Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 6 in A review of the South American genera of Cimbicidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera)

Fig. 6. Lopesiana thomasi (Conde, 1937), ♀ (FIOC). A. Habitus, dorsal. B. Head anterior. C. Thorax, dorsal. D. Wings. Abbreviations: M, Rs+M, 1m-cu, 2m-cu, 2r-m = wing veins; n2 = mesoscutum; T1 = 1st abdominal tergum; blue arrow = dorsomedian margin of torulus; yellow arrow = median mesoscutal sulcus; green arrow = notaulus.

Fig. 4. Thorax, dorsal. A. Pachylosticta albiventris Klug, 1824 in A review of the South American genera of Cimbicidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera)

Fig. 4. Thorax, dorsal. A. Pachylosticta albiventris Klug, 1824, Ƌ (NHMD). B. Corynis obscura (Fabricius, 1775), ♀ (NHMD). Abbreviations: yellow arrow = median mesoscutal sulcus; green arrow = notaulus.

Fig. 3. Abdomen, lateral. A. Pachylosticta albiventris Klug, 1824 in A review of the South American genera of Cimbicidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera)

Fig. 3. Abdomen, lateral. A. Pachylosticta albiventris Klug, 1824, Ƌ (NHMD). B. Pergidae, Parasyzygoniinae: Parasyzygonia cyanoptera (Klug, 1824), ♀ (NHMD). Abbreviations: T[n] = abdominal terga [n]. yellow arrow = spiracle; green arrow = separation between median and lateral parts of abdominal terga.

Fig. 8 in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 8. Enicospilus intermedius sp. nov., holotype, ♀ (NHRS-HEVA000008154), habitus, lateral view. Scale bar = 1 mm.

Fig. 14 in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 14. Head in lateral view. A. Enicospilus merdarius (Gravenhorst, 1829), ♀. B. Enicospilus repentinus (Holmgren, 1860), ♀.

Fig. 7 in Review of the Swedish Enicospilus (Hymenoptera; Ichneumonidae; Ophioninae) with description of three new species and an illustrated key to species

Fig. 7. Posterior metasomal segments and male parameres in lateral view. A. Enicospilus ryrholmi sp. nov., paratype, Ƌ (MZLU Type no. 06123:10). B. E. cederbergi sp. nov., paratype, Ƌ (NHRS- HEVA000008154).

Fig. 2 in A review of the South American genera of Cimbicidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera)

Fig. 2. Fore wing, ♀♀. A. Pachylosticta apicalis (Westwood, 1835) (NHRS). B. Agenocimbex maculata (Marlatt, 1898) (NSMT). C. Pergidae, Parasyzygoniinae: Parasyzygonia cyanoptera (Klug, 1824) (NHMD). Abbreviations: Rs, Rs+M, M, 2r, 2r-m, 2m-cu, 1a, 2a = wing veins; 1R*, Rs* = wing cells; violet arrow = junction between veins Sc+R and M; red arrow = junction between veins Sc+R and Rs+M.

Fig. 1. Antenna. A. Pseudabia fusca Schrottky, 1910 in A review of the South American genera of Cimbicidae (Insecta, Hymenoptera)

Fig. 1. Antenna. A. Pseudabia fusca Schrottky, 1910, ♀ (NMNH). B. Trichiosoma latreillei (Leach, 1817), ♀ (NHML).

Fig. 11 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 11. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa intrudens sp. nov. Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 10 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 10. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa goliath sp. nov. Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 9 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 9. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa annabolteae sp. nov. Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 7 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 7. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa poppeorum sp. nov. Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 6 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 6. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa visayaensis sp. nov. Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 8 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 8. Shells of Reticunassa Iredale, 1936. – A–D. Reticunassa annabolteae sp. nov. A–C. Holotype, MNHN IM-2009-12843, length 11.5 mm, width 5.3 mm, S Madagascar, Ambatobe, Bavarama, 25°27.9′ S, 44°57.6′ E, 0–1 m. D. Protoconch. – E–H. R. goliath sp. nov. E–G. Holotype, MNHN IM-2000- 22724, length 15.5 mm, width 7.9 mm, New Caledonia, Nouméa, leg. D. Massemin, ex coll. H. Kool. H. Protoconch of paratype, MNHN IM-2000-28394. – I–L. R. intrudens sp. nov. Holotype, MNHN IM-2000-22726, length 7.9 mm, width 4.3 mm, New Caledonia, Touho, 20°44′ S, 165°14′ E, 49–59 m. L. Protoconch. – M–P. R. thailandensis sp. nov. M–O. Holotype, ZMA Moll.4.09.047, length 7.35 mm, width 3.8 mm, Thailand, Gulf of Thailand, 6°40.313′ N, 101°43.852′ E, 3–15 m. P. Protoconch. Scale bars: D, H, L, P = 200 µm.

Fig. 5 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 5. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa tringa (Souverbie, 1864). Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 1. A in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 1. A. Bayesian tree based on COI sequences of species of Reticunassa. B. Bayesian tree based on 28S sequences of species of Reticunassa. C. Frequency of pairwise distance (K2P model) values among COI sequences. In gray, intra-specific variation. In black, inter-specific variation. PNG = Papua New Guinea.

Fig. 4 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 4. Geographical and bathymetrical distribution of Reticunassa paupera (Gould, 1850). Star indicates type locality. Each bar represents all lv or dd specimens.

Fig. 2 in Review of the Nassarius pauperus (Gould, 1850) complex (Nassariidae): Part 3, reinstatement of the genus Reticunassa, with the description of six new species

Fig. 2. Characters of Reticunassa Iredale, 1936. A–B. Protoconchs. A. R. paupera (Gould, 1850), MNHN IM-2007-31782. B. R. silvardi (Kool & Dekker, 2006). C. Suture detail of R. paupera. D. Axial striae in R. silvardi. E–F. Intercordal spirals. E. R. tringa (Souverbie, 1864). F. R. paupera. G–H. Columellar details of R. paupera. I–L. Type series of R. paupera. I–J. Lectotype, USNM 5726, length 9.1 mm, width 4.8 mm. K–L. Paralectotype, MCZ 216602, length 7.2 mm, width 3.5 mm. All scale bars = 200 µm.

opencc-by-3.0Mar 2017View details →

Fig. 22 in Review of the clavatus group of the lanternfly genus Pyrops (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 22. Pyrops watanabei (Matsumura, 1913) in nature (photographs by S. Chen). A. Eggs, Taipei City, 28 Jul. 2012. B. Hatched eggs, idem, 19 Feb. 2016. C. Nymph, Nantou County, 14 Feb. 2012. D. Nymph, Taipei City, 7 Jun. 2012, on Triadica sebifera (L.). E–F. Adult, Taipei City, 16 Aug. 2012, on T. sebifera. G. Adult predated by a Sparassidae spider, Taipei City, 16 Aug. 2012, on T. sebifera. H. Group of adults, Taipei City, 6 Aug. 2011, on trunk of T. sebifera.