Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

1,201

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

1,201 results for “oncology”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

The Effect of Chewing Gum and Hot Compresses on Gynecologic Oncologic Surgery

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06196138. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Improvement of Self Management for Oncologic Patients With Pain

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00779597. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
dryad32/100

A practical approach to febrile cancer patients: Diagnostic stewardship in Oncology units

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicAug 2024View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: A virtual molecular tumor board platform to improve efficiency and scalability of delivering precision oncology to physicians and their patients

OBJECTIVES: Scalable informatics solutions that provide molecularly-tailored treatment recommendations to clinicians are needed to streamline Precision Oncology in care settings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a cloud-based virtual molecular tumor board (VMTB) platform that included a knowledgebase, scoring model, rules engine, an asynchronous virtual chat room and a reporting tool that generated a treatment plan for each of the 1725 patients based on their molecular profile, previous treatment history, structured trial eligibility criteria, clinically relevant cancer gene-variant assertions, biomarker-treatment associations, and current treatment guidelines. The VMTB systematically allows clinician users to combine expert-curated data and structured data from clinical charts along with molecular testing data to develop consensus on treatments, especially those that require off-label and clinical trial considerations. RESULTS: The VMTB was used as part of the cancer care process for a focused subset of 1725 patients referred by advocacy organizations wherein resultant personalized reports were successfully delivered to treating oncologists. Median turnaround time from data receipt to report delivery decreased from 14 days to 4 days over 4 years while the volume of cases increased nearly twofold each year. Using a novel scoring model for ranking therapy options, oncologists chose to implement the VMTB-derived therapies over others, except when pursuing immunotherapy options without molecular support. DISCUSSION: VMTBs will play an increasingly critical role in precision oncology as the compendium of biomarkers and associated therapy options available to a patient continues to expand. CONCLUSION: Further development of such clinical augmentation tools that systematically combine patient-derived molecular data, real world evidence from electronic health records, and expert curated knowledgebases on biomarkers with computational tools for ranking best treatments can support care pathways at point of care.

opencc-zeroSep 2020View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Current management of surgical oncologic emergencies

Objectives: For some oncologic emergencies, surgical interventions are necessary for dissolution or temporary relieve. In the absence of guidelines, the most optimal method for decision making would be in a multidisciplinary cancer conference (MCC). In an acute setting, the opportunity for multidisciplinary discussion is often not available. In this study, the management and short term outcome of patients after surgical oncologic emergency consultation was analyzed. Method: A prospective registration and follow up of adult patients with surgical oncologic emergencies between 01-11-2013 and 30-04-2014. The follow up period was 30 days. Results: In total, 207 patients with surgical oncologic emergencies were included. Postoperative wound infections, malignant obstruction, and clinical deterioration due to progressive disease were the most frequent conditions for surgical oncologic emergency consultation. During the follow up period, 40% of patients underwent surgery. The median number of involved medical specialties was two. Only 30% of all patients were discussed in a MCC within 30 days after emergency consultation, and only 41% of the patients who underwent surgery were discussed in a MCC. For 79% of these patients, the surgical procedure was performed before the MCC. Mortality within 30 days was 13%. Conclusion: In most cases, surgery occurred without discussing the patient in a MCC, regardless of the fact that multiple medical specialties were involved in the treatment process. There is a need for prognostic aids and acute oncology pathways with structural multidisciplinary management. These will provide in faster institution of the most appropriate personalized cancer care, and prevent unnecessary investigations or invasive therapy.

opencc-zeroDec 2014View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Oncological and surgical outcome after treatment of pelvic sarcomas

Background and Objectives. Treatment of pelvic tumors remains challenging due to complex anatomy, poor oncological outcome and high complication rates. We sought to investigate the long-term oncological and surgical outcome of these patients. Methods. Between 1980 and 2012, 147 patients underwent surgical treatment for pelvic sarcoma. Histological diagnosis was Chondrosarcoma in 54, Ewing's Sarcoma/PNET in 37, Osterosarcoma in 32 and others in 24 patients. Statistical analysis for the evaluation of oncological and surgical outcome was performed by applying Cox proportional hazards regression and Fine-Gray regression models for competing risk (CR) endpoints. Results. The estimated overall survival (OS) to death was 80%, 45% and 37% at 1, 5 and 10 years, respectively. Univariate analyses revealed a statistically significant unadjusted influence of age age (p=0.038; HR=1.01), margin (p=0.043; HR=0.51) and grade (p=0.001; HR=2.27) on OS. Considering the multivariable model, grade (p=0.005; HR=3.04) and tumor volume (p=0.014; HR=1.18) presented themselves as independent prognostic factors on OS. CR analysis showed a cumulative incidence for major complication of 31% at 5 years. Endoprosthetic reconstruction had a higher risk for experiencing a major complication (p<0.0001) and infection (p=0.001). Conclusions. Pelvic resections are still associated with a high incidence of complications. Patients with pelvic reconstruction and high volume tumors are especially at risk. Consequently, a cautious decision-making process is necessary when indicating pelvic reconstruction, although a restrictive approach to pelvic reconstruction is not necessarily reasonable when the other option is major amputation.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

"Narrative Interview" intervention in Oncology: Qualitative and Quantitative Data

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Oral active matrix metalloproteinase-8 immunotest may be less accurate in haemato-oncologic patients

<p>Dataset of the corresponding study</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Gender perspective in oncology research

<p>Gender bias in oncology research</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2023View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

The Effect of Unfavorable Histological Features on the Oncological Outcomes of Colon Cancer

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03794193. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Psychological Care of Oncology Patients With Post-traumatic Stress in the Context of a COVID-19

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04747249. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

BrUOG 295: Adjuvant FOLFOX-A For Resected Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase II Brown University Oncology Research Group Trial

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02022033. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Feasibility of Aspirate Tissue Monitoring in Neuro-oncological Surgery

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06740097. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 2. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

C14 Study in Oncology Patients With Advanced and/or Metastatic Solid Tumors

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01296568. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Nutritional Intervention-induced Weight Loss During the Oncological Treatment of Obesity-related Breast Cancer

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06046755. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 8.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Comparison of Surgical,Clinical and Oncological Outcomes Between Robotic-assisted and Laparoscopic-assisted Gastrectomy

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02413476. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 16.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

TIPOPS (Telemedicine vs In Person Oncology Patient Surveillance)

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04936243. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Oncology Patients' Management

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03142386. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Impact of Early Mobility on Post-Surgery Recovery in Patients Undergoing Oncologic Surgeries

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04000581. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov28/100

Evaluating the Implementation of a Comprehensive Multilevel Virtual Oncology Program Among Veterans Diagnosed With Lung, Colorectal, Prostate, and Breast Cancers in the US Department of Veterans Affai

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06559059. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record