Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,913
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,913 results for “single cell RNA sequencing”
Human bone marrow assessment by single-cell RNA sequencing
<p>Seurat objects and CyTOF data for <a href="https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.124928">10.1172/jci.insight.124928</a></p> <p>Please run UpdateSeuratObject() after loading. Small object contains annotated metadata with cca and tsne analyses. Large object contains additional reductions (eg umap). </p>
Cross-disease integration of single-cell RNA sequencing data from lung myeloid cells reveals TAM signature in in vitro model
<p>Single cells from a 3D human cell-based model comprising tumor cell line-derived spheroids, cancer-associated fibroblasts and primary monocytes were dissociated and analyzed using scRNAseq. 4 monocyte donors were used in the 3D model, and 3 monocyte donors were used for 2D differentiation of macrophages.</p>
Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Reveals Placental Response under Environmental Stress
<p>This repository provides scRNA-seq data corresponding to the manuscript "Single-Cell RNA-Sequencing Reveals Placental Response under Environmental Stress" by Van Buren, Azzara, Rangel-Moreno, de la Luz Garcia-Hernandez, Murphy, Cohen, Lin, and Park. The repository includes both count by gene matrices output from CellRanger version 6.0.1 (file names *_filtered_feature_matrix.h5 for each of the eight samples Control_1_M, Control_1_F, Control_2_M, Control_2_F, As_1_M, As_1_F, As_2_M, As_2_F), and a finalized Seurat object including cell type assignments as used for analyses in the manuscript (file name final_Seurat_obj.RData). Accompanying code used in analysis can be found at https://github.com/edvanburen/placenta_code.</p>
Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals dysregulated cellular programs in the inflamed epithelium of Crohn's disease patients.
<p><strong>Crohn’s disease (CD) is a complex inflammatory disorder of incompletely understood molecular aetiology. We generated a large single-cell RNA sequencing dataset from the terminal ileal biopsies of two independent cohorts comprising a total of 50 CD patients and 71 healthy controls. We performed transcriptomic analyses to reveal genes, cell types and mechanisms perturbed in CD, leveraging the power of the two cohorts to confirm our findings and assess replicability. In addition to mapping widespread alterations in cytokine signalling, we provide evidence of pan-epithelial upregulation of MHC class I genes and pathways in CD. Using non-negative matrix factorization we revealed intra- and inter-cellular upregulation of expression programs such as G-protein coupled receptor signalling and interferon signalling, respectively, in CD. We observed an enrichment of CD heritability among marker genes for various activated T cell types and myeloid cells, supporting a causal role for these cell-types in CD aetiology. Comparisons between our discovery and replication cohort revealed significant variation in differential gene-expression replicability across cell types. B, T and myeloid cells showed particularly poor replicability, suggesting caution should be exercised when interpreting unreplicated differential gene-expression result in these cell types. Overall, our results provide a rich resource for identifying cell-type specific biomarkers of Crohn’s disease and identifying genes, cell types and pathways that are causally and replicably associated with disease.</strong></p>
Human breast cancer PDTX models bulk and single cell RNA sequencing
<p>This dataset includes information relevant to the following manuscript from the labs of Prof. Carlos Caldas (University of Cambridge), and Dr. Long V. Nguyen (Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network):</p> <p>Nguyen LV et al. Dynamics and plasticity of human breast cancer single cell-derived clones. Under consideration for publication.</p> <p>Bulk RNA sequencing raw count matrices are provided (RawCounts.csv) along with the normalized count matrices (LogCPMNormCounts.csv).</p> <p>Single cell RNA sequencing count matrix processed from R package metacell is provided (mat.pdx_LN_v2_filt.Rda), along with the mc and mc2d files with information on metacell partitions (mc.pdx_LN_v2_filt.Rda and mc2d.pdx_LN_v2_filt.Rda).</p> <p>Single cell RNA sequencing count matrices processed using Seurat are also provided separately for each PDTX model analysed (STG139.rds, STG201.rds, AB040.rds and IC07.rds).</p> <p>Code and information on data analysis is provided for reviewers in our unpublished manuscript and on Github (https://github.com/cclab-brca/clone-dynamics).</p>
Harnessing single cell RNA sequencing to identify dendritic cell types, characterize their biological states and infer their activation trajectory
