Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,025
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6,025 results for “Science of science”
Figure 2 from: Mietchen D, Hagedorn G, Willighagen E, Rico M, Gómez-Pérez A, Aibar E, Rafes K, Germain C, Dunning A, Pintscher L, Kinzler D (2015) Enabling Open Science: Wikidata for Research (Wiki4R). Research Ideas and Outcomes 1: e7573. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7573
Figure 2 - Prototype of the platform at the Center for Data Science of Paris-Saclay, where Wikidata identifiers are already used to link public data and public research data.
Figure 1 from: Mietchen D, Hagedorn G, Willighagen E, Rico M, Gómez-Pérez A, Aibar E, Rafes K, Germain C, Dunning A, Pintscher L, Kinzler D (2015) Enabling Open Science: Wikidata for Research (Wiki4R). Research Ideas and Outcomes 1: e7573. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.1.e7573
Figure 1 - Outline of envisioned platform where Wikidata content can be used within an institutional firewall.
Figure 4 from: Taylor MA (2016) 'Where is the damned collection?' Charles Davies Sherborn's listing of named natural science collections and its successors. In: Michel E (Ed.) Anchoring Biodiversity Information: From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond. ZooKeys 550: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.550.10073
Figure 4 - Differing treatments of Thomas Hawkins. A The original Sherborn entry in Where is the – Collection? (p. 67) B The much more extensive entry in World Palaeontological Collections (Cleevely 1983, p. 147).
Figure 2 from: Taylor MA (2016) 'Where is the damned collection?' Charles Davies Sherborn's listing of named natural science collections and its successors. In: Michel E (Ed.) Anchoring Biodiversity Information: From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond. ZooKeys 550: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.550.10073
Figure 2 - The final bill from Cambridge University Press, tipped into a copy of Where is the – Collection? in the NHM Library. Photo courtesy R. J. Cleevely, NHM.
Figure 3 from: Taylor MA (2016) 'Where is the damned collection?' Charles Davies Sherborn's listing of named natural science collections and its successors. In: Michel E (Ed.) Anchoring Biodiversity Information: From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond. ZooKeys 550: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.550.10073
Figure 3 - A sample page (p. 9), including the entry for Mary Anning. This misses her specimens in the British Museum (Natural History).
Figure 1 from: Taylor MA (2016) 'Where is the damned collection?' Charles Davies Sherborn's listing of named natural science collections and its successors. In: Michel E (Ed.) Anchoring Biodiversity Information: From Sherborn to the 21st century and beyond. ZooKeys 550: 83–106. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.550.10073
Figure 1 - A The cover of Where is the – Collection? B A sample page (p. 29) from Where is the – Collection?, including the entry for John Calvert. The Sowerby women are thought to be the daughters of G. B. Sowerby I (1788–1854) (R. J. Cleevely, pers. comm. 2014).
Figure 3 from: Vohland K, Häuser C, Regan E, Hoffmann A, Wetzel F (2016) 2nd EU BON Stakeholder Roundtable (Berlin, Germany): How can a European biodiversity network support citizen science? Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e8616. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8616
Figure 3 - Examples of citizen science projects and initiatives/tools from the EU BON consortium (Christoph Häuser and Florian Wetzel, MfN, 2014)
Figure 1 from: Vohland K, Häuser C, Regan E, Hoffmann A, Wetzel F (2016) 2nd EU BON Stakeholder Roundtable (Berlin, Germany): How can a European biodiversity network support citizen science? Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e8616. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8616
Figure 1 - EU BON Work Packages (WP) with the three sections (a) Data Sources and Infrastructure, (b) Science and Application and (c) Policy and Dialogue. The Stakeholder Roundtables are a specific task in the WP 6 that targets the stakeholder engagement and science-policy dialogue (credits: Pensoft).
Figure 4 from: Vohland K, Häuser C, Regan E, Hoffmann A, Wetzel F (2016) 2nd EU BON Stakeholder Roundtable (Berlin, Germany): How can a European biodiversity network support citizen science? Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e8616. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e8616
Figure 4 - Species occurrence data records (in millions, x-axis) from CS sources, counted and freely available in Europe (Nils Valland, NBIC, updated in March 2016).
