Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
4,937
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
4,937 results for “Endemic species”
FIGURE 1 in Taxonomy and lectotypification of Lepidagathis barberi (Acanthaceae), a steno-endemic species from Tamil Nadu, India
FIGURE 1. Lectotype of Lepidagathis barberi Gamble (R.H. Beddome s.n., K-000592220).
FIGURE 2 in Taxonomy and lectotypification of Lepidagathis barberi (Acanthaceae), a steno-endemic species from Tamil Nadu, India
FIGURE 2. Lepidagathis barberi Gamble: A. Habit; B. Flowering-twig.
FIGURE 3 in Rediscovery and lectotypification of Croton claussenianus (Euphorbiaceae), an enigmatic endemic species from southeastern Brazil
FIGURE 3. Geographic distribution of Croton claussenianus in Minas Gerais State, Brazil.
FIGURE 4 in Minuartia alpuensis (Caryophyllaceae), a new endemic species from inner Anatolia, Turkey
FIGURE 4. SEM micrographs of pollen grains of Minuartia alpuensis (A–D) and M. leucocephala (E–F).
FIGURE 6 in Macro and microcharacters reveal a new species of Dichanthelium (Poaceae, Panicoideae) endemic to sandy soils of the Chapada Diamantina, Bahia, northeastern Brazil
FIGURE 6. Geographic distribution of Dichanthelium arenicola and D. cumbucana.
TABLE 1 S in A new endemic species of Macropsychanthus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
<p><b>TABLE 1S.</b> Voucher information and GenBank accession numbers for the DNA sequences used in this study.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Taxon</th><th>Voucher</th><th>Locality</th><th>ITS</th><th>ETS</th><th>trnK/matK</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Dioclea sericea</i> Kunth</th><td>R. Schultze-Kraft s.n. (CIAT 9578)</td><td>Colombia, Cauca</td><td>KC779715</td><td>KC779823</td><td>KC779588</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus comosus</i> (G. Mey.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>C. van den Berg 1796 (HUEFS)</td><td>Venezuela, Bolívar</td><td>KC779706</td><td>KC779856</td><td>KC779583</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus edulis</i> (Kuhlm.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 15226 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Bahia</td><td>KC779683</td><td>KC779835</td><td>KC779573</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus glaber</i> (Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 10381 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Mato Grosso</td><td>KC779684</td><td>KC779837</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus grandiflorus</i> (Mart. ex Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>Queiroz 7325 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Bahia</td><td>KC779686</td><td>KC779839</td><td>KC779574</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus grandistipula</i> (L.P. Queiroz) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>H.C. Lima 6634 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Rio de Janeiro</td><td>KC779688</td><td>KC779840</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus latifolius</i> (Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>C. van den Berg 1163 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Bahia</td><td>KC779696</td><td>KC779843</td><td>KC779579</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus macrocarpus</i> (Ducke) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 13910 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Amazonas</td><td>KC779697</td><td>KC779844</td><td>KC779580</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus lauterbachii</i> Harms var. <i>hirsutus</i></th><td>A.N. Millar NGF13855 (L)</td><td>Papua New Guinea Morobe</td><td>MT565584</td><td>MT565564</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus lauterbachii</i> var. <i>lauterbachii</i> Verd.</th><td>M. Hopkins 1360 (K)</td><td>Papua New Guinea</td><td>KP262490</td><td></td><td>KP658375</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus malacocarpus</i> (Huber) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 13076 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Pará</td><td>KC779698</td><td>KC779845</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus marginatus</i> (Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 9136 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Bahia</td><td>KC779700</td><td>KC779847</td><td>KC779581</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus megacarpus</i> (Rolfe) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 10135 (HUEFS)</td><td></td><td>KC779701</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus pulcher</i> (Moldenke) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>M. Sousa 11095 (MEXU)</td><td>Panama, Darién</td><td>MT565575</td><td>MT565557</td><td>MT565542</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus