Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 7 in The collection of the genus Mispila Pascoe, 1864 housed in the Natural History Museum, London (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

FIGURE 7. Habitus of Mispila (s. str.) tonkinea (Pic, 1925) (a–d) Holotype of Mispila punctifrons Breuning, 1938, female; (e–h) male (identified as 'M. punctifrons' in the collection); scale: 5 mm.

FIGURE 10 in The collection of the genus Mispila Pascoe, 1864 housed in the Natural History Museum, London (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

FIGURE 10. Habitus of Mispila spp. (a–g) Mispila (s. str.) elongata Breuning, 1938, a–c holotype, female, d–f male; (h–j) Mispila (s. str.) parallela Breuning, 1937, holotype; scale: 5 mm.

FIGURE 5 in The collection of the genus Mispila Pascoe, 1864 housed in the Natural History Museum, London (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

FIGURE 5. Habitus of Mispila (s. str.) obscura Gahan, 1890 (a–d) lectotype, female; (e–h) paralectotype, male; scale: 5 mm.

FIGURE 4 in The collection of the genus Mispila Pascoe, 1864 housed in the Natural History Museum, London (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

FIGURE 4. Habitus of Mispila (s. str.) venosa auguralis Pascoe, 1878 stat. rev. (a–d) holotype, male; (e, f) male; (g, h) female; scale: 5 mm.

FIGURE 2 in The collection of the genus Mispila Pascoe, 1864 housed in the Natural History Museum, London (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

FIGURE 2. Habitus of Mispila (s. str.) venosa venosa Pascoe, 1864. (a, b) paralectotype, female; (c, d) female; (g–h) male; (i–j) paralectotype, male; scale: 5 mm.

FIGURE 11 in The collection of the genus Mispila Pascoe, 1864 housed in the Natural History Museum, London (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

FIGURE 11. Habitus of Mispila (s. str.) assamensis Breuning, 1938. (a–d) holotype, female; (e–h) male; scale: 5 mm.

FIGURE 8 in The collection of the genus Mispila Pascoe, 1864 housed in the Natural History Museum, London (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

FIGURE 8. Habitus of Mispila spp. (a–d) Mispila (s. str.) notaticeps (Pic, 1925), female; (e–j) Mispila (s. str.) tenuevittata (Pic, 1930), e–g. male, h–j. female; scale: 5 mm.

FIGURE 1 in The collection of the genus Mispila Pascoe, 1864 housed in the Natural History Museum, London (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

FIGURE 1. Types of Mispila (s. str.) venosa venosa Pascoe, 1864. (a–d) lectotype, male; (e–h) paralectotype, female; scale: 5 mm.

FIGURE 9 in The collection of the genus Mispila Pascoe, 1864 housed in the Natural History Museum, London (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)

FIGURE 9. Habitus of Mispila spp. (a–d) Mispila (s. str.) coomani (Pic, 1934), male; (e–h) Mispila (s. str.) javanica Breuning, 1938, female; scale: 5 mm.

publicAug 2022View details →

dryad32/100

Drivers of Odonata flight timing revealed by natural history collection data

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-zeroMar 2020View details →

Natural history specimens collected and/or identified and deposited.

Natural history specimen data collected and/or identified by Gardiner, Lauren, <a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8843-0317">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8843-0317</a>. Claims were made on Bloodhound, <a href="http://bloodhound-tracker.net">https://bloodhound-tracker.net</a> using specimen data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org">https://gbif.org</a>.

opencc-zeroMar 2020View details →

Natural history specimens collected and/or identified and deposited.

Natural history specimen data collected and/or identified by Aleixo, Alexandre, <a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7816-9725">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7816-9725</a>. Claims were made on Bloodhound, <a href="http://bloodhound-tracker.net">https://bloodhound-tracker.net</a> using specimen data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org">https://gbif.org</a>.

opencc-zeroApr 2020View details →

Natural history specimens collected and/or identified and deposited.

Natural history specimen data collected and/or identified by Figuerola, Blanca, <a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4731-9337">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4731-9337</a>. Claims were made on Bloodhound, <a href="http://bloodhound-tracker.net">https://bloodhound-tracker.net</a> using specimen data from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, <a href="https://gbif.org">https://gbif.org</a>.

Fig. 6.12 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections

Fig. 6.12. Cost/efficiency ratio of digitisation for middle sized specimens. (CT is based on a rental service, while the others include the purchase of the equipment).

Fig. 6.11 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections

Fig. 6.11. Comparison between the Focus Stacking Photogrammetry model (left) and the µCT model (right) of the Omorgus beetle. The models are very close, with the µCT model perhaps showing a little more detail. The µCT scan was made using a XRE UniTom at 60 kV and with a voxelsize of 29 µm. https://sketchfab.com/models/ad5fd157c5424c8fb793c1c282450d33

Fig. 6.9 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections

Fig. 6.9. Omorgus beetle structured light scanning with MechScan (left) comparison to µCT scan (right). The main difference is the lack of artefacts due to the needle with the MechScan 3D model. But the MechScan model lacks almost the entire ventral area of the abdomen between the legs. https://sketchfab.com/models/9dc5082c8db14c92879947da927f07dc

Fig. 6.8 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections

Fig. 6.8. Comparison between different treatments of the µCT model. Top and bottom left: µCT model without any treatment regarding removal of the artefacts https://sketchfab.com/models/169c2b29a1404e5cb5f6b6ea0928d075. Top and bottom in the middle: area affected by the metal artefact quickly cut out in GOM Inspect https://sketchfab.com/models/ f40a108e43ea44d78ca3d04ac41ad0a0; Top and bottom right: Carefully removed the needle through segmentation in Dragonfly 3.5. https://sketchfab.com/models/dc194a4e05da4f7ab787c8c7b028d2e7

Fig. 6.7. Bone retoucher digitised with photogrammetry using a in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections

Fig. 6.7. Bone retoucher digitised with photogrammetry using a zoom lens (Ptg 18–55), a fixed focal macro lens (Ptg 100), focus stacking photogrammetry (FS-Ptg 60), structured light (SL) and microCT (µCT).

Fig. 6.6 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections

Fig. 6.6. Detailed view of the sea urchins digitised with different equipment. The goal was to digitise the small punctures on the surface as these aid in identifying the species of the sea urchin.

Fig. 5.2 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections

Fig. 5.2. Micro-contrast enhancement and relighting in DxO OpticsPro 11. The original image is on the left, the post-processed picture on the right. The dark area in the middle is now sufficiently exposed, without losing the look and feel of the specimen.