Monitoring of solar irradiation at Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts
<p>Global and diffuse irradiation data as monitored at the Horw campus of Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts. The data is stored in a tabular format at intervals of one minute. The monitoring station comprises two Kipp and Zonen CMP11 pyranometers, equipped with ventilation units. Diffuse irradiation is measured employing a manually adjusted shadow ring.</p>
Figure 1 from: Cunha CM, Salvador RB (2018) Type specimens of fossil "Architectibranchia" and Cephalaspidea (Mollusca, Heterobranchia) in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 505-527. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.27401
Figure 1 Types. A–B. Holotype of Acteocinacederstromi, H 4.0 mm, ANSP IP16771. C–D. Holotype of Acteocinachowanensis, H 3.8 mm, ANSP IP16754. E–F. Lectotype of Acteocinacrassiplica, H 6.0 mm, ANSP IP13412. G–H. Paratype of Acteocinakirkwoodiana, H 5.0 mm, ANSP IP15935. I–J. Holotype of Acteocinapuruha, H 7.6 mm, ANSP IP13684. K–L. Holotype of Acteocinasubbullata, H 9.9 mm, ANSP IP3193. M–N. Syntype of Acteocinaweatherlli, H 4.6 mm, ANSP IP14431. O–P. Syntype of Acteonbiplicatus, H 17.2 mm, ANSP IP19466; also, syntype of A.gabbana. Q–R. Syntype of Acteoncretacea, H 19.1 mm, ANSP IP18778. S. Holotype of Acteonelegans, H 6.0 mm, ANSP IP6011. T–U. Syntype of Acteonforbesiana, H 9.2 mm, ANSP IP18777.
Figure 4 from: Cunha CM, Salvador RB (2018) Type specimens of fossil "Architectibranchia" and Cephalaspidea (Mollusca, Heterobranchia) in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 505-527. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.27401
Figure 4 Types. A–B. Syntype of Cinulianaticoides, H 9.0 mm, ANSP IP18784. C–D. Syntype(?) of Cinuliarectilabrum, H 9.9 mm, ANSP IP4753. E–F. Holotype of Ringiculahypograpta, H 2.0 mm, ANSP IP3841. G–H. Syntype of Ringiculalata, H 15.4 mm, ANSP IP30695. I–J. Lectotype of Ringiculamississippiensis, H 3.7 mm, ANSP IP13414. K–L. Syntype of Ringiculatrapaquara, H 2.3 mm, ANSP IP6468. M–N. Lectotype of "Ringicula" varia, H 7.1 mm, ANSP IP4264. O–P. Holotype of Roxaniahornii new comb., H 20.1 mm, ANSP IP4232.
Figure 3 from: Cunha CM, Salvador RB (2018) Type specimens of fossil "Architectibranchia" and Cephalaspidea (Mollusca, Heterobranchia) in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 505-527. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.27401
Figure 3 Types. A–B. Lectotype of Nucleopsissubvaricatus, H 10.8 mm, ANSP IP30692. C–D. Holotype of Rictaxisandersoni, H 10.5 mm, ANSP IP13411. E–F. Syntype of Rictaxisoryza, H 6.8 mm, ANSP IP3181. G–H. Lectotype of Tornatellaeabella, H 12.5 mm, ANSP IP30691. I–J. Lectotype of Tornatellaeaimpressa, H 10.7 mm, ANSP IP4286. K–L. Holotype of Volvariareticulata, H 7.2 mm, ANSP IP6467. M–N. Holotype of Acteonellaoviformis, H 42.1 mm, ANSP IP4323. O–P. Syntype of Avellanabullata, H 25.4 mm, ANSP IP289. Q–R. Syntype of Avellanacostata, H 4.5 mm, ANSP IP691. S–T. Lectotype of Biplicaobliqua, H 9.9 mm, ANSP IP4263. U–V. Lectotype of Biplicamathewsonii, H 11.6 mm, ANSP IP4262.
