Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 6 in Effect of Kleptoparasitic Ants on the Foraging Behavior of a Social Spider ( Karsch, 1891).

Fig. 6. Size of the web (cm2 ± SEM) built by fed and fasted (K unexposed ("- K exposure"): n = 3 groups) and K exposed ("+ K exposure"): n = 3 groups) spider groups.

Fig. 2 in Effect of Kleptoparasitic Ants on the Foraging Behavior of a Social Spider ( Karsch, 1891).

Fig. 2. (A) An individual colony of S. sarasinorum. (B) Experimental set-up for the study. (C) Spiders (Host) in captivity- Ant (Kleptoparasite- O. smaragdina) exposed.

Fig. 5 in Effect of Kleptoparasitic Ants on the Foraging Behavior of a Social Spider ( Karsch, 1891).

Fig. 5. Web rebuilding ability (Size of the web (cm2 ± SEM)) of the K exposed (Kleptoparasite "K" is O. smaragdina) spider groups (Fasted (n = 3 groups) and Fed (n = 3 groups)) during the 4 experimental days. The regression lines, blue line (Fasted spider) has the Intercept a = 64.13, Slope b = 73.361 and Coefficient of Determination R2 = 0.96 and the red line (Fed spider) has a = 41.5, b = 65.25 and R2 = 0.948.

Fig. 1 in Effect of Kleptoparasitic Ants on the Foraging Behavior of a Social Spider ( Karsch, 1891).

Fig. 1. Map of the study area – Social spider web colonies (Marked as red spot) on Christ College Irinjalakuda.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 3 in Behavioral, physiological and morphological correlates of parasite intensity in the wild Cururu toad (Rhinella icterica)

Fig. 3. Association between locomotor performance and pulmonary parasite intensity in Rhinella icterica (N = 20; r = –0.49, P = 0.03). SVL = snout-vent length.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 2 in Behavioral, physiological and morphological correlates of parasite intensity in the wild Cururu toad (Rhinella icterica)

Fig. 2. Association between standard metabolic rate and total parasite intensity in Rhinella icterica (N = 22; r = –0.45, P = 0.03).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Behavioral, physiological and morphological correlates of parasite intensity in the wild Cururu toad (Rhinella icterica)

Fig. 1. Association between the score of the first component of a PCA on morphological variables (large heart, kidney and intestine masses) and parasite intensities in Rhinella icterica (N = 16). Full circles represent total parasite intensity (r = 0.66, P <0.01), open circles represent pulmonary parasite intensity (r = 0.71, P <0.01), and open triangles represent intestinal parasite intensity (r = 0.51, P = 0.04).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Data for Spanish versión of The App Behavior Change Scale (ABACUS-Es)

Data for the paper Spanish versión of The App Behavior Change Scale (ABACUS-Es)

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →

Cycles in hydrologic intensification and de-intensification create instabilities in spring nitrate-N export C-Q behavior in northern temperate forests

Data supporting analysis in "Cycles in hydrologic intensification and de-intensification create instabilities in spring nitrate-N export C-Q behavior in northern temperate forests". The worksheet "daily SWE" contains modeled daily snow water equivalent (SWE; mm) at Turkey Lakes Watershed.  Daily values were modeled using a snow accumulation and melt routine within a hydrologic model that used measured precipitation and snow survey data as input and was calibrated to daily discharge measurements at a reference catchment.  For use of SWE data, please cite: Leach, J. A., Buttle, J. M., Webster, K. L., Hazlett, P. W., & Jeffries, D. S. (2020). Travel times for snowmelt-dominated headwater catchments: influences of wetlands and forest harvesting, and linkages to stream water quality. Hydrological Processes, 34(10), 2154-2175. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13746 The worksheet "monthly T, P, PET" contains monthly mean temperature (°C), monthly total precipitation (mm), and monthly Hamon potential evapotranspiration (PET; mm) from measurements made at the Algoma CAPMoN (Canadian Air and Precipitation Monitoring Network) meteorological station (47°02′N, 84°22′W, 411 m.a.s.l.). For use of these climate data, please cite: Semkin, R. G., Jeffries, D. S., Neureuther, R., Lahaie, G., McAulay, M., Norouzian, F., & Franklyn, J. (2012). Summary of hydrological and meteorological measurements in the Turkey Lakes Watershed, Algoma, Ontario, 1980-2010. Water Science and Technology Directorate Contribution No. 11-145. Environment Canada, National Water Research Institute, Burlington, ON, 85 p.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2016View details →

Figure 3. A in Humpback whales interfering when mammal-eating killer whales attack other species: Mobbing behavior and interspecific altruism?

Figure 3. A mother humpback whale and newborn calf photographed off Baja California, Mexico, Oct 2009. When necessary, the mother will use her massive pectoral flippers to defend her small calf from attacking predators, especially killer whales. Photo: M. Lynn, NOAA, Southwest Fisheries Science Center.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2016View details →

Figure 1 in Humpback whales interfering when mammal-eating killer whales attack other species: Mobbing behavior and interspecific altruism?

