Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
246
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
246 results for “prioritization”
Inventory of criteria for prioritization of digitisation of collections focussed on scientific and societal needs
<p>Anno 2017 the task of mobilizing data from biocollections ahead of us is still enormous (data of 90% of the biocollections still needs to be mobilized). It is imperative for stakeholders, individual keepers of natural science collections, the community at large, and even for funding agencies, not only to tackle this backlog as quickly as possible, but do it in the best possible order. To establish the best possible order for digitizing biocollections a demand driven framework is required based among others on criteria used to digitize biocollections.</p>
NOAA NCCOS Assessment: Prioritizing Areas for Future Seafloor Mapping, Research, and Exploration Offshore of California, Oregon, and Washington from 2019-03-01 to 2019-04-01
<p>Spatial information about the seafloor is critical for decision-making by marine resource science, management and tribal organizations. Coordinating data needs can help organizations leverage collective resources to meet shared goals. To help enable this coordination, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS) developed a spatial framework, process and online application to identify common data collection priorities for seafloor mapping, sampling and visual surveys offshore of the West Continental United States Coast (WCC). Twenty-six participants from NOAA’s West Coast Deep Sea Coral Initiative (WCDSCI) and Expanding Pacific Research and Exploration of Submerged Systems (EXPRESS) entered their priorities in an online application, using virtual coins to denote their priorities in 10x10 minute grid cells. Grid cells with more coins were higher priorities than cells with fewer coins. Participants also reported why these locations were important and what data types were needed. Results were analyzed and mapped using statistical techniques to identify significant relationships between priorities, reasons for those priorities and data needs. Ten high priority locations were broadly identified for future mapping, sampling and visual surveys. These locations were distributed throughout the WCC, primarily in depths less than 1,000 m. Participants consistently selected (1) Exploration, (2) Biota/Important Natural Area and (3) Research as their top reasons (i.e., justifications) for prioritizing locations, and (1) Benthic Habitat Map and (2) Bathymetry and Backscatter as their top data or product needs. This ESRI shapefile summarizes the results from this spatial prioritization effort. This information will enable NOAA WCDSCI, EXPRESS and other WCC organization to more efficiently leverage resources and coordinate their mapping of high priority locations along California, Oregon and Washington. </p> <p>This effort was funded by NOAA’s Deep Sea Coral Research and Technology Program (DSCRTP) through its WCDSCI. The overall goal of the project was to systematically gather and quantify suggestions for seafloor mapping, sampling and visual surveys for the WCDSCI and EXPRESS. The results are expected to help WCDSCI, EXPRESS and other organizations on the WCC to identify locations where their interests overlap with other organizations, to coordinate their data needs and to leverage collective resources to meet shared goals.</p> <p>There were four main steps in the WCC spatial prioritization process. The first step was to identify the technical advisory team, which included the 11 members of the DSCRTP WCDSCI Steering Committee and all of the participants involved in the EXPRESS campaign. This advisory team invited 37 participants for the prioritization. Step two was to develop the spatial framework and an online application. To do this, the WCC was divided into five subregions and 3,265 square grid cells approximately 10x10 minutes in size. Existing relevant spatial datasets (<em>e.g.</em>, bathymetry, protected area boundaries, etc.) were compiled to help participants understand information and data gaps and to identify areas they wanted to prioritize for future data collections. These spatial datasets were housed in the online application, which was developed using Esri’s Web AppBuilder. In step three, this online application was used by 26 participants to enter their priorities in each subregion of interest. Participants allocated virtual coins in the 10x10 minute grid cells to denote their priorities. Grid cells with more coins were higher priorities than cells with fewer coins. Participants also reported why these locations were important and what data types were needed. Coin values were standardized across the subregions and used to identify spatial patterns across the WCC region as a whole. The number of coins were standardized because each subregion had a different number of grid cells and participants. Standardized coin values were analyzed and mapped using statistical techniques, including hierarchical cluster analysis, to identify significant relationships between priorities, reasons for those priorities and data needs. This ESRI shapefile contains the 10x10 minute grid cells used in this prioritization effort and associated the standardized coin values overall, as well as by organization, justification and product. For a complete description of the process and analyses please see: Costa <em>et al</em>. 2019.</p>
Replication Package "Applying Test Case Prioritization to Software Microbenchmarks"
<p>Replication package for the paper "Applying Test Case Prioritization to Software Microbenchmarks" accepted for publication in Empirical Software Engineering.</p>
Prioritizing forestation based on biogeochemical and local biogeophysical impacts - data
<p>Output data produced in "Prioritizing forestation based on biogeochemical and local biogeophysical impacts"</p> <p>Contact: michael.gregory.windisch@alumni.ethz.ch; edouard.davin@wyssacademy.org</p> <p>Content: Global output data of BGC, BGP, and combined effect of forestation and forest conservation in NetCDF4 files of 0.083° resolution</p> <p>Naming Key:<br> {effect}_{LUaction}_{season}_TCR_{TCR}_{stat}.nc</p> <p>Naming List:<br> effect_list = ["dC","dT","full"] # BGC only, BGP only, Combined effect<br> LUaction_list = ["defor", "refor"] # Forest conservation action, Forest establishment action<br> season_list = ["Annual", "JJA", "DJF"] # Yearly values, Boreal summer values (June, July, August), Boreal winter values (December, January, February)<br> TCR_list = ["local", "global"] # Local climate response as translator to CO2 equivalent, Global climate response as translator to CO2 equivalent<br> stat_list = ["median", "STD"] # Median values between all input datasets, Standard deviation values between all input datasets </p>
