Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,073
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,073 results for “taxon”
FIGURE 2 in Is Eriocnemis luciani meridae (Aves: Trochilidae) a diagnosable taxon and does it come from Venezuela, with remarks on the collectors Salomón Briceño and Walther Frederick Henninger
FIGURE 2. The holotype of Eriocnemis luciani meridae (second from top in both images) held at the Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn (ZFMK D.8874), with three specimens of E. luciani from Ecuador. Photos: Guy M. Kirwan.
Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest. in Suidae
Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest.
Figure 2 in Assessing the efficacy of higher-taxon approach for ant species surveys to improve biodiversity inventories
Figure 2 Distributions of regression and correlation coefficients between genera- and species-level taxonomy for taxon richness (a, b) and composition (c, d) and their correlations with the environment, or % clay, slope, vegetation type and locations (e, f) by decade over 120 years for both the complete (left) and reduced (right) datasets. Smooth curves have been fitted by LOESS and their respective 95% confidence interval (shaded area) for the correlation coefficients over decades are shown.
Figure 3 in Assessing the efficacy of higher-taxon approach for ant species surveys to improve biodiversity inventories
Figure 3 Relationships between matrix regression and correlation coefficients and the number of ant species per genus measured at fine spatial scale for taxon richness (a, b) and composition (c, d) and their correlations with the environment (e, f) for the complete (left) and reduced (right) datasets.
Figure 1 in Assessing the efficacy of higher-taxon approach for ant species surveys to improve biodiversity inventories
Figure 1 Regressions between the numbers of genera and species of ground-dwelling ants for complete (red circles) and reduced (green circles) database per plot, for nine study sites located in the Brazilian Amazon. The statistical significance of models was tested using 1000 permutations. Allregressionsweresignificantat P <0.001.
Figures 5–6 in Retromalisus damzeni, gen. et sp. nov., a second Baltic amber taxon of the extinct family Berendtimiridae (Insecta: Coleoptera)
Figures 5–6. Details of Retromalisus damzeni gen. et sp. nov., holotype male: 5 pronotum, dorsal view, contour; 6 abdomen, ventral view, contour.
Figure 3 in Retromalisus damzeni, gen. et sp. nov., a second Baltic amber taxon of the extinct family Berendtimiridae (Insecta: Coleoptera)
Figure 3. Anterior part of body of Retromalisus damzeni gen. et sp. nov., holotype male, ventral view.
Combining molecular data sets with strongly heterogeneous taxon coverage enlightens the peculiar biogeographic history of stoneflies (Insecta: Plecoptera)
<p class="Standard1">Extant members of the ancient insect order of stoneflies exhibit a disjunct, antitropical distribution, with one major lineage exclusively occurring in the Southern Hemisphere and the other, with few exceptions, on the Northern continents. Here, we address the biogeographic distribution and phylogenetic relationships of stoneflies using a phylogenetic workflow that combines both transcriptomic and Sanger sequence datasets with heterogeneous taxon coverage. We used a dataset comprising 2997 genes derived from the transcriptomes of 30 species and Sanger sequences of seven genes for 498 species. The backbone phylogeny was mainly inferred from the transcriptomic data, whereas the Sanger nucleotide sequence data provided high species density for divergence time estimation and diversification analyses. Our results show that the biogeographic pattern we observe today is primarily more likely shaped by long-distance over-land dispersal than by vicariance. We inferred that the ancestors of extant stoneflies originated in the Northern Hemisphere approximately 265 Ma and were presumably restricted to this area due to climatic and geographic boundaries. Our analyses suggest that with the break-up of Pangaea around 200 Ma and the associated climatic and geographical changes, two groups of stoneflies, the Anarctoperlaria and the Notonemouridae, dispersed to Gondwana and subsequently went extinct on the northern continents. Both groups likely dispersed across Gondwana before its break-up into the modern continents. At least one member of another group of 'northern' stoneflies, the Acroneuriinae, seems to have migrated from North America to South America around 67 Ma. We found four major net diversification rate shifts, indicating rapid radiation patterns that hampered a robust phylogenetic placement of these stonefly groups. Our study provides the first conclusive evolutionary explanation for the unique distribution pattern of stoneflies.</p>
FIG. 2 in Chalarosthrix gen. nov., a new taxon of the Sphingothrix-Triathrix clade (Harpacticoida: Cletodidae) from the Province of Cortez, Eastern Mexican Pacific
FIG. 2. Chalarosthrix bisetosa gen. et sp. nov., female holotype. A, urosome, ventral (P5-bearing somite omitted); B, P5, anterior.
FIG. 4 in Chalarosthrix gen. nov., a new taxon of the Sphingothrix-Triathrix clade (Harpacticoida: Cletodidae) from the Province of Cortez, Eastern Mexican Pacific
FIG. 4. Chalarosthrix bisetosa gen. et sp. nov., female holotype. A, mandible; B, maxillule; C, maxilla; D, maxilliped.
