Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedJul 2010View details →

Fig. 10 Triops emeritensis n in Phylogeny, molecular ecology and taxonomy of southern Iberian lineages of Triops mauritanicus (Crustacea: Notostraca)

Fig. 10 Triops emeritensis n. sp., adult male (holotype). a Distal part of 2nd trunk limb. b Telson, dorsal view. c Proximal region of 3rd endite of 10th trunk limb, anterior view; meshwork spines and associated row of spinules shown in black, submarginal spines and edge of endite in grey

opennotspecifiedJul 2010View details →

Fig. 8 Triops gadensis n in Phylogeny, molecular ecology and taxonomy of southern Iberian lineages of Triops mauritanicus (Crustacea: Notostraca)

Fig. 8 Triops gadensis n. sp., adult male (holotype). a Telson, dorsal view. b Distal part of 2nd trunk limb. c Proximal region of 5th endite of 2nd trunk limb

opennotspecifiedJul 2010View details →

Fig. 7 Triops baeticus n in Phylogeny, molecular ecology and taxonomy of southern Iberian lineages of Triops mauritanicus (Crustacea: Notostraca)

Fig. 7 Triops baeticus n. sp., adult male (holotype). a Telson, dorsal view. b Distal part of 2nd trunk limb. c Proximal region of 5th endite of 2nd trunk limb

opennotspecifiedAug 2022View details →

Fig. 6 in Molecular tools for resolving Merodon ruficornis group (Diptera, Syrphidae) taxonomy

Fig. 6 Taxa tree chronogram of Merodon ruficornis species group obtained by BEAST. Mean node ages were estimated using a Lognormal relaxed clock model and Birth–Death tree model. The numbers represent the divergence time in million years ago (Mya)

opennotspecifiedAug 2022View details →

Fig. 4 in Molecular tools for resolving Merodon ruficornis group (Diptera, Syrphidae) taxonomy

Fig. 4 Bayesian trees of the Merodon ruficornis species group based on ITS2 sequences. Bayesian posterior probabilities are indicated near nodes. a Sequences without gaps. b Sequences with binary coded gaps

opennotspecifiedAug 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Molecular tools for resolving Merodon ruficornis group (Diptera, Syrphidae) taxonomy

Fig. 1 Utility of analysed molecular tools for resolving taxonomy in Merodon ruficornis species group. Each species and/or population is represented by a different colour. Solid colour boxes indicate successful species/population delimitation by a particular tool. Multicolour boxes depict clusters formed by multiple taxa. The amplification of ITS2 sequences from M. fulvitarsis samples was not successful (NA)

Fig. 5 in Molecular taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the Niphargus tatrensis species complex (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) in Austria

Fig. 5 Time-calibrated maximum clade credibility tree of the Niphargus tatrensis species complex derived from a BEAST analysis of concatenated 28S and COI sequences. Both the posterior probabilities of the nodes and the 95% confidence intervals of their ages are reported. Colours of node dots and wedges of pie charts represent the ancestral area of distribution of each main clade (Slovenia: purple; North

Fig. 3 in Molecular taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the Niphargus tatrensis species complex (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) in Austria

Fig. 3 Results of the species delimitation methods compared with the maximum clade credibility tree of the Niphargus tatrensis complex, derived from BEAST analysis of COI sequences. Both the posterior probabilities of each node and the 95% confidence interval on its relative age (shown as a blue bar) are reported. Morphospecies delimitation is derived by the cladistic analysis conducted by Fišer et al.

Fig. 1 in Molecular taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the Niphargus tatrensis species complex (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) in Austria

Fig. 1 Distribution of the sampling sites of the Niphargus tatrensis species complex used in the phylogenetic and species delimitation analyses. Names refer to morphospecies identification; T, type locality.

Fig. 2 in Molecular taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the Niphargus tatrensis species complex (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) in Austria

Fig. 2 Maximum-likelihood molecular phylogeny (IQ-TREE) of the Niphargus tatrensis complex, built using 28S rRNA and COI concatenat- ed sequences. The node support values shown are Bayesian posterior

Fig. 8 Niphargus moogi n in Molecular taxonomy, phylogeny and biogeography of the Niphargus tatrensis species complex (Amphipoda, Niphargidae) in Austria

Fig. 8 Niphargus moogi n. sp. holotype male. a Outer lobe of labium; b labrum; c maxilla II; d maxilla I; e–g maxilliped: palp (e), outer lobe (f) and inner lobe (g). Scale bars, 0.1 mm

FIGURE 5 in Taxonomy of the tribe Apieae (Apiaceae) revisited as revealed by molecular phylogenies and morphological characters

FIGURE 5. Reconstruction of the eight selected morphological characters on the majority consensus tree obtained from the Bayesian analysis of the ITS matrix. Only clades belonging to tribe Apieae, and one terminal per species are displayed. A. Life form; B. Leaf blade shape; C. Presence and persistence of bracts; D. Presence and persistence of bracteoles; E. Flower colour; F. Mericarp indumentum; G. Mericarps dorsal ribs morphology; H. Mericarps marginal ribs morphology. Legend for G is as follow: a, ribs keeled; b, ribs narrowly winged; c, ribs not prominent but visible as lines; d, ribs inconspicuous. At the right, accepted taxa names are showed in regular italics.

