Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in Species-level identification of trypanosomes infecting Australian wildlife by High-Resolution Melting - Real Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (HRM-qPCR)

Fig. 4. Amplification plots, melt curves and standard curves of T. copemani, T. vegrandis G7 and T. noyesi G8 prepared from a plasmid containing trypanosome species.

Fig. 5. A-D in Species-level identification of trypanosomes infecting Australian wildlife by High-Resolution Melting - Real Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (HRM-qPCR)

Fig. 5. A-D: Derivative melt curves showing mock mixed infections generated from plasmid clones containing the following DNA: (A) T. noyesi G8 and T. copemani; (B) T. vegrandis G7 and T. copemani; (C) T. vegrandis G7 and T. noyesi G8; (D) T. vegrandis G7, T. noyesi G8 and T. copemani.

Fig. 1 in Species-level identification of trypanosomes infecting Australian wildlife by High-Resolution Melting - Real Time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (HRM-qPCR)

Fig. 1. Multiple sequence alignment of a portion of the 18S rDNA of seven Trypanosome species and subsequent genotypes used to design the HRM-qPCR assays.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →

Fig. 3 in Molecular identification of Taenia hydatigena and Mesocestoides species based on copro-DNA analysis of wild carnivores in Mongolia

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree based on a partial sequence of tapeworms obtained by the maximum likelihood method was conducted using the HKY + G + I nucleotide substitution model. Numbers above branches are percent bootstrap values based on 1,000 replicates. Bootstrap value> 70% are shown. (a) Phylogenetic tree based on the cox1 sequences of T. hydatigenaand Mesocestoides sp. isolates available in the GenBankṜ database were included. Hymenolepis nana served as an out-group. (b) Phylogenetic analysis of the 12SrRNA partial sequence of T. hydatigena, Mesocestoides sp., and M. lineatus inferred using the sequence distance method and maximum likelihood. Hymenolepis nana was used as an out-group.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Molecular identification of Taenia hydatigena and Mesocestoides species based on copro-DNA analysis of wild carnivores in Mongolia

Fig. 1. Map of Mongolia showing the distribution of Taenia hydatigena (pentangle), Mesocestoides sp.-1 (square), and Mesocestoides sp.-2 (circle) by province detected by molecular identification of fecal samples from wild carnivores. Mongolia consists of 21 provinces: Arkhangai (Akh), Bayankhongor (Bkh), Bayan-Ulgii (BU), Bulgan (BG), Darkhan-Uul (DU), Dornogobi (DoG), Dundgobi (DuG), Govi-Altai (GA), Khentii (KhE), Khovd (KhO), Khuvsgul (KhU), Orkhon-Uul (OU), Selenge (SE), Sukhbaatar (SB), Tuv (TU), Umnu-Gobi (UG), Uvs (Uv), Uvurkhangai (Ukh), Zavkhan (ZKh), Dornod (D), and Gobi-Sumber (GS). The field survey was conducted in all provinces, unless Dornod (D), and GS (Gobi-Sumber). Ulaanbaatar (U) is the capital city of Mongolia. The field survey was conducted in all provinces, unless Dornod (D), and GS (Gobi-Sumber). Ulaanbaatar (U) is the capital city of Mongolia located in Tuv Province.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Anisakid nematode species identification in harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) from the North Sea, Baltic Sea and North Atlantic using RFLP analysis

Fig. 1. RFLP profiles obtained by digestion of ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region with the restriction enzymes HinfI, RsaI and HaeIII. a)-i) lane 1–5: Anisakid nematodes from harbour porpoises. j)-l) lane 1–3: A. simplex s. s. from North Sea, Baltic and Norwegian harbour porpoises; lane 4–6: P. decipiens s. s. from North Sea and Baltic harbour and grey seals; lane 7–9: C. osculatum s. s. from North Sea and Baltic harbour and grey seals. L: 100-bp ladder.

Fig. 3. Maximum likelihood tree for Culex species showing the 5 clades representing 5 subgroups. Clade I in Mosquito identification and haemosporidian parasites detection in the enclosure of the African penguins (Spheniscus demersus) at the SANBI zoological garden

Fig. 3. Maximum likelihood tree for Culex species showing the 5 clades representing 5 subgroups. Clade I is the Trifilatus Subgroup (Mattingly and Rageau, 1958) for Cx. torrentium; Clade II and III are the Pipiens Complex; Clade IV the Theileri Subgroup (Sirivanakarn, 1976) for Cx. theileri; and Clade V is the Tarsalis (Edwards, 1932) for Cx. declaratory and Apicinus Subgroups (Edwards, 1932) for Cx. mollis. Lutzia sp. used as outgroups. Sequences from this study are indicated by asterisks (*).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Identification of predatory and parasitoid insect species associated with Melanaphis sacchari (Hemiptera: Aphididae), a sorghum pest in Nuevo León, Mexico

