Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 6 in Investigating the risk of non-indigenous species introduction through ship hulls in Chile

Figure 6. Distribution of the COI haplotypes of Ciona robusta per sample, with their number indicated in the barplot. For each sample, the number of specimens is indicated in parentheses. The correspondence between the haplotypes found in this study, and those referenced in GenBank is given in Table S3.

Figure 2 in Investigating the risk of non-indigenous species introduction through ship hulls in Chile

Figure 2. Location of the different areas of the vessel from which the samples were obtained. Protected areas: sea box, rope guard, water discharge holes, top of the rudder and the Kort nozzle. Exposed areas: bilge keel, the helm in general and the rudder. Modified from Sylvester and MacIsaac (2010).

Figure 5 in Investigating the risk of non-indigenous species introduction through ship hulls in Chile

Figure 5. Taxa richness recorded in the Talcahuano port on settlement plates made of different types of materials and maintained at different depths for two months total, considering the two periods of time. Values include averages and ± one standard error.

Figure 1 in Investigating the risk of non-indigenous species introduction through ship hulls in Chile

Figure 1. The black circle corresponds to the locality where the sampling was carried out in each type of sampling (ships, settlement plates in the port of Talcahuano and natural substrates in the El Manzano pier).

Figure 3. Graphical representation using a in Investigating the risk of non-indigenous species introduction through ship hulls in Chile

Figure 3. Graphical representation using a nMDS based on Bray-Curtis distances, of the taxa assemblages in each sampling type (ships, settlement plates in the Talcahuano port, and natural substrates at El Manzano pier). Stress value is 0.17.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Figure 3 in Unambiguous identification of the non-indigenous species Cynoscion regalis (Sciaenidae) from Portugal

Figure 3. – Left (lateral view) and right (mesial view) sagittae of Cynoscion regalis, MNHN-ICOT-01951. Scale bar = 1 cm.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Figure 1 in Unambiguous identification of the non-indigenous species Cynoscion regalis (Sciaenidae) from Portugal

Figure 1. – Map of the area showing localities of captured Cynoscion regalis: (*) in Setubal, Portugal, 2015; (+) in the Gulf of Cadiz, Spain, 2011.

FIG. 3 in Records of Lophocladia trichoclados (C.Agardh) F.Schmitz (Rhodophyta), a non-indigenous species, in eastern Provence and Corsica (France, Mediterranean Sea)

FIG. 3. — Portion of the axis of Lophocladia trichoclados (C.Agardh) F.Schmitz showing, on the bottom right side, the insertion of a twisted stichidium on the basal cell of a coloured trichoblast. From specimen H8344 (Marseille University Herbarium – HCOM). La Gabinière Islet, 6 m depth (December 15th, 2021). Photo: © Marc Verlaque in Boudouresque et al. (2022), as L. lallemandii (Montagne) F.Schmitz. Scale bar: 200 µm.

FIG. 2 in Records of Lophocladia trichoclados (C.Agardh) F.Schmitz (Rhodophyta), a non-indigenous species, in eastern Provence and Corsica (France, Mediterranean Sea)

FIG. 2. — Lophocladia trichoclados (C.Agardh) F.Schmitz carpeting a rocky reef, 7 m depth, west side of La Gabinière Islet, Port-Cros National Park, eastern Provence, on November 27th, 2022. Photo: © Claude Lefebvre.

FIG. 1 in Records of Lophocladia trichoclados (C.Agardh) F.Schmitz (Rhodophyta), a non-indigenous species, in eastern Provence and Corsica (France, Mediterranean Sea)

FIG. 1. — New records of Lophocladia trichoclados (C.Agardh) F.Schmitz, in the northwestern Mediterranean Sea.

FIG. 4 in Records of Lophocladia trichoclados (C.Agardh) F.Schmitz (Rhodophyta), a non-indigenous species, in eastern Provence and Corsica (France, Mediterranean Sea)

FIG. 4. — Lophocladia trichoclados (C.Agardh) F.Schmitz (as L. lallemandii (Montagne) F.Schmitz)). Specimen H8345 (Marseille University Herbarium – HCOM). Collected in the Gulf of Aiacciu (Ajaccio) by Karine Lerissel on November 6th, 2021. We have chosen not to modify the original label of the voucher. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Fig. 12 in New and non-indigenous species of Bryozoa from Iberian waters

Fig. 12. Iberian distribution of the species treated in the present paper (see legends in the figures). A. Arbopercula angulata (Levinsen, 1909) and Caberea cantabra sp. nov. B. Species of Hincksina Norman, 1903.

