Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 4 in A survey of morphological variation in adult Meristogenys amoropalamus (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae), with a description of a new cryptic species

FIGURE 4. Relationship between female snout-vent length (SVL) and ovum numbers per ovary. Closed dots indicate Meristogenys amoropalamus (Group A), while open dots indicate M. dyscritus (Group B).

FIGURE 1 in A survey of morphological variation in adult Meristogenys amoropalamus (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae), with a description of a new cryptic species

FIGURE 1. Map of Borneo showing the localities discussed in this study. 1, Wario; 2, Bundu Tuhan; 3, Liwagu; 4, Kamborangah; 5, Mesilau; 6, Poring; 7, Mahua; 8, Bario; 9, Gunung Tapai Sia. KNP and CRNP indicate Kinabalu National Park and Crocker Range National Park, respectively. Closed and open dots indicates the sampling localities of Group A (Meristogenys amoropalamus) and Group B (M. dyscritus), respectively. At half-closed dot localities, we collected larvae of both species.

FIGURE 10 in A survey of morphological variation in adult Meristogenys amoropalamus (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae), with a description of a new cryptic species

FIGURE 10. Plots of percentage ratios of HAL and TL to SVL in females. Closed dots indicate Meristogenys amoropalamus (the asterisk is the paratopotype of M. amoropalamus), while open dots indicate M. dyscritus (Group B).

FIGURE 7 in A survey of morphological variation in adult Meristogenys amoropalamus (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae), with a description of a new cryptic species

FIGURE 7. Dorsolateral views of Meristogenys amoropalamus (A, SP 26612) from Kamborangah and M. dyscritus (B, SP 26481) from Liwagu.

FIGURE 6 in A survey of morphological variation in adult Meristogenys amoropalamus (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae), with a description of a new cryptic species

FIGURE 6. Eyes of Meristogenys amoropalamus (Group A) and M. dyscritus (Group B). A, the female paratopotype of M. amoropalamus from the type locality (Gunung Tapai Sia) after anaesthesia; B, C, M. amoropalamus from Mesilau after (B) and before (C) anaesthesia; D–F, M. dyscritus from Wario after anaesthesia (D) and M. dyscritus from Liwagu before anaesthesia (E, F). Specimen vouchers: A, OMNH Am8068; B, BORNEENSIS 22901; C, KUHE 39460; D, BOR 22970; E, SP 26481; F, SP 21514. For abbreviations, see Appendix.

FIGURE 12 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 12. Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views of body of the lectotype of Rabdosoma torquatum (RMNH 114).

FIGURE 11 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 11. Original plate of the holotype of Rabdosoma varium (RMNH 114), modified from Jan and Sordelli (1865).

FIGURE 10. Bivariate plots with 95 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 10. Bivariate plots with 95% confidence regions for the first two axes derived from scores of PCA analyses for male (A–B) and female (C–D) of Atractus torquatus complex.

FIGURE 13 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 13. Geographical distribution of the Atractus torquatus. Black triangle corresponds to doubtful and circles to literature records. Literature records were taken from Dixon & Soini (1977, 1986), Hoogmoed (1980) and Abuys (1984).

FIGURE 8 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 8. Pattern of the geographic variation for polymorphic qualitative character along of the Atractus torquatus complex. The number of supralabials = 1, number of infralabials = 2 and number of maxillary teeth = 3. The colour represents the frequency for each state of characters: blue correspond to six; green correspond to seven and red correspond to eight. The frequencies of the character states are from our own sample plus from the Dixon & Soini (1986). The total sample comprises 81 individuals and the traits were counted in both sides for each specimen.

FIGURE 9 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 9. Morphological variation in the hemipenial morphology along the Atractus torquatus populations. Sulcate (left) and asulcate (right) sides of the organ of FMT 1286 from municipality of Manaus, state of Amazonas, Brazil (A–B); INPA 14670 from Lago Ayapuá, Rio Purus, municipality of Beruri, state of Amazonas, Brazil (C–D); FMT 1201 from municipality of Manaus, state of Amazonas, Brazil (e–f); and MPEG 23684 from Serra do Acari, municipality of Oriximiná, state of Pará, Brazil (g–h). Scale = 5 mm.