prioritization data and result for the navigable danube
<p>Shape file containing data and results of the prioritization approach for the navigable Danube river for conservation and restortion planning.</p>
Technical Debt Prioritization Using Machine Learning
<p>Technical debt (TD) identification tools can find thousands of technical debt items (TDIs) in a software project. Remedying all of them would take months or even years, so prioritization and decision-making are needed to make this process efficient. On the other hand, advances in machine learning over the last few decades have allowed researchers to apply methods to cluster behaviors and identify patterns in software engineering data. In this study, we aim to develop machine learning methods to decide whether and when a given TDI should be paid off in \st{real} software projects. We performed a survey to collect data from Java open-source software projects hosted on GitHub. From the 2,616 survey responses, we created a dataset using three different labeling strategies - "pay or not", 3-classes, and priority. We applied nine well-known machine learning methods over 27 source code metrics to build models to predict if and when a TDI should be paid off. The best methods for determining whether an item should be paid off achieved a mean accuracy of 0.86 and an F1-score of 0.85. For when to make the payment, we applied four approaches. Their performance achieved an accuracy of 0.59 using traditional analysis and 0.83 with tuned analysis for the most flexible method.</p>
S110 | DUTCHUSE |Dutch Prioritized Chemical Use Categories
<p>This is the collection associated with list S110 DUTCHUSE Dutch Prioritized Chemical Use Categories on the NORMAN Suspect List Exchange.</p> <p><a href="https://www.norman-network.com/nds/SLE/">https://www.norman-network.com/nds/SLE/</a></p> <p>List of 1700+ compounds with monitoring data and their assigned use categories performed within Dutch prioritization exercise by Ad eco advies and Deltares (NORMAN Working Group 1).<br> The final use category was compiled from several lists, including the <a href="https://watson-cost.eu/outputs/databases/">Watson database</a>, <a href="https://www.riwa-rijn.org/en/">RIWA</a>, <a href="https://rvszoeksysteem.rivm.nl/ZZSlijst/TotaleLijst">Dutch Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC)</a>, Kennisimpuls Waterkwalititeit (KIWK), WFD priority and specific pollutants (NL), <a href="https://www.norman-network.com/nds/SLE/">NORMAN lists</a> and some expert judgement.<br> The 1700 compounds were chosen based on availability of Dutch targeted monitoring data (3 different datasets) in 2022. This list is a translation of the file kindly provided by Anja Derksen, AD eco advies<br> </p>
A battery of in silico models application for pesticides exerting reproductive health effects: assessment of performance and prioritization of mechanistic studies
<p>Dataset of Table 1-7</p> <p>Data of Table 1, “Pesticides and their classification”</p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1_Tab1.PNG). Corresponding raw data is regarding classification in the hazard class reproductive toxicity available on line. All further related information are provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK__Tab1_PPP_27_1_M.txt) in txt format.</p> <p> </p> <p>Data of Table 2, “PDB structures of nuclear receptors used in VTL and ED” </p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1_Tab2 15 meta data files as pdf-format with information sources of PDB structures used in employed in silico models (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M1.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M2.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M3.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M4.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M5.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M6.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M7.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M8.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M9.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M10.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M11.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M12.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M13.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M14.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_2_M15.pdf). All further related information are provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_Tab2_27_2_M.txt) in txt format.</p> <p> </p> <p>Data of Table 3, “Results of in vivo studies (Shepelska et al., 2021; Shepelskaya and Kolyanchuk, 2021; Shepelskaya and Kolianchuk, 2018)”</p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1_Table3.PNG). Three meta data file as pdf-format with data of in vivo studies (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_3_M1.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_3_M2.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_27_3_M3.pdf). All further related information are provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_Tab3_27_3_M.txt) in txt format.</p> <p> </p> <p>Data of Table 4, “Results of in silico modelling of pesticides interaction with nuclear receptors”</p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1 _Tab4.PNG). Corresponding raw data with in silico modelling results provided as two files in CSV format (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_1-17.csv) and seventeen pdf files (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_1.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_2.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_3.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_4.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_5.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_6.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_7.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_8.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_9.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_10.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_11.