Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
13,770
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
13,770 results for “performance”
ATEPP: A Dataset of Automatically Transcribed Expressive Piano Performance
<p>ATEPP is a dataset of expressive piano performances by virtuoso pianists. The dataset contains 11742 11677 performances (~1000 hours) by 49 pianists and covers 1580 movements by 25 composers. All of the MIDI files in the dataset come from the piano transcription of existing audio recordings of piano performances. Scores in MusicXML format are also available for around half of the tracks. The dataset is organized and aligned by compositions and movements for comparative studies. For more details, please check <a href="https://github.com/BetsyTang/ATEPP">here</a>. </p>
Data, scripts, and R Notebook for Carneiro et al 2023. Flight performance and wing morphology in the bat Carollia perspicillata: biophysical models and energetics. Integrative Zoology DOI:10.1111/1749-4877.12707
<p>Files provided as supporting information for the paper by Carneiro et al. 2023. Flight performance and wing morphology in the bat <em>Carollia perspicillata</em>: biophysical models and energetics. Integrative Zoology. DOI:10.1111/1749-4877.12707</p> <p>File descriptions</p> <p>ArmTA.txt - Temperature and surface areas for arms of <em>C. perspicillata</em> after flight experiment<br> BodyTA.txt - Temperature and surface areas for body of <em>C. perspicillata</em> after flight experiment<br> HeadTA.txt - Temperature and surface areas for head of <em>C. perspicillata</em> after flight experiment<br> WingTA.txt - Temperature and surface areas for wings (patagium) of <em>C. perspicillata</em> after flight experiment<br> WingMorph.txt - Morphological variables measured in the body and wings of <em>C. perspicillata</em><br> HeatLoss.R - Function to estimate heat loss (Qt)<br> PowFlight.R - Function to estimate minimum power required to fly<br> Script-HeatLoss-FlightPerformance.R - R script with set of analyses performed<br> SupportingInformationFile.docx - R notebook with set of analyses performed, word format<br> SupportingInformationFile.nb.html - R notebook with set of analyses performed, html format<br> SupportingInformationFile.Rmd - R notebook with set of analyses performed (R markdown)</p> <p>For the R scripts (Script-HeatLoss-FlightPerformance.R) and notebook (<br> SupportingInformationFile.Rmd) to work and be compiled, all files need to be copied to the same folder.</p>
Performance Criteria and Example Parameter Sets Comparing Different Variants of the Ensemble Kalman Filter as Applied to Volcanology
<p>This dataset contains the results of various Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF) inversions in which synthetic GNSS and InSAR observations from an inflating magma system are assimilated into numerical models of rock deformation around a pressurized ellipsoidal magma reservoir. Each inversion uses a different variant of the EnKF, with changes to workflow meta-parameters such as the number of ensemble members or the particular update algorithm used. In particular, each filter variant is evaluated by comparing the final output model to the original synthetic model. The specific performance criteria used include (1) the root mean square error (RMSE) between the model predictions and the assimilated observations, as well as normalized misfit terms measuring the filter's ability to resolve (2) reservoir wall tensile stress, (3) easily-observable unique parameters such as reservoir position and aspect ratio, and (4) difficult-to-derive non-unique parameters such as the specific size and internal pressure of the reservoir. The assimilated data include two different scenarios, one in which inflation is caused by pressurization and another in which it is driven by a lateral reservoir expansion. Both datasets are tested with each EnKF variant. Finally, we include example matrices from within an EnKF update step to demonstrate inter-parameter correlations that develop during the assimilation and how they can be mitigated through randomization.</p>
Data from: Effects of plastic fragments on plant performance are mediated by soil properties and drought
<p>In recent years, the effects of plastic contamination on soil and plants have received growing attention. Plastic can affect soil water content and thus may interact with the effects of drought on soil and plants. However, the effects of plastic on soil are highly context-dependent, and interactions with drought have been hardly tested. We conducted two greenhouse experiments to test the combined effects of plastic fragments (of varying size and concentration), water availability and soil texture, on soil water content and performance of the plant <em>Arabidopsis thaliana</em>. Plastic fragments had stronger negative effects on soil water content in low water availability, and the shape of this response (linear <em>vs.</em> unimodal) was mediated by soil texture. Conversely, increasing concentration of plastic had positive effects on plant growth. We suggest that plastic fragments introduce fracture points within soil aggregates. This increases number and size of soil pores favoring water loss but also facilitating root growth. Our results suggest complex interactive effects of plastic and drought, that may lead to a decoupling of plant and soil response. These processes should be taken into account in ecological studies and agricultural practices.</p>
