Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
319
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
319 results for “spider mite”
Fig. 9 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries
Fig. 9. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) eggs in treatments of N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) (B), plots on Navaho variety in a field experiment.
Fig. 5 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries
Fig. 5. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) motiles in N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) (B), plots on Arapaho variety in a field experiment. (The arrows on the graph indicate the time of treatment and mite density at that time.)
Fig. 3 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries
Fig. 3. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) eggs stages in N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) (B), plots on Arapaho variety in a greenhouse experiment.
Fig. 1 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries
Fig. 1. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) motiles in treatments of N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) plots (B), on Arapaho variety in a greenhouse experiment. (The arrows on the graph indicate the time of treatment and mite density at that time.)
Fig. 6 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries
Fig. 6. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) motiles in treatments of N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) (B), plots on Navaho variety in a field experiment. (The arrows on the graph indicate the time of treatment and mite density at that time.)
Fig. 10 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries
Fig. 10. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) eggs in treatments of N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) (B), plots on Ouachita variety in a field experiment. (The arrows on the graph indicate the time of treatment and mite density at that time.)
Fig. 4 in Acaricide efficacy and resistance in South Carolina tomato populations of twospotted spider mite
Fig. 4. LC50 values (± 95% confidence interval) for 7 AIs screened against a known-susceptible lab colony and 3 field-collected populations of Tetranychus urticae. When present, the dashed line indicates the amount of AI in the maximum labelled field rate. This value also is indicated in each graph by "FR=". The resistance ratio of each AI × population is written above each data point.
Fig. 1 in Acaricide efficacy and resistance in South Carolina tomato populations of twospotted spider mite
Fig. 1. Mean (± SE) spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) counts per tomato leaflet in a 2015 and 2016 acaricide efficacy trial conducted in South Carolina, USA. Arrows indicate dates of acaricide applications. Treatments with the same letter within a date are not statistically different (lsmeans P> 0.05). "ns" indicates that the overall model was not significant. The dotted line represents the action threshold for spider mites in tomato (2 per leaflet).
Fig. 2 in Acaricide efficacy and resistance in South Carolina tomato populations of twospotted spider mite
Fig. 2. Mean (± SE) cumulative mite d of Tetranychus urticae in a 2015 and 2016 acaricide efficacy trial conducted in South Carolina, USA. Arrows indicate dates of acaricide applications. Treatments with the same letter within a date are not statistically different (lsmeans P> 0.05). "ns" indicates that the overall model was not significant.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Spider Mites Collection of Jean Gutierrez.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Spider Mites Collection of Jean Gutierrez". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/ac60a288-fcc9-43fe-a7d4-e732b748a981">https://bionomia.net/dataset/ac60a288-fcc9-43fe-a7d4-e732b748a981</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/ac60a288-fcc9-43fe-a7d4-e732b748a981">https://gbif.org/dataset/ac60a288-fcc9-43fe-a7d4-e732b748a981</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Linked collectors and determiners for: New species, new records and re-description of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) from India.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "New species, new records and re-description of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) from India". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/4a2f1ce7-212f-4961-9f19-937ffbb0d21b">https://bionomia.net/dataset/4a2f1ce7-212f-4961-9f19-937ffbb0d21b</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/4a2f1ce7-212f-4961-9f19-937ffbb0d21b">https://gbif.org/dataset/4a2f1ce7-212f-4961-9f19-937ffbb0d21b</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Figure 12 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 12 Seasonal abundance of predatory mites observed during 2010 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in Farm B.
Figure 11 Seasonal abundance ofEotetranychus. carpiniobserved during 2010 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 11 Seasonal abundance ofEotetranychus. carpiniobserved during 2010 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in Farm B.
Figure 7 Seasonal abundance ofKampimodromus aberransobserved during 2010 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 7 Seasonal abundance ofKampimodromus aberransobserved during 2010 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 2 Seasonal abundance ofEotetranychus carpiniobserved during 2009 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 2 Seasonal abundance ofEotetranychus carpiniobserved during 2009 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 8 Seasonal abundance ofTyphlodromus pyriobserved during 2009 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 8 Seasonal abundance ofTyphlodromus pyriobserved during 2009 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 9 Seasonal abundance ofTyphlodromus pyriobserved during 2010 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 9 Seasonal abundance ofTyphlodromus pyriobserved during 2010 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 4 Seasonal abundance ofAmblyseius andersoniobserved during 2009 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 4 Seasonal abundance ofAmblyseius andersoniobserved during 2009 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
Figure 10 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 10 Canopy's feature parameters observed in different vineyards of Farm A. Different letters indicate significant differences at Tukey test (α = 0.05).
Figure 3 Seasonal abundance ofEotetranychus carpiniobserved during 2010 in Biological control of spider mites in North-Italian vineyards using pesticide resistant predatory mites
Figure 3 Seasonal abundance ofEotetranychus carpiniobserved during 2010 (months are indicated in x-axis) on different treatments in vineyards of Farm A.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.