Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

51

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

51 results for “software quality”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo36/100

An empirical study on the influence of developers' experience on software test code quality

<p>Software developers&#39; engagement in open-source software projects lies in different levels of participation, e.g., core or peripheral developers. Recent studies have investigated the role of developers&#39; contributions and their influence on software quality. However, few studies investigate the relationship between the developers&#39; experience and test code quality in software projects. In this study, we aim to investigate the relationship between the developers&#39; experience and the test code quality from the perspective of test smells. We performed an empirical study to analyze the insertion and removal of test smells in four open-source Java projects. We collected 18 test smells and calculated their authorship through the projects&#39; Tags. &nbsp;The four software projects contain 386 test classes and 5,178 test smells. We found out that the insertion of 67.28\% of test smells occurs during the test class creation, and the removal of 20.88\% of test smells occurs during the evolution of projects. In addition, core developers are responsible for inserting 88.91\% and removing 89.82\% test smells. Core developers insert and remove more test smells than the peripheral developers. Most test smell removal is due to test code deletion, which may indicate that both core and peripheral developers are unaware of test smells in test code.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2022View details →
zenodo36/100

Towards Understanding the Impact of Code Modifications on Software Quality Metrics

<p>The provided dataset contains the data used by "Towards Understanding the Impact of Code Modifications on Software Quality Metrics", in order to examine the impact of code changes in software quality metrics and identify types of code changes with similar impact and the results obtained.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2023View details →
zenodo36/100

Which RESTful API Design Rules are Important and How Do They Improve Software Quality? A Delphi Study with Industry Experts

<p>The dataset of a Delphi study with 8 industry experts who reached consensus on the perceived importance and positive software quality impact of 82 RESTful API design rules from the catalogue by Mark&nbsp;Mass&eacute;&nbsp;(&quot;REST API Design Rulebook&quot;,&nbsp;O&rsquo;Reilly Media, 2011). The replication package contains:</p> <ul> <li><strong>rules.csv:</strong> the final consensus results for the 82 rules in CSV format</li> <li><strong>rule-importance.xlsx</strong>: the detailed results and analysis for rule importance as an Excel spreadsheet</li> <li><strong>rule-sw-quality-impact.xlsx</strong>:&nbsp;the detailed results and analysis for rule impact on software quality as an Excel spreadsheet</li> </ul> <p>In this version, we updated the final numbers for the software quality mapping with the results from the synchronous meeting.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2021View details →
zenodo36/100

Quality and Trackability of Author Indicated Software Citations (NEST Case Study)

<p>This dataset contains a randomly selected minimal sample of 471 NEST software citations, which were provided by authors and published on the NEST software page as a publication list. The software citations were analyzed on their quality and trackability.</p> <p>The data was collected in 2020 for a PhD thesis on research data and software (re)use indications in scholarly works.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2021View details →
zenodo36/100

Dataset for paper: Perception of Software Quality Teaching from Information Technology Undergraduate Final-Year Students

<p>Dataset mentioned in the paper &quot;Perception of Software Quality Teaching from Information Technology Undergraduate Final-Year Students&quot;, submitted to&nbsp;XXVI Ibero-American Conference on Software Engineering (CIbSE 2023). There are two files available: one PDF file, where the survey presented as it was submitted to the participants of our study, in portuguese;&nbsp;and a .CSV one, with the answers of this survey.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
dryad36/100

Scores on independence, quality of life, and satisfaction on visual mapping software intervention in children with Down syndrome

<p>Enhancing independence and quality of life are key modifiable outcomes that are short- and long-term goals for children with Down syndrome and for their parents. Here we report the outcome of a 4-week feasibility study in a cohort of 26 children with Down Syndrome, 7–17 years old, who used an assistive technology approach that incorporated smart device software and <span>step-by-step</span> pictures (the MapHabit System). Parents reported improvements in children's activities of daily living, quality of life, and independence. They recommended this technology to other families. This report and its findings underscore the feasibility of using assistive technology in children with Down syndrome within home and family settings.</p> <p>The current findings that assistive technology can be used successfully and effectively in family and home settings set the stage for more informative systematic studies using assistive technology for this population.</p>

opencc-zeroMay 2023View details →
zenodo36/100

Evolution of Teamwork Quality Instruments in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review

<p>Suplemmentary Material of the article:&nbsp;Evolution of Teamwork Quality Instruments in Agile Software Development: A Systematic Literature Review</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2023View details →
zenodo36/100

Free Open Source Communities Sustainability: Does It Make a Difference in Software Quality?

<p>&nbsp;Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) communities&#39; sustainability is important to maintain and promote access to technology and innovation. While considerable effort has been invested on the topic of FOSS sustainability, limited attention has been given to its impact on community outcomes, e.g., software quality. We conducted an empirical study to examine the influence of FOSS sustainability on software quality. We used projects&#39; data sourced from the Apache Software Foundation Incubator. A total of 236 projects were originally selected. Our final list included a total of 217 projects after applying our exclusion criteria. We used Bayesian data analysis, which incorporates probability distributions to represent the regression coefficients and intercepts. Our findings suggest that our selected sustainability metrics do not significantly affect defect density or code coverage. However, we observed a positive impact of community age on specific code quality metrics, such as risk complexity, number of very large files, and code duplication percentage. Interestingly, our findings show that even when communities are experiencing sustainability, certain code quality metrics are negatively impacted. This implies that code quality practices are not consistently linked to sustainability, and defect management and prevention may be prioritized over the former.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2023View details →
dryad36/100

