Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 12 in Revision of the morphology, phylogenetic relationships, behaviour and diversity of the Iberian and Italian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Hybotidae)

Fig. 12. Terminalia of Tachydromia pieltaini (Gil Collado, 1936) from Spain, Asturias, Covadonga (RBINS). A. Right surstylus and right epandrial lamella. B. Epandrium with cerci. C. Left epandrial lamella and left surstylus. D. Right surstylus. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.

Fig. 9 in Revision of the morphology, phylogenetic relationships, behaviour and diversity of the Iberian and Italian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Hybotidae)

Fig. 9. Terminalia of the holotype of Tachydromia lusitanica (Grootaert, Shamshev & Andrade, 2009) from Portugal, Braga, Gilmonde (RBINS). A. Right surstylus. B. Epandrium with cerci. C. Left epandrial lamella and left surstylus. Figure adapted from Grootaert et al. 2009.

Fig. 8 in Revision of the morphology, phylogenetic relationships, behaviour and diversity of the Iberian and Italian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Hybotidae)

Fig. 8. Terminalia of Tachydromia iberica (Arias, 1919) from Portugal, Leiria, Porto de Mós (RBINS). A. Right surstylus and right epandrial lamella. B. Epandrium with cerci. C. Left epandrial lamella and left surstylus. D. Right surstylus. Scale bar: 0.1 mm

Fig. 7 in Revision of the morphology, phylogenetic relationships, behaviour and diversity of the Iberian and Italian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Hybotidae)

Fig. 7. Terminalia of Tachydromia iberica (Arias, 1919) from Spain, Segovia, El Espinar (Central System) (RBINS). A. Right surstylus and right epandrial lamella. B. Epandrium with cerci. C. Left epandrial lamella and left surstylus. D. Right surstylus. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.

Fig. 6 in Revision of the morphology, phylogenetic relationships, behaviour and diversity of the Iberian and Italian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Hybotidae)

Fig. 6. Terminalia of Tachydromia iberica (Arias, 1919) from Spain, Madrid (RBINS). A. Right surstylus and right epandrial lamella. B. Epandrium with cerci. C. Left epandrial lamella and left surstylus. D. Right surstylus. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Revision of the morphology, phylogenetic relationships, behaviour and diversity of the Iberian and Italian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Hybotidae)

Fig. 5. Terminalia of the holotype of Tachydromia ebejeri Gonçalves, Grootaert & Andrade sp. nov., holotype (RBINS). A. Right surstylus and right epandrial lamella. B. Epandrium with cerci. C. Left epandrial lamella and left surstylus. D. Right surstylus. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.

Fig. 4 in Revision of the morphology, phylogenetic relationships, behaviour and diversity of the Iberian and Italian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Hybotidae)

Fig. 4. Terminalia of Tachydromia cantabrica Gonçalves, Grootaert & Andrade sp. nov., holotype (RBINS). A. Right surstylus and right epandrial lamella. B. Epandrium with cerci. C. Left epandrial lamella and left surstylus. D. Right surstylus. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.

Fig. 10 in Revision of the morphology, phylogenetic relationships, behaviour and diversity of the Iberian and Italian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Hybotidae)

Fig. 10. Terminalia of Tachydromia nigrohirta Gonçalves, Grootaert & Andrade sp. nov., holotype (RBINS). A. Right surstylus and right epandrial lamella. B. Epandrium with cerci. C. Left epandrial lamella and left surstylus. D. Right surstylus. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.

Fig. 20 in Revision of the morphology, phylogenetic relationships, behaviour and diversity of the Iberian and Italian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Hybotidae)

Fig. 20. Drawings of the tip of stenopterous wings and images obtained by scanning electron microscope (SEM) of the micropterous wings. Males are pictured in the left column, females in the right. A–B. T. ebejeri Gonçalves, Grootaert & Andrade sp. nov. C–D. T. cantabrica Gonçalves, Grootaert & Andrade sp. nov. E–F. T. lusitanica (Grootaert, Shamshev & Andrade, 2009). G–H. T. nigrohirta Gonçalves, Grootaert & Andrade sp. nov. Scale bars: A–B, D, F, H = 10 µm; C, E, G = 50 µm.