MedAID_Key performance indicators for gilthead seabream on-growing under summer temperatures
<p>This data set contains the results from a nutritional trial performed at the Centre of Marine Sciences of Algarve (CCMAR, Faro, Portugal) within the framework of WP2 of the MedAID project (Mediterranean Aquaculture Integrated Development, Horizon 2020, GA number 727315). This experiment evaluated the impacts of protein to lipid ratios in low fishmeal/fish oil diets on key performance indicators of gilthead seabream (<em>Sparus aurata</em>, initial weight: 100 g ± 7 g) on-grown during summer temperature conditions. For further information on experimental conditions, please refer to the publication: “Aragão C., Cabano M., Colen R., Teodósio R., Gisbert E., Dias J. and Engrola S., 2022. Modulation of dietary protein to lipid ratios for gilthead seabream on-growing during summer temperature conditions. Aquaculture Reports, 25: 101262. doi:10.1016/j.aqrep.2022.101262”. In addition to properly cite this dataset, it would be appreciated that when using this dataset in a publication the original publication is cited.</p>
Hygrothermal performance of ventilated attics in Nordic climate, field study 2021-2022
<p>The dataset contains measured data from a field stufy. The study was performed during years 2021 and 2022 in the test buildings of Tampere University. The measured data contains: 1. Temperature and relative humidity values inside six ventilated attics at 10-minutes intervals 2. Values of carbon dioxide content during air change rate measurements, which were done using carbon dioxide as a tracer gas. </p>
Catalyst Supraparticles: Tuning the Structure of Spray‐Dried Pt/SiO2 Supraparticles via Salt‐Based Colloidal Manipulation to Control their Catalytic Performance
<p>This data publication is based on the metadata and raw datasets underlying the manuscript: P. Groppe, J. Reichstein, S. Carl, C. Cuadrado Collados, B.-J. Niebuur, K. Zhang, B. Apeleo Zubiri, J. Libuda, T. Kraus, T. Retzer, M. Thommes, E. Spiecker, S. Wintzheimer, K. Mandel, Catalyst Supraparticles: Tuning the Structure of Spray-Dried Pt/SiO2 Supraparticles via Salt-Based Colloidal Manipulation to Control their Catalytic Performance. Small 2024, 2310813. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202310813</p> <p>A detailed description of the dataset is given in the attached "Raw data assignment.xlsx"</p>
Dataset of report "A.2.2.6: Validation of the fitness of purpose of the performance assessment protocol developed in A2.1.4 by demonstrating its applicability for 2 terpenes using TD-GC/MS/FID and the static standards produced in A1.1.2."
<p>Dataset of report "A.2.2.6: Validation of the fitness of purpose of the performance assessment protocol developed in A2.1.4 by demonstrating its applicability for 2 terpenes using TD-GC/MS/FID and the static standards produced in A1.1.2."</p>
Design of an Ontology-Driven Constraint Tester (ODCT) and Application to SAREF & Smart Energy Appliances: Datasets, SHACL Shapes, Demo Video of Web Application, and Detailed Performance Reports
<h2>Description</h2> <p>This repository presents the resources used for validating the compliance of <strong>smart energy appliances</strong> against the <strong>Smart Appliances REFerence (SAREF)</strong> ontology and its extension <strong>SAREF4ENER</strong>, as part of the <strong>Ontology-Driven Constraint Tester (ODCT)</strong> project. The ODCT tool is specifically designed to ensure <strong>semantic interoperability</strong> and adherence to standardized ontological frameworks, which are crucial for integrating smart devices into modern energy management systems.</p> <h2>ODCT Overview</h2> <p>The <strong>Ontology-Driven Constraint Tester (ODCT)</strong> is a robust framework created to validate datasets against ontologies defined by <strong>SAREF</strong> and <strong>SAREF4ENER</strong>, both established under ETSI SmartM2M. This tool has been applied to the <strong>Flexible Start use case</strong> from the <strong>Joint Research Centre’s (JRC) Code of Conduct for Energy Smart Appliances</strong>. The ODCT tool ensures that smart devices like energy-efficient washing machines, thermostats, and connected lighting operate in compliance with established ontologies, thereby enhancing their <strong>interoperability</strong> within energy management systems and smart grids.