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_12.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_13.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_14.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_15.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_16.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_17.pdf). Four meta data file as pdf-format with detailed in silico modelling descriptions (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M1.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M2.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M3.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_M1.pdf). All further related information is provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_Tab4_24_1-2_M.txt) in txt format.</p> <p> </p> <p>Data of Tabe 5, “Combination of in silico results with in vitro results by considering as positive result only where both in silico models predict a hit (Combined 1)”</p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1 _Tab5.PNG). Corresponding raw data with in silico modelling results provided as two files in CSV format (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_1-17.csv) and seventeen pdf files (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_1.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_2.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_3.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_4.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_5.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_6.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_7.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_8.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_9.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_10.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_11.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_12.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_13.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_14.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_15.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_16.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_17.pdf). Four meta data file as pdf-format with detailed in silico modelling descriptions (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M1.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M2.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M3.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_M1.pdf).</p> <p>Corresponding raw data with ToxCast results provided as seventeen files in CSV format (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_1.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_2.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_3.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_4.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_5.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_6.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_7.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_8.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_9.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_10.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_11.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_12.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_13.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_14.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_15.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_16.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_17.csv)All further related information is provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_Tab5_24_25_1_M.txt) in txt format.</p> <p> </p> <p>Data of Table 6, “Combination of in silico results with in vitro results by considering as a positive any in silico hit independently of the employed model (Combined 2)”</p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1 _Tab6.PNG). Corresponding raw data with in silico modelling results provided as two files in CSV format (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_1-17.csv) and seventeen pdf files (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_1.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_2.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_3.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_4.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_5.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_6.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_7.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_8.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_9.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_10.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_11.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_12.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_13.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_14.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_15.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_16.pdf ; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_17.pdf). Four meta data file as pdf-format with detailed in silico modelling descriptions (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M1.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M2.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_1_M3.pdf; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_24_2_M1.pdf).</p> <p>Corresponding raw data with ToxCast results provided as seventeen files in CSV format (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_1.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_2.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_3.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_4.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_5.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_6.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_7.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_8.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_9.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_10.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_11.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_12.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_13.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_14.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_15.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_16.csv; IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_25_1_17.csv)All further related information is provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_Tab6_24_25_1_M.txt) in txt format.</p> <p> </p> <p>Data of Table 7, “Metrics of performance of in silico models separately and combined.”</p> <p>The Dataset (TIV-D-23-00280R1) contains the original table as PNG-format (TIV-D-23-00280R1 _Tab7.PNG). Corresponding raw data with calculation of relevant performance metrics provided as one file in CSV format (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_26_1.csv). One meta data file as pdf-format with detailed description of the method used for calculation (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_26_1_M1.pdf).</p> <p>All further related information is provided as one meta-data-file (IZSEZO-2L2269_TIV-D-23-00280R1_SK_PPP_Tab7_26_1_M.txt) in txt format.</p>
