Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

12,632

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

12,632 results for “FISH”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo40/100

Figure 3 in Before the freeze: otoliths from the Eocene of Seymour Island, Antarctica, reveal dominance of gadiform fishes (Teleostei)

Figure 3. Drawings of Eocene otoliths from Seymour Island. A—C, Argentina antarctica sp. nov., holotype, NRM-PZ P.15964, mirror imaged; A, outer face; B, ventral view; C, inner face. D—I, Diaphus? marambionis sp. nov.; D—F, holotype, NRM-PZ P.15966; D, anterior view, E, inner face, F, ventral view; G—I, (mirror imaged) paratypes, NRM-PZ P.15967; G, inner face; H, ventral view; I, inner face. J, K, Paraulopus sp., NRM-PZ P.15965, mirror imaged; J, inner face; K, ventral view.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2. Location photographs. A in Before the freeze: otoliths from the Eocene of Seymour Island, Antarctica, reveal dominance of gadiform fishes (Teleostei)

Figure 2. Location photographs. A, aerial view of IAA 1/90, 'Ungulate site', 64Ǫ14,04.67ĮĮS,56Ǫ 39,56.38ĮĮ W, marked by asterisk; B, panoramic view of site IAA 1/90 with 'Natica horizon' marked by asterisks; C, Argentine-Swedish field party collecting fossils at IAA 2/95, 'Marsupial site', 64Ǫ13,58ĮĮS,56Ǫ39,06ĮĮ W); D, panoramic view of site IAA 2/95 with Cockburn Island in background; E, 'Natica horizon' near site IAA 2/95 showing lens-like character of the beds. Photographs by F. Degrange (A, D), T. Mors (B) and J. Hagstrom (C, E).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1. Location and stratigraphy. A in Before the freeze: otoliths from the Eocene of Seymour Island, Antarctica, reveal dominance of gadiform fishes (Teleostei)

Figure 1. Location and stratigraphy. A, map of Antarctica showing the position of the Antarctic Peninsula; B, map of the Antarctic Peninsula showing Seymour Island; C, geological map of Seymour Island showing the outcrop of Telm 4-5 and localities IAA 1/90 and 2/ 95; D, composite measured section through the La Meseta Formation showing the stratigraphical position of the sampled 'Natica horizon' (IAA 1/90 and 2/95). Modified from Reguero et al. (2013). Strontium date values from Dutton et al. (2002), Ivany et al. (2008), Dingle & Lavelle (1998) and Reguero et al. (2002).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 8 in Before the freeze: otoliths from the Eocene of Seymour Island, Antarctica, reveal dominance of gadiform fishes (Teleostei)

Figure 8. Eocene palaeogeography in south polar projection and the distributions of selected taxa of Protacanthopterygii, Paracanthopterygii and Berycoidei. Regions studied for fossil otoliths are marked by an asterisk (each region may contain multiple locations). Otolith data are compiled from Schwarzhans (1980, 1985); the palaeogeographical reconstruction is based on Reguero et al. (2013); the delimitation of the Weddellian bioprovince is based on Zinsmeister (1982); the reconstruction of palaeocurrents is composed from Crame (1999) and Huber et al. (2004).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →
dryad40/100

Neglected patterns of variation in transgenerational plasticity: The importance of different sources of environmental variation differs across ages and sexes in a cyprinid fish

<p>Adaptive transgenerational plasticity (TGP) requires individuals to integrate environmental experience across multiple sources. However, few empirical studies have considered that the relative relevance of certain sources might vary across ontogeny and sexes.</p> <p>Here, we address this knowledge gap by studying inducible antipredator defenses, one of the most convincing examples of TGP. We assessed individual and combined effects of perceived high predation risk in mothers, fathers, caring males and personal environments on the morphology of juvenile, adult male and adult female cyprinids Pimephales promelas.</p> <p>Parental rather than personal environmental experience determined morphological defense expression across ages and sexes, likely because parents had a longer sampling period.</p> <p>In juveniles and adult males, egg-mediated environmental experience outweighed sperm-mediated environmental experience in the induction of body shape differences, likely because eggs can transmit information beyond epigenomes. However, in adult females, where body shape responses can be interpreted as life-history plasticity, information from egg and sperm were equally important, likely resulting from different integration mechanisms between morphological and life-history plasticity.</p> <p>The importance of care-mediated relative to gamete-mediated variation changed between juveniles and adult males, likely because they represent short- and long-term environmental experience, respectively. Instead, in adult females, both sources were again equally important, potentially owing to lag-times of life-history plasticity. Parental care intensity only contributed marginally to defense formation.</p> <p>These results highlight age- and sex-specific prioritization of different environmental experiences so as to generate optimal phenotypes.</p>

opencc-zeroMar 2024View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 13 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 13. Scanning electron micrographs of Chondracanthus kabatai sp. n. from Zenopsis conchifer Lowe. A. Genito-abdomen ventral view (arrow). B–D. Male attached to genito-abdomen of female. (m- male)

