Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 1 in Amended diagnosis of the genus Nannodiaptomus (Copepoda, Calanoida), based on redescription of N. phongnhaensis and description of a new species from caves in central Vietnam

FIGURE 1. Sampling locations for representatives of the genus Nannodiaptomus Dang & Ho, 2001 in the Phong Nha-Ke Bang National Park, central Vietnam. Large picture was modified from Limbert (2012).

FIGURE 2 in Amended diagnosis of the genus Nannodiaptomus (Copepoda, Calanoida), based on redescription of N. phongnhaensis and description of a new species from caves in central Vietnam

FIGURE 2. Nannodiaptomus phongnhaensis Dang & Ho, 2001. Female: A, habitus, dorsal view; B, detail of setulation of terminal caudal setae; C, pedigerous somites 4 and 5 and genital double-somite, dorsal view; D, pedigerous somites 4 and 5, genital double-somite and leg 5, lateral view; E, genital double-somite, ventral view; F, leg 1; G, leg 2; H, leg 3; I, leg 4. Scale bars: 100 µm.

FIGURE 11 in Amended diagnosis of the genus Nannodiaptomus (Copepoda, Calanoida), based on redescription of N. phongnhaensis and description of a new species from caves in central Vietnam

FIGURE 11. Nannodiaptomus haii sp. nov. SEM micrographs. Female: A, rostrum, ventral view; B, pedigerous somite 5 and genital double-somite, dorsal view. Male: C, pedigerous somite 5, genital double-somite, urosomite 2 and 3, dorsal view; D, leg 5, anterior view; E, leg 5, posterior view; F–H, left leg 5 Exp-2. Female: I, leg 5, anterior view; K, leg 5, posterior view.

FIGURE 10 in Amended diagnosis of the genus Nannodiaptomus (Copepoda, Calanoida), based on redescription of N. phongnhaensis and description of a new species from caves in central Vietnam

FIGURE 10. Nannodiaptomus haii sp. nov. Male: A, leg 5, posterior view; B, right leg 5, lateral view; C, left leg 5, lateral view; D, left leg 5, posterior view; E, left leg 5, distal part, anterior view; F, right leg 5, detail of basis and Exp-1, anterior view. Female: G, leg 5, posterior view. Scale bars: A–C, 100 µm; D–G, 10 µm.

FIGURE 5 in Amended diagnosis of the genus Nannodiaptomus (Copepoda, Calanoida), based on redescription of N. phongnhaensis and description of a new species from caves in central Vietnam

FIGURE 5. Nannodiaptomus phongnhaensis Dang & Ho, 2001. Male: A, right antennule, evident segments 1–13; B, right antennule, evident segments 14–22. Female: C, rostrum, lateral view; D, rostrum, ventral view; E, leg 5, posterior view. Scale bars: A–D, 100 µm; E, 10µm.

FIGURE 12 in Reappraisal of species attributed to Halicarcinus White, 1846 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae) with diagnosis of four new genera and one new species from New Ireland, Papua New Guinea

FIGURE 12. Stimpsoplax setirostris (Stimpson, 1858). Male, 3.6 mm, CBM-ZC 295: a, dorsal carapace; b, thoracic sternum; c, rostrum, antennules, antennae, eyestalks, proepistome and epistome, ventral view; d, posterior part of epistome, anterior view; e, maxilliped, 3; f, left cheliped, upper; g, left chela, outer face; h, gonopod 1; i, left gonopod 2, outer (ventral) view. Scale bars = 1 mm.

FIGURE 10 in Reappraisal of species attributed to Halicarcinus White, 1846 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae) with diagnosis of four new genera and one new species from New Ireland, Papua New Guinea

FIGURE 10. Lucascinus coralicola (Rathbun, 1909). Male, 4.7 mm, CBM-ZC 3632: a, carapace, dorsal view, b, frontal region, ventral view; c, thoracic sternum; d, left cheliped, upper view; e, chela, lateral view; f, gonopod 2, outer (ventral) view; g, same, inner (dorsal) view. Lucascinus keijibabai (Takeda & Miyake, 1971). Male, ZLKU 13089 (holotype, male, 2.1 mm: h, frontal region, ventral view. Scale bars a–e, h = 1 mm; f, g = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 4 in Reappraisal of species attributed to Halicarcinus White, 1846 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae) with diagnosis of four new genera and one new species from New Ireland, Papua New Guinea

FIGURE 4. Micas filholi (De Man, 1888). Holotype of Elamena filholi De Man, 1888, male, cl 4.0 mm, SMF ZMG 805: a, carapace and right pereopods; b, rostrum and anterior carapace; c, right pereopod 3, dactylus; d, pleon; e, gonopod 1. Scale bars a–d = 1 mm, e = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 1 in Reappraisal of species attributed to Halicarcinus White, 1846 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Hymenosomatidae) with diagnosis of four new genera and one new species from New Ireland, Papua New Guinea

FIGURE 1. Halicarcinus cookii (Filhol, 1885): a–c, lectotype of Hymenicus cookii Filhol, 1885, MNHN IU-2014-7143 (B32572), (female, 6.1 mm). Halicarcinus planatus (Fabricius, 1775): d, holotype of Elamena mexicana (H. Milne Edwards, 1853), MNHN IU-2000-655 (B655), (male, 7.3 mm). Halicarcinus quoyi (H. Milne Edwards, 1853): e, lectotype of Elamena quoyi H. Milne Edwards, 1853, MNHN-2000-667 (B667), (male without rostrum, 6.4 mm); f, paralectotype, MNHN-2000- 32609 (B32609), (sex unknown, dry fragments).