Locus coeruleus activity strengthens prioritized memories under arousal
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Prioritization of barriers that hinders Local Flexibility Market proliferation
<p>This dataset contains the prioritization provided by a panel of 15 experts to a set of 28 barriers categories for 8 different roles of the future energy system. A Delphi method was followed and the scores provided in the three rounds carried out are included. The dataset also contains the scripts used to assess the results and the output of this assessment. </p> <p>A list of the information contained in this file is:</p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>data folder</strong>: this folders includes the scores given by the 15 experts in the 3 rounds. Every round is in an individual folder. There is a file per expert that has the scores between -5 (not relevant at all) to 5 (completely relevant) per barrier (rows) and actor (columns). There is also a file with the description of the experts in terms of their position in the company, the type of company and the country.</p> </li> <li> <p><strong>fig folder</strong>: this folder includes the figures created to assess the information provided by the experts. For each round, the following figures are created (in each respective folder):</p> <ul> <li> <p>Boxplot with the distribution of scores per barriers and roles. </p> </li> <li> <p>Heatmap with the mean scores per barriers and roles.</p> </li> <li> <p>Boxplots with the comparison of the different distributions provided by the experts of each group (depending on the keywords) per barrier and role.</p> </li> <li> <p>Heatmap with the mean score per barrier weighted depeding on the importance of the role in each use case and the final prioritization.</p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>Finally, bar plots with the mean scores differences between rounds and boxplot with comparisons of the scores distributions are also provided.</p> <ul> <li> <p><strong>stat folder</strong>: this folder includes the files with the results of the different statistical assessment carried out. For each round, the following figures are created (in each respective folder):</p> <ul> <li> <p>The statistics used to assess the scores (Intraclass correlation coefficient, Inter-rater agreement, Inter-rater agreement p-value, Homogeneity of Variances, Average interquartile range, Standard Deviation of interquartile ranges, Friedman test p-value Average power post hoc) per barrier and per role.</p> </li> <li> <p>The results of the post hoc of the Friedman Test per berries and per roles.</p> </li> <li> <p>The average score per barrier and per role.</p> </li> <li> <p>The mean value of the scores provided by the experts grouped by the keywords per barrier and role. P-value of the comparison of these two values.</p> </li> <li> <p>The end prioritization of the barrier for the use case (averaging the scores or fuzzy merging of the critical sets)</p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>Finally, the differences between the mean and standard deviations of the scores between two consecutive rounds are provided.</p>
RTPTorrent: An Open-source Dataset for Evaluating Regression Test Prioritization
<p>This dataset is designed to be used in evaluation studies of regression test prioritization techniques. It includes 20 open-source Java projects from GitHub and over 100,000 logs of real-world build logs from TravisCI. The projects span a wide range with regard to size, number of contributors, and maturity of open-source Java projects available on GitHub.</p> <p>Futher, the dataset includes the results of baseline approaches to ease the comparison of new techniques applied to the dataset.</p> <p>A readme file with a more detailed description of the structure of the dataset is included. For even more information see the corresponding MSR 2020 publication.</p> <p>Versions:</p> <ul> <li> 2020-09-23 (version 1.1) <ul> <li>Updated archived `deeplearning4j` repository with a fork that contains all of the original commits. Repository at the original GitHub location had been replaced. Defect identified by Daniel Elsner (Technische Universität München).</li> <li>Renamed root folder from MSR2 to rtp-torrent</li> </ul> </li> <li>2020-05-25 (version 1.0) <ul> <li>Initial release</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p>
Data for: A spatial framework for prioritizing biochar application to arable land: a case study for Sweden
<p>The uploaded data is related to the publication: <em>A spatial framework for prioritizing biochar application to arable land: a case study for Sweden</em>, and contains the following:</p> <p>(I) Raster files for three different biochar prioritization narratives.</p> <p>(II) High-resolution biochar use indication maps (in JPEG) for different prioritization narratives. </p>
pVACview: an interactive visualization tool for efficient neoantigen prioritization and selection (Supp data)
<p>Supplemental tables for article: <strong>pVACview: an interactive visualization tool for efficient neoantigen prioritization and selection </strong></p>
Figure 3 in America's Most Wanted Fishes: cataloging risk assessments to prioritize invasive species for management action
Figure 3. The proportion of risk statuses of fish families with four or more species assessed at the extent of Florida. Panel (A) shows the proportion of species with high, moderate, low, multiple, and undetermined risk statuses of assessed species (total number of species evaluated in a family). Panel (B) shows the ratio of assessed to unassessed species in a given family (total species in a family). Total species in a family were obtained from FishBase (Froese and Pauly 2023).