Figure 2 from: Cunha CM, Salvador RB (2018) Type specimens of fossil "Architectibranchia" and Cephalaspidea (Mollusca, Heterobranchia) in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 505-527. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.27401
Figure 2 Types. A. Holotype of Acteonglans, H 1.9 mm, ANSP IP1517. B–C. Syntype of Acteonidoneus, H 11.1 mm, ANSP IP30547. D–E. Lectotype of Acteonlineatus, H 8.6 mm, ANSP IP5541. F. Holotype of Acteonnitens, H 4.0 mm, ANSP IP1516. G–H. Syntype of Acteonnovellus, H 12.0 mm, ANSP IP1600. I–L. Syntype of Acteonovoidea, H 23 mm, ANSP IP56167. 32–33. Same, H 21.0 mm, ANSP IP56166; also, holotype of A.subovoides. M–N. Lectotype of Acteonpolitus, H 8.2 mm, ANSP IP4266. O–P. Syntype of Acteonpomilius, H 10.1 mm, ANSP IP30546. Q–R. Syntype of Acteonpunctatus, H 8.8 mm, ANSP IP5537. S–T. Holotype of Acteonsubtornatilis, H 18.1 mm, ANSP IP3183.
Figure 5 from: Cunha CM, Salvador RB (2018) Type specimens of fossil "Architectibranchia" and Cephalaspidea (Mollusca, Heterobranchia) in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 505-527. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.27401
Figure 5 Types. A–B. Holotype of Bullamacrostoma, H 26.2 mm, ANSP IP30727. C–D. Holotype of Bullopsiscretacea, H 18.0 mm, ANSP IP18924. E–F. Holotype of Retusabiforis, H 2.9 mm, ANSP IP3192. G. Paralectotype of Retusagalba, H 14.3 mm, ANSP IP53816. H. Lectotype of Retusagalba, H 15.0 mm, ANSP IP30548. I–J. Lectotype of Retusasthillairii, H 14.0 mm, ANSP IP5486. K. Syntype of Retusasubspissa, H 4.8 mm, ANSP IP30641. L. Holotype of Volvulellacylichnoides, H 4.2 mm, ANSP IP3177. M–N. Syntype of Volvulellacylindrica, H 4.7 mm, ANSP IP3179.
Figure 6 from: Cunha CM, Salvador RB (2018) Type specimens of fossil "Architectibranchia" and Cephalaspidea (Mollusca, Heterobranchia) in the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Zoosystematics and Evolution 94(2): 505-527. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.94.27401
Figure 6 Types. A. Holotype of Volvulellamicratracta, H 1.5 mm, ANSP IP3842. B. Syntype of Volvulellaminutissima new comb., H 2.3 mm, ANSP IP13267. C–D. Holotype of Volvulellaornata, H 3.2 mm, ANSP IP3178. E. Holotype of Volvulellaparallela, H 2.1 mm, ANSP IP3188. F. Holotype of Volvulellatritica, H 4.1 mm, ANSP IP19104. G. Holotype of Atyscinctorii, H 2.6 mm, ANSP IP3185. H. Syntype of Atyssulculorum, H 2.5 mm, ANSP IP3317. I–J. Syntype of Cylichnacylindrus, H 4.7 mm, ANSP IP1554. K. Syntype of Cylichnadekayi, H 5.0 mm, ANSP IP6008. L. Syntype of Cylichnakellogii, H 5.7 mm, ANSP IP13266. M. Holotype of Cylichnarecta, H 8.0 mm, ANSP IP18782. N. Syntype of Bullaoccidentalis, H 10.0 mm, ANSP IP17139. O–P. Lectotype of Cylichnacostata, H 16.0 mm, ANSP IP4338. Q–R. Syntype of Acteonsculptus, H 1.9 mm, ANSP IP1515. S. Syntype of Acteonmilium, H 2.1 mm, ANSP IP1520. T. Holotype of Acteonangulatus, H 2.4 mm, ANSP IP1521.