Figure 1. Locations and numbers of recorded interactions between humpback and killer whales described in Appendix S2 and summarized in Table 1; the number in each circle is the number of interactions from the general area.

Figure 14. The time that a in Manatee behavioral response to boats

Figure 14. The time that a manatee has to change its behavior (i.e., the time window from when a boat was first audible on the DTAG to when the boat reached its CPA to the manatee) plotted against boat speed at CPA. The criteria to be included in this analysis were: boat passed within 50 m of the manatee; boat did not change its speed class during the pass; it was either a single boat pass or the first within a series of boat passes; and personal watercraft (e.g., Jet Skis) were excluded.

Figure 4 in Manatee behavioral response to boats

Figure 4. The mean rate of change in roll (A), heading (B), depth (C), and fluking (D) for 16 tagged manatees during boat passes with a CPA <50 m, during boat passes with a CPA>50 m, and periods without boat noise. Categories with different letters are significantly different (P <0.05). Standard error of the mean (6 SEM) is represented by whiskers.

Figure 8 in Manatee behavioral response to boats

Figure 8. Model-estimated mean probability of a manatee making a change in depth (6 SEM) according to the order of the boat pass. "First" indicates that the boat pass was a single boat pass or the first boat pass in a series of overlapping boat passes. "Subsequent" indicates a boat pass after the first pass in a series of overlapping boat passes. Means sharing any common letters are not significantly different (P> 0.05). The fixed factor values used to generate these estimates are listed in Table 3.

Figure 11 in Manatee behavioral response to boats

Figure 11. Model-estimated mean time delay from start of boat pass until first change in manatee behavior (6 95% CI) in relation to the time available for change (i.e., time from start of pass to CPA). Results are broken out by fluking state at the start of the pass: high fluking state (orange) and low fluking state (purple). Intermediate fluking state was slightly lower but not significantly different from low fluking state (Fig. S4). The fixed factor values used to generate these estimates are listed in Table 3.

Figure 3 in Manatee behavioral response to boats

Figure 3. Visualization of the acoustic and sensor data recorded by a manatee-borne DTAG for a boat pass while the tagged manatee was resting at 3 m depth. The top plot (A) is a spectrogram (frequency vs. time) from the acoustic record; color denotes amplitude (dark red is loudest). The second plot (B) shows changes in pitch of the manatee's peduncle; the colored horizontal lines at the bottom of the plot depict fluking state: black indicates a period of fluking classified as low, green is intermediate, and red indicates high fluking behavior. The purple triangle indicates an increase in fluking rate. The third plot (C) shows the manatee's roll, the fourth (D) shows the manatee's heading (relative scale), and the bottom plot (E) shows the manatee's depth, all plotted against time (s) on the x-axis. The blue lines on the bottom three plots represent periods of time during which there was a substantial change in the corresponding parameter (e.g., depth). On the bottom plot (E), the first black vertical line on the left indicates the start of the boat pass (i.e., when it first becomes audible on DTAG record), the red line indicates the boat's closest point of approach (CPA), and the black line on the right indicates the end of the boat pass (i.e., no longer audible on the DTAG record). For this pass, the manatee changed its fluking behavior, roll, heading, and depth during the boat pass and the first change in behavior was an increase in fluking state at 5.5 s before CPA (arrow on plot B).

Figure 13 in Manatee behavioral response to boats

Figure 13. The time of a manatee's first change in behavior in relation to boat speed class for boat passes within 50 m of the manatee based on the raw data (n 5 64). (A) Time of behavioral change expressed relative to the start of the pass (i.e., when boat noise first became audible on the DTAG record). (B) Time of behavioral change expressed relative to the time at CPA of the boat. The CPA occurs at 0 s with negative values indicating changes in behavior that occurred before CPA and positive values indicating changes after CPA. The boxes represent the interquartile range, the horizontal line shows the median, and the whiskers indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles.

Figure 2 in Manatee behavioral response to boats

Figure 2. Manatees were captured and tagged in Lemon Bay during the first field season (2007) and in Placida Harbor and Gasparilla Sound during the second field season (2008). When the DTAGs were recording and the manatees were being followed by the observation boat, the manatees ranged from Sarasota Bay to Cayo Costa, between the Gulf of Mexico and the Peace River.

Figure 15 in Manatee behavioral response to boats

Figure 15. The amount of time a manatee has to change its behavior before the time of CPA in relation to boat speed class for boat passes within 50 m of the manatee based on the raw data (n 5 91). Boat passes are split between those that are single or the first in a string of overlapping passes (A) and those subsequent to the first pass in a string of overlapping passes (B). The boxes represent the interquartile range, the horizontal line shows the median, and the whiskers indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles.

Figure 5 in Manatee behavioral response to boats

Figure 5. Model-estimated mean probability (6 SEM) of any change in manatee behavior (roll, heading, depth, or fluking) during a boat pass in relation to manatee-boat distance at CPA. Means sharing any common letters are not significantly different (P> 0.05). The fixed factor values used to generate these estimates are listed in Table 3.