Fig. 2 in New and non-indigenous species of Bryozoa from Iberian waters

Fig. 2. Arbopercula angulata (Levinsen, 1909) (MHNUSC-Bry 643), Menorca (Balearic Islands). A–B. View of part of large colony on plastic. C–E. Autozooids with fewer and less-developed spines. F. Second layer of spineless autozooids covering the first layer of spiny zooids. G. Autozooids of the growing margin with developing gymnocystal processes.

Fig. 5 in New and non-indigenous species of Bryozoa from Iberian waters

Fig. 5. Hincksina flustroides (Hincks, 1877) (MHNUSC-Bry 617), Cíes Islands (Galicia, NW Spain). A. Autozooids and avicularia. B. Ovicelled zooids.

Fig. 7 in New and non-indigenous species of Bryozoa from Iberian waters

Fig. 7. Hincksina elephantina sp. nov., holotype (MHNUSC 10127), La Línea, Andalucía (Strait of Gibraltar). A. Young autozooids at the growing edge, showing the development of oral and marginal spines. B. Group of autozooids, avicularia and an ovicell immersed in a distal autozooid (arrow). C. Detail of an autozooid with stout oral spines. D. Cluster of avicularia on a concavity and autozooids with developed oral spines. E. Detail of a cluster of avicularia. F. Cluster of avicularia on a convexity. G. Several ovicells in distal avicularia and autozooid; note developed proximal peak.

Fig. 4 in New and non-indigenous species of Bryozoa from Iberian waters

Fig. 4. Arbopercula tenella (Hincks, 1880), holotype (NHMUK 1899.5.1.648), Florida (USA). A. View of colony. Note the autozooids with well-developed proximal cryptocyst and gymnocystal processes. B. Autozooid with multiporous rosette-plates in basal corners of distal wall. (Photos by M.E. Spencer Jones).

Fig. 8 in New and non-indigenous species of Bryozoa from Iberian waters

Fig. 8. Hincksina chimaera sp. nov., Alboran Island. A–C. Paratype (MNCN 25.03/2412). D–F. Holotype (MNCN 25.03/2450). A. Growing edge of colony showing interzooidal avicularia and autozooids. Note the thin spines, some bifurcated. B. Detail showing avicularia, oral spines and bifurcated spines (bottom left). C. Ovicells immersed in avicularia and in distal autozooid. D. Ovicelled zooids and avicularia. Note two ovicells associated with the same avicularium and flattened marginal spines. E. Ovicelled zooids and avicularia. Note the developed central peak in the ovicell. F. Flattened marginal and oral spines.

Fig. 3 in New and non-indigenous species of Bryozoa from Iberian waters

Fig. 3. Arbopercula angulata (Levinsen, 1909) (MHNUSC-Bry 643), Menorca (Balearic Islands). A. Autozooids with well-developed spines and gymnocystal processes. B. Multiporous rosette-plates. C. Spineless autozooids. D. Second layer of spineless autozooids covering the first layer of spiny zooids.

Fig. 1 in New and non-indigenous species of Bryozoa from Iberian waters

Fig. 1. Arbopercula angulata (Levinsen, 1909), holotype (NHMD-77254), Koh Samet (Gulf of Thailand). A. Autozooids with well-developed spines and gymnocystal processes. B–C. Autozooids with fewer, poorly developed spines and gymnocystal processes. D. Autozooids without spines and gymnocystal processes.

Fig. 10 in New and non-indigenous species of Bryozoa from Iberian waters

Fig. 10. Caberea cantabra sp. nov. A–C, F–G. Holotype (MHNUSC 10128). A. Frontal view of branching pattern. B. Branching pattern. C. Detail of autozooids. D. Paratype (MNHN-IB-2008-6926), ovicelled zooids. E. Paratype (MNHN-IB-2008-6935), basal vibracula. F. Basal view of branching pattern. G. Basal view with developed rhizoids.