Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 3 in Ecologically-sustainable tree monocultures contribute to conservation of an Araucaria Forest endemic frog

Figure 3. Diet composition of Physalaemus lisei (black bars) in relation to the taxonomic composition of pitfall traps (white bars). Dotted line delimits the feeding niche of P. lisei.

Figure 2 in Ecologically-sustainable tree monocultures contribute to conservation of an Araucaria Forest endemic frog

Figure 2. Body mass (g) distribution of Physalaemus lisei captured in the São Francisco de Paula National Forest, southern Brazil. (A) Temporal variation in body mass (g) distribution between October 2003 and April 2005; (B) among-habitat variation in body mass distribution. Horizontal line represents the median; the box delimits the first and third quartile; the vertical lines delimit the maximum and minimum values, except for the outliers that are represented by asterisks. FO, Araucaria Forest; PA, Araucaria angustifolia plantation; PP, Pinus plantation; PE, Eucalyptus plantation.

Figure 1 in Ecologically-sustainable tree monocultures contribute to conservation of an Araucaria Forest endemic frog

Figure 1. Number of individuals of Physalaemus lisei captured in the São Francisco de Paula National Forest, southern Brazil. (A) Temporal dynamic between October 2003 and April 2005; (B) among-habitat variation in the mean (¡SE) number of captures. FO, Araucaria Forest; PA, Araucaria angustifolia plantation; PP, Pinus plantation; PE, Eucalyptus plantation.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2010View details →

Figure 2 in Vocalizations of the Brazilian torrent frog Hylodes heyeri (Anura: Hylodidae): Repertoire and influence of air temperature on advertisement call variation

Figure 2. Territorial call of Hylodes heyeri from the Municipality of Morretes, Parana´, Brazil. Recorded on 11 January 2002, at 22.4°C. (A) Power spectrum; (B) spectrogram; (C) oscillogram.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2010View details →

Figure 3 in Vocalizations of the Brazilian torrent frog Hylodes heyeri (Anura: Hylodidae): Repertoire and influence of air temperature on advertisement call variation

Figure 3. Mean number of advertisement calls (bars) emitted by males of Hylodes heyeri during 5 min of monitoring each hour, and air temperature (line).

Figure 2 in Fly parasitism in Papuan frogs, with a discussion of ecological factors influencing evolution of life-history differences

Figure 2. Regressions of weight versus snout–vent length (SV) for male Rana supragrisea. Larger frogs infested with fly larvae (closed squares, dashed line) exhibit lower weights compared to uninfested frogs (open circles, solid line), but this difference in regressions is determined solely by the largest infested specimen.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2006View details →

Figure 3 in Factors influencing spatial and temporal structure of frog assemblages at ponds in southeastern Brazil

Figure 3. Distribution of nine tadpole species within ponds at Santuário do Caraça, southeastern Brazil, according to variables used to describe microhabitats used by them and period of occurrence, in the first three axes of discriminant space. In the first discriminant axis, smaller values represent larger association to the bottom. In the second axis, the largest values indicate use of deeper microhabitats by tadpoles. In the third axis, larger values indicate species that used both microhabitats with and without aquatic vegetation, and lower values indicate species that used only microhabitats with aquatic vegetation. Centroids for each species are shown on the right.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2006View details →

Figure 1 in Factors influencing spatial and temporal structure of frog assemblages at ponds in southeastern Brazil

Figure 1. Mean monthly temperatures and monthly rainfall at the study site between September 2003 and December 2004.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2006View details →

Figure 2 in Factors influencing spatial and temporal structure of frog assemblages at ponds in southeastern Brazil

Figure 2. Distribution of adult individuals of 22 anuran species at Santuário do Caraça, southeastern Brazil, according to variables used to describe microhabitat use and activity periods, in the first three axes of the discriminant function. Centroids for each species are shown on the right.

