Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

359

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

359 results for “native bee”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo40/100

Figure 2. A in Exotic and predatory: a spider (Araneae: Salticidae) that preys on native stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) in Brazil

Figure 2. A. Nest in PVC pipe. B, C, D, E. Menemerus bivitattus (Dufour, 1831) on the move to prey on the sentinels of Nannotrigona (Nannotrigona) testceicornis (Lepeletier, 1836). / A. Nido en tubo de PVC. B, C, D, E. Menemerus bivitattus (Dufour, 1831) en movimiento para aprovecharse de los centinelas de Nannotrigona (Nannotrigona) testceicornis (Lepeletier, 1836).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1 in Exotic and predatory: a spider (Araneae: Salticidae) that preys on native stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) in Brazil

Figure 1. Location map of the natural nest of Nannotrigona (Nannotrigona) testceicornis (Lepeletier, 1836), in the neighborhood of Pituba, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. / Mapa de ubicación del nido natural de Nannotrigona (Nannotrigona) testceicornis (Lepeletier, 1836), en el barrio de Pituba, Salvador,

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2023View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 2. The 2019 in Wild bee pollinators foraging in peanut and cotton adjacent to native wildflower strips

Fig. 2. The 2019 mean (± SE) of bees per bee bowl captured in cotton and those with cotton pollen and unidentified pollen (= other) (a), and the mean (± SE) of bees per bee bowl captured in cotton with G. pulchella (IB), Monarda citriodora (mint), and Rudbeckia hirta (susan) (b).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1. The 2018 in Wild bee pollinators foraging in peanut and cotton adjacent to native wildflower strips

Fig. 1. The 2018 mean (± SE) of bees per bee bowl captured in peanut and those with peanut pollen (a), and the mean (± SE) of bees per bee bowl captured in peanut with Gaillardia pulchella (IB), and both G. pulchella and peanut pollen (b).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →
zenodo40/100

Figs 2, 3 in Native bee fauna of tomato crops: a comparison of active sampling and pan trapping methods

Figs 2, 3. Richness (Fig. 2) and abundance (Fig. 3) of flower visiting bees sampled bY different pan trap colors in nine tomato crops in GoiÁs state, BraZil. Boxplots represent means while vertical lines represent the 95% confidence interval. Each point represents value for each sampling unit.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2019View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1 in Behavioral repertoires and interactions between Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the native bee Lithurgus littoralis (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in flowers of Opuntia huajuapensis (Cactaceae) in the Tehuacán desert

Fig. 1. Behavior accumulation curves of bees in 150 flowers of Opuntia huajuapensis. A: Apis mellifera (1) and Lithurgus littoralis (2). B: L. littoralis females (3) and L. littoralis males (4). Dotted lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 2 in Behavioral repertoires and interactions between Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and the native bee Lithurgus littoralis (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in flowers of Opuntia huajuapensis (Cactaceae) in the Tehuacán desert

Fig. 2. Time spent (A) and mean feeding duration (B) in flowers of Opuntia huajuapensis by Apis mellifera females and Lithurgus littoralis females and males. No A. mellifera males were recorded at any time during the experiment. Vertical bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1 in Ecological impact and population status of non-native bees in a Brazilian urban environment

Figure 1 Bipartite network and non-native bees sampled in Curitiba. a) Bipartite network, non-native plant and bees colored, b) Anthidium manicatum, female; c) Distributional range of A. manicatum (SpeciesLink); d) Melipona scutellaris worker on Calliandra brevipes; e) Distributional range of M. scutellaris (SpeciesLink), natural records in green.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Linked collectors and determiners for: USGS PWRC - Native Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab (BIML).

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "USGS PWRC - Native Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab (BIML)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/f519367d-6b9d-411c-b319-99424741e7de">https://bionomia.net/dataset/f519367d-6b9d-411c-b319-99424741e7de</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/f519367d-6b9d-411c-b319-99424741e7de">https://gbif.org/dataset/f519367d-6b9d-411c-b319-99424741e7de</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Linked collectors and determiners for: New records and range extensions of several species of native bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) from Mississippi.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "New records and range extensions of several species of native bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) from Mississippi". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/6bccbb3f-e095-4f54-b1f2-a1be8837e69c">https://bionomia.net/dataset/6bccbb3f-e095-4f54-b1f2-a1be8837e69c</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/6bccbb3f-e095-4f54-b1f2-a1be8837e69c">https://gbif.org/dataset/6bccbb3f-e095-4f54-b1f2-a1be8837e69c</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Linked collectors and determiners for: Native Bee Inventory of Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge.

Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Native Bee Inventory of Missisquoi National Wildlife Refuge". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/0a4996f4-f2ec-471e-ad46-43e04df1f0d4">https://bionomia.net/dataset/0a4996f4-f2ec-471e-ad46-43e04df1f0d4</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/0a4996f4-f2ec-471e-ad46-43e04df1f0d4">https://gbif.org/dataset/0a4996f4-f2ec-471e-ad46-43e04df1f0d4</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →
dryad40/100

Data from: Fitness costs and benefits of a non-native floral resource for subalpine solitary bees

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2025View details →
dryad40/100

Planting native wildflowers improves vacant land as bee habitat in a post-industrial city

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2025View details →
edi40/100

Native Bee and Nectar-Producing Plant Community Data from Iowa and Missouri (2017-2018)

The majority of tallgrass prairie in the American Midwest has been lost, largely due to extensive conversion to agriculture, with negative impacts on prairie-dependent taxa. Pastureland managed with both periodic fire and grazing (“pyric herbivory”) to mirror historic disturbance shows promise as a tool to restore grassland species’ diversity. The benefits of pyric herbivory management to the abundance and diversity of grassland insect pollinators has been demonstrated at "site" level but finer spatial scale benefits remain unclear. These data focus on native bee communities and nectar-producing flower abundance within sites either managed with graze and burn (same fire schedule as burn only but with cattle grazing) or patch-burn graze (grazing by cattle with a burn on one third of the site every year). The graze and burn sites were further managed against an invasive grass (tall fescue; Schedonorus arundinaceus) where one third of the site was left as a control, two thirds were sprayed with the herbicide glyphosate in 2014 and one of those two thirds was also seeded with native prairie plants the following spring. Native bees and flowers were sampled from May to August 2017 and 2018 on six sites in southern Iowa (Ringgold Co.) and norther Missouri (Harrison Co.).

openCC (other)Sep 2022View details →
dryad36/100

Molecular sequencing and morphological identification reveal similar patterns in native bee communities across private and public grasslands of eastern North Dakota

<p>Bees play a key role in the functioning of human-modified and natural ecosystems by pollinating agricultural crops and wild plant communities. Global pollinator conservation efforts need large-scale and long-term monitoring to detect changes in species' demographic patterns and shifts in bee community structure. The objective of this project was to test a molecular sequencing pipeline that would utilize a commonly used locus, produce accurate and precise identifications consistent with morphological identifications, and generate data that are both qualitative and quantitative. We applied this amplicon sequencing pipeline to native bee communities sampled across Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) lands and native grasslands in eastern North Dakota. We found the 28S LSU locus to be more capable of discriminating between species than the 18S SSU rRNA locus, and in some cases even resolved instances of cryptic species or morphologically ambiguous species complexes. Overall, we found the amplicon sequencing method to be a qualitatively accurate representation of the sampled bee community richness and species identity, especially when a well-curated database of known 28S LSU sequences is available. Both morphological identification and molecular sequencing revealed similar patterns in native bee community structure across CRP lands and native prairie. Additionally, a genetic algorithm approach to compute taxon-specific correction factors using a small subset of the most concordant samples demonstrated that a high level of quantitative accuracy could be possible if the specimens are fresh and processed soon after collection. Here we provide a first step to a molecular pipeline for identifying insect pollinator communities. This tool should prove useful for future national monitoring efforts as use of molecular tools becomes more affordable and as numbers of 28S LSU sequences for pollinator species increase in publicly-available databases.</p>

opencc-zeroDec 2019View details →
dryad36/100

Characterization of Salix nigra floral insect community and activity of three native Andrena bees