<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Dendritic cells (DCs) orchestrate innate and adaptive immunity, by translating the sensing of distinct danger signals into the induction of different effector lymphocyte responses, to induce different defense mechanisms suited to face distinct types of threats. Hence, DCs are very plastic, which results from two key characteristics. First, DCs encompass distinct cell types specialized in different functions. Second, each DC type can undergo different activation states, fine-tuning its functions depending on its tissue microenvironment and the pathophysiological context, by adapting the output signals it delivers to the input signals it receives. Hence, to better understand DC biology and harness it in the clinic, we must determine which combinations of DC types and activation states mediate which functions, and how.<br> To decipher the nature, functions and regulation of DC types and their physiological activation states, one of the methods that can be harnessed most successfully is ex vivo single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). However, for new users of this approach, determining which analytics strategy and computational tools to choose can be quite challenging, considering the rapid evolution and broad burgeoning of the field. In addition, awareness must be raised on the need for specific, robust and tractable strategies to annotate cells for cell type identity and activation states. It is also important to emphasize the necessity of examining whether similar cell activation trajectories are inferred by using different, complementary methods. In this chapter, we take these issues into account for providing a pipeline for scRNAseq analysis and illustrating it with a tutorial reanalyzing a public dataset of mononuclear phagocytes isolated from the lungs of naïve or tumor-bearing mice. We describe this pipeline step-by-step, including data quality controls, dimensionality reduction, cell clustering, cell cluster annotation, inference of the cell activation trajectories and investigation of the underpinning molecular regulation. It is accompanied with a more complete tutorial on Github. We anticipate that this method will be helpful for both wet lab and bioinformatics researchers interested in harnessing scRNAseq data for deciphering the biology of DCs or other cell types, and that it will contribute to establishing high standards in the field.</p> <p><strong>Data : </strong></p> <p>1. Table1_full_version.docx : Marker genes for cell clusters of global Seurat analysis<br> 2. Table2_full_version.docx : List of the Immgen samples used to generate the reference compendium for CMAP signature generation<br> 3. Table5_full_version.docx : Top 20 marker genes for cell clusters of the Seurat analysis on selected cDC1s</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Harnessing single cell RNA sequencing to identify dendritic cell types, characterize their biological states and infer their activation trajectory
<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Dendritic cells (DCs) orchestrate innate and adaptive immunity, by translating the sensing of distinct danger signals into the induction of different effector lymphocyte responses, to induce different defense mechanisms suited to face distinct types of threats. Hence, DCs are very plastic, which results from two key characteristics. First, DCs encompass distinct cell types specialized in different functions. Second, each DC type can undergo different activation states, fine-tuning its functions depending on its tissue microenvironment and the pathophysiological context, by adapting the output signals it delivers to the input signals it receives. Hence, to better understand DC biology and harness it in the clinic, we must determine which combinations of DC types and activation states mediate which functions, and how.<br> To decipher the nature, functions and regulation of DC types and their physiological activation states, one of the methods that can be harnessed most successfully is ex vivo single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). However, for new users of this approach, determining which analytics strategy and computational tools to choose can be quite challenging, considering the rapid evolution and broad burgeoning of the field. In addition, awareness must be raised on the need for specific, robust and tractable strategies to annotate cells for cell type identity and activation states. It is also important to emphasize the necessity of examining whether similar cell activation trajectories are inferred by using different, complementary methods. In this chapter, we take these issues into account for providing a pipeline for scRNAseq analysis and illustrating it with a tutorial reanalyzing a public dataset of mononuclear phagocytes isolated from the lungs of naïve or tumor-bearing mice. We describe this pipeline step-by-step, including data quality controls, dimensionality reduction, cell clustering, cell cluster annotation, inference of the cell activation trajectories and investigation of the underpinning molecular regulation. It is accompanied with a more complete tutorial on Github. We anticipate that this method will be helpful for both wet lab and bioinformatics researchers interested in harnessing scRNAseq data for deciphering the biology of DCs or other cell types, and that it will contribute to establishing high standards in the field.