Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
5,864
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
5,864 results for “species diversity”
Fig. 1 in Ant diversity on the largest Mediterranean islands: on the presence or absence of 28 species in Sicily (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
Fig. 1 - Sampling effort across Sicily (circum-Sicilian islands excluded) according to the number of samples from AAC and ESC. / Sforzo di campionamento in Sicilia (isole circumsiciliane escluse) basato sul numero di campioni in AAC e ESC.
Fig. 5 - Solenopsis latro sicula. a-b,e in Ant diversity on the largest Mediterranean islands: on the presence or absence of 28 species in Sicily (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
Fig. 5 - Solenopsis latro sicula. a-b,e) Queen / regina; c-d,f) male / maschio. Monte Pellegrino. Scale bar / scala grafica: 0.5 mm (ESC).
Fig. 2 in Diversity of forensically-important dipteran species in different environments in northeastern Brazil, with notes on the attractiveness of animal baits
Fig. 2. Similarity analysis (Cluster's dendrogram) of the diversity of necrophagous Diptera species in 4 types of environment in northeastern Brazil.
Fig. 1 in New species diversity revealed from molecular and morphological characterization of gall-inducing Calophya spp. (Hemiptera: Calophyidae) from Brazilian peppertree
Fig. 1. Adult male Calophya from Ubu, Carapina, and Salvador populations (A), adult male Calophya terebinthifolii (B), 5th instar from Ubu (C), Calophya latiforceps from Salvador and Carapina (D) and C. terebinthifolii (E).
Fig. 16 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 16. Esca of Lophiomus spp. A. Lm. laticeps (Ogilby, 1910) stat. rev. (NTUM13463, sample ID: NC1375). B. Ditto (NTUM13468, sample ID: NC964). C. Lm. nigriventris sp. nov., holotype (NTUM15096, sample ID: WJC5808). D. Lm. immaculioralis sp. nov., holotype (NTUM16313, sample ID: WJC7777). E. Lm. carusoi sp. nov., holotype (MNHN 2024-0099, sample ID: NC2059). F. Ditto, paratype (NTUM17682, sample ID: NC1978). G. Lm. setigerus (Vahl, 1797) (NTUM14414, sample ID: WJC7223). H. Ditto (NTUM14414, sample ID: WJC7224). Scale bars = 1 mm.
Fig. 15. X in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 15. X-ray radiographs in dorsal view and zoom-in images of left pectoral-fin of Lophiomus spp. collected in this study for visualizing interspecific variations in pectoral-fin ray counts. A. Lm. setigerus (Vahl, 1797), neotype (NTUM10408, sample ID: WJC0905). B. Lm. laticeps (Ogilby, 1910) stat. rev. (NTUM13463, sample ID: NC1375). C. Lm. immaculioralis sp. nov., holotype (NTUM16313, sample ID: WJC7777). D. Lm. nigriventris sp. nov., holotype (NTUM15096, sample ID: WJC5808). E. Lm. carusoi sp. nov., holotype (MNHN 2024-0099, sample ID: NC2059).
Fig. 12 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 12. Lophiomus immaculioralis sp. nov., holotype (NTUM16313, sample ID: WJC7777). A. Preserved specimen, dorsal view. B. Ditto, ventral view. C. Ditto, fresh specimen. D. Ditto, floor of mouth.
Fig. 13 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 13. Lophiomus nigriventris sp. nov. A–D. Holotype (NTUM15096, sample ID: WJC5808). E–H. Subadult paratype (NTUM12188, sample ID: PNG3184). A. Preserved specimen, dorsal view. B. Ditto, ventral view. C. Ditto, fresh specimen. D. Ditto, floor of mouth. E. Preserved specimen, dorsal view. F. Ditto, ventral view. G. Ditto, fresh specimen. H. Ditto, floor of mouth.
Fig. 8 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 8. Lophiomus setigerus (Vahl, 1797). A–D. Neotype (NTUM10408, sample ID: WJC0905). E–H. Large specimens (NTUM14414, sample ID: WJC7223). A. Preserved specimen, dorsal view. B. Ditto, ventral view. C. Ditto, fresh specimen. D. Ditto, floor of mouth. E. Preserved specimen, dorsal view. F. Ditto, ventral view. G. Ditto, fresh specimen. H. Ditto, floor of mouth.
Fig. 11. Lophiomus laticeps stat. rev., newly collected specimens. A–D in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 11. Lophiomus laticeps stat. rev., newly collected specimens. A–D. Large (NTUM13463, sample ID: NC1375). E–H. Small (NTUM13468, sample ID: NC964). A. Preserved specimen, dorsal view. B. Ditto, ventral view. C. Ditto, fresh specimen. D. Ditto, floor of mouth. E. Preserved specimen, dorsal view. F. Ditto, ventral view. G. Ditto, fresh specimen. H. Ditto, floor of mouth.
