Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 7 in Proliferation of the invasive termite Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on Grand Cayman and overall termite diversity on the Cayman Islands

Fig. 7. Plot for the Single Linkage clustering method for distances to the nearest marine dockage of Coptotermes gestroi over Grand Cayman Island.

Fig. 6 in Proliferation of the invasive termite Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on Grand Cayman and overall termite diversity on the Cayman Islands

Fig. 6. Plot for the Single Linkage clustering method for Coptotermes gestroi over Grand Cayman Island.

Fig. 8 in Proliferation of the invasive termite Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on Grand Cayman and overall termite diversity on the Cayman Islands

Fig. 8. Distribution of mean nearest neighbor distance obtained from Monte- Carlo simulation with 102 randomized points placed in built areas within suitable habitats.

Fig. 5 in Proliferation of the invasive termite Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on Grand Cayman and overall termite diversity on the Cayman Islands

Fig. 5. Termite sampling localities from UF Termite Collection (for purposes of space, the geographic positions of Little Cayman and Cayman Brac are not related to that of Grand Cayman).

Fig. 9 in Proliferation of the invasive termite Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on Grand Cayman and overall termite diversity on the Cayman Islands

Fig. 9. Areas predicted as infested by the simulation model for Coptotermes gestroi over Grand Cayman Island. Sampled termite locations in 2014 are mapped (points). Yellow, orange, and red cells indicate the>0%, ≥50%, and 100% occupancy envelopes, respectively.

Fig. 10 in Proliferation of the invasive termite Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on Grand Cayman and overall termite diversity on the Cayman Islands

Fig. 10. Caribbean basin survey localities for all termites (blue dots) and for Microcerotermes species only (orange dots) (Source: UF Termite Collection).

Fig. 2. Hierarchical cluster analysis with 2 in Proliferation of the invasive termite Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on Grand Cayman and overall termite diversity on the Cayman Islands

Fig. 2. Hierarchical cluster analysis with 2 (a), 3 (b), 4 (c), and 5 (d) clusters for Coptotermes gestroi over Grand Cayman Island.

Fig. 4 in Proliferation of the invasive termite Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on Grand Cayman and overall termite diversity on the Cayman Islands

Fig. 4. Vector-type layers used to obtain a surface of unsuitable habitat for Coptotermes gestroi on Grand Cayman Island.

Fig. 3. Collection localities for Coptotermes gestroi over Grand Cayman Island and 102 in Proliferation of the invasive termite Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on Grand Cayman and overall termite diversity on the Cayman Islands

Fig. 3. Collection localities for Coptotermes gestroi over Grand Cayman Island and 102 random points.

Fig. 1 in Proliferation of the invasive termite Coptotermes gestroi (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) on Grand Cayman and overall termite diversity on the Cayman Islands

Fig. 1. Coptotermes gestroi localities in the greater Caribbean Basin (Source: UF Termite Collection).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Pyruvate transamination and NAD biosynthesis enable proliferation of succinate dehydrogenase-deficient cells by supporting aerobic glycolysis

Data supporting results published by Ricci et al. Pyruvate transamination and NAD biosynthesis enable proliferation of succinate dehydrogenase-deficient cells by supporting aerobic glycolysis. Cell Death and Disease (2023) 14:403 (https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-023-05927-5).

Fig. 9. T. thermophila cells immunostained with monoclonal anti-cdc14A in Effects of Roscovitine on Schedule of Divisional Morphogenesis, Basal Bodies Proliferation and Cell Divisions in Tetrahymena thermophila

Fig. 9. T. thermophila cells immunostained with monoclonal anti-cdc14A antibody. Cs and nCS – apical couplets of basal bodies for proter and opisthe, respectively; Ma – macronucleus. Other explanations as in Figs 1 and 8. Bar: 10 µm, bar in D for B–D.

Fig. 7. T. thermophila cells immunostained with the antiserum against component B in Effects of Roscovitine on Schedule of Divisional Morphogenesis, Basal Bodies Proliferation and Cell Divisions in Tetrahymena thermophila

Fig. 7. T. thermophila cells immunostained with the antiserum against component B of epiplasm. DF – staining around the deep fibers. Other explanations as in Fig. 1. Bar: 10 µm.

Fig. 2 in Effects of Roscovitine on Schedule of Divisional Morphogenesis, Basal Bodies Proliferation and Cell Divisions in Tetrahymena thermophila

Fig. 2. Localization of nuclei in control and roscovitine treated T. tetrmophila. The cells were immunostained with the anti-centrin 20H5 antibody and stained with DAPI. A and B – control cells in the VI stage of morphogenesis, and early cytokinesis, respectively; C and D – roscovitine treated cells (4 h) in the VI stage of morphogenesis and in cytokinesis respectively. Arrows – micronuclei (in the C micronucleus in opisthe is out of focus). Bar: 10 µm.

Fig. 4. Postdivider cells after 5.5 h in Effects of Roscovitine on Schedule of Divisional Morphogenesis, Basal Bodies Proliferation and Cell Divisions in Tetrahymena thermophila

Fig. 4. Postdivider cells after 5.5 h of roscovitine treatment. Cells were immunostained with anti-centrin 20H5 antibody. A and A' – ventral and dorsal views of the same proter cell with remnants of the OA2; B–C opisthe cells, B – opisthe with ARF on dorsal side, C – opisthe with remnants of oral structures; D and D' – ventral and dorsal views of the same cell; E and E' – ventral and dorsal views of the same opisthe during pinching off the OA. Other explanations as in Fig. 1. Bar: 10 µm for A–E'.

Fig. 5 in Effects of Roscovitine on Schedule of Divisional Morphogenesis, Basal Bodies Proliferation and Cell Divisions in Tetrahymena thermophila

Fig. 5. Mean cell sizes, positions of OA1, OA2 and fission zone in control and in roscovitine treated cells. Upper panel: early and late control dividers, lower panel: early dividers after 3.5 h roscovitine treatment, late dividers after 3.5 and 5.5 h roscovitine treatment. The shape of cells is represented by elipses. Solid horizontal lines – cells "equator", dotted horizontal lines – positions of the fission furrow. All sizes and distances were drawn to the same scale. Bar: 10 µm. The measurements represent means of at least 10 specimens for each cell sample.

Fig. 6 in Effects of Roscovitine on Schedule of Divisional Morphogenesis, Basal Bodies Proliferation and Cell Divisions in Tetrahymena thermophila

Fig. 6. Correlation of length of proters and shift of the fission zone in relation to OA2 induced by roscovitine in late dividers. The shift of the fission zone was measured as a difference between length of the proters and distance from cell apex to the anterior end of the OA2 (ordinate). Each point in this diagram represent individual cell. Open symbols – untreated cells, close symbols – cells treated with roscovitine for 3.5 and 5.5 h (pooled).

Fig. 10 in Effects of Roscovitine on Schedule of Divisional Morphogenesis, Basal Bodies Proliferation and Cell Divisions in Tetrahymena thermophila

Fig. 10. Western blot of T. thermophila fractions with monoclonal antibody anti-cdc14A. H – homogenate, S – supernatant, C – cortical fraction (pellet).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2023View details →

Data sets for de Oliveira et al.: "Leishmania major telomerase RNA knockout: from altered cell proliferation to decreased parasite infectivity"

This file contains relevant data about the article: "Leishmania major telomerase RNA knockout: from altered cell proliferation to decreased parasite infectivity"