FIGURE 39 in New diagnosis for species of Plutomurus Yosii (Collembola, Tomoceridae), with descriptions of two new species from Georgian caves

FIGURE 39. Cladrogram depicting relationships among Plutomurus sampled in different caves (parenthesis) estimated using mitochondrial and ribosomal sequences. Asterisks identify nodes with more than 80 bootstrap support in maximum likelihood (GTR +I + G) and Neighbour Joining (K2P) analyses. Numbers at nodes are average COI p–distances between terminals.

FIGURES 7–14 in New diagnosis for species of Plutomurus Yosii (Collembola, Tomoceridae), with descriptions of two new species from Georgian caves

FIGURES 7–14. Plutomurus revazi sp. nov. 7, labrum (bar: 0.04 mm); 8, labial palp (bar: 0.02 mm); 9, outer lobe of maxillary palp (bar: 0.02 mm); 10, trochanteral and femoral organs (bar: 0.06 mm); 11, leg III tibiotarsus, showing the location of the spine-like chaetae (bar: 0.06 mm) (some ordinary chaetae are illustrated for comparison); 12–14, claw and Emp. I–III respectively (bar: 0.05 mm) (a, basal tooth to internal lamellae; b, first unpaired tooth, the more developed, c and d, additional unpaired teeth; The arrows point each tooth).

FIGURES 15–17 in New diagnosis for species of Plutomurus Yosii (Collembola, Tomoceridae), with descriptions of two new species from Georgian caves

FIGURES 15–17. Plutomurus revazi sp. nov. 15, mucro (bar: 0.03 mm) (The arrows show the presence of the two medial teeth); 16, spines on dens (bar: 0.05 mm); 17, tenaculum (bar: 0.03 mm).

FIGURES 5–6 in New diagnosis for species of Plutomurus Yosii (Collembola, Tomoceridae), with descriptions of two new species from Georgian caves

FIGURES 5–6. Plutomurus revazi sp. nov. 5, habitus (light microscopy); 6, habitus (SEM) (bar: 0.4 mm).

FIGURE 1 in New diagnosis for species of Plutomurus Yosii (Collembola, Tomoceridae), with descriptions of two new species from Georgian caves

FIGURE 1. The location of the three caves studied in the region of Imereti on the map of Georgia (1A); the same zoomed in localities (1B).

FIGURES 18–21 in New diagnosis for species of Plutomurus Yosii (Collembola, Tomoceridae), with descriptions of two new species from Georgian caves

FIGURES 18–21. Plutomurus revazi sp. nov. 18, SEM microphotograph of claw I and Emp. I (bar: 0.03 mm); 18', detail of internal lamellae on claw I, showing teeth: a, basal to internal lamellae; b, first unpaired tooth, the more developed (broken), c and d, additional unpaired teeth, not always presents); 19, detail of Emp. I, showing the two internal ridges with three denticles on each (bar: 0.01 mm); 20, Abd. VI, ventral, view, and male genital plate (bar: 0.06 mm); 21, detail of male genital plate (bar: 0.02 mm).

FIGURE 38 in New diagnosis for species of Plutomurus Yosii (Collembola, Tomoceridae), with descriptions of two new species from Georgian caves

FIGURE 38. Maximum macrochaetotaxy observed on Plutomurus species (The meaning for the symbols is the same as in Figs 22–24).

FIGURE 34 in New diagnosis for species of Plutomurus Yosii (Collembola, Tomoceridae), with descriptions of two new species from Georgian caves

FIGURE 34. Plutomurus eristoi sp. nov. claw III and Emp. III (bar: 0.02 mm); (34', arrow shows the confluence of the two internal lamellae in the middle of Emp.

FIGURES 25–33 in New diagnosis for species of Plutomurus Yosii (Collembola, Tomoceridae), with descriptions of two new species from Georgian caves

FIGURES 25–33. Plutomurus eristoi sp. nov. 25, labrum (bar: 0.05 mm); 26, labial palp (bar: 0.025 mm); 27, outer lobe of maxillary palp (bar: 0.02 mm); 28, trochanteral and femoral organs (bar: 0.05 mm); 29, leg III tibiotarsus, showing the location of the spine-like chaetae (bar: 0.05 mm) (some ordinary chaetae are illustrated for comparison); 30, claw III and Emp. III (bar: 0.05 mm); 31, tenaculum (bar: 0.04 mm); 32, spines on dens (bar: 0.05 mm); 33, mucro (bar: 0.025 mm).

FIGURES 2–4 in New diagnosis for species of Plutomurus Yosii (Collembola, Tomoceridae), with descriptions of two new species from Georgian caves

FIGURES 2–4. Profile of the studied caves: 2, Satsurblia (Tatashidze et al. 2009b); 3, Prometheus (Tatashidze et al. 2009b); 4, Satevzia (Liponava 1990) (the black circles show the point of capture of the specimens of Plutomurus revazi sp. nov. and P. eristoi sp. nov.).

FIGURES 22–24 in New diagnosis for species of Plutomurus Yosii (Collembola, Tomoceridae), with descriptions of two new species from Georgian caves

FIGURES 22–24. Plutomurus revazi sp. nov., dorsal chaetotaxy: 22, head; 23, Th. II–III; 24, Abd. I–VI (dash-lined hollow circles represent eyes; large black circles represent macrochaetae; white circles represent mesochaetae or small macrochaetae; small black circles represent microchaetae; squares with a black dot represent bothriothrix; triangles are microsensillae; circles with a slash represent pseudopores).