purpureus</i> (Elmer) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>Soejarto 7967 (F)</td><td>Philippines, Luzon</td><td>MT565583</td><td>MT565563</td><td>KX652152</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus violaceus</i> (Mart. ex Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>Cabid s.n. (CTES)</td><td>Argentina, Corrientes</td><td>KC779702</td><td>KC779848</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus rufescens</i> (Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>J. Stehman 4721 (BHCB)</td><td>Brazil, Espírito Santo</td><td>MT565579</td><td>MT565561</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus ruschii</i> Fonseca-Cortés & Queiroz</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 15254 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Espírito Santo</td><td>KC779717</td><td>KC779854</td><td>KC779590</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus schottii</i> (Benth.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>S. Buzato 28114 (UEC)</td><td>Brazil, São Paulo</td><td>KC779710</td><td>KC779852</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus sclerocarpus</i> (Ducke) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 15911 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, Pará</td><td>MT565577</td><td>MT565558</td><td>MT565543</td></tr><tr><th><i>Macropsychanthus wilsonii</i> (Standl.) L.P. Queiroz & Snak</th><td>L.P. Queiroz 4899 (HUEFS)</td><td>Brazil, São Paulo</td><td>KC779725</td><td>KC779857</td><td>KC779594</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 1. Morphological characteristics for distinguishing M in A new endemic species of Macropsychanthus (Leguminosae: Papilionoideae) from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest
<p><b>TABLE 1.</b> Morphological characteristics for distinguishing <i>M. ruschii</i> of other morphological similar species of the AF, in bold the diagnostic characters of each species.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Characters</th><th><i>M. edulis</i></th><th><i>M. grandistipula</i></th><th><i>M. rufescens</i></th><th><i>M. ruschii</i></th><th><i>M. schottii</i></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Stipule length (mm)</th><td>10–20</td><td><b>15–30</b></td><td>10–20</td><td><b>17–20</b></td><td>10–20</td></tr><tr><th>Stipule width (mm)</th><td>3–6</td><td><b>7–15</b></td><td>3–6</td><td><b>2–3</b></td><td>3–5</td></tr><tr><th>Rachis length</th><td><b>1–2</b></td><td>2–2.5 cm long</td><td><b>To 0.5 cm</b></td><td>0.5–0.7 cm</td><td>0.2–1.5 cm</td></tr><tr><th>leaflet undersurface indumentum</th><td>Strigose to sericeous and fulvous</td><td>Glabrescent</td><td>Strigose to sericeous and fulvous</td><td>Glabrescent</td><td><b>Sericeous and argenteus</b></td></tr><tr><th>bracteoles size (mm)</th><td>3–4 × 3–4</td><td>1–3 × 1–3</td><td>3–4 × 3–4</td><td>2–3 × 1–3</td><td>2–4 × 2–3</td></tr><tr><th>flower length (mm)</th><td>13–16</td><td><b>17–20</b></td><td>13–16</td><td><b>10–12</b></td><td>13–16</td></tr><tr><th>petal color</th><td>White to bright pink</td><td>White with the center with lilac stripes</td><td>White to bright pink</td><td><b>Lilac with white stripes</b></td><td>White to bright pink</td></tr><tr><th>keel petal apex</th><td>Concave</td><td>Rounded</td><td>Concave</td><td>Rounded</td><td>Concave</td></tr><tr><th>keel petal length (mm)</th><td>8–12</td><td><b>14–17</b></td><td>8–12</td><td><b>8–12</b></td><td>9–13</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table ¹: Comparison of analysis of variance results for skull (occlusal view) and mandible (side view) shape in Rhipidomys mastacalis from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Object asymmetry and correspondence methods were employed to assess asymmetry for skulls and mandibles, respectively. in Morphological symmetry of Rhipidomys mastacalis (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) in fragmented habitats of the Atlantic Forest in Northeastern Brazil: a study on the influence of the environment on an endemic species