Figure 1 in America's Most Wanted Fishes: cataloging risk assessments to prioritize invasive species for management action
Figure 1. The proportion of risk statuses of fish families with four or more species assessed at the extent of the conterminous U.S. Panel (A) shows the proportion of species with high, moderate, low, multiple, and undetermined risk statuses of assessed species (total number of species evaluated in a family). Panel (B) shows the ratio of assessed to unassessed species in a given family (total species in a family). Total species in a family were obtained from FishBase (Froese and Pauly 2023).
Figure 2 in America's Most Wanted Fishes: cataloging risk assessments to prioritize invasive species for management action
Figure 2. The proportion of risk statuses of fish families with four or more species assessed at the extent of the Great Lakes region. Panel (A) shows the proportion of species with high, moderate, low, multiple, and undetermined risk statuses of assessed species (total number of species evaluated in a family). Panel (B) shows the ratio of assessed to unassessed species in a given family (total species in a family). Total species in a family were obtained from FishBase (Froese and Pauly 2023).
Dataset: How do news about a heatwave affect public prioritization of climate change adaptation and mitigation behaviors?
<p><span>These datasets contain survey data that was used to evaluate the effect of the exposure to heatwave news texts on people’s preference for climate mitigation and adaptation actions, as presented in the manuscript titled “<em>How do news about a heatwave affect public prioritization of climate change adaptation and mitigation behaviors?</em>”. Three versions of the dataset are available:</span></p> <ol> <li><strong>Original dataset</strong>: This version contains choice text as data points and includes all finished survey responses that passed the attention check questions (n=1209).</li> <li><strong>Original recoded dataset</strong>: This version was generated by recoding choice text into numerical values. The 'Income' variable, representing household income levels for both Canadian and US residents, was added by converting reported income ranges to a unified scale based on exchange rate equivalencies. The "Income_Canadians" and "Income_US" columns were subsequently removed to avoid repetitions. </li> <li><strong>Final dataset</strong>: This version excludes observations from participants who completed the survey in under four minutes and those who selected the same response for every item within each matrix-style question (also known as straight-lining). Additionally, responses with missing values in questions regarding political views, gender, and household income, as well as responses where participants identified as non-binary or indicated that their gender was not listed, were omitted (see “Methods” for more details). Dependent variables have been added based on the original responses, including personal-level mitigation and adaptation likelihoods, personal-level mitigation preference, and both non-weighted and weighted collective-level mitigation preference. Furthermore, the dataset includes a 'Climate Change Concern' variable, derived through principal component analysis of thirteen variables expressing participants’ climate change attitudes and efficacy beliefs concerning climate actions. Variables not used in the subsequent data analysis were removed. Age, political views, education, and income columns were standardized. The final dataset was used for the data analysis presented in the manuscript.</li> </ol> <p>The following variables/columns can be found across the three versions of the dataset:</p> <ul> <li>Dependent variables: <ul> <li>Starting with “<em>Personal_Mitigation</em>”: participant’s self-reported likelihood of taking selected personal-level climate change mitigation actions</li> <li>Starting with “<em>Personal_Adaptation</em>”: participant’s self-reported likelihood of taking selected personal-level climate change adaptation actions</li> <li>Starting with “<em>Collective_Mitigation</em>”: participant’s ranking of the collective-level climate change mitigation initiatives</li> <li>Starting with “<em>Collective_Adaptation</em>”: participant’s ranking of the collective-level climate change adaptation initiatives</li> <li><em>Personal_Mitigation_Likelihood</em>: personal-level mitigation likelihood (present only in the final dataset)</li> <li><em>Personal_Adaptation_Likelihood</em>: personal-level adaptation likelihood (present only in the final dataset)</li> <li><em>Personal_Preference</em>: personal-level mitigation preference (present only in the final dataset)</li> <li><em>Collective_Preference_Unweighted</em>: non-weighted collective-level mitigation preference (present only in the final dataset)</li> <li><em>Collective_Preference_Weighted</em>: weighted collective-level mitigation preference (present only in the final dataset)</li> </ul> </li> <li>Independent variables: <ul> <li><em>Group</em>: group that the participant was assigned to as part of the experimental