Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 10 in Taxonomy and redescription of the Yellow-footed Antechinus, Antechinus flavipes (Waterhouse) (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae)

FIGURE 10. Scatterplot of canonical variates scores (roots 1 and 2) for males of antechinus species found in tropical latitudes: A. flavipes rubeculus (closed squares), A. adustus (open squares), A. bellus (crosses), A. godmani (closed triangles), A. leo (open triangles), A. mysticus (closed circles).

FIGURE 12 in Taxonomy and redescription of the Yellow-footed Antechinus, Antechinus flavipes (Waterhouse) (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae)

FIGURE 12. Scatterplot of canonical variates scores (roots 1 and 3) for males of antechinus species found in tropical latitudes: A. flavipes rubeculus (closed squares), A. adustus (open squares), A. bellus (crosses), A. godmani (closed triangles), A. leo (open triangles), A. mysticus (closed circles).

FIGURE 8 in Taxonomy and redescription of the Yellow-footed Antechinus, Antechinus flavipes (Waterhouse) (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae)

FIGURE 8. Scatterplot of canonical variates scores (roots 1 and 3) for males of antechinus species found in temperate or subtropical latitudes: A. flavipes flavipes (open circles), A. flavipes leucogaster (crosses), A. agilis (open squares), A. minimus (closed squares), A. mysticus (closed circles), A. stuartii (open triangles), A. subtropicus (closed triangles) and A. swainsonii (asterisks).

FIGURE 7 in Taxonomy and redescription of the Yellow-footed Antechinus, Antechinus flavipes (Waterhouse) (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae)

FIGURE 7. Scatterplot of canonical variates scores (roots 1 and 2) for females of antechinus species found in temperate or subtropical latitudes: A. flavipes flavipes (open circles), A. flavipes leucogaster (crosses), A. agilis (open squares), A. minimus (closed squares), A. mysticus (closed circles), A. stuartii (open triangles), A. subtropicus (closed triangles) and A. swainsonii (asterisks).

FIGURE 6 in Taxonomy and redescription of the Yellow-footed Antechinus, Antechinus flavipes (Waterhouse) (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae)

FIGURE 6. Scatterplot of canonical variates scores (roots 1 and 2) for males of antechinus species found in temperate or subtropical latitudes: A. flavipes flavipes (open circles), A. flavipes leucogaster (crosses), A. agilis (open squares), A. minimus (closed squares), A. mysticus (closed circles), A. stuartii (open triangles), A. subtropicus (closed triangles) and A. swainsonii (asterisks).

FIGURE 1. A in Taxonomy and redescription of the Yellow-footed Antechinus, Antechinus flavipes (Waterhouse) (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae)

FIGURE 1. A guide to measurement of variables: skull and dentary (a–h), and external body measures (i, j).

FIGURE 5 in Taxonomy and redescription of the Yellow-footed Antechinus, Antechinus flavipes (Waterhouse) (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae)

FIGURE 5. Scatterplot of canonical variates scores (roots 1 and 2) for females of the three A. flavipes subspecies: A. flavipes flavipes (open circles), A. flavipes leucogaster (crosses) and A. flavipes rubeculus (closed squares).

FIGURE 3 in Taxonomy and redescription of the Yellow-footed Antechinus, Antechinus flavipes (Waterhouse) (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae)

FIGURE 3. Bayesian phylogeny of the Genus Antechinus based on concatenated mitochondrial (Cytb) and nuclear (IRBP) gene sequences.

FIGURE 4 in Taxonomy and redescription of the Yellow-footed Antechinus, Antechinus flavipes (Waterhouse) (Marsupialia: Dasyuridae)

FIGURE 4. Scatterplot of canonical variates scores (roots 1 and 2) for males of the three A. flavipes subspecies: A. flavipes flavipes (open circles), A. flavipes leucogaster (crosses) and A. flavipes rubeculus (closed squares).

Figure 9. Phylogeny showing a in Evolution of molar shape in didelphid marsupials (Marsupialia: Didelphidae): analysis of the influence of ecological factors and phylogenetic legacy

Figure 9. Phylogeny showing a summary of the optimization for the third lower molar (m3). Numbers on the branches indicate node number. Taxon names and nodes in bold indicate the optimizations being shown. Deformation grids show the changes with respect to the previous node.

Figure 7 in Evolution of molar shape in didelphid marsupials (Marsupialia: Didelphidae): analysis of the influence of ecological factors and phylogenetic legacy

Figure 7. Scatter plots resulting from the between-group PCA of the third upper molar (M3), summarizing differences between the five diet categories. White squares with the Roman numeral of each diet category represent the centroid of the distribution for that category. Deformation grids show the extreme shape of each PC.