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Data:</strong></p> <p>1. Immgen_cell_types.cls : Microarray Phase 1 expression</p> <p>2. Immgen_norm_exp_data.gct : Microarray Phase 1 class</p> <p> </p>
Harnessing single cell RNA sequencing to identify dendritic cell types, characterize their biological states and infer their activation trajectory
<p><strong>Summary: </strong>Dendritic cells (DCs) orchestrate innate and adaptive immunity, by translating the sensing of distinct danger signals into the induction of different effector lymphocyte responses, to induce different defense mechanisms suited to face distinct types of threats. Hence, DCs are very plastic, which results from two key characteristics. First, DCs encompass distinct cell types specialized in different functions. Second, each DC type can undergo different activation states, fine-tuning its functions depending on its tissue microenvironment and the pathophysiological context, by adapting the output signals it delivers to the input signals it receives. Hence, to better understand DC biology and harness it in the clinic, we must determine which combinations of DC types and activation states mediate which functions, and how.<br> To decipher the nature, functions and regulation of DC types and their physiological activation states, one of the methods that can be harnessed most successfully is ex vivo single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). However, for new users of this approach, determining which analytics strategy and computational tools to choose can be quite challenging, considering the rapid evolution and broad burgeoning of the field. In addition, awareness must be raised on the need for specific, robust and tractable strategies to annotate cells for cell type identity and activation states. It is also important to emphasize the necessity of examining whether similar cell activation trajectories are inferred by using different, complementary methods. In this chapter, we take these issues into account for providing a pipeline for scRNAseq analysis and illustrating it with a tutorial reanalyzing a public dataset of mononuclear phagocytes isolated from the lungs of naïve or tumor-bearing mice. We describe this pipeline step-by-step, including data quality controls, dimensionality reduction, cell clustering, cell cluster annotation, inference of the cell activation trajectories and investigation of the underpinning molecular regulation. It is accompanied with a more complete tutorial on Github. We anticipate that this method will be helpful for both wet lab and bioinformatics researchers interested in harnessing scRNAseq data for deciphering the biology of DCs or other cell types, and that it will contribute to establishing high standards in the field.</p> <p><strong>Data: </strong></p> <p>cDC1_maturation_loom_file.rds : Loom file used for RNA Velocity Analysis</p> <p><br> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Harnessing single cell RNA sequencing to identify dendritic cell types, characterize their biological states and infer their activation trajectory
<p><strong>Summary:</strong> Dendritic cells (DCs) orchestrate innate and adaptive immunity, by translating the sensing of distinct danger signals into the induction of different effector lymphocyte responses, to induce different defense mechanisms suited to face distinct types of threats. Hence, DCs are very plastic, which results from two key characteristics. First, DCs encompass distinct cell types specialized in different functions. Second, each DC type can undergo different activation states, fine-tuning its functions depending on its tissue microenvironment and the pathophysiological context, by adapting the output signals it delivers to the input signals it receives. Hence, to better understand DC biology and harness it in the clinic, we must determine which combinations of DC types and activation states mediate which functions, and how.