<p><b>Table ¹:</b> Comparison of analysis of variance results for skull (occlusal view) and mandible (side view) shape in <i>Rhipidomys mastacalis</i> from three vegetation classes in Brazil.Object asymmetry and correspondence methods were employed to assess asymmetry for skulls and mandibles,respectively.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Shape procrustes ANOVA</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Effect Sum of squares</b></th><td><b>Mean squares</b></td><td><b>Degrees of freedom</b></td><td><i>F statistic</i></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td><td><b>Pillai tr.</b></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td></tr><tr><th><b>Skulls</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.19908517</td><td>0.0004253957</td><td>468</td><td>22.36</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00366522</td><td>0.0002036232</td><td>18</td><td>10.70</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.00890443</td><td>0.0000190266</td><td>468</td><td>2.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.00825565</td><td>0.0000084935</td><td>972</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.37829478</td><td>0.0003965354</td><td>954</td><td>18.57</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00547536</td><td>0.0003041869</td><td>18</td><td>14.25</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.02037065</td><td>0.0000213529</td><td>954</td><td>1.89</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.02201359</td><td>0.0000113239</td><td>1944</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0645902300</td><td>0.0001302222</td><td>496</td><td>5.18</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0113531900</td><td>0.0007095741</td><td>16</td><td>28.23</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0124666800</td><td>0.0000251344</td><td>496</td><td>1.88</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0136608800</td><td>0.0000133407</td><td>1024</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Mandibles</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.70443879</td><td>0.0012579264</td><td>560</td><td>8.10</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.16</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.00549957</td><td>0.0002749783</td><td>20</td><td>1.77</td><td>0.0207</td><td>0.0207</td><td>0.0069</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.08696012</td><td>0.0001552859</td><td>560</td><td>2.46</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.75</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.07312665</td><td>0.0000387718</td><td>1160</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>1.19843989</td><td>0.0011984399</td><td>1000</td><td>8.16</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.70</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.01169771</td><td>0.0005848855</td><td>20</td><td>3.98</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.14685738</td><td>0.0001468574</td><td>1000</td><td>3.03</td><td><0.0001</td><td>11.21</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.09880745</td><td>0.0000484350</td><td>2040</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.3269927600</td><td>0.0004808717</td><td>680</td><td>4.52</td><td><0.0001</td><td>14.14</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0143644400</td><td>0.0007182221</td><td>20</td><td>6.75</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.0017</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0723474900</td><td>0.0001063934</td><td>680</td><td>2.39</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.41</td><td>0.0017</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0622041800</td><td>0.0000444316</td><td>1400</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>
Table ²: Comparison of the results of analysis of variance on the shape of scapulae (occlusal view) and pelvis (side view) in Rhipidomys mastacalis from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Correspondence asymmetry was the only method used for asymmetry analysis. in Morphological symmetry of Rhipidomys mastacalis (Mammalia, Rodentia, Cricetidae) in fragmented habitats of the Atlantic Forest in Northeastern Brazil: a study on the influence of the environment on an endemic species
<p><b>Table ²:</b> Comparison of the results of analysis of variance on the shape of scapulae (occlusal view) and pelvis (side view) in <i>Rhipidomys mastacalis</i> from three vegetation classes in Brazil. Correspondence asymmetry was the only method used for asymmetry analysis.</p><table><tbody><tr><th><b>Shape procrustes ANOVA</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Effect Sum of squares</b></th><td><b>Mean squares</b></td><td><b>Degrees of freedom</b></td><td><i>F statistic</i></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td><td><b>Pillai tr.