Fig. 3 in Revision of the morphology, phylogenetic relationships, behaviour and diversity of the Iberian and Italian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Hybotidae)

Fig. 3. Terminalia of Tachydromia apterygon Plant & Deeming, 2006 from Italy, Lazio, Posta (RBINS). A. Right surstylus and right epandrial lamella. B. Epandrium with cerci. C. Left epandrial lamella and left surstylus. D. Right surstylus. Scale bar: 0.1 mm.

Fig. 1 in Revision of the morphology, phylogenetic relationships, behaviour and diversity of the Iberian and Italian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Hybotidae)

Fig. 1. Currently known distribution of the Iberian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803. Each dot represents a presence point, with each colour corresponding to a different species. When two species co-occur in the same area, their presence is represented by a smaller dot on top of a dot of regular dimension, each of those with the colour corresponding to the co-occurring species. The dots surrounded by a black circle with a vertical line represent localities previously known.

Fig. 2 in Revision of the morphology, phylogenetic relationships, behaviour and diversity of the Iberian and Italian ant-like Tachydromia Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Hybotidae)

Fig. 2. Maximum-likelihood tree (ln L = -29397.646621) based on the combined dataset (COI, nontrimmed 28S,12S, AATS and PGD) using Garli ver. 2.01.1067 and the structural alignment for 28S. Bootstrap support values (below) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (above) are depicted at the nodes (only> 50 or> 0.5, respectively). Abbreviations: BS = Bootstrap support values; PP = Bayesian posterior probabilities. A greyscale is used to highlight the ingroup, where the darkest shade of grey highlights the Iberian flightless ant-like species of Tachydromia Meigen, 1803, followed by a lighter shade which includes T. apterygon Plant & Deeming, 2006, hence representing all the flightless species occurring in southern Europe and, finally, the lighter shade covers all Tachydromia analysed, including the macropterous species assigned to different species groups sensu Chvála (1970). The white bar indicates the species originally assigned to genus Pieltainia Arias, 1919, while the grey bars indicate the taxa originally assigned to genus different species-groups sensu Chvála (1970).

opencc-zeroMar 2020View details →

dryad40/100

Data from: Differential patterns of floristic phylogenetic diversity across a post-glacial landscape

Abstract: Aim: In this study, we explored spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity and endemism in the flora of Norway and tested hypothesized post-glacial environmental drivers of phylogenetic diversity, including temperature, precipitation, edaphic factors, and time since glacial retreat. Location: Norway. Taxon: Vascular plants (Trachaeophyta). Methods: We produced a multi-locus Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogeny using a combination of newly produced DNA sequences from herbarium specimens and sequences available from public repositories. We combined the phylogeny with species occurrence data to estimate phylogenetic diversity and phylogenetic endemism across Norway, using a spatial randomization to judge statistical significance. We used multiple-model inference to identify environmental variables that contributed the most to the patterns of phylogenetic diversity. Finally, we estimated phylogenetic turnover and used this to identify Norwegian plant assemblages in terms of composition and evolutionary history. Results: Our ML phylogeny contained 87% of all currently described native Norwegian vascular plants. Assemblages were phylogenetically overdispersed in warmer and wetter regions of Norway, as well as in regions with a longer post-glacial history. In cold and dry regions, plant assemblages were phylogenetically clustered, and characterised by neo-endemism, while the mild and wet regions were characterised by both paleo- and neo-endemism. Phylogenetic diversity was positively correlated with summer temperature and habitat heterogeneity, and peaked in the southeast of Norway. Main conclusions: Both contemporary ecological factors (climate and habitat heterogeneity), and post-glacial history seem to have shaped the phylogenetic structure of the flora of Norway. The flora in the far north of Norway appear to be a result of recent diversification while the coastal regions are assemblages of deeper lineages. Our results suggest that there is an evolutionary signal in the distribution of the Norwegian vascular flora.

dryad40/100

Multiple dimensions of phylogenetic diversity are needed to explain the complex aboveground-belowground diversity relationships