<br> To decipher the nature, functions and regulation of DC types and their physiological activation states, one of the methods that can be harnessed most successfully is ex vivo single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). However, for new users of this approach, determining which analytics strategy and computational tools to choose can be quite challenging, considering the rapid evolution and broad burgeoning of the field. In addition, awareness must be raised on the need for specific, robust and tractable strategies to annotate cells for cell type identity and activation states. It is also important to emphasize the necessity of examining whether similar cell activation trajectories are inferred by using different, complementary methods. In this chapter, we take these issues into account for providing a pipeline for scRNAseq analysis and illustrating it with a tutorial reanalyzing a public dataset of mononuclear phagocytes isolated from the lungs of naïve or tumor-bearing mice. We describe this pipeline step-by-step, including data quality controls, dimensionality reduction, cell clustering, cell cluster annotation, inference of the cell activation trajectories and investigation of the underpinning molecular regulation. It is accompanied with a more complete tutorial on Github. We anticipate that this method will be helpful for both wet lab and bioinformatics researchers interested in harnessing scRNAseq data for deciphering the biology of DCs or other cell types, and that it will contribute to establishing high standards in the field.</p> <p><strong>Data: </strong></p> <p>MDAlab_cDC1_maturation.tar : Docker image used for the analysis</p>
Extended data for "The need to reassess single-cell RNA sequencing datasets: the importance of biological sample processing"
<p>Extended data for "The need to reassess single-cell RNA sequencing datasets: the importance of biological sample processing"</p>
Single-Cell RNA-sequencing of neural precursor cells from an Alzheimer's mouse model, wild-type mice, and Alzheimer's mice rescued with Usp16 haploinsufficiency
<p class="MsoNormal">Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease observed with aging that represents the most common form of dementia. To date, therapies targeting end-stage disease plaques, tangles, or inflammation have limited efficacy. Therefore, we set out to identify an earlier targetable phenotype. Utilizing a mouse model of AD we found that cell intrinsic neural precursor cell (NPC) dysfunction precedes widespread inflammation and amyloid plaque pathology, making it one of the earlier defects in the evolution of the disease. We demonstrate that reversing impaired NPC self-renewal via genetic reduction of USP16, a histone modifier and critical physiological antagonist of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 1, can prevent downstream cognitive defects and decrease astrogliosis in vivo. To delineate potential self-renewal pathways that might contribute to the defect and rescue of Tg-SwDI NPCs and Tg-SwDI/<em>Usp16<sup><span>+/-</span></sup></em> NPCs, respectively, we performed single-cell RNA-seq and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) on lineage depleted primary FACS-sorted CD31<sup><span>-</span></sup>CD45<sup><span>-</span></sup>Ter119<sup><span>-</span></sup>CD24<sup><span>-</span></sup> NPCs from Tg-SwDI, WT, and Tg-SwDI/<em>Usp16<sup><span>+/-</span></sup></em> mice at 3-4 months and 1 year of age. Using the GSEA Hallmark gene sets, we found only three gene sets that were enriched in Tg-SwDI mice over WT mice and rescued in the Tg-SwDI/<em>Usp16<sup><span>+/-</span></sup> </em>mice at both ages: TGF-ß pathway, oxidative phosphorylation, and Myc Targets. The TGF-ß pathway consistently had the highest normalized enrichment score in pairwise comparisons between Tg-SwDI vs WT and Tg-SwDI vs Tg-SwDI/<em>Usp16<sup><span>+/-</span></sup> </em>of the three rescued pathways. These data suggest that USP16 may regulate neural precursor cell function in part through the BMP pathway.</p>
Script and single cell RNA sequencing datasets of Biomphalaria glabrata hemocyte
<p>The results of the gene and cell barcode counts (feature-barcode matrices) are available in the file "filtered_feature_bc_matrix_Naive". These data have been processed by cellRanger v3.1.0 and can be used with the script "scRNAseq_Biomphalaria_naive" which gathers all the analyses done for publication.</p> <p> </p>
Supplementary Data for "The shaky foundations of simulating single-cell RNA sequencing data"
<p>Supplementary Data for "The shaky foundations of simulating single-cell RNA sequencing data"</p> <p>See description.txt, Supplementary Text, Methods and https://github.com/HelenaLC/simulation-comparison for further description of the files available here.</p>
Exploring cell diversity and fidelity in crustacean limb regeneration using single-nucleus RNA sequencing
<p>R objects containing datasets generated by snRNA-seq on Parhyale hawaiensis limbs. These datasets have been generated during my Phd thesis.</p>