Figure 1 in Evolution of molar shape in didelphid marsupials (Marsupialia: Didelphidae): analysis of the influence of ecological factors and phylogenetic legacy

Figure 1. Occlusal views of the third upper (A, B) and lower (C, D) didelphid molars. A and C, molars of Didelphis albiventris showing the landmarks and semilandmarks used. B and D, didelphid molars illustrating features of crown morphology discussed in the text. Squares, landmarks; circles, semilandmarks. See text for a detailed description of landmarks. Abbreviations: ac, anterior cingulum (light grey shading); cc, centrocrista; co, cristid obliqua; ect, ectoflexus; Ent, entoconid; ento, entocristid; Hyp, hypoconid; Hypd, hypoconulid; Me, metacone; Med, metaconid; meta, metastylar corner (grey shading); Pa, paracone; Pacr, paracristid; Pad, paraconid; para, parastylar corner (dark grey shading); postcd, postcristid; prePa, preparacrista; Pr, protocone; Prcr, protocristid; Prd, protoconid; prePr, preprotocrista; posMe, metacrista; posPr, postprotocrista; StA, stylar cusp A; StB, stylar cusp B; StC, stylar cusp C; StD, stylar cusp D; StE, stylar cusp E; Ta: talonid; Tri: trigonid.

Figure 3 in Evolution of molar shape in didelphid marsupials (Marsupialia: Didelphidae): analysis of the influence of ecological factors and phylogenetic legacy

Figure 3. First upper molar (M1) shape variation along the first two principal components (PC) from the PCA of the Procrustes coordinates, showing the distribution of taxonomic groups. Deformation grids show the extreme shape of each PC.

Figure 5 in Evolution of molar shape in didelphid marsupials (Marsupialia: Didelphidae): analysis of the influence of ecological factors and phylogenetic legacy

Figure 5. Third upper molar (M3) shape variation along the first two principal components (PC) from the PCA of the Procrustes coordinates, showing the distribution of taxonomic groups. Deformation grids show the extreme shape of each PC.

Figure 2 in Evolution of molar shape in didelphid marsupials (Marsupialia: Didelphidae): analysis of the influence of ecological factors and phylogenetic legacy

Figure 2. First lower molar (m1) shape variation along the first two principal components (PC) from the PCA of the Procrustes coordinates, showing the distribution of taxonomic groups. Deformation grids show the extreme shape of each PC.

Figure 8. Phylogeny showing a in Evolution of molar shape in didelphid marsupials (Marsupialia: Didelphidae): analysis of the influence of ecological factors and phylogenetic legacy

Figure 8. Phylogeny showing a summary of the optimization for the third upper molar (M3). Numbers on the branches indicate node number. Taxon names and nodes in bold indicate the optimizations being shown. Deformation grids show the changes with respect to the previous node.

Figure 6 in An osteology-based appraisal of the phylogeny and evolution of kangaroos and wallabies (Macropodidae: Marsupialia)

Figure 6. Diagnostic features of the Lagostrophinae (Lagostrophus, A, C, E, G; Troposodon, B, D, F, H). A–B, mesial surface of the anterior portion of the dentary showing the deep, rugose symphyseal plate (s) that is not anteriorly expanded. C–D, lateral surface of the dentary with broad, deep buccinator concavity (b), and broad, concave insertion area for the anteriormost layer of the middle masseter muscle (m). E–F, lingual surface of the lower incisor (i1) is covered by an extension of the enamel (e) from the buccal side of the crown. G–H, lower cheek tooth row showing lower premolar (p3) with crown markedly curved-in lingually (arrow) at posterior end.

Figure 10 in An osteology-based appraisal of the phylogeny and evolution of kangaroos and wallabies (Macropodidae: Marsupialia)

Figure 10. Stratigraphic distribution and genus-level phylogeny of the Macropodidae. Horizontal bars denote generic ranges. Vertical bars indicate that first- or last-known appearances of genera have been reliably dated. Otherwise, ranges have been approximated from the most widely accepted published age estimates for strata yielding these taxa (largely derived using biocorrelation and stage-of-evolution biochronology; e.g. see Archer et al., 1995; Megirian et al., 2004; Travouillon et al., 2006). Clade divergence times are speculative, but have been guided by taxon ranges and the degree of morphological evolution characterizing successive clades.

Figure 1 in An osteology-based appraisal of the phylogeny and evolution of kangaroos and wallabies (Macropodidae: Marsupialia)

Figure 1. Map of Australia and New Guinea showing locations of key macropodid fossil localities discussed in the text.

Figure 5 in An osteology-based appraisal of the phylogeny and evolution of kangaroos and wallabies (Macropodidae: Marsupialia)

Figure 5. Right upper (A, C, E, G) and lower (B, D, F, H) molars in occlusal view, showing distinguishing character states. A–B, Bettongia penicillata (bunodont). C–D, Setonix brachyurus (bilophodont, simple, and low crowned). E–F, Simosthenurus occidentalis (bilophodont, crenulated, and low crowned). G–H, Macropus fuliginosus (bilophodont, complex, and high crowned).