Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 6 in A new rock dwelling frog of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae) from Eastern Cuba, with comments on other species with similar habits

FIGURE 6. Microhabitat of Eleutherodactylus michaelschmidi n. sp. at La Ceiba (type locality), Tercer Frente, Santiago de Cuba. Photo by Nils Navarro.

FIGURE 5 in A new rock dwelling frog of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae) from Eastern Cuba, with comments on other species with similar habits

FIGURE 5. Distribution map of Eleutherodactylus michaelschmidi n. sp. in Eastern Cuba. 1: La Ceiba (type locality), Tercer Frente; 2: Cueva de Rondón, Contramaestre; 3: Loma del Ají, Contramaestre.

FIGURE 3 in A new rock dwelling frog of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae) from Eastern Cuba, with comments on other species with similar habits

FIGURE 3. Karyotypes of E. bresslerae (a, b, c) and E. michaelschmidi n. sp. (a', b', c'), after conventional Giemsa staining (a, a'), C-banding of the constitutive heterochromatin (b, b'), and silver labeling of the nucleolus organizer regions (NORs) (c, c'). Note in (a, a') the very similar chromosome morphologies in both species, in (b, b') the differences in the amount and distribution of the C-bands, and in (c, c') the same location of the NORs in the paracentromeric region in the long arm of the chromosome pairs 1.

FIGURE 2 in A new rock dwelling frog of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae) from Eastern Cuba, with comments on other species with similar habits

FIGURE 2. Spectrograms and waveforms of advertisement calls. A: Eleutherodactylus michaelschmidi n. sp.; B: E. bresslerae; C: E. ricordii, from La Melba, Holguín; D: E. acmonis, from El Yunque de Baracoa, Guantánamo.

FIGURE 1 in A new rock dwelling frog of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae) from Eastern Cuba, with comments on other species with similar habits

FIGURE 1 (second part). I: Eleutherodactylus blairhedgesi, female from Canasí, Santa Cruz del Norte, La Habana; J: E. greyi, male from Codina, 7 km NW of Topes de Collantes, Guamuhaya, Sancti Spiritus; K: E. pezopetrus, male with striped pattern from Cantera Julio A. Mella (known in the past as Cantera de Miranda), Santiago de Cuba. L: E. pinarensis, female from Cueva de La Barca, Guanahacabibes. M: E. symingtoni, male from Cueva del Basurero, Artemisa, La Habana. N: E. zeus, female from Sierra de San Carlos, Pinar del Río. Photos: I, L, M, and N, by L. M. Díaz; J, by Rolando Fernández de Arcila; K, by Emilio Alfaro.

FIGURE 4 in A new rock dwelling frog of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae) from Eastern Cuba, with comments on other species with similar habits

FIGURE 4. Karyotypes of E. bresslerae (a) and E. michaelschmidi n. sp. (a'), as well as a cell nucleus (b) from the bone marrow of E. michaelschmidi after fluorescence staining with quinacrine mustard. Note the uniform quinacrine fluorescence along all chromosomes of E. bresslerae, and the distinctly bright fluorescence of the constitutive heterochromatin at the telomeric region in the long arms of the chromosome pairs 7, 9 and 11 of E. michaelschmidi (white arrowheads). In the bone marrow cell nucleus of E. michaelschmidi these quinacrine positive heterochromatic regions appear as very brightly fluorescent chromocenters.

FIGURE 1 in A new rock dwelling frog of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia: Leptodactylidae) from Eastern Cuba, with comments on other species with similar habits

FIGURE 1 (first part). Cuban frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus. A, B, C, and D: E. michaelschmidi n. sp., showing pattern variation; first individual (A) is the holotype male in its natural habitat prior to collection; illustrated paratypes MNHNCu: 980 (B), 981 (C), 977 (D). E: E. bresslerae, female from Boca del Río Yumurí, Guantánamo. F: E. ricordii, male from the surroundings of Arroyo Bueno, La Melba, Holguín. G: E. acmonis, female from El Yunque de Baracoa, Guantánamo. H: E. thomasi zayasi, female from Sierra de Camarones, La Habana. Photos: A–D, E, and G, by Nils Navarro; F and H, by L. M. Díaz.

FIGURE 4 in Description of a new Fridericia species (Oligochaeta: Enchytraeidae) and its molecular comparison with two morphologically similar species by PCRRFLP

FIGURE 4. Fridericia crassiductata sp.n. Fridericia crassiductata sp.n. A = praeclitellar segments (½ X – ½ XII) (sperm funnels marked with arrows, B = Photograph of bursal slits (marked with arrows) of the male copulatory organs, C = Photograph of the subneural gland in XIV (marked with arrow).

FIGURE 3 in Description of a new Fridericia species (Oligochaeta: Enchytraeidae) and its molecular comparison with two morphologically similar species by PCRRFLP

FIGURE 3. Fridericia crassiductata sp.n. Fridericia crassiductata sp.n. Photograph of the clitellar glands (dorsal view).