</b></td><td><i>p -Value</i></td></tr><tr><th><b>Scapulae</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0941373400</td><td>0.0010459705</td><td>90</td><td>3</td><td><0.0001</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0100439600</td><td>0.0010043960</td><td>2.88</td><td>0.0037</td><td>0.0003</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0314069500</td><td>0.0003489662</td><td>90</td><td>5.89</td><td><0.0001</td><td>4.91</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0118544100</td><td>0.0000592721</td><td>200</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.2064168200</td><td>0.0010320841</td><td>200</td><td>4.82</td><td><0.0001</td><td>7.15</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0262808000</td><td>0.0026280796</td><td>10</td><td>12.28</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.86</td><td>0.0022</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0428160400</td><td>0.0002140802</td><td>200</td><td>2.68</td><td><0.0001</td><td>4.98</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0335675700</td><td>0.0000799228</td><td>420</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.2508635400</td><td>0.0009291242</td><td>270</td><td>4.07</td><td><0.0001</td><td>7.11</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0256608100</td><td>0.0025660812</td><td>10</td><td>11.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.87</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0616394000</td><td>0.0002282941</td><td>270</td><td>3.10</td><td><0.0001</td><td>5.72</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0412323300</td><td>0.0000736292</td><td>560</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Pelvis</b></th></tr><tr><th><b>Forested vegetation</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.0543411200</td><td>0.0004312787</td><td>126</td><td>4.63</td><td><0.0001</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0043155600</td><td>0.0003082544</td><td>14</td><td>3.31</td><td>0.0002</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0117297800</td><td>0.0000930935</td><td>126</td><td>2.31</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.07</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0112943700</td><td>0.000040337</td><td>280</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Occupancy mosaics in forested areas</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.1059661700</td><td>0.0003440460</td><td>308</td><td>4.42</td><td><0.0001</td><td>9.69</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0049395300</td><td>0.0003528236</td><td>14</td><td>4.53</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.85</td><td>0.0311</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0239852500</td><td>0.0000778742</td><td>308</td><td>2.00</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.64</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0251368400</td><td>0.0000390324</td><td>644</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr><tr><th><b>Cocoa plantations</b></th></tr><tr><th>Individual</th><td>0.1292837500</td><td>0.0003420205</td><td>378</td><td>5.68</td><td><0.0001</td><td>10.51</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Side</th><td>0.0043550500</td><td>0.0003110747</td><td>14</td><td>5.17</td><td><0.0001</td><td>0.84</td><td>0.0016</td></tr><tr><th>Individual × side</th><td>0.0227608400</td><td>0.0000602139</td><td>378</td><td>2.24</td><td><0.0001</td><td>6.17</td><td><0.0001</td></tr><tr><th>Error 1</th><td>0.0210413800</td><td>0.0000268385</td><td>714</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>–</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 1 in Revision of the endemic South African genus Moegistorhynchus Macquart (Diptera: Nemestrinidae), with a species key, description of three new species and comments on pollination biology and biogeography
<p><b>TABLE 1.</b> Emergence times for the seven species of <i>Moegistorhynchus</i> and other co-occurring and functionally similar insect pollinators. Emergence times are based on museum specimen labels and observational records from iNaturalist.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Taxa</th><th>Jan</th><th>Feb</th><th>Mar</th><th>Apr</th><th>May</th><th>Jun</th><th>Jul</th><th>Aug</th><th>Sep</th><th>Oct</th><th>Nov</th><th><b>Dec</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>M. braunsi</i> Bequaert</th></tr><tr><th><i>M. brevirostris</i> (Wiedemann)</th></tr><tr><th><i>M. strillii</i> <b>sp. nov.</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>M. longirostris</i> (Wiedemann)</th></tr><tr><th><i>M. manningi</i> <b>sp. nov.</b></th></tr><tr><th><i>M. perplexus</i> Bequaert</th></tr><tr><th><i>M. turneri</i> <b>sp. nov.</b></th></tr><tr><th>Nemestrinidae (e.g., <i>Prosoeca</i> species: <i>P. peringueyi</i> Lichtwardt (Manning & Goldblatt, 1997), <i>P. westermanni</i> Wiedemann, <i>P. rubicunda</i> Bezzi)</th></tr><tr><th>Tabanidae (e.g., <i>Philoliche rostrata</i> (Linnaeus) and <i>P. gulosa</i> (Wiedemann) (Manning & Goldblatt, 1997)</th></tr><tr><th>Hymenoptera (Apidae) (e.g., <i>Amegilla</i> sp.)</th></tr></tbody></table>
FIGURE 16 in Scrobipalpa chardonnayi Huemer and Özden, sp. nov.: a new presumably endemic species from Cyprus (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae)
FIGURE 16. Habitat of S. chardonnayi sp. nov. holotype.