FIG. 1 in Chalarosthrix gen. nov., a new taxon of the Sphingothrix-Triathrix clade (Harpacticoida: Cletodidae) from the Province of Cortez, Eastern Mexican Pacific
FIG. 1. Chalarosthrix bisetosa gen. et sp. nov., female holotype. A, habitus, dorsal; B, anal somite and caudal rami, dorsal (Roman numerals indicate each caudal seta); C, habitus, lateral; D, anal somite and left caudal ramus (Roman numerals indicate each caudal seta).
FIG. 7 in Chalarosthrix gen. nov., a new taxon of the Sphingothrix-Triathrix clade (Harpacticoida: Cletodidae) from the Province of Cortez, Eastern Mexican Pacific
FIG. 7. "Allcompat" consensus tree of the Bayesian analysis (equivalent to the majority-rule consensus tree) using MrBayes showing the most probable relationships amongst Sphingothrix, Triathrix, and Chalarosthrix. Numbers indicate the Bayesian Posterior Probability values (BPP %).
Distribution. Chile (from Valdivia S to the N shore of Navarino I) and W & S Argentina (from Neuquén to Tierra del Fuego). Records from N Chile, probably represents another taxon. in Vespertilionidae
Distribution. Chile (from Valdivia S to the N shore of Navarino I) and W & S Argentina (from Neuquén to Tierra del Fuego). Records from N Chile, probably represents another taxon.
Bioclimatic, soil, terrain, distance to Native American settlement, and historical tree taxon relative abundance data at 8-km resolution for the northeastern United States
<p><span>Researchers have debated impacts of past Native American land use on forests including upon tree species composition in northeastern United States (US), with estimates of impacts ranging from local to regional extent. This study examines tree relative abundances in the </span><span>northeastern US </span><span>(approx. 420,000 km2) </span><span>to assess whether Native Americans influenced geographic distributions of 18 tree taxa prior to Euro-American settlement. </span><span>We used boosted regression trees to model abundance patterns and to assess the importance of distance-based proxies of Native American land use versus environmental variables. We trained models that included and excluded distance-based proxies. Abundance estimates from original land survey records (1650-1850 CE) were acquired for taxa at 8 km spatial resolution, and related to Native American settlement locations (1500-1800 CE) and 27 environmental variables. </span><span>When evaluated upon test data, regional-scale models of relative abundance that included distance-based proxies performed only slightly better than models that excluded them, with mean improvements in RMSE of 0.1 percentage points. Models suggest that Native American land use modestly altered the relative abundance of taxa locally, extending no more than 50 km from settlement. Models also suggest slight increases near settlement of a few percentage points in relative abundance for fire-tolerant and/or dietary taxa (e.g. oak, hickory, and pine), and for early-successional taxa (e.g. ash). </span><span>Past</span><span> Native American land use had no detectable effect on forest composition across a regional extent, but increased the abundance of fire-tolerant, shade-intolerant, and nut-producing trees locally.</span></p> <p><span>The Excel-format (.xlsx) dataset here provides the training and testing data for the BRT models in this publication. It contains relative abundances of the 18 tree taxa expressed as a fraction of total number of trees. It also provides bioclimatic (e.g. annual temperature, annual preciptation), soil (e.g. pH, percent sand), terrain (e.g. slope), and Native American (e.g. distance to settlement) variables developed from multiple sources. A column also indicates whether an observation was part of the training data or the test data. See the publication and its Supporting Information for full details on the acquisition and processing of these data, as well as the original providers of the data. If using these data, please </span><span>cite both this dataset's corresponding article, as well as the original providers of the data.</span></p> <p>Also provided are ascii-format (.asc) gridded data layers that were used for making spatial predictions of taxon relative abundances from BRT models.</p> <p>The original creators/providers of the relative abundance, bioclimatic, soil, terrain, and Native American data or layers used for creating the gridded data in this study are:</p> <p><span>Abel, T. (2016). The Iroquoian occupations of Northern New York: A summary of current research. Ontario Archaeology, 96, 65–75. </span></p> <p><span>CIFAS. (2017). Map Of First Nations in New Brunswick. Comitas Institute for Anthropological Study. <a href="http://cifas.us/first-nations-maps/">http://cifas.us/first-nations-maps/</a> </span></p> <p><span>Grumet, R. S. (1995). Historic Contact: Indian People and Colonists in Today's Northeastern United States in the Sixteenth through Eighteenth Centuries. University of Oklahoma Press.</span></p> <p><span>Jordan, K. A. (2013). Incorporation and colonization: Postcolumbian Iroquois satellite communities and processes of indigenous autonomy. American Anthropologist, 115(1), 29–43.</span></p> <p><span>Milner, G. R., & Chaplin, G. (2010). Eastern North American population at ca. A.D. 1500. American Antiquity, 75(4), 707–726.