Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
42
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
42 results for “primary biodiversity data”
Figure 5a. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 5a. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from 37 open access articles published in Zootaxa and five articles published in Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders (Suppl. materials 8, 9). These charts illustrate interoperability of data from XML-based publishing and subsequently marked up legacy literature.Figure 5a.All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.Figure 5b.Species-rank treatments. <br> All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.
Figure 4b. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 4b. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from five articles published in Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders (Suppl. materials 6, 7). Data elements were XML encoded as part of the routine publication process.Figure 4a.All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.Figure 4b.Species-rank treatments. <br> Species-rank treatments.
Figure 3a. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 3a. - Legacy literature dashboard: charts summarizing content from 37 open access articles published in Zootaxa containing treatments on spiders (Suppl. materials 4, 5). Data elements were XML encoded using GoldenGATE.Figure 3a.All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.Figure 3b.Species-rank treatments. <br> All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.
Figure 2b. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 2b. - Number of publications (a; Suppl. material 2) and treatments (b; Suppl. material 3) contributing to spider taxonomy sorted by number of treatments per publication source (e.g., journal, book publisher). Source: the World Spider Catalog, accessed 14 October 2014.Figure 2a.12,377 publications listed in the 2014 World Spider Catalog. Zootaxa is the top ranking venue with 509 titles representing just over 4% of spider taxonomy.Figure 2b.The 2014 World Spider Catalog refers to 126,621 treatments. With 3314 treatments (2.6%), Zootaxa is the third ranking all time venue behind two museum monograph series: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History (4537 treatments, 3.6%) and Harvard's Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology (3761 treatments, 3.0%). <br> The 2014 World Spider Catalog refers to 126,621 treatments. With 3314 treatments (2.6%), Zootaxa is the third ranking all time venue behind two museum monograph series: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History (4537 treatments, 3.6%) and Harvard's Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology (3761 treatments, 3.0%).
Figure 2a. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 2a. - Number of publications (a; Suppl. material 2) and treatments (b; Suppl. material 3) contributing to spider taxonomy sorted by number of treatments per publication source (e.g., journal, book publisher). Source: the World Spider Catalog, accessed 14 October 2014.Figure 2a.12,377 publications listed in the 2014 World Spider Catalog. Zootaxa is the top ranking venue with 509 titles representing just over 4% of spider taxonomy.Figure 2b.The 2014 World Spider Catalog refers to 126,621 treatments. With 3314 treatments (2.6%), Zootaxa is the third ranking all time venue behind two museum monograph series: Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History (4537 treatments, 3.6%) and Harvard's Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology (3761 treatments, 3.0%). <br> 12,377 publications listed in the 2014 World Spider Catalog. Zootaxa is the top ranking venue with 509 titles representing just over 4% of spider taxonomy.
Figure 1a. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 1a. - GBIF records proportioned by selected taxonomic groups (Suppl. material 1). Inner ring shows vertebrates, insects, arachnids, other animals, plants, and other kingdoms; outer ring separates birds from other vertebrates, Hymenoptera from other insects, and spiders from other arachnids.Figure 1a.All records in GBIF (n = 517,325,595).Figure 1b.Specimen-based records in GBIF (n = 98,144,242). <br> All records in GBIF (n = 517,325,595).
Figure 3b. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 3b. - Legacy literature dashboard: charts summarizing content from 37 open access articles published in Zootaxa containing treatments on spiders (Suppl. materials 4, 5). Data elements were XML encoded using GoldenGATE.Figure 3a.All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.Figure 3b.Species-rank treatments. <br> Species-rank treatments.
Figure 1b. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 1b. - GBIF records proportioned by selected taxonomic groups (Suppl. material 1). Inner ring shows vertebrates, insects, arachnids, other animals, plants, and other kingdoms; outer ring separates birds from other vertebrates, Hymenoptera from other insects, and spiders from other arachnids.Figure 1a.All records in GBIF (n = 517,325,595).Figure 1b.Specimen-based records in GBIF (n = 98,144,242). <br> Specimen-based records in GBIF (n = 98,144,242).
Supplementary material 15: Species dashboard: Tenuiphantes tenuis from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Dashboard charts showing only specimens of the linyphiid spider Tenuiphantes tenuis. When viewed using a browser (such as Google Chrome) with an internet connection, this page sends a series of queries to Plazi and integrates the results with the Google Charts API to produce 37 interactive dashboard charts.
Supplementary material 7: Prospective publishing dashboard: species-rank treatments from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Dashboard charts summarizing content from 5 articles published in Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders. This page shows data from species-rank treatments. When viewed using a browser (such as Google Chrome) with an internet connection, this page sends a series of queries to Plazi and integrates the results with the Google Charts API to produce 37 dashboard charts.
Supplementary material 14: Treatment dashboard: content from Pardosa zyuzini treatment in Kronestedt and Marusik (2011) from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Dashboard charts showing content from one treatment: Pardosa zyuzini in Kronestedt and Marusik (2011). When viewed using a browser (such as Google Chrome) with an internet connection, this page sends a series of queries to Plazi and integrates the results with the Google Charts API to produce 37 interactive dashboard charts.