</p> <h2>Repository Contents</h2> <p>This repository contains essential resources used in the ODCT compliance testing process:</p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>Compliant Dataset</strong>: This dataset represents a fully compliant scenario where no errors are present in the smart energy appliances’ profiles, demonstrating the ODCT’s accuracy under ideal conditions.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Modified Datasets</strong>: These datasets introduce various types of errors to showcase ODCT’s ability to handle diverse compliance scenarios:</p> <ol> <li><strong>Modified Dataset 1</strong>: Introduces type mismatches and spelling errors in key attributes.</li> <li><strong>Modified Dataset 2</strong>: Contains extraneous properties and missing required properties, including details about energy consumption and efficiency class.</li> <li><strong>Modified Dataset 3</strong>: Includes both extraneous and missing properties, and additional priority levels for energy profiles.</li> </ol> </li> <li> <p><strong>SHACL Shapes</strong>: The SHACL shapes used in the compliance testing for both SAREF and SAREF4ENER ontologies are included in this repository to allow reproducibility of the validation process.</p> </li> </ul> <ul> <li> <p><strong>Error Detection Results and Performance Reports</strong>: After conducting compliance tests using ODCT we got the Results and Performance Reports, the repository includes comprehensive reports detailing the results. These reports highlight the types of errors detected and provide a performance analysis of the tool under various scenarios.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>Demonstration Video</strong>: A video is provided to guide users through the <strong>ODCT web application</strong>, showcasing how the tool detects errors and generates detailed compliance reports based on smart energy appliance datasets.</p> </li> </ul> <h2>Background</h2> <p>The integration of smart energy appliances into modern power grids is key to improving <strong>energy management</strong> and supporting <strong>sustainability goals</strong> like the <strong>European Green Deal</strong>. However, ensuring that these devices communicate effectively and conform to <strong>standardized protocols</strong> is a challenge. The <strong>ODCT</strong> tool addresses this challenge by providing a rigorous, ontology-based validation framework that is both <strong>protocol-agnostic</strong> and <strong>technology-flexible</strong>.</p> <p>This work is grounded in the broader context of <strong>global warming</strong> and the need for <strong>energy efficiency</strong> and <strong>demand-side flexibility</strong> in energy systems. By ensuring compliance with <strong>SAREF</strong> and <strong>SAREF4ENER</strong>, ODCT supports the EU’s ambitions for <strong>carbon neutrality</strong> by 2050, contributing to a connected, efficient, and sustainable energy ecosystem.</p> <h2>Methodology</h2> <p>ODCT uses a structured methodology that involves:</p> <ol> <li><strong>Generating relevant datasets</strong> for validation.</li> <li><strong>Defining SHACL shape constraints</strong> based on ontologies.</li> <li><strong>Developing a user-friendly web application</strong> to facilitate compliance testing.</li> <li><strong>Performing compliance tests</strong> that validate datasets against SHACL shapes, ensuring interoperability and adherence to energy management standards.</li> </ol> <h2>Why It Matters</h2> <p>Researchers and developers working on smart energy appliances will benefit from ODCT by:</p> <ul> <li>Ensuring their devices meet standardized ontological requirements for <strong>interoperability</strong>.</li> <li>Reducing <strong>compliance issues</strong> in the development phase, leading to smoother integration into energy management systems.</li> <li>Supporting the <strong>sustainability efforts</strong> by enhancing device communication in <strong>smart grids</strong>.</li> </ul> <p>This repository showcases the potential of ODCT in fostering <strong>data accuracy</strong>, <strong>semantic interoperability</strong>, and <strong>compliance</strong> with essential energy standards. It offers comprehensive resources for furthering research and development in the field of smart energy appliances and energy management.</p>
Performance Data of an Ice-Melting Probe from Field Tests in two Different Ice Environments