Datasets accompanying "Deciphering the heterogeneity of differentiating hPSC-derived corneal limbal stem cells through single-cell RNA-sequencing"
<p>Datasets include two seurat objects: one with all unfiltered cells and raw expression data (seu_unfiltered.rds) and one dataset with normalised expression and latest annotations (differentiation_object_latest.rds). Additionally, a single-cell object containing post-(py)SCENIC analysis is added (ipsc_scenic.h5ad).</p>
Datasets for evaluating SCEMENT: Scalable and Memory Efficient Integration of Large-scale Single Cell RNA-sequencing Data
<p>This resource contains pre-processed A. thaliana root , the H. sapiens aortic valve datasets, PBMC Covid atlas and public 10x datasetse used in the paper, SCEMENT: Scalable and Memory Efficient Integration of Large-scale Single Cell RNA-sequencing Data. The raw datasets provided in the links below are pre-processed for quality control with respect to both cells and genes. </p> <p>A. thaliana datasets are sourced from the following locations at <a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/home">Single-cell Gene expression Atlas </a>and <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/">Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)</a>:</p> <ol> <li>E-GEOD-121619 : <a title="E-GEOD-121619" href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-121619/results">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-121619/results</a></li> <li>E-GEOD-152766 : <a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-152766/results">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-152766/results</a></li> <li>E-GEOD-158761 : <a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-158761/results">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-158761/results</a></li> <li>E-GEOD-123013 : <a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-123013/results">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-GEOD-123013/results</a></li> </ol> <p>H. sapiens datasets are obtained from the NCBI database : <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA562645/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA562645/ </a></p> <ol> <li>GSE152766: <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE152766">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE152766</a></li> <li>GSE158761: <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE158761">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE158761</a></li> </ol> <p>All COVID atlas datasets are from: <a href="http://covid19.cancer-pku.cn">http://covid19.cancer-pku.cn</a> . covid_atlas_data1.zip contains the h5ad files and covid_atlas_data2.zip contains the Seurat rds files.</p> <p>PBMC datasets are from the following public sources:</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>Dataset Name</td> <td>Chemistry Version</td> <td>Web Link</td> </tr> <tr> <td>10k Human PBMCs, 3' v3.1, Chromium X</td> <td>v3.1</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/10k-human-pbmcs-3-ht-v3-1-chromium-x-3-1-high">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/10k-human-pbmcs-3-ht-v3-1-chromium-x-3-1-high</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>20k Human PBMCs, 3' HT v3.1, Chromium X</td> <td>v3.1</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/20-k-human-pbm-cs-3-ht-v-3-1-chromium-x-3-1-high-6-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/20-k-human-pbm-cs-3-ht-v-3-1-chromium-x-3-1-high-6-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>10k Human PBMCs, 3' v3.1, Chromium Controller</td> <td>v3.1</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/10k-human-pbmcs-3-v3-1-chromium-controller-3-1-high">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/10k-human-pbmcs-3-v3-1-chromium-controller-3-1-high</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Healthy PBMC Chromium Connect (channel 1)</td> <td>v3.1</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/peripheral-blood-mononuclear-cells-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-chromium-connect-channel-1-3-1-standard-3-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/peripheral-blood-mononuclear-cells-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-chromium-connect-channel-1-3-1-standard-3-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Healthy PBMC Chromium Connect (channel 5)</td> <td>v3.1</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/peripheral-blood-mononuclear-cells-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-chromium-connect-channel-5-3-1-standard-3-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/peripheral-blood-mononuclear-cells-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-chromium-connect-channel-5-3-1-standard-3-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>10k PBMCs from a Healthy Donor (v3 chemistry)</td> <td>v3.