<i>Salix nigra</i> (black willow) is a widespread tree that hosts many species of polylectic hymenopterans and oligolectic bees of the genus <i>Andrena</i>. The early flowering of <i>S. nigra</i> makes it an important nutritive resource for insects emerging from hibernation. However, since <i>S. nigra</i> is dioecious, not all insect visits will lead to successful pollination. Using both visual observation and pan-trapping we characterized the community of insects that visited <i>S. nigra</i> flowers and assessed differences among male and female trees as well as the chemical and visual drivers that influenced community composition across three years. We found that male trees consistently supported higher diversity of insects than female trees and only three insect species, all <i>Andrena spp.</i>, consistently visited both sexes. Additionally, <i>A. nigrae</i>, which was the only insect that occurred more on female than male flowers, correlated strongly to volatile cues. This suggests that cross-pollinators cue into specific aspects of floral scent, but diversity of floral visitors is driven strongly by visual cues of yellow male pollen. Through time the floral activity of two <i>Andrena</i> species remained stable, but <i>A. nigrae</i> visited less in 2017 when flowers bloomed earlier than other years. When native bee emergence does not synchronize with bloom, activity appears to be diminished which could threaten species that subsist on a single host. Despite the community diversity of <i>S. nigra</i> flowers, its productivity depends on a small fraction of species that are not threatened by competition, but rather by rapidly changing conditions that lead to host-insect asynchrony.

opencc-zeroMar 2022View details →
zenodo36/100

Fig. 2 in Use of crape myrtle, Lagerstroemia (Myrtales: Lythraceae), cultivars as a pollen source by native and non-native bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Quincy, Florida

Fig. 2. Bahiagrass quadrat positions.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo36/100

Fig. 3 in Use of crape myrtle, Lagerstroemia (Myrtales: Lythraceae), cultivars as a pollen source by native and non-native bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Quincy, Florida

Fig. 3. Isolines depicting Bombus impatiens aggregations and gaps in bahiagrass on 23 Jul 2010.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo36/100

Fig. 4 in Use of crape myrtle, Lagerstroemia (Myrtales: Lythraceae), cultivars as a pollen source by native and non-native bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Quincy, Florida

Fig. 4. Isolines depicting Bombus impatiens distributions in crape myrtle on 21 Jul 2010.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
dryad36/100

Spillover of chalkbrood fungi to native solitary bee species from non-native congeners

<p>Introduced, managed bees such as mason bees (genus <em>Osmia</em>) can confer significant pollination benefits to agricultural systems, but a risk of introducing non-native species into new ecosystems is the co-introduction of pathogens along with them. Pathogen spillover to wild, native bees may then drive native bee species declines.</p> <p>This study examined prevalence of the chalkbrood-causing fungal genus <em>Ascosphaera</em> in the nests of both non-native and native mason bee species. We conducted large-scale trap-nesting and pan-trapping efforts across the Mid-Atlantic United States with community scientists. Using molecular methods, nests were screened for all known <em>Ascosphaera</em> species in which genetic sequences have been published. After finding <em>Ascosphaera</em> species first described in Asia, we compared their local prevalence with the local abundance of mason bees from Asia. Lastly, we compared the prevalence of co-introduced Ascosphaera species across sites with a variety of landcover profiles.</p> <p>Results indicate species originally described in Japan, <em>Ascosphaera naganensis</em> and <em>Ascosphaera fusiformis</em>, are now present in native Virginia mason bees, <em>Osmia lignaria</em> and <em>Osmia georgica</em>, with high prevalence of <em>A. naganensis</em> found in <em>O. georgica</em>.</p> <p>We also found that the declining native mason bee <em>O. georgica</em> experienced higher prevalence of non-native <em>Ascosphaera</em> spp. at sites with larger numbers of non-native <em>O. cornifrons</em> and <em>O. taurus</em>, perhaps indicating greater likelihood of spillover of these <em>Ascosphaera</em> species with greater sources of transmission. Lastly, when the proportion of agricultural landcover surrounding bee nests was high, there was significantly greater prevalence of non-native <em>Ascosphaera</em> in <em>O. georgica</em> compared to more natural landcover types.</p> <p>Synthesis and applications. Through community science programming, we documented species of Japanese chalkbrood fungi inside native mason bee nests in North America. Native mason bees encounter non-native fungi more frequently with increasing abundance of non-native mason bees. Agricultural landscapes may exacerbate spillover of non-native fungi for native mason bees. The use of non-native bee species in agriculture should involve monitoring native bees for pathogens in the surrounding area for detection of spillover and species declines.</p>

opencc-zeroMar 2023View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record