<p>This dataset was acquired at field tests of the steerable ice-melting probe "EnEx-IceMole" (Dachwald et al., 2014). A field test in summer 2014 was used to test the melting probe's system, before the probe was shipped to Antarctica, where, in international cooperation with the MIDGE project, the objective of a sampling mission in the southern hemisphere summer 2014/2015 was to return a clean englacial sample from the subglacial brine reservoir supplying the Blood Falls at Taylor Glacier (Badgeley et al., 2017, German et al., 2021).</p> <p>The standardized log-files generated by the IceMole during melting operation include more than 100 operational parameters, housekeeping information, and error states, which are reported to the base station in intervals of 4 s. Occasional packet loss in data transmission resulted in a sparse number of increased sampling intervals, which where compensated for by linear interpolation during post processing. The presented dataset is based on a subset of this data: The penetration distance is calculated based on the ice screw drive encoder signal, providing the rate of rotation, and the screw's thread pitch. The melting speed is calculated from the same data, assuming the rate of rotation to be constant over one sampling interval. The contact force is calculated from the longitudinal screw force, which es measured by strain gauges. The used heating power is calculated from binary states of all heating elements, which can only be either switched on or off. Temperatures are measured at each heating element and averaged for three zones (melting head, side-wall heaters and back-plate heaters).</p>
Data from: Trade-offs in Coordination Strategies for Duet Jazz Performances Subject to Network Delay and Jitter
<p>This dataset is associated with the paper “Trade-offs in Coordination Strategies for Duet Jazz Performances Subject to Network Delay and Jitter” and includes recordings of improvisations by jazz duos over a network. The related paper is published in <em>Music Perception</em> and is accessible at <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2024.42.1.48">doi:10.1525/mp.2024.42.1.48</a> </p> <p><strong>Introduction:</strong></p> <p>This dataset includes data from approximately four hours of live, improvised musical duo performances over a simulated network environment collected in Cambridge, United Kingdom between April-July 2022 as part of a doctoral research project. Data includes audio and video recordings of 130 individual performances, biometric data, and subjective evaluations and comments from the musicians. The primary aim of the project was to collect data via a novel performance capture and manipulation system for use in the empirical modelling of ensemble coordination strategies during networked music-making. This analysis is reported in Cheston, Cross, and Harrison (2023), "Trade-offs in Coordination Strategies for Networked Jazz Performances". Please refer to this publication for full details on the data collection procedure. Our codebook is <a href="https://github.com/HuwCheston/Jazz-Jitter-Analysis">hosted on GitHub</a> and, in conjunction with this dataset, can be used to reproduce the analysis contained in the article.</p> <p>The ten musicians shown in these recordings were recruited for their expertise in jazz improvisation. They were grouped into five duos consisting each of one pianist and drummer, with no musician performing in more than one duo. Participants were instructed to improvise together over a standard twelve-bar blues musical structure, but following a formula which required them to provide a clear and unambiguous pulse of continuous quarter notes. Varying amounts of network latency and jitter were simulated for each performance, consisting respectively of the minimum amount of delay applied to the live feedback a musician heard from their partner and the degree that this delay varied. The amount of latency and jitter applied to the performance is summarised in the file or directory name for each performance and is described in detail in the above publication. Note that latency and jitter conditions were presented in a random order for each duo.</p> <p><strong>Data collected includes:</strong></p> <ul> <li>audio recordings for each performance, with and without delay, collected via direct line-in (MIDI, WAV).</li> <li>video recordings, collected via high-quality webcams (MKV, AVI).</li> <li>streams of the quarter note pulse provided by each musician in a performance (MIDI).</li> <li>muxed audio-visual recordings of both participants in each performance (MP4)</li> <li>accelerometer and photoplethysmography streams, collected from arm-worn devices (TXT, duos 3-5 only)</li> <li>questionnaire responses from performers, evaluating each condition (XLSX)</li> <li>ratings of performance quality from an unbiased sample of listeners, collected during an online perceptual study (CSV)</li> </ul> <p><strong>Repository structure:</strong></p> <p><strong><em>NB: please see <a href="https://huwcheston.github.io/Jazz-Jitter-Analysis/getting-started.html">this section of the code documentation website</a> for a full description of how to recreate the analyses and models created in the paper.</em></strong></p> <p>The files <em>data.zip </em>and <em>data.z0*</em> contain all data collected from the study, APART from the perceptual study stimuli & results. To open these files, download the <em>data.zip</em> file and <em><strong>all the corresponding volumes ending in .z0 </strong></em>and open the <em>data.zip</em> file using a tool for opening multi-part zip files, such as WinRAR. <em>Do not try to open the files ending in .z0</em>, otherwise you may get a message about the data being corrupted. Inside <em>data.zip</em>, you'll see the following folders and files:</p> <ul> <li><em>avmanip_output</em>: the raw MIDI, audio, and video output from each performance <ul> <li>the subfolders are organised with a single folder per participant duo, experimental block, and condition.