FIGURE 4 in Taxonomy of the tribe Apieae (Apiaceae) revisited as revealed by molecular phylogenies and morphological characters

FIGURE 4. Transverse section of the mericarps of species representing of all the genera of tribe Apieae except Billburttia. All the photographs show mericarps in cross section except for Naufraga (J) which is a complete schizocarp. Scale bar = 1 mm. Lower cases indicate in the different slides the main carpological features commented in this work: c, commissure; mr, marginal ribs; pr, primary dorsal ribs; sr, secondary ribs; v, vallecula; cv, commissural vitta; vv, vallecular vitta; vb, vascular bundles. Dash lines in figures C and O depicts the break of fruit layers due to manipulation. For voucher information see Table 1. Species are provided in alphabetical order. A. Ammi majus. B. Anethum foeniculoides. C. Anethum graveolens, arrow depicts the vascular bundles within a broken winged marginal rib. D. Apium anuum. E. Apium graveolens. F. Deverra aphylla. G. Deverra denudata. H. Deverra intermedia. I. Foeniculum vulgare (A. Aparicio & J. G. Rowe s.n., MA). J. Naufraga balearica, arrow depicts commissural vascular bundles. K. Petroselinum crispum, arrow depicts an accessorial vitta (E. San Miguel ESM278, MA). L. Pseudoridolfia fennanei (paratype J. Mathez 6979ter, MPU). M. Ridolfia

FIGURE 3 in Taxonomy of the tribe Apieae (Apiaceae) revisited as revealed by molecular phylogenies and morphological characters

FIGURE 3. Mericarps of species representing of all the genera of tribe Apieae (except Billburttia). Pictures represent the adaxial view of a single mericap unless specified otherwise. A. Foeniculum vulgare. B. Anethum foeniculoides, C. Anethum graveolens. D. Naufraga balearica (two mericarps on the pedicelle). E. Petroselinum crispum (lateral view). F. Ridolfia segetum. G. Ammi majus. H. Stoibrax involucratum. I. Apium graveolens. J. Apium annuum. K. Pseudoridolfia fennanei. L. Stoibrax dichotomum. M. Seseli webbii. N. Sclerosciadium nodiflorum. O. Deverra denudata. P. Deverra aphylla (two mericarps kept together).

FIGURE 2 in Taxonomy of the tribe Apieae (Apiaceae) revisited as revealed by molecular phylogenies and morphological characters

FIGURE 2. Majority rule consensus tree obtained from the Bayesian analysis of the rps16 matrix with coded indels. Bayesian posterior probabilities are given in regular typeface next to the respective branches when greater than 0.9; bootstrap values from the corresponding maximum parsimony consensus tree are given in italics when greater than 75%. Well supported major clades and subclades are named according Results. The white arrows at right point the placement of the different accessions of Stoibrax. The black arrows point the

FIGURE 1 in Taxonomy of the tribe Apieae (Apiaceae) revisited as revealed by molecular phylogenies and morphological characters

FIGURE 1. Majority rule consensus tree obtained from the Bayesian analysis of ITS matrix with coded indels. Bayesian posterior probabilities are given in regular typeface next to the respective branches; bootstrap values from the corresponding maximum parsimony consensus tree are given in italics when greater than 75%. Well supported major clades and subclades are named according to Results. The white arrows at right point the placement of the different accessions of Stoibrax. The black arrows point the placement of the different

opennotspecifiedMar 2015View details →

FIGURE 3 in Molecular phylogeny and taxonomy of Fibroporia (Basidiomycota) in China

FIGURE 3. Microscopic structures of Fibroporia albicans (drawn from the holotype). a: Basidiospores. b: Basidia and basidioles. c: Cystidioles. d: Hyphae from trama. e: Hyphae from subiculum.

opennotspecifiedMar 2015View details →

FIGURE 1 in Molecular phylogeny and taxonomy of Fibroporia (Basidiomycota) in China

FIGURE 1. Maximum parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of Fibroporia albicans and its related species, based on ITS sequences. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap proportions (before slash) higher than 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (after slash) more than 0.95. Newly generated sequences are indicated in bold.

opennotspecifiedMar 2019View details →

FIGURE 15 in Contributions to the taxonomy of the Irano-Turanian genus Rhabdosciadium (Apiaceae): Nomenclatural notes, carpology, molecular phylogeny and the description of a new species from Bitlis (Turkey)

FIGURE 15. Mericarp cross-sections of Rhabdosciadium hizanense (A) and R. anatolyi (B). Pr: primary ridges make finger-like projections in R. hizanense (A), but only slightly protrude in R. anatolyi (B); bd: Vascular bundle; Vit: Vittae; P: Pericarp; S: Seed; Endsp: Endosperm; F: Funicle; Hc: Hypodermal collenchyma. Scale bar = 300 μm.