Supplementary material 13: Article dashboard: content from Kronestedt and Marusik (2011) from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Dashboard charts showing content from one article, Kronestedt and Marusik 2011. This page shows data from all treatments. When viewed using a browser (such as Google Chrome) with an internet connection, this page sends a series of queries to Plazi and integrates the results with the Google Charts API to produce 37 interactive dashboard charts.
Supplementary material 6: Prospective publishing dashboard: all treatments from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Dashboard charts summarizing content from 5 articles published in Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders. This page shows data from all treatments. When viewed using a browser (such as Google Chrome) with an internet connection, this page sends a series of queries to Plazi and integrates the results with the Google Charts API to produce 37 dashboard charts.
Figure 4a. from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
Figure 4a. - Dashboard charts summarizing content from five articles published in Biodiversity Data Journal containing treatments on spiders (Suppl. materials 6, 7). Data elements were XML encoded as part of the routine publication process.Figure 4a.All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.Figure 4b.Species-rank treatments. <br> All treatments regardless of taxonomic rank.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Capture of Primary Biodiversity Data for West African Plants.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Capture of Primary Biodiversity Data for West African Plants". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/f455bc89-8b18-4ad2-a982-cb961022a3ab">https://bionomia.net/dataset/f455bc89-8b18-4ad2-a982-cb961022a3ab</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/f455bc89-8b18-4ad2-a982-cb961022a3ab">https://gbif.org/dataset/f455bc89-8b18-4ad2-a982-cb961022a3ab</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Supplementary material 17: Generating Interactive Dashboard Charts Based on Plazi Treatment Data from: Integrating and visualizing primary data from prospective and legacy taxonomic literature - Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e5063 (12 May 2015) https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.3.e5063
A brief explanation of how to create and customize interactive charts using data on Plazi.
Data from: Biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships change through primary succession
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Primary rainforest amount at the landscape scale mitigates bird biodiversity loss and biotic homogenization
1.Tropical conservation strategies traditionally focus on large tracts of pristine forests, but given rapid primary forest decline, understanding the role of secondary forest remnants for biodiversity maintenance is critical. Until now, the interactive effects of changes in forest amount, configuration and disturbance history (secondary vs. primary forest) on the conservation value of tropical landscapes has remained unknown, hampering the incorporation of these global change drivers into local and global conservation planning. 2.We disentangled effects of landscape wide forest amount, fragment size, and forest age (old growth versus secondary forest) on abundance, α-diversity, β-diversity (biotic homogenisation) and community shifts of bird communities in human-dominated landscapes of southern Costa Rica. Utilizing two complementary methods, yielding 6900 individual detections and 223 species, we characterized bird communities in 49 forest fragments representing independent gradients in fragment size (<5 ha vs >30 ha) and forest amount (5%-80%) in the surrounding landscape (within 1000 m). 3.Abundance and α-diversity of forest specialists and insectivores declined by half in small fragments, but only in landscapes with little old growth forest. Conversely, secondary forest at the landscape scale showed no such compensation effect. Similarly, a null-model approach indicated significant biotic homogenisation in small versus large fragments, but only in landscapes with little old growth forest, suggesting forest amount and configuration interactively affect β-diversity in tropical human-dominated landscapes. Finally, dramatic abundance-based community shifts relative to intact forests are largely a result of landscape-scale loss of old growth rather than changes in overall forest cover. 4.Policy implications. Our study provides strong evidence that retaining old growth within tropical human modified landscapes can simultaneously curb erosion of avian forest specialist α-diversity, mitigate collapse of β-diversity (biotic homogenisation) and dampen detrimental avian community shifts. However, secondary forests play, at best, a subordinate role to mitigate these processes. To maintain tropical forest biodiversity, retaining old growth forest within landscapes should be first priority, highlighting a land-sparing approach.
Data from: Primary rainforest amount at the landscape scale mitigates bird biodiversity loss and biotic homogenization
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Willing or unwilling to share primary biodiversity data: results and implications of an international survey
Biodiversity science and conservation increasingly depend on the sharing and integration of large amounts of data, but many researchers resist sharing their primary biodiversity data. We recently conducted an international survey to ascertain the attitudes, experiences, and expectations regarding biodiversity data sharing and archiving of researchers. The results show that whereas most respondents are willing to share paper-related biodiversity data, more than sixty percent of respondents are unwilling to share primary data before publishing. Results indicate an underdeveloped culture of data sharing and several major technological and operational barriers. A major concern for researchers is appropriate benefits from data sharing. Most respondents would accept data archiving policies of journals. Researchers also express concerns about how to easily and efficiently deal with data and data quality in public databases. Expectations for biodiversity databases include standardization of data format, user-friendly data submission tools, formats for different types of data and coordination among databases. The survey results provide suggestions for improving data sharing and archiving by individual scientists, organizations, journals, and databases.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.