</li> <li>avmanip_output\trial_1\Block 1\Condition 1 - 23 05 relates to the performance of the first duo of participants in the first session of the experiment, in the first condition they encountered, with 23ms of latency and 0.5x jitter.</li> </ul> </li> <li><em>midi_bpm_cleaning</em>: the cleaned MIDI files (quarter note onset positions) <ul> <li>the subfolders are organised similarly to the <em>avmanip_output</em> folder, using the same conventions.</li> </ul> </li> <li><em>muxed_performances</em>: the combined audio-video .mp4 files from each performance <ul> <li>these files are labelled in the format: duo_session_latency_jitter_keysfmt_drumsfmt.</li> <li>muxed_performances\kdelay_ddelay\d1_s1_l23_j00_kdelay_ddelay.mp4 relates to the performance of the first duo of participants in the first session of the experiment, in the first condition they encountered, with 23ms of latency and 0.5x jitter, and with latency and jitter applied to both keys and drummer.</li> <li>for more information on recreating these videos, <a href="https://huwcheston.github.io/Jazz-Jitter-Analysis/getting-started.html#reproduce-combined-audio-visual-stimuli">see the linked section of the code documentation website.</a></li> </ul> </li> <li><em>questionnaire_anonymized</em>: the anonymized questionnaire responses given by participants, also contained in the supplementary material of the associated paper (see preprint).</li> </ul> <p>Alongside <em>data.zip </em>and the <em>data.z0*</em> archives, there are two further loose files, <em>Database View Participant - Dashboard.csv, Database View SuccessTrial - Dashboard.csv, </em>which are the anonymized demographic and response data from the perceptual experiment, and one loose archive folder <em>perceptual_study_videos.rar</em>, which contains the stimuli used in the perceptual experiment.</p> <p>To reproduce the analysis from the paper, all files should be unzipped into the \data\raw directory of the code repository created after <a href="https://github.com/HuwCheston/Jazz-Jitter-Analysis">cloning this from GitHub</a>. For more detail and instructions on installation, <a href="https://huwcheston.github.io/Jazz-Jitter-Analysis/getting-started.html">see the section of the code documentation website linked here</a>.</p> <p><strong>Usage:</strong></p> <p>These recordings of live, improvised duo performances are unattributed and anonymised as agreed with participants at the point of data collection. The musicians involved received a one-off, fixed payment for their time and had their travel expenses reimbursed, with funding provided by Cambridge Digital Humanities (<a href="https://www.cdh.cam.ac.uk/research/projects/newmusicsoftwareplatform/">project page</a>). All participants consented to the use of their recordings for projects by the current authors and for these recordings to be shared with interested members of the music psychology community, with the intention of furthering academic research. The musicians did not intend that the recordings be used for commercial, artistic, or entertainment purposes, and such use is not permitted.</p> <p><strong>Citation:</strong></p> <p>If you use this dataset in your research, please cite the paper it relates to:</p> <pre><code>@article{10.1525/mp.2024.42.1.48, author = {Cheston, Huw and Cross, Ian and Harrison, Peter M. C.}, title = "{Trade-offs in Coordination Strategies for Duet Jazz Performances Subject to Network Delay and Jitter}", journal = {Music Perception}, volume = {42}, number = {1}, pages = {48-72}, year = {2024}, month = {09}, issn = {0730-7829}, doi = {10.1525/mp.2024.42.1.48}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2024.42.1.48}, eprint = {https://online.ucpress.edu/mp/article-pdf/42/1/48/833292/mp.2024.42.1.48.pdf}, }</code></pre> <p><strong>Contact:</strong></p> <p>Huw Cheston - <a href="http://twitter.com/huwcheston/">@huwcheston</a> - hwc31@cam.ac.uk</p>
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Reef Performance Standard - Benthic Algae and Macroinvertebrate Cover, Abundance, and Richness
These data describe annual estimates of the percent cover, abundance, and species richness (evaluated as species density) of benthic macroalgae and macroinvertebrates from replicate transects at three subtidal reefs. Data collection began in 2009 at an artificial reef (Wheeler North Reef in Orange County, CA) and two natural reference reefs (San Mateo Kelp in Orange County, CA and Barn Kelp in San Diego County, CA) to evaluate the ability of Wheeler North Reef to compensate for losses of kelp forest habitat and associated biota caused by the operation of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS).