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/10-k-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-v-3-chemistry-3-standard-3-0-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/10-k-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-v-3-chemistry-3-standard-3-0-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>1k PBMCs from a Healthy Donor (v2 chemistry)</td> <td>v2.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/1-k-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-v-2-chemistry-3-standard-3-0-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/1-k-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-v-2-chemistry-3-standard-3-0-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>1k PBMCs from a Healthy Donor (v3 chemistry)</td> <td>v3.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/1-k-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-v-3-chemistry-3-standard-3-0-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/1-k-pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-v-3-chemistry-3-standard-3-0-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Fresh 68k PBMCs (Donor A)</td> <td>v1.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/fresh-68-k-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/fresh-68-k-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Frozen PBMCs (Donor A)</td> <td>v1.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-a-1-standard-1-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Frozen PBMCs (Donor B)</td> <td>v1.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-b-1-standard-1-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-b-1-standard-1-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Frozen PBMCs (Donor C)</td> <td>v1.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-c-1-standard-1-1-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/frozen-pbm-cs-donor-c-1-standard-1-1-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>PBMCs from a Healthy Donor: Whole Transcriptome Analysis</td> <td>v3.1</td> <td><a href="https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-whole-transcriptome-analysis-3-1-standard-4-0-0">https://www.10xgenomics.com/datasets/pbm-cs-from-a-healthy-donor-whole-transcriptome-analysis-3-1-standard-4-0-0</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>PBMC 600K</td> <td>v1</td> <td><a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-HCAD-4/downloads">https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gxa/sc/experiments/E-HCAD-4/downloads</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>GSM4560071</td> <td>v2.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM4560071">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM4560071</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>GSM4560074</td> <td>v2.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM4560074">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM4560074</a></td> </tr> <tr> <td>GSM4560070</td> <td>v2.0</td> <td><a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM4560070">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSM4560070</a></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>References for the Datasets :</p> <ol> <li>H. sapiens dataset: Kang Xu, Shangbo Xie,Yuming Huang,Tingwen Zhou, Ming Liu, Peng Zhu, Chunli Wang, Jiawei Shi, Fei Li,Frank W. Sellke and Nianguo Dong (2020) Cell-Type Transcriptome Atlas of Human Aortic Valves Reveal Cell Heterogeneity and Endothelial to Mesenchymal Transition Involved in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease.</li> <li>E-GEOD-152766: Shahan R, Hsu C, Nolan TM, Cole BJ, Taylor IW et al. (2020) A single cell Arabidopsisroot atlas reveals developmental trajectories in wild type and cell identity mutants.</li> <li>E-GEOD-121619: Jean-Baptiste K, McFaline-Figueroa JL, Alexandre CM, Dorrity MW, Saunders L et al. (2019) Dynamics of Gene Expression in Single Root Cells of Arabidopsis thaliana.</li> <li>E-GEOD-123013: Ryu KH, Huang L, Kang HM, Schiefelbein J. (2019) Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Resolves Molecular Relationships Among Individual Plant Cells.</li> <li>E-GEOD-158761: Gala HP, Lanctot A, Jean-Baptiste K, Guiziou S, Chu JC et al. (2020) A single cell view of the transcriptome during lateral root initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana.</li> <li>COVID Atlas Reference: Xianwen Ren, Wen Wen, Xiaoying Fan et.al. (2021) COVID-19 immune features revealed by a large-scale single-cell transcriptome atlas</li> <li>PBMC data are downloaded from respective links</li> </ol>
Data for 'Comparative Analysis of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Methods'