</span></p> <p><span>NASA. (2000). SRTM 90m Digital Elevation Database v4.1. <a href="https://cgiarcsi.community/data/srtm-90m-digital-elevation-database-v4-1/">https://cgiarcsi.community/data/srtm-90m-digital-elevation-database-v4-1/</a> </span></p> <p><span>O'Donnell, M. S., & Ignizio, D. A. (2012). Bioclimatic Predictors for Supporting Ecological Applications in the Conterminous United States (Data Series 691; p. 10). U.S. Geological Survey. <a href="https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/4fe0f9f4e4b05d4ed81d9392">https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/4fe0f9f4e4b05d4ed81d9392</a> </span></p> <p><span>Paciorek, C. J., Goring, S. J., Thurman, A. L., Cogbill, C. V., Williams, J. W., Mladenoff, D. J., Peters, J. A., Zhu, J., & McLachlan, J. S. (2016). Statistically-estimated tree composition for the northeastern United States at the time of Euro-American settlement. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0150087. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150087">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150087</a> </span></p> <p><span>Peters, M. P., Iverson, L. R., Prasad, A. M., & Matthews, S. N. (2013). Integrating Fine-scale Soil Data into Species Distribution Models: Preparing Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Data from Multiple Counties (General Technical Report NRS-122; p. 70). U.S. Forest Service. <a href="https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/45308">https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/45308</a> </span></p>
Subspecies and Distribution. A.p.phaeotisG.S.Miller,1902—E&SEMexico(fromVeracruztoYucatanPeninsula),NGuatemala,Belize,Honduras,ENicaragua,ECostaRica,PanamaandWColombia. A.p.nanusK.Andersen,1906—W&SWMexico(fromSinaloatoOaxaca). A. p. palatinus W. B. Davis, 1970 — S Mexico (SW Chiapas), S Guatemala, W El Salvador, W Nicaragua, and W Costa Rica. Records from W Ecuador and N Peru are unverified; they could represent the Little Fruit-eating Bat (A. ravus), which was thought to be part of this taxon. Those from Venezuela, N Brazil, and Guyana probably represent misidentifications. in Phyllostomidae
Subspecies and Distribution. A.p.phaeotisG.S.Miller,1902—E&SEMexico(fromVeracruztoYucatanPeninsula),NGuatemala,Belize,Honduras,ENicaragua,ECostaRica,PanamaandWColombia. A.p.nanusK.Andersen,1906—W&SWMexico(fromSinaloatoOaxaca). A. p. palatinus W. B. Davis, 1970 — S Mexico (SW Chiapas), S Guatemala, W El Salvador, W Nicaragua, and W Costa Rica. Records from W Ecuador and N Peru are unverified; they could represent the Little Fruit-eating Bat (A. ravus), which was thought to be part of this taxon. Those from Venezuela, N Brazil, and Guyana probably represent misidentifications.
Supplementary File S1. Taxon list SMTP.
<p>Supplementary File S1</p> <p>Material from the collection of the Swedish Malaise trap project used for the study: Open access in a taxonomic sense: a morphological and molecular guide to Western Palaearctic Dusona (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae).</p> <p> </p>
Supplementary File S2. Taxon list CH
<p>Supplementary File S2</p> <p>Material from the Swiss natural history museums in Basel and St. Gallen used for the study: Open access in a taxonomic sense: a morphological and molecular guide to Western Palaearctic Dusona (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae).</p> <p> </p>
FIGURES 25–28 in From the Ethiopian Bale Mountains hotspot-Filopalpinae subfam. nov., a new taxon of Laniatorean harvestmen based on external and genital morphology (Arachnida, Opiliones, Assamiidae)
FIGURES 25–28. Filopalpus kakaensis sp. nov. Male holotype (25–26); female paratype (27–28). Body lateral view (25, 27) and dorsal view (26, 28), Scale: 1 mm.
FIGURES 1–6 in From the Ethiopian Bale Mountains hotspot-Filopalpinae subfam. nov., a new taxon of Laniatorean harvestmen based on external and genital morphology (Arachnida, Opiliones, Assamiidae)
FIGURES 1–6. Filopalpus joschmidti sp. nov. Body dorsal view. 1–3, 5. Male; 4, 6 female. 1–2. Left pedipalp stretched out and surpassing length of leg II; 1. and 2–3. represent different males (note different equipment of apophyses of rear end of opisthosoma). 4. Female with short pedipalp; 5–6. Distal part of prosoma; note cover of hedgehog-like tubercles with seta on top. A and b in Figs 1 and 2 indicate the pedipalp (a) and leg II (b). Photographs by Jean Severin (1) and Joachim Schmidt (2–6).
FIGURES 11–24 in From the Ethiopian Bale Mountains hotspot-Filopalpinae subfam. nov., a new taxon of Laniatorean harvestmen based on external and genital morphology (Arachnida, Opiliones, Assamiidae)
FIGURES 11–24. Filopalpus joschmidti sp. nov. Male holotype (11–17; 21–23) and female paratype (18–20; 24). 11–12. Penis dorsal and lateral views. 13–15. Glans dorsal, ventral and lateral views. 16–19. Chelicera pro-lateral and retro-lateral views. 20. Pedipalpus retro-lateral view. 21. Pedipalpal femur-patella joint, retro-lateral view male. 22. Pedipalp retro-lateral view. 23. Pedipalpal tibia and tarsus. 24. Ovipositor distal part. Scales: 11–12: 0.3 mm, 13–19: 0.1 mm, 20: 0.5 mm, 21: 0.13 mm, 22: 0.25 mm, 23: 0.5 mm, 24: 0.05 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.