intervention</li> <li><em>Distance</em>: indicates whether the participant was assigned to read about a heatwave occurring in their community or a city 6,000 km away (for experimental groups only)</li> <li><em>Severity</em>: indicates whether the participant was prompted to read about a heatwave without or with the mention of associated causalities (for experimental groups only)</li> </ul> </li> <li>Covariates and supporting variables: <ul> <li><em>Gender</em>: gender identity</li> <li><em>Identity</em>: ethnic and/or racial identity</li> <li><em>Age</em>: age</li> <li><em>Political_Views</em>: position on the liberal-conservative continuum</li> <li><em>Education</em>: highest level of education</li> <li><em>Country</em>: country of residence</li> <li><em>Canada_Province</em>: province or territory of residence (for Canadian participants only)</li> <li><em>US_State</em>: state of residence (for US participants only)</li> <li><em>Duration_Residence</em>: duration of residence in the current community</li> <li><em>Income_Canadians</em>: annual household income in Canadian dollars (for Canadian participants only)</li> <li><em>Income_US</em>: annual household income in US dollars (for US participants only)</li> <li><em>Income</em>: annual household income for both Canadian and US residents derived by converting reported income ranges to a unified scale based on exchange rate equivalencies</li> <li><em>Efficacy_Mitigation_Personal</em>: belief regarding the response efficacy of personal-level climate change mitigation actions</li> <li><em>Efficacy_Mitigation_Collective</em>: belief regarding the response efficacy of collective-level climate change mitigation actions</li> <li><em>Efficacy_Adaptation_Personal</em>: belief regarding the response efficacy of personal-level climate change adaptation actions</li> <li><em>Efficacy_Adaptation_Collective</em>: belief regarding the response efficacy of collective-level climate change adaptation</li> <li><em>Climate_Change_Importance:</em> perception of climate change as a personally important issue</li> <li>Climate_Change_Worry: level of worry about climate change</li> <li>Starting with “<em>Climate_Risk</em>”: beliefs regarding the degree of harm that climate change will cause to plants and animal species (Climate_Risk_Animals_Plants), future generations of people (Climate_Risk_Future_Generations), people in developing countries (Climate_Risk_Developing_Countries), people in participant’s country (Climate_Risk_Country), people in participant’s community (Climate_Risk_Community), and the participant personally (Climate_Risk_Personal)</li> <li>Climate_Change_Onset_Time: belief regarding when climate change will start harming people in their community</li> <li><em>Six_Americas_Segment</em>: the Global Warming's Six Americas segment participant aligns with derived based on the Six Americas Short SurveY (SASSY) Group Scoring Tool</li> <li><em>Climate_Change_Concern</em>: variable derived through PCA of thirteen variables expressing participants' climate change attitudes and efficacy beliefs pertaining to climate actions (present only in the final dataset)</li> <li><em>Survey_Duration_Seconds</em>: The amount of time it took the respondent to complete the survey</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
Execution and data log: on the effectiveness of random and adaptive random test case prioritization
<p>Execution and data logs automatically generated by the test driver during experimentation. These results are similar (but not identical) to the results summarized in Table 1 of the following paper:</p> <p>Z. Q. Zhou, A. Sinaga, and W. Susilo, "On the fault-detection capabilities of adaptive random test case prioritization: case studies with large test suites," in Proceedings of the 45th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-45). IEEE, 2012, pp. 5584-5593.<br> https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.454</p> <p>Compared with the above paper, the current dataset was collected from a different but similar set of experiments and included faulty versions 13, 23, and 26 of the Replace program---although these three versions were excluded from the experiments reported in the above paper due to their instability.</p> <p>If you find these data useful, please cite the above paper.</p>
main source codes and files of "Meta-path Based Prioritization of Functional Drug Actions with Multi-Level Biological Networks"
<p>These source codes and their related files are associated the study. "Meta-path Based Prioritization of Functional Drug Actions with Multi-Level Biological Networks"</p> <p>This study is in process of publication.</p>
Prioritizing Commercial Analogues of Previous USP5 ZnF-UBD Hits
<p>Expansion of the chemical series of <a href="https://openlabnotebooks.org/co-crystal-structures-of-usp5-zf-ubd-and-weak-binding-compounds/">previous hits of USP5 zinc finger ubiquitin binding domain</a> (ZnF-UBD) by docking commercially available chemical analogs and prioritizing chemical analogues to exploit new interactions in the binding pocket of USP5 ZnF-UBD</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.