<p>Raw sequencing data to "Comparative Analysis of Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Methods". </p> <p>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28212749</p> <p> </p> <p>In addition to the GEO submission https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE75790, you can find here raw bam files for UMI-methods tagged with cell barcode and UMI sequences.</p> <p>MD5 checksum: f10825509952fffd9c4dc0c1dcb9eb8e</p>
Chronic social defeat stress induces meningeal neutrophilia via type I interferon signaling: single cell RNA sequencing data
<p>Meningeal single cell RNA sequencing data</p> <p>Meningeal samples were collected from both dorsal and ventral skull, avoiding inclusion of choroid plexus. Samples were digested in 2.5 mg/mL Collagenase D (Cat. #11088858001; Roche) and 12.5 μL of 0.5 mg/mL DNAseI (Cat. #L5002139; Worthington), put on a shaker at 370C for 30 m, diluted with cold HBSS + 0.1% BSA, and mashed through a 70 μm cell strainer prior to sorting.</p> <p>Data represent live, nucleated, singlet cells (DAPI-DRAQ5+) sorted on a BD FACS Aria Fusion into HBSS + 10% FBS prior to droplet encapsulation using 10x Genomics’ Drop-seq platform (Chromium v2).</p> <p>10X chip lane is indicate by 'group' column</p> <p>Group 1 = 4 pooled homecage control (unstressed) mice</p> <p>Group 2 = 4 pooled homecage control (unstressed) mice</p> <p>Group 3 = 4 pooled mice exposed to chronic social defeat for 14 days; tissue was collected 2 hours following final defeat</p> <p>See the following repositories for data processing:</p> <p><a href="https://github.com/maryellenlynall/2019_bcell_stress/blob/master/bcellstress20.Rmd">https://github.com/maryellenlynall/2019_bcell_stress/</a> (processing from raw files starts at bcellstress020.Rmd)</p> <p><a href="https://github.com/staceykigar/meningeal_neut/">https://github.com/staceykigar/meningeal_neut/</a></p> <p>We also provide a processed dataset (processed.RData) with assays 'counts' and 'logcounts' which is the processed single cell object saved at line "# Save object for upload to Zenodo" in script <a href="https://github.com/staceykigar/meningeal_neut/">https://github.com/staceykigar/meningeal_neut/</a>neutrophilstress01.Rmd </p> <p>Cluster annotations are in sce$Annotation</p> <p>Neutrophil subcluster annotations are in sce$Subcluster</p> <p>Sample condition is in sce$cond, where "HC" indicates homecage control and "SD" indicates chronic social defeat</p> <p>10X chip lane is in sce$group</p>
Single-cell RNA sequencing of mouse embryonic cells from the oocyte, 2-cell, 4-cell, 8-cell, blastocyst, and morula stages
<p>STRT-N is a newly optimized single-cell RNA sequencing method for studies of early genome activation in mammalian preimplantation development. Single embryos from the oocyte, 2-cell, 4-cell, 8-cell, blastocyst, and morula stages were sampled for experiments and were sequenced using STRT-N method. Here is the raw data from STRTN-seq. FASTQ files are available in <a href="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-BSST976">BioStudies database</a>.</p>
Additional raw data in `Cell-type-specific co-expression inference from single cell RNA-sequencing data'.
<p>This repository holds the additional raw data used to generate figures in the publication "<strong><em>Cell-type-specific co-expression inference from single cell RNA-sequencing data</em></strong>" (preprint version: <a href="http://source%20code%20repo%20for%20%60cell-type-specific%20co-expression%20inference%20from%20single%20cell%20rna-sequencing%20data%27./">https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.13.520181v1</a>).</p> <p>Table of contents:</p> <ul> <li>Figure_1B.rds: <ul> <li>raw data of Figure 1B </li> <li>co-expression estimates of 500*499/2 gene pairs across 100 replicates for 7 methods under two settings of sequencing detph variations</li> </ul> </li> <li>Supplementary_Figure_1B.rds: <ul> <li>raw data of Supplementary Figure 1B </li> <li>co-expression estimates of 500*499/2 gene pairs across 100 replicates for 7 methods under two settings of sequencing detph variations</li> </ul> </li> <li>Supplementary_Figure_2.rds: <ul> <li>raw data of Supplementary Figure 2 </li> <li>empirical power evaluated for 4999 gene pairs and 6 methods</li> </ul> </li> <li>Figure_3B.rds: <ul> <li>raw data of Figure 3B</li> <li>co-expression estimates of a network of 500 genes for 9 methods across 100 replicates</li> </ul> </li> <li>Additional_Raw_Data.xlsx <ul> <li>raw data of Figure 3A: (geometric mean expression levels, co-expression estimates) for 4999 gene pairs and 11 methods</li> <li>raw data of Figure 3C: running times for 11 methods</li> <li>raw data of Supplementary Figure 3: (geometric mean expression levels, co-expression estimates) for 4999 gene pairs and 11 methods under two settings of sequencing detph variations</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.