Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
47
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
47 results for “review process”
Prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes and other Listeria species in fish, fish products and fish processing environment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
<p>Dane wykorzytsane w publikajci "Prevalence of <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em> and other <em>Listeria</em> species in fish, fish products and fish processing environment: A systematic review and meta-analysis" . Dane obejmują wyniki surowe z baz artykułów, dane wykorzystane do wykonania metaanalizy oraz wyniki surowe uzyskane po przeprowadzaniu metaanalizy</p>
Dataset for paper: The Promise and Challenges of Using LLMs to Accelerate the Screening Process of Systematic Reviews
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Methods, Processes, Frameworks, and Tools for Privacy Requirements
<p> Context: Requirements Engineering (RE) relies on the collaboration of various roles—such as requirements engineers, stakeholders, and developers—and various techniques, methods, processes, frameworks, and tools. This makes RE a highly human-dependent process that benefits greatly from tool support. Understanding how these techniques, methods, processes, frameworks, and tools are applied across RE phases could provide valuable insights into ways to enhance the RE process, contributing to more successful outcomes. Objective: The primary objective of this study is to identify the techniques, methods, processes, frameworks, and tools applied across different requirements engineering phases—such as elicitation, analysis, specification, validation, and management—to address privacy requirements. Method: We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and identified 125 primary studies, and we also conducted a survey with 37 practitioners. Results: Our review identified a range of techniques, methods, processes, frameworks, and tools for addressing privacy requirements. Most studies were conducted in academic contexts, with the most frequently used tools being: PriS Method, Secure Tropos, LINDDUN, i* (i-star), STRAP (Structured Analysis for Privacy), Privacy by Design (PbD), and SQUARE. Additionally, over 75% of the studies applied these tools in the privacy requirements elicitation phase. In the industry, most of the techniques identified in the literature are not known or used by practitioners. Conclusion: This study provides a comprehensive analysis of techniques and tools for privacy requirements in RE, revealing a strong focus on academic contexts with limited industry application. Future research should explore the scalability and effectiveness of these tools in real-world environments, as well as the reasons why practitioners do not use them.</p>
Supplementary material for "Language and User Requirements for Business Process Simulation - A Systematic Literature Review"
<p>This is ment as a supplementary material for the Publication "Language and User Requirements for Business Process Simulation - A Systematic Literature Review". It contains all sources that were used for the creation of the requirements broken down for each one.</p>
Data from: Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution.
<p>Despite substantial progress for women in science, women remain underrepresented in many aspects of the scholarly publication process. We examined how the gender diversity of editors and reviewers changed over time for six journals in ecology and evolution (2003-2015 for four journals, 2007-2015 or 2009-2015 for the other two), and how several aspects of the peer review process differed between female and male editors and reviewers. We found that, for five of the six journals, women were either absent or very poorly represented as handling editors at the beginning of our dataset. The representation of women among handling editors increased gradually and consistently, with women making up 29% of the handling editors (averaged across journals) in 2015, similar to the representation of women as last authors on ecology papers (23% in 2015) but lower than the proportion of women among all authors (31%) and among members of the societies that own the journals (37-40%). The proportion of women among reviewers has also gradually but consistently increased over time, reaching 27% by 2015. Female editors invited more female reviewers than did male editors, and this difference increased with age of the editor. Men and women who were invited to review did not differ in whether they responded to the review invitation, but, of those that responded, women were slightly more likely to agree to review. In contrast, women were less likely than men to accept invitations to serve on journal editorial boards. Our analyses indicate that there has been progress in the representation of women as reviewers and editors in ecology and evolutionary biology, but women are still underrepresented among the gatekeepers of scholarly publishing relative to their representation among researchers.</p>
Data from: Medical-device recalls in the UK and the device-regulation process: retrospective review of safety notices and alerts
Background: Medical devices are used widely for virtually every disease and condition. Although devices are subject to regulation, the number of recalls, the clinical data requirements for regulation and the impact on patient safety are poorly understood. Methods: The authors defined a device using European directives and used publicly available information on the Medicines and Health Regulatory Authority website to determine the number of devices recalled from January 2006 to December 2010. Two reviewers independently assessed Field Safety Notices and Medical Device Alerts. The authors wrote to manufacturers to obtain further information and clinical data, and summarised data by year, Conformité Européenne classification, indication, and Food and Drug Administration recall system of severity. Results: In total, 2124 field safety notices were issued over the 5-year period, an increase of 1220% (62 in 2006 to 757 in 2010). 447 Medical Device Alerts were issued in the same period, and 44% were assessed as a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death. The authors wrote to 192 manufacturers of withdrawn devices and received 101 (53%) replies; only four (2.1%) provided the clinical data the authors requested. A lack of available transparent data prevented full analyses of the safety impact. Of the highest-risk recalled devices, more than half were related to the cardiovascular system (25%) or musculoskeletal system (33%), and 88% (95% CI 80% to 97%) were assessed as a reasonable probability of causing serious adverse health consequences or death. For low-risk devices, the figure was 34% (95% CI 26% to 42%). Conclusion: The number of medical devices subject to recalls or warnings in the UK has risen dramatically. A substantial number of these devices may have caused serious adverse effects in patients and contributed to healthcare costs. Significant problems exist in the UK with a lack of access to transparent data and a registry of the highest-risk devices.