FIGURE 7 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 7. Dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views of preserved specimens of Atractus torquatum from Parque Nacional de Amacayacu, municipality of Leticia, department of Amazonas, Colombia (A–B) and km 38 of the El Dorado–Santa Elena de Uairén road, state of Bolívar, Venezuela, photo by D. Calcaño (C).

FIGURE 6 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 6. Lateral view of head (A) and dorsal (B) and ventral (C) views of body of the holotype of Atractus davidhardi (ICN 10096) from Muniyamena, municipality of Leticia, department of Amazonas, Colombia.

FIGURE 5 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 5. General view in life of Atractus torquatus from Reserva Ducke, municipality of Manaus, state of Amazonas, Brazil, photo by M. Martins (a); Moiobamba, Rio Purus, Arumã district, municipality of Beruri, state of Amazonas, Brazil, photo by M. Senna (b); Balbina Hydroelectric Plant, municipality of Presidente Figueiredo, state of Amazonas, Brazil, photo by M. Martins (c); Parque Nacional do Pico da Neblina, municipality of São Grabriel da Cachoeira, state of Amazonas, Brazil, photo by V. Carvalho (d); Rio Madeira, Abunã district, Porto Velho, state of Rondônia, Brazil, photo by M. Senna (e); Moiobamba, Rio Purus, Arumã district, municipality of Beruri, state of Amazonas, Brazil, photo by M. Senna (g); Río Uey, middle basin of Río Cuyuní, state of Bolívar, Venezuela, photo by C. Barrio-Amorós (g–h).

FIGURE 3 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 3. Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views of body of the holotype of Atractus janethae (ICN 10104) from La Chorera, municipality of Puerto Córdoba, department of Amazonas, Colombia.

FIGURE 4 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 4. Variation of the blotch condition on the nuchal region to the specimens of the Atractus torquatus from Balbina Hydroelectric Plant, municipality of Presidente Figueredo (FMT 1358) (A), municipality of Manaus (FMT 338) (B) and municipality of São Miguel da Cachoeira (INPA 15760) (C). All specimens come from localities in the state of Amazonas in Brazil and they are part of Guiana Shield populations.

FIGURE 2 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 2. Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views of body of the holotype of Atractus lucilae (ICN 10105) from La Pedrera, municipality of Puerto Córdoba, department of Amazonas, Colombia.

FIGURE 1 in Morphological variation, polymorphism, and Taxonomy of the Atractus torquatus complex (Serpentes: Dipsadidae)

FIGURE 1. Dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views of body of the specimen of Atractus torquatus (ICN 10111) from municipality of Mitú, department of Vaupés, Colombia.

opennotspecifiedDec 2013View details →

FIGURES 15–23. Morphological character variation within P. c a m b o u e i. Figs 15–17 in Revision of the Pachycondyla wasmannii - group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from the Malagasy region

FIGURES 15–23. Morphological character variation within P. c a m b o u e i. Figs 15–17: Head in profile showing the shape of the occipital corner. Fig. 15: Normally rounded in form 1; Fig. 16: Protruding as a lobe in form 2; Fig. 17: Hornlike extension in form 3. Figs 18–19: Mesosoma in lateral view showing hairs on propodeal dorsum. Fig. 18: Hairs present in form 1; Fig. 19: Hairs absent in form 4. Figs 20–21: Anterodorsal angles of pronotum. Fig. 20: Bidentate in form 5; Fig. 21: Smoothly rounded in form 6. Figs 22–23: Sculpture and pubescence on fourth abdominal tergite. Fig. 22: Smooth and shiny between large punctures and pubescence absent (form 1); Fig. 23: With closely-spaced small punctures between large punctures and abundant pubescence (form 6).