proportion of (a) metamorph native frogs (Cyclorana australis) and (b) metamorph cane toads (Rhinella marina) infected with lungworms, not infected with lungworms, or with inflammatory 'foci' (probable cases of a lungworm larva penetrating the anuran's body but failing to survive).
Fig. 2 in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts
Fig. 2. The distribution of lungworm larvae in cane toad metamorphs. (a) Toad metamorphs infected with Rhabdias hylae (native frog lungworm) and (b) toad metamorphs infected with Rhabdias pseudosphaerocephala (cane toad lungworm). Data in panel (b) are from Pizzatto et al. (2010), with permission. LUNG refers to adult lungworms found within the lung, SKIN/MUSCLE refers to larvae found in the skeletal muscle or subcutaneous tissue, HEAD refers to larvae detected in the head or neck region (excluding those found in eye tissue), EYE indicates larvae found in the eye or periocular tissue, and COELOM denotes larvae within the coelom or coelomic membranes.
Fig. 1. Histological image depicting a in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts
Fig. 1. Histological image depicting a transverse section of (a) R. hylae larva in the connective tissue of the head of a cane toad and (b) the inflammatory response composed primarily of macrophages and multinucleated giant cells surrounding the parasite. Haematoxylin and eosin stain, 400× magnification, scale bar equals 30 μm.
Fig. 4 in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts
Fig. 4. Effect of time since exposure to Rhabdias hylae larvae on cane toad metamorphs: (a) shows the number of larvae found in toads and (b) shows the number of foci (areas of inflammation with no visible larvae) in toads, as determined by histological methods.
Fig. 9 in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts
Fig. 9. Change in the average number of inflammatory foci (probable cases of larval parasites breaking down) observed in all anurans over time. Graph shows average values ± 1 S.E.M.
Fig. 6 in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts
Fig. 6. Effects of Rhabdias hylae infection on cane toad metamorphs: (a) the average percentage of neutrophils and (b) lymphocytes around inflammation sites over time in cane toads infected with Rhabdias hylae. Graphs show average values ±1 S.E.M.
Fig. 3 in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts
Fig. 3. The state of Rhabdias hylae larvae in cane toads as a function of days-post treatment. The graph shows larval numbers as the percentage of total larvae that were seen at each time period.
Fig. 5 in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts
Fig. 5. Average inflammation severity surrounding Rhabdias hylae larvae and foci (probable larvae being broken down by the host's immune system) within infected cane toads at different numbers of days post-infection. Graph shows average values ±1 S.E.M.
Fig. 8 in Host-parasite interactions during a biological invasion: The fate of lungworms (Rhabdias spp.) inside native and novel anuran hosts
Fig. 8. Changes through time (days post-infection) on the relative numbers of anurans that were infected with lungworms, and that contained adult versus juvenile stages of the parasites involved. Data are shown for two lungworm species (Rhabdias hylae from native frogs, and Rhabdias pseudosphaerocephala from invasive cane toads) and for two types of host: the native frog, Cyclorana australis, and the cane toad, Rhinella marina. The panels show data for (a) C. australis infected with R. pseudosphaerocephala, (b) C. australis infected with R. hylae, (c) cane toads infected with R. pseudosphaerocephala and (d) cane toads infected with R. hylae.
Fig. 2 in Effect of tenthredinid leaf miner invasions on growth of Alaska white birch in Anchorage, Alaska, USA, and the interaction with biological control of amber-marked birch leaf miner
Fig. 2. Time series analysis of mean radial growth increments (mm) of Alaska white birch (Betula neoalaskana) in Anchorage, Alaska (n = 99) from 1984 to 2018: (1) pre-amber-marked birch leaf miner (Profenusa thomsoni) outbreak control period (1984–1995) (black dots); (2) amber-marked birch leaf miner outbreak period (1996–2007) (red dots); and (3) the amber-marked birch leaf miner suppression period due to biological control (2008–2018) (green dots). Time Series Mean = 1.7938, Std = 0.3843, N = 35, Zero Mean ADF (Augmented Dickey Fuller test) = −0.9887, Single ADF = −2.8315, Trend ADF = −4.8800.
Fig. 1 in Effect of tenthredinid leaf miner invasions on growth of Alaska white birch in Anchorage, Alaska, USA, and the interaction with biological control of amber-marked birch leaf miner
Fig. 1. Percentage of Alaska white birch (Betula neoalaskana) leaves in Anchorage mined by the amber-marked birch leaf miner (AMBLM on graph) (Profenusa thomsoni) or the late birch leaf edge miner (LEM on graph) (Heterarthrus nemoratus) from 1990 to 2019, from the initial invasion of amber-marked birch leaf miner (around 1991) through its suppression by classical biocontrol (2004– 2015) and the invasion of a second species of leaf miner (H. nemoratus) (around 2008). Data on percentage of birch leaves mined by each species were taken from multiple sources: (1) P. thomsoni: 2006–2011 (Soper et al. 2015); 2015 and 2018 (Wenninger unpublished 2018); and 2019 (Andersen et al. 2021); and (2) H. nemoratus: 2008–2010 (Lundquist et al. 2012); 2011 (Mulvey &Lamb 2012, p. 15); 2015 and 2018 (Wenninger unpublished 2018); and 2019 (Andersen et al. 2021).
Fig. 3 in Effect of tenthredinid leaf miner invasions on growth of Alaska white birch in Anchorage, Alaska, USA, and the interaction with biological control of amber-marked birch leaf miner
Fig. 3. Trends in annual radial growth increment (mm) from Alaska white birch (Betula neoalaskana) in Anchorage, Alaska (n = 99 cores) during each of 3 periods: (A) the pre-amber-marked birch leaf miner (Profenusa thomsoni) outbreak period (1984–1995, (B) the amber-marked birch leaf miner outbreak period (1996– 2007), and (C) the biological control amber-marked birch leaf miner suppression period (2008–2018).
Linked collectors and determiners for: The occurrence, distribution and biology of invasive fish species in fresh and brackish water bodies of NE Morocco.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "The occurrence, distribution and biology of invasive fish species in fresh and brackish water bodies of NE Morocco". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/55347db9-46a3-449d-8e55-ba6ed02e4820">https://bionomia.net/dataset/55347db9-46a3-449d-8e55-ba6ed02e4820</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/55347db9-46a3-449d-8e55-ba6ed02e4820">https://gbif.org/dataset/55347db9-46a3-449d-8e55-ba6ed02e4820</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.