Fig. 1. Melanaphis sacchari predators and parasitoids found in Nuevo León, Mexico. (A) Allograpta sp. in adult status, (B) Chilocorus cacti (lef), and Chilocorus stigma (right), (C) Olla v-nigrum, (D) Chrysoperla sp., (E) Allograpta sp. (lef) in larval status, and Cycloneda sanguinea (right), (F) Hippodamia convergens, (G) Ocyptamus dimidiatus, (H) Scymnus sp., (I) Pachyneuron sp., (J) Aphidius sp., (K) Melanaphis sacchari mummies.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Figure 3 in Unambiguous identification of the non-indigenous species Cynoscion regalis (Sciaenidae) from Portugal

Figure 3. – Left (lateral view) and right (mesial view) sagittae of Cynoscion regalis, MNHN-ICOT-01951. Scale bar = 1 cm.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Figure 1 in Unambiguous identification of the non-indigenous species Cynoscion regalis (Sciaenidae) from Portugal

Figure 1. – Map of the area showing localities of captured Cynoscion regalis: (*) in Setubal, Portugal, 2015; (+) in the Gulf of Cadiz, Spain, 2011.

Fig. 22 in Polydictya lanternflies of the Indochinese region: Six new species and identification key (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 22. Polydictya spp. from Indochinese region: cumulative totals of numbers of species recorded since 1910.

Fig. 21. Polydictya uniformis Walker, 1957 in Polydictya lanternflies of the Indochinese region: Six new species and identification key (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 21. Polydictya uniformis Walker, 1957, holotype ♂ (BMNH). A, habitus, dorsal view; B, habitus, ventral view. C, frons, normal view. D, head, pro- and mesonotum, dorsal view. E, head and thorax, lateroventral view. F, labels.

Fig. 20 in Polydictya lanternflies of the Indochinese region: Six new species and identification key (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 20. Polydictya tricolor (Westwood, 1845) ♀, Vietnam, Kon Ka Kinh N.P., V.2017 (RBINS). A, habitus, dorsal view; B, head, pro- and mesonotum, dorsal view. C, habitus, ventral view. D, frons, normal view. E, habitus, lateral view. F, head and prothorax, lateral view.

Fig. 19. Polydictya pantherina Gerstaecker, 1895. A–C in Polydictya lanternflies of the Indochinese region: Six new species and identification key (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 19. Polydictya pantherina Gerstaecker, 1895. A–C, holotype ♀ (ZIMG – photographs © P. Michalik). A, habitus, dorsal view; B, habitus, ventral view. C, labels. D–G, holotype ♂ of synonym Polydictya krisna Kirkaldy, 1902 (BMNH). D, habitus, dorsal view. E, frons, normal view. F, labels. G, head, lateral view.

Fig. 18 in Polydictya lanternflies of the Indochinese region: Six new species and identification key (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 18. Polydictya kuntzi Nagai & Porion, 2004, ♀ (MHNL). A, habitus, dorsal view; B, habitus, ventral view. C, head, pro- and mesonotum, dorsal view. D, frons, normal view. E, habitus, lateral view. F, label. G, head and thorax, lateral view.

Fig. 17. Polydictya johannae Lallemand, 1956 in Polydictya lanternflies of the Indochinese region: Six new species and identification key (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 17. Polydictya johannae Lallemand, 1956, holotype ♀ (FSAG). A, habitus, dorsal view; B, habitus, ventral view. C, frons, normal view. D, head, pro- and mesonotum, dorsal view. E, head and thorax, lateroventral view. F, labels.

Fig. 16 in Polydictya lanternflies of the Indochinese region: Six new species and identification key (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 16. Polydictya basalis (Hope, 1843), holotype ♀ (OUMNH – photographs © Z. Simmons). A, habitus, dorsal view; B, labels. C, habitus, ventral view. D, head, pro- and mesonotum, dorsal view. E, head, frontal view. E, head and thorax, lateral view.

Fig. 15. Polydictya affinis Atkinson, 1885 in Polydictya lanternflies of the Indochinese region: Six new species and identification key (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 15. Polydictya affinis Atkinson, 1885, holotype ♀ (BMNH). A, habitus, dorsal view; B, habitus, ventral view. C, head, pro- and mesonotum, dorsal view. D, frons, normal view. E, labels.

Fig. 14 in Polydictya lanternflies of the Indochinese region: Six new species and identification key (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 14. Polydictya thompsoni sp. nov., A–B, in nature, Thailand, Kaeng Krachan N.P., 10.XI.2017. B, trophobiotic interaction with Camponotus sp. (Formicidae) (photographs © P. Thompson).

Fig. 13 in Polydictya lanternflies of the Indochinese region: Six new species and identification key (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 13. Polydictya thompsoni sp. nov., holotype ♀ (RBINS). A, habitus, dorsal view; B, head, pro- and mesonotum, dorsal view. C, habitus, ventral view. D, frons, normal view. E, habitus, lateral view. F, head and prothorax, lateral view.