Quantifying the relation between predator-induced behavior and growth performance in larval anurans, 1999.
Because the nature and magnitude of species interactions are functions of the traits that species possess, understanding how individual traits affect performance is important to our understanding of community structure. To examine the relation between species traits and performance, we first assessed behavioral responses of two larval anurans to three predator species in the laboratory. We then correlated these responses with growth performance of the two anurans when they competed in the field. In the laboratory experiment, larval bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) and green frogs (R. clamitans) exhibited no reduction in activity or spatial avoidance to bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus), moderate reductions in activity and spatial avoidance of mudminnows (Umbra limi ), and large reductions in activity and spatial avoidance of larval dragonflies (Anax spp.). In the field experiment, these behavioral responses were directly related to corresponding reductions in growth of the anuran larvae. Thus, for both species, changes in growth in the field could be correlated to the behavioral responses observed in the laboratory. Further, proportional changes in behavior in the presence of the different predators appeared to be related to changes in competitive relations in the field.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Fish Abundance and Species Richness
These data describe the annual estimates of density of wetland fish (all species combined) and the species richness (as the number of unique species) in six main channel and six tidal creek locations at four coastal wetlands as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration monitoring program to track long-term patterns in species abundance and diversity. This study began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetland in San Diego County, CA, Carpinteria Salt Marsh in Santa Barbara County, CA, and Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County, CA. Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County was added in 2013. Beginning in 2024, Tijuana Estuary was replaced with Los Penasquitos Lagoon in San Diego County, CA.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Bird Abundance and Species Richness
These data describe the annual estimates of bird density and richness (as a species density) in twenty plots at four coastal wetlands as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration monitoring program to track long-term patterns in species abundance and diversity. This study began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetlands and Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County, CA, Carpinteria Salt Marsh in Santa Barbara County, CA, and Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County, CA. Beginning in 2024, Tijuana Estuary was replaced with Los Penasquitos Lagoon in San Diego County, CA.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Bird Food Chain Support
These data describe annual estimates of the density of feeding birds at four coastal wetlands as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration monitoring program to track long-term patterns in food chain support provided to birds. This study began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetlands and Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County, CA, Carpinteria Salt Marsh in Santa Barbara County, CA, and Point Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County. Beginning in 2024, Tijuana Estuary was replaced with Los Penasquitos Lagoon in San Diego County, CA.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Invertebrate Abundance and Richness
These data contain annual estimates of the density of wetland macroinvertebrates (all species combined) and species richness (as a species density) in six main channel and six tidal creek locations at four coastal wetlands as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration monitoring program to track long-term patterns in species abundance and diversity. This study began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetland and Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County, CA, Carpinteria Salt Marsh in Santa Barbara County, CA, and Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County, CA. Beginning in 2024, Tijuana Estuary was replaced with Los Penasquitos Lagoon in San Diego County, CA.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Spartina Canopy
These data describe annual estimates of Spartina foliosa canopy architecture (measured as proportion of stems > 3 ft long) from four locations at two coastal wetlands as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration mitigation monitoring program to track long-term patterns in Spartina size structure. This study began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetlands and Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County, CA. Beginning in 2024, Tijuana Estuary was replaced with Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County, CA.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Water Quality
These data describe annual estimates of wetland water quality, measured as the average duration of hypoxia (time dissolved oxygen concentration below 3 mg/l), collected as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration mitigation monitoring program designed to evaluate compliance of the restoration project with conditions of the SONGS permit. This study began in 2012 in the San Dieguito Wetlands and Tijuana Estuary in San Diego County, CA, Carpinteria Salt Marsh in Santa Barbara County, CA, and Point Mugu Lagoon in Ventura County, CA. Beginning in 2024, Tijuana Estuary was replaced with Los Penasquitos Lagoon in San Diego County, CA.
UCSB SONGS Mitigation Monitoring: Wetland Performance Standard - Tidal Prism
These data describe estimates of tidal prism at the San Dieguito Wetland as part of the SONGS San Dieguito Wetland Restoration mitigation monitoring program to track long-term patterns of tidal prism. This study began in 2012.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.