Scores on independence, quality of life, and satisfaction on visual mapping software intervention in children with Down syndrome

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicMay 2023View details →
zenodo32/100

Implementing Traceability Repositories as Graph Databases for Software Quality Improvement: Datasets used to test our methodology that is presented in the paper 10.1109/QRS.2018.00040

<p>The first dataset is the Event Based Traceability for Managing Evolutionary Change (EBT), it is a public dataset provided by CoEST, the original artifacts and trace links are represented in XML and text format. From the EBT dataset, we selected the 41<em> requirements </em>and 25<em> test case </em>artifacts, in addition to the answer set of 51 trace links which relates the <em>requirements </em>with the<em> test case. </em>Artifacts and trace links are prepared in XML format<strong>. </strong>The data set contains XML for each artifact such as RQ.xml, EBTrelations.xml is the answer set file, TradModel.xml which describes the defined model and TradTraceabilityRule.xml that includes the rules applied for trace link types.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The second dataset AgileOERP is collected from commercial management tool to customize an open source ERP applying agile methodology. It contains 350<em> user stories (US), </em>1323<em> tasks (TS) </em>and 198<em> developer test (DT) </em>artifacts, in addition to answer set of trace links that manually generated by developers which relates the <em>user story </em>artifact with<em> task (</em>1304) artifact, as such relates the <em>task </em>artifact with<em> developer test </em>artifact (65). Artifacts and trace links are prepared in XML format<strong>. </strong>The data set contains XML for each artifact such as US.xml, ERPrelations.xml is the answer set file, AgileModel.xml which describes the defined model and AgileTraceabilityRule,xml that includes all rules applied for trace links&nbsp; type</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>The original dataset of the last dataset is the Aqualush irrigation system which is used as a case study in &ldquo;C. Fox, Introduction to Software Engineering Design: Processes, Principles and Patterns with UML2. Addison-Wesley, 2006&rdquo;. The trace links are generated and provided in &ldquo;E. Ben Charrada, D. Caspar, C. Jeanneret, and M. Glinz, towards a benchmark for traceability, in Joint EVOL and IWPSE 2011, pp. 21-30&rdquo;, in HTML format. For our work, we selected the <em>software requirements specification (</em>396 SRS), <em>user level requirements (</em>48 ULR), <em>use case (</em>74 UC), <em>detailed design (85 DD) </em>and <em>software architecture(15 SArch) </em>artifacts in addition to the answer set of trace links that relate the SRS with other artifacts(4038) and thus relates the DD artifact with other artifacts (1719) . Artifacts and trace links are prepared in XML<strong>. </strong>The data set contains XML for each artifact such as SRS.xml, AqualushRelations.xml is the answer set file, TradModel.xml which describes the defined model and TradTraceabilityRule.xml that includes the rules applied for trace link types.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2018View details →
zenodo32/100

Building DEVS Models from the Functional Design of Software Architecture Components to Estimate Quality

<p>Presentation of the paper titled &quot;Building DEVS Models from the Functional Design of Software Architecture Components to Estimate Quality&quot;.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Exploring Generative AI Tools for Software Quality: Insights from a Rapid Multivocal Literature Review

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

To Type or Not to Type? A Systematic Comparison of the Software Quality of JavaScript and TypeScript Applications on GitHub

<p>This repository contains the data and script (sampling, data collection, statistical analysis)&nbsp;for a repository mining study on GitHub to compare the software quality of JavaScript and TypeScript applications. Please refer to the README for more information.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Predicting Bug-Inducing Commits Using Software Quality Metrics

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Evaluating an instrument of the research software related to software quality - Dimension 2 - Dataset of Focus Groups

<p>Artifacts used for data collection and analysis of the focus group sessions during the evaluation of an instrument for research software related to software quality - dimension 2.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

How Tertiary Studies perform Quality Assessment of Secondary Studies in Software Engineering - Replication Package

<p>Replication Package for the paper:</p> <p>D. Costal, C. Farr&eacute;, X. Franch, C. Quer. 2021. How Tertiary Studies perform Quality Assessment of Secondary Studies in Software Engineering. CIbSE 2021.</p> <p>Please refer to the above paper if you want to cite/use this data.</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2021View details →
zenodo32/100

Supplementary Materials and Raw Data for "Automated Test Suite Generation for Software Product Lines based on Quality-Diversity Optimisation"

<p>Supplementary Materials and Raw Data for &quot;Automated Test Suite Generation for Software Product Lines based on Quality-Diversity Optimisation&quot;</p> <p>1. OnlineSupplement.pdf------Online&nbsp;supplementary data for the paper</p> <p>2. RQ1-4.rar----Raw data for the paper</p> <p>3.&nbsp;Runtime to generate, optimise and execution test suites.xlsx -----Data used in Section 7 PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS</p> <p>Source code of the algorithms used to produce these data can be found at GitHub&nbsp;https://github.com/gzhuxiangyi/SPLTestingMAP</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2023View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

New Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy Software in the Improvement of Image Quality

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03980535. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
zenodo28/100

Meta-models for Software Quality and Its Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review (Article Pool)

<p>This pdf includes all of the articles that analyzed in the study:&nbsp;&quot;Meta-models for Software Quality and Its Evaluation: A Systematic Literature Review&quot;.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Data Extraction and Quality Assessment about Cybersecurity in the Context of Agile Software Development

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2024View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record