Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

501

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

501 results for “Phylogenetic tree”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo28/100

Supplementary phylogenetic trees of Babesia bigemina based on partial sequences of both genes Rap-1a and gp45, with SH-aLRT support values (%), aBayes support, and ultrafast bootstrap support (%).

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: An efficient independence sampler for updating branches in Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling of phylogenetic trees

Sampling tree space is the most challenging aspect of Bayesian phylogenetic inference. The sheer number of alternative topologies is problematic by itself. In addition, the complex dependency between branch lengths and topology increases the difficulty of moving efficiently among topologies. Current tree proposals are fast but sample new trees using primitive transformations or re-mappings of old branch lengths. This reduces acceptance rates and presumably slows down convergence and mixing. Here, we explore branch proposals that do not rely on old branch lengths but instead are based on approximations of the conditional posterior. Using a diverse set of empirical data sets, we show that most conditional branch posteriors can be accurately approximated via a Γ distribution. We empirically determine the relationship between the logarithmic conditional posterior density, its derivatives, and the characteristics of the branch posterior. We use these relationships to derive an independence sampler for proposing branches with an acceptance ratio of ∼90% on most data sets. This proposal samples branches between 2× and 3× more efficiently than traditional proposals with respect to the effective sample size per unit of runtime. We also compare the performance of standard topology proposals with hybrid proposals that use the new independence sampler to update those branches that are most affected by the topological change. Our results show that hybrid proposals can sometimes noticeably decrease the number of generations necessary for topological convergence. Inconsistent performance gains indicate that branch updates are not the limiting factor in improving topological convergence for the currently employed set of proposals. However, our independence sampler might be essential for the construction of novel tree proposals that apply more radical topology changes.

opencc-zeroDec 2014View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: Quantifying MCMC exploration of phylogenetic tree space

In order to gain an understanding of the effectiveness of phylogenetic Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), it is important to understand how quickly the empirical distribution of the MCMC converges to the posterior distribution. In this paper we investigate this problem on phylogenetic tree topologies with a metric that is especially well suited to the task: the subtree prune-and-regraft (SPR) metric. This metric directly corresponds to the minimum number of MCMC rearrangements required to move between trees in common phylogenetic MCMC implementations. We develop a novel graph-based approach to analyze tree posteriors and find that the SPR metric is much more informative than simpler metrics that are unrelated to MCMC moves. In doing so we show conclusively that topological peaks do occur in Bayesian phylogenetic posteriors from real data sets as sampled with standard MCMC approaches, investigate the efficiency of Metropolis-coupled MCMC (MCMCMC) in traversing the valleys between peaks, and show that conditional clade distribution (CCD) can have systematic problems when there are multiple peaks.

opencc-zeroDec 2014View details →
dryad28/100

Data from: A Poissonian model of indel rate variation for phylogenetic tree inference

While indel rate variation has been observed and analyzed in detail, it is not taken into account by current indel-aware phylogenetic reconstruction methods. In this work, we introduce a continuous time stochastic process, the geometric Poisson indel process, that generalizes the Poisson indel process by allowing insertion and deletion rates to vary across sites. We design an efficient algorithm for computing the probability of a given multiple sequence alignment based on our new indel model. We describe a method to construct phylogeny estimates from a fixed alignment using neighbor joining. Using simulation studies, we show that ignoring indel rate variation may have a detrimental effect on the accuracy of the inferred phylogenies, and that our proposed method can sidestep this issue by inferring latent indel rate categories. We also show that our phylogenetic inference method may be more stable to taxa subsampling than methods that either ignore indels or indel rate variation.

opencc-zeroDec 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

FIGURE 7. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred from a in Three uncharted endemicearthworm species of the genus Eutyphoeus (Oligochaeta Octochaetidae) from Mizoram, India

FIGURE 7. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred from a dataset of 609 positions.

opennotspecifiedJul 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Phylogenetic tree

<p>The phylogenetic trees constructed with the cp_genus-tRNA and cp_genus-rRNA datasets.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3. Phylogenetic trees obtained from morphological data. A in Combined-data phylogenetics and character evolution of Clitellata (Annelida) using 18S rDNA and morphology

Figure 3. Phylogenetic trees obtained from morphological data. A, phylogenetic tree obtained from one of the three replicate Bayesian inference runs of the somatic data set. Posterior probabilities of ± 0.85 are indicated in front of the nodes. B, phylogenetic tree obtained from one of the three replicate Bayesian inference runs of the spermatozoal data set. Posterior probabilities ± 0.85 are indicated in front of the nodes.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2008View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 3 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

File S3

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 9 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

File S9

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

File S1

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 7 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

File S7

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 21 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

Table S2

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 8 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

File S8

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 19 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

Figure S4

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 18 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

Figure S3

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 17 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

Figure S2

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 16 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

Figure S1

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 11 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

File S11

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 15 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

File S15

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 4 from: Rajter Ľ, Dunthorn M (2021) Ciliate SSU-rDNA reference alignments and trees for phylogenetic placements of metabarcoding data. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 5: e69602. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.5.69602

File S4

opencc-zeroSep 2021View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record