Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in Contribution to the genus Chilocorus Leach, 1815 (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Chilocorini), with descriptions of two new species from China

Fig. 2. Chilocorus yunlongensis Cao & Xiao, 1984. a. Dorsal view. b. Penis. c. Tegmen, lateral view. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. (FIQB)

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2018View details →

Fig. 1. Chilocorus politus Mulsant, 1850. a. Dorsal view. b. Lateral view. c. Frontal view. d. Abdomen. e. Penis. f in Contribution to the genus Chilocorus Leach, 1815 (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae: Chilocorini), with descriptions of two new species from China

Fig. 1. Chilocorus politus Mulsant, 1850. a. Dorsal view. b. Lateral view. c. Frontal view. d. Abdomen. e. Penis. f. Apex of penis. g. Tegmen, lateral view. h. Tegmen, ventral view. i–j. Female genitalia. i. Ovipositor. j. Spermatheca. Scale bars: 0.1 mm. (SCAU)

Fig. 11 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 11. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa intrudens sp. nov. Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 10 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 10. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa goliath sp. nov. Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 9 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 9. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa annabolteae sp. nov. Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 7 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 7. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa poppeorum sp. nov. Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 6 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 6. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa visayaensis sp. nov. Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 8 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 8. Shells of Reticunassa Iredale, 1936. – A–D. Reticunassa annabolteae sp. nov. A–C. Holotype, MNHN IM-2009-12843, length 11.5 mm, width 5.3 mm, S Madagascar, Ambatobe, Bavarama, 25°27.9′ S, 44°57.6′ E, 0–1 m. D. Protoconch. – E–H. R. goliath sp. nov. E–G. Holotype, MNHN IM-2000- 22724, length 15.5 mm, width 7.9 mm, New Caledonia, Nouméa, leg. D. Massemin, ex coll. H. Kool. H. Protoconch of paratype, MNHN IM-2000-28394. – I–L. R. intrudens sp. nov. Holotype, MNHN IM-2000-22726, length 7.9 mm, width 4.3 mm, New Caledonia, Touho, 20°44′ S, 165°14′ E, 49–59 m. L. Protoconch. – M–P. R. thailandensis sp. nov. M–O. Holotype, ZMA Moll.4.09.047, length 7.35 mm, width 3.8 mm, Thailand, Gulf of Thailand, 6°40.313′ N, 101°43.852′ E, 3–15 m. P. Protoconch. Scale bars: D, H, L, P = 200 µm.

Fig. 5 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 5. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa tringa (Souverbie, 1864). Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 1. A in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 1. A. Bayesian tree based on COI sequences of species of Reticunassa. B. Bayesian tree based on 28S sequences of species of Reticunassa. C. Frequency of pairwise distance (K2P model) values among COI sequences. In gray, intra-specific variation. In black, inter-specific variation. PNG = Papua New Guinea.

Fig. 4 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 4. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa paupera (Gould, 1850). Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 2 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 2. Characters of Reticunassa Iredale, 1936. A–B. Protoconchs. A. R. paupera (Gould, 1850), MNHN IM-2007-31782. B. R. silvardi (Kool & Dekker, 2006). C. Suture detail of R. paupera. D. Axial striae in R. silvardi. E–F. Intercordal spirals. E. R. tringa (Souverbie, 1864). F. R. paupera. G–H. Columellar details of R. paupera. I–L. Type series of R. paupera. I–J. Lectotype, USNM 5726, length 9.1 mm, width 4.8 mm. K–L. Paralectotype, MCZ 216602, length 7.2 mm, width 3.5 mm. All scale bars = 200 µm.

Fig. 10 in A new genus and three new species of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Sri Lanka

Fig. 10. Schenkelia aurantia sp. nov. A. Palp, ventral view. B. Palp, retrolateral view. C. Epigyne, ventral view. D. Vulva, ventral view. Abbreviations: see Material and methods. Scale bars: A–B = 0.2 mm; C–D = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 9 in A new genus and three new species of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Sri Lanka

Fig. 9. Schenkelia aurantia sp. nov., Ƌ. A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Palp, prolateral view. D. Palp, ventral view. E. Palp, retrolateral view. Scale bars: A–B = 1 mm; C–E = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 7. Mogrus frontosus Simon, 1871 in A new genus and three new species of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Sri Lanka

Fig. 7. Mogrus frontosus Simon, 1871, Ƌ. A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C. Palp, prolateral view. D. Palp, ventral view. E. Palp, retrolateral view. Scale bars: A–B = 1 mm; C–E = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 5. A–B. Mogrus frontosus Simon, 1871 in A new genus and three new species of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Sri Lanka

Fig. 5. A–B. Mogrus frontosus Simon, 1871, Ƌ. C–D. Brancus calebi sp. nov., Ƌ. A, C. Palp, ventral view. B, D. Palp, retrolateral view. Abbreviations: see Material and methods. Scale bars: 0.2 mm.

Fig. 3 in A new genus and three new species of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Sri Lanka

Fig. 3. Bavirecta flavopuncta sp. nov., ♀. A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Epigyne, ventral view. D. Vulva, ventral view. Scale bars: A–B = 2 mm; C–D = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 1 in A new genus and three new species of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Sri Lanka

Fig. 1. Bavirecta flavopuncta sp. nov., Ƌ. A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Palp, prolateral view. D. Palp, ventral view. E. Palp, retrolateral view. The arrowheads point to the dorsal trapezoid (A) and black blotches (D). Scale bars: A–B = 2 mm; C–E = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 4 in A new genus and three new species of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Sri Lanka

Fig. 4. Brancus calebi sp. nov., Ƌ. A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Palp, prolateral view. D. Palp, ventral view. E. Palp, retrolateral view. Scale bars: A–B = 1 mm; C–E = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 11 in A new genus and three new species of jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) from Sri Lanka

Fig. 11. Schenkelia aurantia sp. nov., ♀. A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Epigyne, ventral view. D. Vulva, ventral view. Scale bars: A–B = 1 mm; C–D = 0.1 mm.