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 12 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 12. Scanning electron micrographs of Chondracanthus kabatai sp. n., non-type female from Zenopsis conchifer Lowe. A, B. Cephalic appendages. C, D. Mandible. E. Maxilla. F. Maxilliped.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 10 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 10. Chondracanthus kabatai sp. n., non-type female from Zenopsis conchifer Lowe. A. Antennule. B. Antennule apex. C, D. Antenna. E, F. Mandible. G. Maxillule. H, I. Maxilla. J. Maxilliped. K. Leg 1. L. Leg 2. M. Ventral view of genito-abdomen. N. Caudal ramus.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 11 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 11. Scanning electron micrographs of Chondracanthus kabatai sp. n., non-type female from Zenopsis conchifer Lowe. A. Head ventral view showing antennule and antenna. B, C. Antenna. D. Antennule.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 9 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 9. Chondracanthus kabatai sp. n. from Zenopsis conchifer Lowe. A, B. Holotype, female, dorsal and ventral view. C. Paratype, female (ZSI/WGRC/IR/INV/11732), dorsal view, D. Paratype, female (ZSI/WGRC/IR/INV/11729), dorso-lateral view.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 6 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 6. Acanthochondria krishnai sp. n., non-type male from Uranoscopus guttatus Cuvier. A. Habitus lateral view. B. Antennule. C. Antenna. D. Mandible. E. Maxillule. F. Maxilla. G. Maxilliped. H. Leg 1. I. Leg 2. J. Lateral view of genito-abdomen. K. Ventral view of genito-abdomen.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 7. A, B in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 7. A, B. Site of attachment of Chondracanthus kabatai sp. n. (arrows) on its host fish Zenopsis conchifer Lowe.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 5 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 5. Acanthochondria krishnai sp. n., non-type male from Uranoscopus guttatus Cuvier. A. Habitus lateral view. B. Antennule. C. Antenna.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 4. Acanthochondria krishnai sp. n., paratype, female from Uranoscopus guttatus Cuvier. A. Mandible. B. Maxillule. C. Maxilla. D. Maxilliped. E. Maxilliped apex. F. Leg 1. G. Leg 2. H, I. Genito-abdomen with rami, ventral and ventro-lateral views. J. Rami.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 2. Acanthochondria krishnai sp. n., holotype, female from Uranoscopus guttatus Cuvier. A. Dorsal view. B. Ventral view. C, D. Cephalon, dorsal and ventral views. E. Antennule. F. Antenna.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 1. Acanthochondria krishnai sp. n., female from Uranoscopus guttatus Cuvier. A, B. Dorsal view. C. Ventral view.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 3 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 3. Acanthochondria krishnai sp. n., non-type female from Uranoscopus guttatus Cuvier. A. Cephalon ventral view showing cephalic appendages. B. Antennule (arrow). C. Antennules (arrows). D. Cephalic appendages. E. Leg 1. F. Leg 2. G–J. Genitoabdomen. G. Lateral view with rami. H. Ventral view with rami. I. Dorsal view with male. J. With rami. (a1- antennule, a2- antenna, mxp- maxilliped, max- maxilla; L1- leg 1, L2- leg 2, m- male, r- rami).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 14 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 14. Chondracanthus kabatai sp. n., paratype male from Zenopsis conchifer Lowe. A. Habitus, lateral view. B. Antennule. C. Antenna. D. Mandible. E. Maxillule. F. Maxilla. G. Maxilliped. H. Leg 1. I. Leg 2. J. Lateral view of genito-abdomen. K. Rami.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 8 in New species of Acanthochondria Oakley, 1930 and Chondracanthus Delaroche, 1811 (Copepoda: Cyclopoida: Chondracanthidae) parasitizing marine fishes from Indian waters

Figure 8. Chondracanthus kabatai sp. n. from Zenopsis conchifer Lowe. A–C. Holotype, female, dorsal, ventral and lateral views. D–F. Paratype, female, dorsal, ventral and dorso-lateral views.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2020View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in Parapsilorhynchus odishaensis, a new cyprinid fish (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from Odisha, India

Figure 2. Ventral view of head: a. Parapsilorhynchus odishaensis (ZSI FF 4626), paratype; b. P. tentaculatus (ZSI F 9695/1); c. P. discophorus (ZSI–WRC P/3360).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2017View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record