Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
116
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
116 results for “seasonal abundance”
Fig. 3 in Seasonal abundance and spatial distribution of Diaphania hyalinata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on yellow squash in south Florida
Fig. 3. Comparison of average daily temperature (°C) and average daily rainfall (mm) with mean abundance of total Diaphania hyalinata larvae during the 4 cropping seasons (26 May–30 Dec 2014) of yellow squash. Data on temperature and rainfall were obtained from the Florida Automated Weather Network, Homestead, Florida.
Fig. 2 in Seasonal abundance and spatial distribution of Diaphania hyalinata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on yellow squash in south Florida
Fig. 2. Weekly abundance (mean ± SE per 2 leaves) of total Diaphania hyalinata larvae on yellow squash during 4 planting seasons from 26 May through 30 Dec 2014. Means topped by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (P> 0.05) (analysis of variance and Waller–Duncan K-ratio test). Bars above and below means represent standard errors.
Fig. 1 in Seasonal abundance and spatial distribution of Diaphania hyalinata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) on yellow squash in south Florida
Fig. 1. Weekly abundance (mean ± SE per 2 leaves) of small (L1 + L2), medium (L3 + L4), large (L5) Diaphania hyalinata larvae on yellow squash from a) 26 May through 16 Jun, b) 18 Jul through 8 Aug, c) 1 Sep through 22 Sep, and d) 9 Dec through 30 Dec 2014. Means topped by the same uppercase letter are not significantly different (P> 0.05) between larval sizes, and means topped by the same lowercase letter are not significantly different (P> 0.05) between sampling dates (analysis of variance and Waller–Duncan K-ratio test). Bars above and below means represent standard errors.
Fig. 3 in Seasonal variation in the abundance and distribution of ticks that parasitize Microcebus griseorufus at the BezàMahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar
Fig. 3. Possible life cycle of H. lemuris. Peak activity for larvae occurs in May, but larvae may be found feeding into June and October. Larvae attach to Microcebus hosts and after a blood meal, fall off and molt into nymphs. Nymphs are active and feed on Microcebus throughout the dry season and likely feed on other lemurs during part of the wet season. Adult-stage ticks remain active during the wet season, feeding on larger-bodied lemurs, such as L. catta, and P. verreauxi. Engorged females fall off and lay eggs in leaf litter. It is possible that all four stages can diapause if no suitable hosts or conditions are found (gray dotted line). Mice or rats may also serve as hosts to larvae during the dry season.
Fig. 1. Monthly averages for A in Seasonal variation in the abundance and distribution of ticks that parasitize Microcebus griseorufus at the BezàMahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar
Fig. 1. Monthly averages for A) tick intensity on mouse lemurs as it compares to B) rainfall and C) temperature, during the year-long study season. Shaded area indicates months included in the dry season. Environmental data were collected daily.
Fig. 2 in Seasonal variation in the abundance and distribution of ticks that parasitize Microcebus griseorufus at the BezàMahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar
Fig. 2. Differences in infestation rates at Parcel 1 by A) sex B) substrate C) males and substrate and D) females and substrate. * indicates P <0.05, **P <0.01; ***P <0.001 and compares variables on the x-axis.
Figure 6 in Seasonal variations of abundance and live/dead compositions of copepods in Mersin Bay, northeastern Levantine Sea (eastern Mediterranean)
Figure 6. Percentage of dead copepods at the coastal and open water stations (a), and the percentage of dead copepods at 0–100 and 100–195 m at the open water station (b).
Figure 5 in Seasonal variations of abundance and live/dead compositions of copepods in Mersin Bay, northeastern Levantine Sea (eastern Mediterranean)
Figure 5. Cluster diagram of abundance data sets of monthly sampling based on the Bray– Curtis similarity matrix (1 represents coastal station, 2 represents open water station).
Fig. 2 in Seasonal population abundance of the assembly of solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera) according to land-use in Maranhão state, Brazil
Fig. 2. Abundance of solitary bees according to land-use (a), month (b) and interactions between land-use and month (c). Repeated measures ANOVA followed by post hoc Fisher LSD tests (P <0.05). Means ± SE are given.
Fig. 1 in Seasonal population abundance of the assembly of solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera) according to land-use in Maranhão state, Brazil
Fig. 1. Abundance of solitary wasps according to land-use (a), month (b) and interaction between land-use and month (c). Repeated measures ANOVA followed by post hoc Fisher LSD tests (P <0.05). Means ± SE are given.
Figs 4-8 in Influence of environmental variables on seasonal abundance and relative growth of Macrobrachium amazonicum (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea): variations of a continental population
Figs 4-8. Percentage distribution of the independent effect of the abiotic factor on the total abundance (Fig. 4), and on the abundance by demographic category (Figs 5-8) of Macrobrachium amazonicum (Heller, 1862). Grey bars indicate a significant effect (p<0.05), determined by the randomization test. Positive and relative relationships are shown by the bars above and under the horizontal aXis, respectively (EC, conductivity; DO, dissolved oXygen; PI, precipitation; T, water temperature).
