Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 26 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 26. Eutrichodesmus incisus sp. n., ♂ paratype from Tiao Shuz Dong Cave; A, leg 9, caudal view; B & C, right gonopod, mesal and lateral views, respectively (dp = distofemoral process). − Scale bar: A, 0.2 mm, B, C, 0.1 mm.

Figure 25 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 25. Eutrichodesmus incisus sp. n., ♂ paratype from Liao Jing Ling Cave; A, gonopods, ventral view; B, distal parts of gonopods, ventral. − Scale bars: A, 0.1 mm & B, 0.05 mm.

Figure 20 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 20. Eutrichodesmus similis sp. n., ♂ paratype from Gui Dong 2 Cave; A, paratergum with ozopore, lateral view; B, leg; C, gonopods, ventral view; D, gonopod apex, ventral view. − Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm & D, 0.05 mm.

Figure 28 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 28. Doratodesmus grandifoliatus (Zhang in Zhang & Wang, 1993), ♀ from Ma Fa Tiao Dong Cave; A, telson, ventrolateral view; B, cross-section of a midbody segment, caudal view; C, head, front view; D, distal part of antenna; E, paratergum with ozopore, lateral view; F, tegument, sublateral view. − Scale bars: A, E, 0.1 mm, B, C, 0.2 mm, D, 0.05 mm & F, 0.01 mm.

Figure 23 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 23. Eutrichodesmus incisus sp. n., ♀ paratype from Tiao Shuz Dong Cave; A, posterior part of body, dorsal view; B, anterior part of body, subventral view; C, midbody segments, ventral view; D, telson, ventral view; E, cross-section of a midbody segment, caudal view; F, paratergum with ozopore, lateral view. − Scale bars: A-C, E, 0.2 mm, D, 0.1 mm & F, 0.05 mm.

Figure 8 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 8. Eutrichodesmus armatocaudatus sp. n., ♂ paratype from cave 4; A & B, right gonopod, mesal and lateral views, respectively (micropilosity not shown; dp = distofemoral process). − Scale bar: 0.2 mm.

Figure 30 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 30. Doratodesmus grandifoliatus (Zhang in Zhang & Wang, 1993), ♂ from Ma Fa Tiao Dong Cave; A, leg 9, caudal view; B & C, right gonopod, lateral and mesal views, respectively (sl = solenomere; lo = lateral lobe). − Scale bar: A, 0.2 mm, B, C, 0.1 mm.

Figure 7 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 7. Eutrichodesmus armatocaudatus sp. n., ♂ paratype from cave 4; A, body segments 6 and 7, ventral view; B, gonopods, ventral view; C, same, ventral view; D, gonopod apices. − Scale bars: A, 0.5 mm, B, 0.2 mm, C, 0.05 mm & D, 0.02 mm.

Figure 3 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 3. Eutrichodesmus basalis sp. n., ♀ paratype; A, enlarged paraterga with ozopores, lateral view; B, bisegmented seta; C, tegument texture; D, limbus and adjacent parts; E, claw. − Scale bars: A, 0.05 mm, B, D, E, 0.01 mm, C, 0.02 mm.

Figure 6 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 6. Eutrichodesmus armatocaudatus sp. n., ♂ paratype from cave 4; A, anterior part of body, frontoventral view; B, cross-section of a midbody segment, caudal view; C, enlarged paraterga with ozopores, lateral view; D, paratergum with porostele, caudal view; E, porostele; F, texture of prozonite and limbus; G, cerotegument with a bisegmented seta. − Scale bars: A, B, 0.2 mm, C, D, 0.1 mm, E, G, 0.01 mm & F, 0.05 mm.

Figure 2 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 2. Eutrichodesmus basalis sp. n., ♀ paratype; A, anterior part of body, frontodorsal view; B, head, front view; C, antenna; D, cross-section of a midbody segment, caudal view; E, posterior part of body, ventral view; F, legs, ventral view. − Scale bars: A, B, D, E, 0.1 mm & C, F, 0.05 mm.

Figure 4 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 4. Eutrichodesmus basalis sp. n., ♂ paratype; A, leg 9, caudal view; B & C, left gonopod, mesal and lateral views, respectively (dp = distofemoral process). − Scale bar: A, 0.2 mm, B, C, 0.1 mm.

Figure 5 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 5. Eutrichodesmus armatocaudatus sp. n., ♂ paratype from cave 4; A, habitus, lateral view; B, midbody segments, lateral view; C, posterior part of body, lateral view; D, midbody segments, ventral view; E, posterior part of body, ventral view; F, telson, ventral view. − Scale bars: A, 1.0 mm, B, C, E, 0.2 mm, D, 0.5 mm & F, 0.1 mm.