Linked collectors and determiners for: A mountain of millipedes I: An endemic species-group of the genus Chaleponcus Attems, 1914, from the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Odontopygidae).
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "A mountain of millipedes I: An endemic species-group of the genus Chaleponcus Attems, 1914, from the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania (Diplopoda, Spirostreptida, Odontopygidae)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/5329bfc4-61b2-48f5-a96a-caf4ba31039b">https://bionomia.net/dataset/5329bfc4-61b2-48f5-a96a-caf4ba31039b</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/5329bfc4-61b2-48f5-a96a-caf4ba31039b">https://gbif.org/dataset/5329bfc4-61b2-48f5-a96a-caf4ba31039b</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Linked collectors and determiners for: On the taxonomy of the Italian endemic Hoplia dubia (Rossi, 1792), with the description of two new species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae).
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "On the taxonomy of the Italian endemic Hoplia dubia (Rossi, 1792), with the description of two new species (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Melolonthinae)". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/f3a915c9-a35b-454a-9090-c8792904d8d4">https://bionomia.net/dataset/f3a915c9-a35b-454a-9090-c8792904d8d4</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/f3a915c9-a35b-454a-9090-c8792904d8d4">https://gbif.org/dataset/f3a915c9-a35b-454a-9090-c8792904d8d4</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Linked collectors and determiners for: Allocybaeina littlewalteri (Araneae: Cybaeidae): a new genus and species endemic to northwestern California.
Natural history specimen data linked to collectors and determiners held within, "Allocybaeina littlewalteri (Araneae: Cybaeidae): a new genus and species endemic to northwestern California". Claims or attributions were made on Bionomia by volunteer Scribes, <a href="https://bionomia.net/dataset/4a1fd7f9-9585-4083-8588-2592be2f41e0">https://bionomia.net/dataset/4a1fd7f9-9585-4083-8588-2592be2f41e0</a> using specimen data from the dataset aggregated by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org/dataset/4a1fd7f9-9585-4083-8588-2592be2f41e0">https://gbif.org/dataset/4a1fd7f9-9585-4083-8588-2592be2f41e0</a>. Formatted as a Frictionless Data package.
Fig. 1. – Capurodendron mikearum L. Gaut. & Boluda. A in Two further new species in the highly-diverse Malagasy endemic genus Capurodendron (Sapotaceae)
Fig. 1. – Capurodendron mikearum L. Gaut. & Boluda. A. Corolla, seen from inside; B. Corolla, seen from outside; C. Flower; D. Leaf, abaxial side; E. Leaf, adaxial side; F. Flower, dissected laterally; G. Flowering branch; H. Fruit; I. Seed. [A–G: Gautier 6339; H–I: Andrianjafy 1679] [Drawing: G. Loza]
Figure 1 in A new genus and species of Entomolepididae Brady, 1899 (Copepoda, Siphonostomatoida) associated with the endemic octocoral Phyllogorgia dilatata (Esper, 1806) (Cnidaria, Octocorallia) from Northeastern Brazil
Figure 1. Sampling site in Periperi Beach, Todos-os-Santos Bay, Salvador City, Bahia, Brazil.
FIGURE 1 in A new endemic species of Trigonachras (Sapindaceae) from Sabah, Malaysia (Borneo)
FIGURE 1. Geographical distribution of Trigonachras postardanjeisin (shown in black solid circle).
FIGURE 3 in Senegalia lotterii (Fabaceae) a new species endemic to the Barberton Centre of Endemism, South Africa
FIGURE 3: Distribution of Senegalia lotterii.
FIGURE 3 in Mimosa sobralii (Fabaceae, Mimosoideae), a new tree species endemic to the southern Brazilian highland slopes
FIGURE 3. Distribution of Mimosa sobralii and Mimosa bifurca in South America.
FIGURE 3 a-b in A geometric morphometric evaluation on three populations of endemic species Dorcadion micans (Cerambycidae, Coleoptera) in Ankara Province from Turkey with a new subspecies description
FIGURE 3 a-b. Principal components scatter plots of elytra (a) and pronotum (b)
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.