Fig. 9. Lophius indicus Alock, 1889. A–D in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 9. Lophius indicus Alock, 1889. A–D. Large syntype (BMNH 1890.11.28.45). E–H. Small syntype (BMNH 1890.11.28.45.46). A. Preserved specimen, dorsal view. B. Ditto, ventral view. C. Ditto, floor of mouth. D. Ditto, X-ray radiograph. E. Preserved specimen, dorsal view. F. Ditto, ventral view. G. Ditto, floor of mouth. H. Ditto, X-ray radiograph. Photographed by L. Goodayle. © Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London (available under CC-BY 4.0).
Fig. 10. Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 10. Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910, holotype (AMS E. 2973). A. Preserved specimen, dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C. Floor of mouth. D. X-ray radiograph in dorsal view. E. X-ray radiograph in lateral view (white triangles indicate the dorsal-fin spines; gray triangles indicate the dorsal-fin rays). Photographed by K. Parkinson.
Fig. 6 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 6. CVA biplot of the first and second canonical variates (CV1 and CV2) of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 based on 16 measurements and meristic counts (see Results).
Fig. 14 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 14. Lophiomus carusoi sp. nov., holotype (MNHN 2024-0099, sample ID: NC2059). A. Preserved specimen, dorsal view. B. Ditto, ventral view. C. Fresh specimen. D. Preserved specimen, floor of mouth.
Fig. 7 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 7. Cranial comparative osteology of the three lophiid genera. A. Lophiodes mutilus (Alcock, 1894). B. Lophius litulon (Jordan, 1902). C. Lophiomus setigerus (Vahl, 1797). Scale bars = 10 mm.
Fig. 4 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 4. Phylogenetic trees of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 reconstructed by partitioned maximumlikelihood and Bayesian inference methods based on the TC dataset (4146 bp, COI: 663 bp; cytb: 1143 bp; RAG1: 1440 bp; Rhodopsin: 900 bp; ML: TN + F + I (partition 1, 1–663), GTR + F + I + G4 (partition 2, 664–1806), TPM3 + F + G4 (partition 3, 1807–3246), TPM2u+F+I (partition 4, 3247–4146); BI: with the same partition but changed to HKY + I (partition 1), GTR + I + G (partition 2), GTR + G (partition 3), GTR+I (partition 4)). Phylogenetic tree branch lengths are proportional to inferred nucleotide substitutions except the connection to distant outgroup Lophiodes mutilus. Node numbers represent 'SH-aLRT / UFBoot / pp.' values, with the former two values expressed in percent (%). See the caption of Fig. 2 for locality abbreviations. Terminal names in bold suggest the newly described or resurrected taxa in this study.
Fig. 5 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 5. PCA biplot of the first and second principal components (PC1 and PC2) of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883, with a total of 49.2% of explained variation based on 16 measurements and meristic counts (see Results). Ellipses indicate the confidence interval level set at 0.68 for each group. Arrows represent the direction of the variables projected into the 2D plane of PC1 and PC2.
Fig. 3 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 3. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 based on the NU dataset (2340 bp, RAG1: 1440 bp;Rhodopsin: 900 bp; TPM3u + F + G4 (1–1440 bp), TPM2u + F + I (1441– 2340 bp)). Phylogenetic tree branch lengths are proportional to inferred nucleotide substitutions except the connection to distant outgroup Lophiodes mutilus. Node numbers represent 'SH-aLRT / UFBoot' values in percent (%). See the caption of Fig. 2 for locality abbreviations. The terminal names in bold suggest the newly described or resurrected taxa in this study.
Fig. 1 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 1. Bathymetric terrain map of eastern Indian Ocean and West Pacific showing the occurrence points of species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 based on the samples/sequences included in the analyses of this study. White circle: type locality of the species of Lophiomus.
Fig. 2 in Integrative taxonomy reveals unanticipated hidden diversity in the monotypic goosefish genus Lophiomus (Teleostei, Lophiidae), with description of three new species and resurrection of Chirolophius laticeps Ogilby, 1910
Fig. 2. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of the species of Lophiomus Gill, 1883 based on the MT dataset (1806 bp, COI: 663 bp; cytb: 1143 bp; TN + F + I (1–663 bp), GTR + F + I + G4 (664–1806 bp)) with species delimitation analyses (vertical bars on the right side of the tree). Branch lengths of the phylogenetic tree are proportional to the inferred nucleotide substitutions except for the one connecting to the distant outgroup of Lophiodes mutilus. Node numbers represent 'SH-aLRT / UFBoot' values in percent (%). Locality abbreviations: AU = Australia (NSW = New South Wales; Qld = Queensland; WA = Western Australia); CS = Coral Sea; HN = Hainan Island; IN = India; NC = New Caledonia; PH = Penghu Island; PL = Philippine; PNG = Papua New Guinea; SCS = South China Sea; TH = Thailand; TW = Taiwan. Text next to final decisions represents inferred taxon names and numbers of supported criteria covering all available criteria, with proportions in parentheses.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.