Towards a plan S gap analysis: open access potential across disciplines using Web of Science and DOAJ
<p>Dataset accompanying two blogposts: </p> <p><a href="https://101innovations.wordpress.com/2018/12/05/oa-potential-journals-and-publications-across-disciplines/">https://101innovations.wordpress.com/2018/12/05/oa-potential-journals-and-publications-across-disciplines/</a></p> <p><a href="https://101innovations.wordpress.com/2018/12/05/gold-oa-journals-in-wos-and-doaj/">https://101innovations.wordpress.com/2018/12/05/gold-oa-journals-in-wos-and-doaj/</a></p> <p> </p> <p>In the proposed <a href="https://www.coalition-s.org/feedback/">implementation guidelines</a> for Plan S, it has become clear there will be, for the coming years at least, three ways to open access (OA) that are compliant with Plan S:</p> <ul> <li>publication in full open access journals and platforms</li> <li>deposit in open access repositories of author accepted manuscript (AAM) or publisher version (VOR)</li> <li>publishing in hybrid journals that are part of transformative agreements</li> </ul> <p>Additional requirements concern <em>copyright</em> (copyright retention by authors or institutions), <em>licensing</em> (CC-BY, CC-BY-SA or CC0), <em>embargo periods</em> (no embargo's) and <em>technical requirements</em> for open access journals, platforms and repositories.</p> <p>To get a first indication as to what that potential for open access is across different disciplines, we looked at a particular subset of journals, namely those in Web of Science. For a number of (sub)disciplines, we identified the proportion of full gold, hybrid and closed journals in Web of Science, as well as the proportion of hybrid and closed journals that allows green open access by archiving AAM/VOR in repositories. We also looked at the number of publications from 2017 (articles & reviews) that were actually made open access (or not) under each of these models.</p> <p>We fully acknowledge the practical decision toi use Web of Science leads to limitation and bias in the results. In particular this concerns a bias against:</p> <ul> <li>recently launched journals</li> <li>non-traditional journal types</li> <li>smaller journals not (yet) meeting the technical requirements of WoS</li> <li>journals in languages other than English</li> <li>journals from non-Western regions</li> </ul> <p>To further explore this bias, and give context to the interpretation of results derived from looking at full gold OA journals in Web of Science only, we analyzed the inclusion of DOAJ journals in WoS per major discipline.</p> <p>We also looked at the proportion of DOAJ journals (and articles/reviews therein) in different parts of the Web of Science Core Collection that we used: either in the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) / Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) /Arts & Humanities Citation Index (AHCI), or in the Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).</p>
Raw data for "UV Attenuation in Rocks and Minerals: Implications for Mars Science"
<p>Raw data for "UV Transmission in Rocks and Minerals: Implications for Mars Science"</p>
[DATA_SCIENCE] Interviews: The Medical and Environmental Data Mash-up Infrastructure (MEDMI)
<p>This is a set of interview transcripts executed by Niccolò Tempini between March and October 2016, as part of the ERC project "The Epistemology of Data-Intensive Science", and in the context of a case study of MEDMI. Please read the "Notes on transcript editing" document for further information.</p> <p>Three papers or chapters that specifically make use of these interviews have been published as of 2020:</p> <ul> <li>Tempini, N., Leonelli, S., 2018. Concealment and discovery: The role of information security in biomedical data re-use. Soc Stud Sci 48, 663–690. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718804875">https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718804875</a></li> <li>Leonelli, S., Tempini, N., 2018. Where health and environment meet: the use of invariant parameters in big data analysis. Synthese 1–20. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1844-2">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1844-2</a></li> <li>Tempini, N. 2020. The Reuse of Digital Computer Data: Transformation, Recombination and Generation of <em>Data Mixes</em> in Big Data Science. In: Leonelli S., Tempini N. (eds) Data Journeys in the Sciences. Springer, Cham. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37177-7_13">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37177-7_13</a></li> </ul> <p>The transcripts document MEDMI researchers' experience of infrastructure development and data curation and re-use practices. Researchers have consented to have these transcripts made available as Open Data. Other interviewees did not give consent, so those transcripts are held securely by the research team in Exeter.<br> You also find the information sheet provided to interviewees, which gives you the context for this project. Further information and related publications can be found at www.datastudies.eu.</p>
Metadata model with controlled vocabularies proposed for the Social Sciences domain
<p>This dataset is related to the MSc work "Descrição de dados de investigação: requisitos de investigadores para modelos de metadados na Psicologia e Ciências da Educação", where, by observing practices, identifying needs, knowing work processes and identifying expectations, and trying to take advantage of researchers' knowledge about the importance of research data in their activity, we have analyzed procedures for accessing, storing and preserving research data. We also have studied models and workflows for managing datasets of completed projects. Considering the recommendations of Data Curation, we proposed the description model that was later expanded with specific examples of controlled vocabularies used in the Psychology scientific domain.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.