FIGURE 1 in Description of a new Fridericia species (Oligochaeta: Enchytraeidae) and its molecular comparison with two morphologically similar species by PCRRFLP

FIGURE 1. Fridericia crassiductata sp.n. A = setal bundles of a praeclitellar segment (lateroventral view), B = Photograph of the cutaneous glands of a praeclitellar segment (dorsal view), C = Photograph of the head (head pore marked with arrows), D = Photograph of the head (brain marked with arrows), E = Photograph of the coelomocytes. Each photograph is sized with a black line representing 50 μm length.

FIGURE 6 in Description of a new Fridericia species (Oligochaeta: Enchytraeidae) and its molecular comparison with two morphologically similar species by PCRRFLP

FIGURE 6. The gel image BsuRI of restriction digestion. The numbering of samples corresponds with the number in Table 1. The character M nominates the molecular marker, the length of fragments are represented on the left side of the photo (also by Fig. 7–10).

FIGURE 5 in Description of a new Fridericia species (Oligochaeta: Enchytraeidae) and its molecular comparison with two morphologically similar species by PCRRFLP

FIGURE 5. Fridericia crassiductata sp.n. A = Photograph of the spermatheca. (the diverticle fill with sperm around the ampulla marked with black arrows, the ectal duct with white arrows, ectal gland with asterisk, B = Photograph of the opening of spermathecal ectal duct (glands marked with black arrows, duct with white arrow), C = Photograph of the opening of spermathecal ectal duct three glands marked with black arrows, duct with white arrow).

FIGURE 8 in Similar look but different song: a new Cicadetta species in the montana complex (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadidae)

FIGURE 8. Distribution maps of Cicadetta species in France including Corsica (inset). Internal borders follow administrative divisions ("départements"). Cicadetta cf. montana refer to specimens of the complex that could not be determined at species level because of unavailable acoustic information.

FIGURE 7 A–C in Similar look but different song: a new Cicadetta species in the montana complex (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadidae)

FIGURE 7 A–C. Frequency pattern of a typical long echeme produced by C. cerdaniensis. A, Oscillogram; B, Spectrogram (time vs frequency vs amplitude, colour amplitude scale given on the right) and mean spectrum (frequency vs amplitude) of the first and second parts of the echeme. C, Dominant frequency variation along the echeme. Parameters as in figure 6.

FIGURE 6 A–E in Similar look but different song: a new Cicadetta species in the montana complex (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadidae)

FIGURE 6 A–E. Temporal pattern of C. cerdaniensis calling song. A, Oscillogram (time vs amplitude) of two typical sequences, each made of three phrases (P1, P2, P3). Letters refer to temporal zooms depicted in C, D and E; B, Variations of temporal parameters along the phrases. ED, EID, FPD and SPD covary. C, Oscillogram of a typical echeme produced during phrase 1 (P1); D, Oscillogram of a typical echeme produced during phrase 2 (P2); E, Oscillogram of a typical echeme produced during phrase 3 (P3). Abbreviations as in figure 2.

FIGURE 5 in Similar look but different song: a new Cicadetta species in the montana complex (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadidae)

FIGURE 5. Type-locality habitat of C. cantilatrix sp. nov. Males were mainly found calling in trees and bushes.

FIGURE 3 in Similar look but different song: a new Cicadetta species in the montana complex (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadidae)

FIGURE 3. Temporal and frequency characteristics of C. cantilatrix sp. nov. calling song. Density distributions were estimated using Gaussian kernel smoothing and plotted over histograms.

FIGURE 4 A–C in Similar look but different song: a new Cicadetta species in the montana complex (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadidae)

FIGURE 4 A–C. Frequency pattern of a typical long echeme produced by C. cantilatrix sp. nov. A, Oscillogram; B, Spectrogram (time vs frequency vs amplitude, colour amplitude scale given on the right) and mean spectrum (frequency vs amplitude) of the first and second parts of the echeme; C, Dominant frequency variation along the echeme. Frequency analysis parameters: Hamming window, overlap = 87.5%, frequency resolution = 43 Hz. Short echeme showed similar frequency parameters.

FIGURE 2A–D in Similar look but different song: a new Cicadetta species in the montana complex (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadidae)

FIGURE 2A–D. Temporal pattern of C. cantilatrix sp. nov. calling song. A, Oscillogram (time vs amplitude) of two typical sequences, each made of two phrases (P1, P2) with short and long echemes respectively, letters refer to time windows depicted in C and D; B, Variations of temporal parameters along sequences. When ED increases IED decreases and vice versa. FPD covaries with ED while SPD remains constant. Longer IED values separate successive sequences; C, Oscillogram of a typical short echeme produced during phrase 1 (P1); D, Oscillogram of a typical long echeme produced during phrase 2 (P2). ED = echeme duration, IED = inter-echeme duration, FPD = first echeme part duration, SPD = second echeme part duration.

FIGURE 1 in Similar look but different song: a new Cicadetta species in the montana complex (Insecta, Hemiptera, Cicadidae)

FIGURE 1. Dorsal view of C. cantilatrix sp. nov.: male holotype with a lateral view of the genitalia (inset) and female paratype.