The complex relationship between aboveground and belowground diversity and whether they act as surrogates for one another remains unresolved. Increasing evidence suggests that investigating phylogenetic diversity could provide valuable insights into the interplay between plants and soil microbes, but the proliferation of phylogenetic diversity metrics has hindered comparative studies and the identification of general patterns. To overcome this challenge, we implemented a multi-dimensional framework that classifies phylogenetic diversity metrics into three dimensions: richness, divergence, and regularity, each of which captures different ecological aspects of species differences. Then we applied this framework to investigate the relationship between above and belowground diversity in a subtropical forest in Eastern China. We found that phylogenetic diversity of plant and soil microbes, including bacteria and fungi, were more strongly correlated at the richness and regularity dimension compared with divergence dimension. Further analyses revealed that these observed correlation patterns can be attributed to the influence of soil total phosphorus content, which is the limiting factor of plant and microbial phylogenetic diversity at richness and regularity dimensions. Together, our study demonstrated the necessity of using a multi-dimensional approach to advance our understanding of the complex relationships between plant and soil microbial biodiversity.

opencc-zeroDec 2023View details →

FIGURE 15 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis and comparative morphology reveals the diversity and distribution of needle nematodes of the genus Longidorus (Dorylaimida: Longidoridae) from Spain

FIGURE 15 Light micrographs of Longidorus pini Andrés and Arias, 1988 paratypes from San Martín del Pimpollar, Avila province (A–F), and the population from Nava de Francia, Salamanca province (G–M). A–C, G–I, female anterior regions. D–F, J–K, female tails. L-M, male tail with detail of spicules. Abbreviations: a = anus; gr = guiding ring; sp = spicules; spl = ventromedian supplements. Scale bars = 20 μm

FIGURE 13 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis and comparative morphology reveals the diversity and distribution of needle nematodes of the genus Longidorus (Dorylaimida: Longidoridae) from Spain

FIGURE 13 Light micrographs of Longidorus cf. olegi Kankina & Metlitskaya, 1983. (A)–(B) female anterior region. (C)–(F) female lip regions. (G) detail of basal bulb. (H) vulval region. (I)–(L) female tails. (M) and (N), male tail with detail of spicules. (O)–(R) First-, second-, third-, and fourth-stage juvenile (J1–J4) tails, respectively. Abbreviations: a = anus; af = amphidial fovea; gr = guiding ring. Scale bars = 20 μm

FIGURE 14 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis and comparative morphology reveals the diversity and distribution of needle nematodes of the genus Longidorus (Dorylaimida: Longidoridae) from Spain

FIGURE 14 Relationship of body length to length of functional and replacement odontostyle (Ost and rOst, respectively) length in all developmental stages from first-stage juveniles (J1) to mature females of Longidorus cf. olegi Kankina & Metlitskaya, 1983

FIGURE 12 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis and comparative morphology reveals the diversity and distribution of needle nematodes of the genus Longidorus (Dorylaimida: Longidoridae) from Spain

FIGURE 12 Light micrographs of Longidorus nevesi Macara 1985. (A) female anterior region. (B) female lip region. (C) vulval region. (D) female tail. (E)–(F) male tail with detail of spicules. Abbreviations: a = anus; gr = guiding ring; spl = ventromedian supplements; V = vulva. Scale bars = 20 μm

Figure 11 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis and comparative morphology reveals the diversity and distribution of needle nematodes of the genus Longidorus (Dorylaimida: Longidoridae) from Spain

Figure 11 Light micrographs of Longidorus carpetanensis Arias et al., 1986 from Puebla de Sanabria, Zamora (A)–(F), and topotypes from Navalmoral, Avila (G)–(L). A–C, G and H, female anterior regions. D, I, female tails. E and F, J and L, male tail with detail of spicules. Abbreviations: a = anus; gr = guiding ring; spl = ventromedian supplements. Scale bars = 20 µm

FIGURE 9 in Molecular phylogenetic analysis and comparative morphology reveals the diversity and distribution of needle nematodes of the genus Longidorus (Dorylaimida: Longidoridae) from Spain

FIGURE 9 Light micrographs of Longidorus pacensis sp. nov. (A)–(G) Anterior regions. (H) Vulval region. (I)–(K) Female tails. (L) Detail of sperm cells. (M) and (N) Male tails. (O)–(R) First-, second-, third-, and fourth-stage juvenile (J1–J4) tails, respectively. Abbreviations: a = anus; af = amphidial fovea; gr = guiding ring; sp = spicules; spl = ventromedian supplements; v = vulva. Scale bars = 20 μm