Fig. 16 in Contributions to the knowledge of Formicidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata): a new diagnosis of the family, the first global male-based key to subfamilies, and a treatment of early branching lineages

Fig. 16. Male representatives of three subfamilies. A–B. Formica wheeleri, Formicinae (U.S.A., CASENT0173024, A. Nobile). C–D. Rhytidoponera, Ectatomminae, ectaheteromorph clade (Australia, CASENT0004610, A. Nobile). E–F. Pogonomyrmex rastratus (Argentina, CASENT0172673, A. Nobile). Scale bars: A, C = 0.5 mm, B, D, F = 1.0 mm, E = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 9 in Contributions to the knowledge of Formicidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata): a new diagnosis of the family, the first global male-based key to subfamilies, and a treatment of early branching lineages

Fig. 9. Apomyrma CD01, male, photomicrographs. A. Forewing. B. Hindwing. C. Abdominal sternum IX, ventral view. D. Genital capsule, dorsal view. E. Genital valves, slightly splayed and without cupula, ventral view. F. Genital capsule, lateral view. G. Volsella and paramere, mesal view. H. Penisvalva in situ, mesal view. Scale bars: A–B = 0.5 mm, C–H = 0.1 mm. Abbreviations: see Material and Methods.

Fig. 10 in Contributions to the knowledge of Formicidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata): a new diagnosis of the family, the first global male-based key to subfamilies, and a treatment of early branching lineages

Fig. 10. Representative males of Leptanillinae, lateral view A. Protanilla "TH01" (Thailand, CASENT0119776, A. Nobile), arrow indicates loss of abdominal segment II petiolation. B. Protanilla "TH03" (Thailand, CASENT0119791, E. Prado). C. Leptanilla swani (Australia, CASENT0172318, A. Nobile). D. Protanilla sp. (Indonesia, CASENT0178838, A. Nobile), arrow indicates basolateral basimeral process. E. Scyphodon sp. (Indonesia, MCZ155112w, A. Nobile). F. Noonilla sp., used with permission from Petersen (1968). Scale bars: A, C, E–F = 0.2 mm, D = 0.5 mm, B = 1.0 mm.

Fig. 12 in Contributions to the knowledge of Formicidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata): a new diagnosis of the family, the first global male-based key to subfamilies, and a treatment of early branching lineages

Fig. 12. Martialis heureka Rabeling & Verhaagh, 2008, male, wing photomicrographs and genitalia illustrations, genital membranes not shown. A. Forewing. B. Hindwing. C. Abdominal sternum IX, ventral view. D. Genital capsule, dorsal view. E. Genital capsule, ventral view. F. Genital capsule, lateral view. G. Volsella and paramere, mesal view. H. Penisvalva in situ, mesal view. Scale bars: A–B = 0.5 mm, C–H = 0.1 mm. Abbreviations: see Material and Methods.

Fig. 15 in Contributions to the knowledge of Formicidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata): a new diagnosis of the family, the first global male-based key to subfamilies, and a treatment of early branching lineages

Fig. 15. Male representatives of three subfamilies. A, D. Frontal view. B–C, E. Lateral view. — A–B. Pseudomyrmex holmgreni, Pseudomyrmecinae (Paraguay, CASENT0173758, A. Nobile). C. Aneuretus simoni, Aneuretinae, used with permission from Wilson et al. (1956). D–E. Technomyrmex difficilis, Dolichoderinae (Madagascar, CASENT0049968, A. Nobile). Scale bars: A, D = 0.2 mm, B = 1.0 mm, E = 0.5 mm, no scale available for C.

Fig. 14 in Contributions to the knowledge of Formicidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata): a new diagnosis of the family, the first global male-based key to subfamilies, and a treatment of early branching lineages

Fig. 14. Male representatives of three subfamilies. A, C, E. Frontal view. B, D, F. Lateral view. — A–B. Proceratium creek, Proceratiinae (U.S.A., CASENT010441, A. Nobile). C–D. Acanthostichus, Dorylinae (French Guiana, CASENT0056970, A. Nobile). E–F. Myrmecia chasei, Myrmeciinae (Australia, CASENT0903663, W. Ericson). Scale bars: A, C = 0.2 mm, B, E = 0.5 mm, D = 1.0 mm, E = 2.0 mm.

Fig. 4. Male morphology. A–C. Abdominal sternum IX in Contributions to the knowledge of Formicidae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata): a new diagnosis of the family, the first global male-based key to subfamilies, and a treatment of early branching lineages

Fig. 4. Male morphology. A–C. Abdominal sternum IX in ventral view. B. Oblique. D–E. Petiole in lateral view. F. Forewing in dorsal view. G–H. Propodeum in lateral view. — A. Aenictogiton indet. (Zambia, CASENT0106126, M. Branstetter). B. Cerapachys "parasyscia" lineage (Kenya, B. Boudinot). C. Emeryopone buttelreepeni (Thailand, CASENT0278779, B. Boudinot). D. Paraponera clavata (?Panama, B. Boudinot). E. Cerapachys lividus (Madagascar, CASENT0138502, D. Raharinjanahary). F. Phaulomyrma indet. (Thailand, UCRENT150358, A. Nobile). G. Leptanillinae indet. (Thailand, CASENT0156249, B. Boudinot); arrow indicates dorsal margin of petiolar foramen. H. Adelomyrmex dentivagans; arrow indicates propodeal lobe. All scale bars = 0.2 mm, except D–E = 1.0 mm.