Data from: Quality control processes in allografting: a twenty-year retrospective review of a hospital-based bone bank in Taiwan
Musculoskeletal allografts are now commonly used. To decrease the potential risks of transmission of pathogenic bacteria, fungi, or viruses to the transplant recipients, certain issues regarding the management of patients who receive contaminated allografts need to be addressed. We aimed to clarify the incidence and extent of disease transmission from allografts by analyzing the allografting procedures performed in the bone bank of our hospital over the past 20 years. We retrospectively reviewed the data from our allograft registry center on 3979 allografts that were implanted in 3193 recipients throughout a period of two decades, from July 1991 to June 2011. The source of the allografts, results of all screening tests, dates of harvesting and implantation, and recipients of all allografts were checked. With the help of the Center for Infection Control of our hospital, a strict prospective, hospital-wide, on-site surveillance was conducted, and every patient with healthcare-associated infection was identified. Fisher's exact test was used to compare the infection rate between recipients with sterile allografts and those with contaminated allografts. The overall discard and infection rates were, respectively, 23% and 1.3% in the first decade (1991–2001); and 18.4% and 1.25% in the second decade (2001–2011). The infection rate of contaminated allograft recipients was significantly higher than that of sterile allograft recipients (10% vs. 1.15%, P < 0.01) in the second decade. Both infection and discard rates of our bone bank are comparable with those of international bone banks. Strict allograft processing and adequate prophylactic use of antibiotics are critical to prevent infection and disease transmission in such cases.
FIGURES 27–29. Otostigmus greggi Holotype. 27. Forcipular coxosternal tooth-plates. 28. Left forcipular trochanteroprefemoral process. 29 in A review of the orientalis group of the Otostigmus subgenus Otostigmus Porat, 1876 (Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha: Scolopendridae)
FIGURES 27–29. Otostigmus greggi Holotype. 27. Forcipular coxosternal tooth-plates. 28. Left forcipular trochanteroprefemoral process. 29. Sternite of ultimate leg-bearing segment and left coxopleural process. FIGURES 30–31. Otostigmus kashmiranus Holotype. 30. Forcipular coxosternal tooth-plates (after Lewis, 1992). 31. Sternite 10 (after Lewis, 1992). FIGURES 32–37. Otostigmus loriae HNHM. 32. Antennal article 2 & 3 dorsal (somewhat foreshortened). 33. Forcipular coxosternal tooth-plates. 34. Tergite 16. 35. Ultimate tergite. 36. Ultimate leg-bearing segment ventral. 37. Detail of left coxopleural process. Scale bars = 1.0 mm except Figs 27, 28, 30 & 37 = 0.5 mm.
Protocol selection process - Literature Review creating the Integrated List of Agile Practices
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Protocol selection process - Systematic Literature Review Related Work
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Advances in Leukemia Detection and Classification: A Systematic Review of AI and Image Processing Techniques
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes on Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review
<p>Supplementary material outlining complete list of reviewed papers, chronic diseases and their classifications, algorithms used, publication venues, and excluded papers.</p>
FIGURE 15. Neoplatynaspis nataliae gen. etsp. nov.: a. head and thorax, ventral view; b. prosternal intercoxal process; c. proleg; d. middle leg; e. hind leg; f. tarsi. in A review of Platynaspini (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) of the Indian subcontinent, including description of a new genus from north-eastern India and Bangladesh
FIGURE 15. Neoplatynaspis nataliae gen. etsp. nov.: a. head and thorax, ventral view; b. prosternal intercoxal process; c. proleg; d. middle leg; e. hind leg; f. tarsi.
Data from: Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution.
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Medical-device recalls in the UK and the device-regulation process: retrospective review of safety notices and alerts
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Quality control processes in allografting: a twenty-year retrospective review of a hospital-based bone bank in Taiwan
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
A review of expert group-based science advisory processes in Canada
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal
Lack of diversity on editorial boards might generate disparities in editorial and peer review that contribute to gender and geographic disparities in scholarly publishing. We use a comprehensive data set of the peer review process for all papers submitted to the journal Functional Ecology from January 2004 to June 2014 to examine how gender, seniority and geographic location of editors and reviewers influence reviewer recruitment and scores given to papers by reviewers. The gender ratio of editors for Functional Ecology was majority male, but the proportion of female editors increased over time. The gender ratio of selected reviewers was also highly majority male, but the proportion of women selected as reviewers increased over the 10 years largely because the number of women on the editorial board increased and female editors invited more female reviewers than did male editors. Male editors selected <25% female reviewers even in the year they selected the most women, but female editors consistently selected ˜30–35% female reviewers. Editors also over-selected reviewers from their own geographic locality. Women invited to review were less likely to respond to review invitations, but more likely to accept if they responded. Women invited to review responded to the invitation similarly regardless of whether the editor inviting them was male or female, but men invited to review were both less likely to respond and more likely to decline if the editor was female. Review scores given to papers did not differ between male and female reviewers, and final decisions (proportion of papers rejected) did not differ between male and female editors. The proportion of women among selected reviewers decreased with editor seniority when the editor was male but increased with editor seniority when the editor was female. Thus, the gender ratio of selected reviewers differed little between early-career male and female editors but differed a lot between late-career (more senior) male and female editors. Individuals invited to review were less likely to agree to review if the editor was more senior. Editor gender, seniority and geographic location affect who is invited to review for Functional Ecology, and how invitees respond to review invitations, but not the final outcome of the peer review process. To increase diversity of reviewer populations, journals should increase gender, age and geographic diversity of their editorial boards.
Overview of the Literature Review process and Steps
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Table-Matrix, containing all the codes generated from the inductive analysis process of the 78 articles that made up the final sample. (Not only Opportunity, but also Uncertainty: A systematic review of how entrepreneurship literature appropriates both constructs.)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.