Figs 2, 3 in Influence of environmental variables on seasonal abundance and relative growth of Macrobrachium amazonicum (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea): variations of a continental population
Figs 2, 3. Percentage of total abundance (Fig. 2) and juveniles, males, non-ovigerous females and ovigerous females (Fig. 3) of Macrobrachium amazonicum (Heller, 1862) along the study period (J, juveniles; M, males; NOF, non-ovigerous female; OF, ovigerous females).
Figure 3 in Seasonal abundance of Tetranychus urticae and Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Tetranychidae and Phytoseiidae) on four strawberry cultivars
Figure 3. Overall mean numbers of Tetranychus urticae and Amblyseius swirskii on four strawberry cultivars during (a) 2017/2018 and (b) 2018/2019 seasons.
Figure 1 in Seasonal abundance of Tetranychus urticae and Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Tetranychidae and Phytoseiidae) on four strawberry cultivars
Figure 1. Mean numbers of Tetranychus urticae and Amblyseius swirskii populations on four strawberry cultivars during 2017/2018 season.
Figure 2 in Seasonal abundance of Tetranychus urticae and Amblyseius swirskii (Acari: Tetranychidae and Phytoseiidae) on four strawberry cultivars
Figure 2. Mean numbers of Tetranychus urticae and Amblyseius swirskii populations on four strawberry cultivars during 2018/2019 season.
Figure 2 in Climatic and cultivar effects on phytoseiid species establishment and seasonal abundance on citrus
Figure 2 Abundances (number of individuals per beating sample) of phytoseiid mite species on seedlings in August. A – mean Amblyseius swirskii abundance with and without pollen provisioning. B – The relationship betweenTyphlodromus athiasae andA. swirskii abundances on different cultivars. The order of cultivars appearing in the legend corresponds to the magnitudes of their fitted intercepts (Pomello> Volka> …> Shamouti). Error bars are ± 1 SE
Figure 1 in Climatic and cultivar effects on phytoseiid species establishment and seasonal abundance on citrus
Figure 1 Phytoseiid species abundances (number of individuals per beating sample) on different cul- tivars in April, 5 weeks post release, on seedlings where Euseius stipulatus was released, with pollen provisioning (white bars), on seedlings where Euseius scutalis was released, with pollen provision- ing (gray bars), and on seedlings where no predator was released, without pollen provisioning (black bars). A – Euseius stipulatus abundances. B –Iphiseius degeneransabundances. C –Amblyseius swirskii abundances. Error bars are ± 1 SE.
Figure 3 in Climatic and cultivar effects on phytoseiid species establishment and seasonal abundance on citrus
Figure 3 Mean daily reproductive output per female (panels A and B) and survival rate (of both sexes, panels C and D), ofA. swirskii and E. stipulatus on Pomelo and Shamouti leaf discs in climate-controlled chambers. Panels A and C – Temperature regime 1 (simulating spring temperatures). Panels B and D – Temperature regime 2 (simulating summer temperatures). See Table 2 for the daily temperature schedule of each regime. Note the different scales of reproductive output between the two temperature regimes. Error bars are ± 1 SE.
Fig. 1. Relative abundance, A in Spatiotemporal dynamics of insect diversity in tropical seasonal forests is linked to season and elevation, a case from northern Thailand
Fig. 1. Relative abundance, A* (number of individuals caught. trap-1. month-1) of Diptera and Auchenorrhyncha trapped in six elevation zones over 12 months sampling at Doi Inthanon in 2014. Standard errors indicated. Note log10 scale. Data were fitted to a linear regression model in PAST; Diptera, open circles (r2 = 0.8567, p = 0.0081); Auchenorrhyncha, closed circles (r2 = 0.3182, p = 0.2434). In Kruskal-Wallis H-tests of untransformed data there was a significant difference between the medians for Diptera (H = 29.3, p <0.01) but not for Auchenorrhyncha (H = 3.3, p = 0.657).
Fig. 3. Relative abundance, A in Spatiotemporal dynamics of insect diversity in tropical seasonal forests is linked to season and elevation, a case from northern Thailand
Fig. 3. Relative abundance, A* (number of individuals caught. trap-1. month-1) of Diptera and Auchenorrhyncha over 12 months sampling at Doi Inthanon in 2014. Standard errors indicated. Note log10 scale. In Kruskal-Wallis H-tests of untransformed data there was a significant difference between the medians for Diptera (H = 24.5, p <0.05) and Auchenorrhyncha (H = 34.3, p <0.01).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.