Figure 5 in A new, sibling, tree frog from Jerusalem (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae)

Figure 5. Oscillograms of representative segments from advertisement calls of assorted Hyla populations, in approximate geographical order from west to east and to south, all at the same time scale. Sources are indicated in parentheses. (A–E) Hyla arborea. (A) Hyla a. arborea, near Tübingen, Germany (Schneider 1967). (B, C) Hyla a. kretensis, near Chania, Crete (Schneider 1974): (B) at 8°C; (C) at 22°C. (D) Hyla arborea, Western Anatolia (Schneider, 2000) at approx. 19°C (according to Figure 5). (E) Hyla a. schelkownikowi, Dilijan, Armenia (Egiasarian and Schneider 1990), approx. 12–13°C. (F–H) Hyla savignyi. (F) Anamur, Turkey (Kaya and Simmons 1999) at 12°C. (G) Armenia (Egiasarian and Schneider 1990) at 16–17°C. (H) Sa'ar, Israel (Schneider and Nevo 1972) at 23°C. (I–K) Hyla heinzsteinitzi sp. n. (I) 'Ein Fara, Judaean Desert, Israel (Shy's recording) at 23°C. (J) Moza bridge, Judaean Hills, Israel (Shy's recording) at 22–23°C. (K) Jerusalem, Israel (Grach's recording) at 17°C.

Figure 1 in A new, sibling, tree frog from Jerusalem (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae)

Figure 1. Lateral colour pattern of Hyla species, daytime colouration, green phase: Top, Hyla savignyi, adult male from the Dor beach, Israel (IG 1425 2234). Note that the dark lateral stripe has a fairly smooth upper border. Bottom, H. heinzsteinitzi sp. n., 1-year-old female of the laboratory colony, metamorphosed in the beginning of May 2000 and photographed 16 January 2001. Note that the dark lateral stripe is posteriorly broken into islands and rosettes. The difference in the lateral stripe pattern is not related to sex. Scale: cm and mm.

Figure 4 in A new, sibling, tree frog from Jerusalem (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae)

Figure 4. Principal Coordinates Analysis (see text). Triangles, specimens with truncate snout profile, later assigned to Hyla heinzsteinitzi sp. n.; circles, specimens with round snout profile, later assigned to Hyla savignyi, from the area of sympatry.

Figure 3 in A new, sibling, tree frog from Jerusalem (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae)

Figure 3. Lateral views of heads showing snout shape (from photographs, reproduced at equal image size): (A) Hyla heinzsteinitzi sp. n. male HUJ-R 15192. (B) H. heinzsteinitzi female HUJ-R 15191. (C) Sympatric Hyla savignyi male HUJ-R 9400. (D) Allopatric H. savignyi female, HUJ-R 15318. (Specimen details in the text.)

Figure 8 in A new, sibling, tree frog from Jerusalem (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae)

Figure 8. Map of locality records of Hyla spp. in Israel (from specimens in HUJ): solid triangles, Hyla heinzsteinitzi sp. n. (only in the enlarged inset); solid circles, H. savignyi; open squares, towns for orientation.

Figure 7 in A new, sibling, tree frog from Jerusalem (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae)

Figure 7. Collection site of some of the paratypes of Hyla heinzsteinitzi sp. n.: 'Ein Fara, Wadi El Qilt, Judaean Desert, 19 February 1977.

Figure 3 in Do male tree frogs feed during the breeding season? Stomach flushing of five syntopic hylid species in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Figure 3. Relation between length of the reproductive period and food intake by 50 males per species.

Fig. 6 in Anomaloglossus confusus, a New Ecuadorian Frog Formerly Masquerading as ''Colostethus'' chocoensis (Dendrobatoidea: Aromobatidae)

Fig. 6. Hyloxalus chocoensis (Boulenger) in dorsal and ventral view. Upper: Subadult female holotype

Fig. 3 in Anomaloglossus confusus, a New Ecuadorian Frog Formerly Masquerading as ''Colostethus'' chocoensis (Dendrobatoidea: Aromobatidae)

Fig. 3. Right hand and left foot of Anomaloglossus confusus, new species (AMNH A-104819, holotype). Scale line 5 1 mm.

Fig. 4 in Anomaloglossus confusus, a New Ecuadorian Frog Formerly Masquerading as ''Colostethus'' chocoensis (Dendrobatoidea: Aromobatidae)

Fig. 4. Anomaloglossus confusus, new species. Dorsal and ventral views of two adult females, showing minor variation in color pattern. AMNH A-104819 (holotype) on left, AMNH A-104820 (paratopotype) on right. Scale 5 10 mm.

Fig. 1 in Anomaloglossus confusus, a New Ecuadorian Frog Formerly Masquerading as ''Colostethus'' chocoensis (Dendrobatoidea: Aromobatidae)

Fig. 1. Anomaloglossus confusus, new species. Left- and right-side views of the adult female holotype in life (AMNH A-104819, 24 mm SVL). The blackish ground color appeared dark olivegreen in sunlight. About 2.3X life size.