Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 9 in The herpetofauna of the Serra do Urubu mountain range: a key biodiversity area for conservation in the brazilian atlantic forest

FIGURE 9: Reptile species recorded at the Serra do Urubu mountain range. (A) Amphisbaena alba, (B) Amphisbaena pretrei, (C) Norops fuscoauratus, (D) Dactyloa punctata, (E) Diploglossus lessonae (juvenile), (F) Diploglossus lessonae (adult), (G) Ophiodes sp. (H) Hemidactylus mabouia (Photo by C.O. Gussoni).

FIGURE 7 in The herpetofauna of the Serra do Urubu mountain range: a key biodiversity area for conservation in the brazilian atlantic forest

FIGURE 7: Amphibians species recorded at the Serra do Urubu mountain range. (A) Proceratophrys renalis, (B) Lithobates palmipes, (C) Pristimantis ramagii, (D) Pristimantis sp.

FIGURE 5 in The herpetofauna of the Serra do Urubu mountain range: a key biodiversity area for conservation in the brazilian atlantic forest

FIGURE 5: Amphibians species recorded at the Serra do Urubu mountain range. (A) Scinax eurydice, (B) Scinax fuscomarginatus, (C) Scinax x-signatus pattern 1, (D) Scinax clade ruber, (E) Scinax nebulosus, (F) Scinax pachycrus, (G) Scinax x-signatus pattern 2, (H) Adenomera cf. hylaedactyla.

FIGURE 4 in The herpetofauna of the Serra do Urubu mountain range: a key biodiversity area for conservation in the brazilian atlantic forest

FIGURE 4: Amphibians species recorded at the Serra do Urubu mountain range. (A) Boana faber, (B) Boana freicanecae, (C) Boana raniceps (Photo by C.O. Gussoni), (D) Boana semilineata, (E) Phyllodytes edelmoi, (F) Phyllodytes gyrinaethes, (G) Pithecopus nordestinus, (H) Scinax auratus.

FIGURE 12 in The herpetofauna of the Serra do Urubu mountain range: a key biodiversity area for conservation in the brazilian atlantic forest

FIGURE 12: Reptile species recorded at the Serra do Urubu mountain range. (A) Tantilla melanocephala, (B) Atractus potschi, (C) Dipsas sazimai, (D) Erythrolamprus aesculapii (Photo by C.O. Gussoni), (E) Imantodes cenchoa, (F) Leptodeira annulata, (G) Oxyrhopus petolarius (Photo by C.O. Gussoni), (H) Oxyrhopus trigeminus.

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →

Figure 2 in Shar Mountain National Park (R. North Macedonia) - shelter for caddisfly biodiversity in the country

Figure 2. Photos of the localities where the new species were recorded: a) S1 - Stream in Leshnica; b) S2 - Waterfall before v. Gajre; c) S3 – Uliverica; d) S4 - Stream above v. Novo Selo.

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →

Figure 1 in Shar Mountain National Park (R. North Macedonia) - shelter for caddisfly biodiversity in the country

Figure 1. Map of the sampling localities (S1 – S4) on Shar Mountain (R. North Macedonia). Map prepared by Daniela Jovanovska, PhD.

Fig. 9 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 9. Comparison between species frequency of museum collections (data from Frisone et al. 2016) and bulk sampling (this study). Error bars denote binomial standard errors of percentages.

Fig. 8 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 8. Distribution of sponge genera from museum collections (data from Frisone et al. 2016) and bulk sampling (this study). Error bars denote binomial standard errors of percentages.

Fig. 7 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 7. Families and relative abundances frequencies from museum collections (data from Frisone et al. 2016) and bulk sampling (this study). Error bars denote binomial standard errors of percentages.

Fig. 6 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 6. Comparison between frequency of museum collections (data from Frisone et al. 2016) and bulk field sampling (this study) at the ordinal level. Error bars denote binomial standard errors of percentages.

Fig. 5 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 5. Distribution of species richness (number of taxa) and species abundance (number of individuals per taxon) among classes.

Fig. 11 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 11. Rank-abundance distribution of bulk samples (A) and museum collection (Whittaker plots) (B). Y axis shows species abundance; X axis ranks each species in order from most to least abundant. Black dots represent species.

Fig. 2 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 2. Location (B) and geological map (A) of the study area (Verona and Vicenza provinces, Northern Italy), modified from http://gisgeologia.regione. veneto.it/, author: Regione Veneto, Sezione Geologia e Georisorse, and released under the Italian Open Data License 2.0 (https://www.dati.gov.it/content/ italian-open-data-license-v20). Outline of the Lessini Shelf during the Eocene modified from Bosellini (1989). The sponge-bearing outcrop is indicated by the white star near Chiampo. Cf, Castelvero fault; SVf, Schio-Vicenza fault; Pf, Pedemontana thrust fault.

Fig. 4 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 4. Rarefaction curve (line in the middle) of the Chiampo sponge fauna at Lovara. Grey area demarcate 95% confidence intervals of diversity estimates.

Fig. 12 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 12. In situ Eocene specimen of Laocoetis patula from Lovara Quarry, Italy; showing its characteristic morphology with canal openings in quadrate arrangement, indicated by the white arrow. Coin for scale is 22 mm in diameter.

Fig. 10 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 10. Percent similarity (A) and Jaccard similarity (B) measurements between bulk and museum collection material at different taxonomic levels.

Fig. 3 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 3. Bulk collection of Eocene sponges at Lovara Quarry. Some of the sponge specimens are indicated by white arrows.

Fig. 1 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 1. Sponge fossils from the Eocene of Chiampo. A. The lyssacinosid Stauractinella eocenica Frisone, Pisera, and Preto, 2016. B. The lychniscosid Callicylix eocenicus Pisera and Busquets, 2002. C. The lithistid demosponge Platychonia sp. D. The hexactinosid Laocoetis patula Pomel, 1872. Scale bars 10 mm. Photos S. Castelli.