Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,025
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6,025 results for “Science of science”
Supplementary material 1 from: Woodburn M, Buschbom J, Grant S, Jones J, Norton B, Trekels M, Vincent S, Webbink K (2023) No Pain No Gain: Standards mapping in Latimer Core development. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 7: e113053. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.7.113053
SKOS mappings
Imptox Public Workshop Micro- Nanoplastics & Human Health: Insights from Science and Research (pt1)
<p>Experts gather at the Imptox workshop to discuss the emerging understanding of micro- and nanoplastics' impact on human health. On Friday, March 24th, 2023, the successful Imptox public workshop attracted a large audience discussing the potential health impacts of micro- and nanoplastics with experts from all over Europe. The Imptox project has received funding from the EU’s H2020 framework program for research and innovation under grant agreement n. 965173</p>
Supplementary Materials of the Tutorial: "Promotion of Open Science in Requirements Engineering: Leveraging the ORKG and ORKG Ask for FAIR Scientific Information"
<h1>Summary</h1> <p>This collection contains all the supplementary materials of the second tutorial titled "<a href="https://conf.researchr.org/details/RE-2025/RE-2025-tutorials/1/Promotion-of-Open-Science-in-Requirements-Engineering-Leveraging-the-ORKG-and-ORKG-A" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Promotion of Open Science in Requirements Engineering: Leveraging the ORKG and ORKG Ask for FAIR Scientific Information</a>", accepted at the <a href="https://conf.researchr.org/home/RE-2025" target="_blank" rel="noopener">33rd IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference 2025</a>.</p> <p>The materials complement the tutorial sessions and provide participants with resources to enhance their understanding and application of open science principles in the field of Requirements Engineering (RE) by leveraging the <a href="https://orkg.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG)</a> and <a href="https://ask.orkg.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ORKG Ask</a> for FAIR scientific information. These materials contain all the presentation slides and exercise materials so that everyone can repeat the theoretical presentations independently and carry out the practical exercises themselves at any time.</p> <h1>Contents</h1> <h2>1. Slides - All slides used in the tutorial.</h2> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Files</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>0. RE25 Tutorial - All Sessions.pdf</td> <td>The complete set of all slides used in the tutorial, which are also provided individually for each session of the tutorial.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>1. RE25 Tutorial - Welcome.pdf</td> <td>The welcome with an overview of the content of the tutorial.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>2. RE 25 Tutorial - Introduction to Open Science in RE.pdf</td> <td>The theoretical introduction to open science regarding its importance, benefits, and incentives for researchers themselves and the wider RE community.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>3. RE25 Tutorial - Introduction to ORKG and ORKG Ask.pdf</td> <td>The theoretical introduction to the Open Research Knowledge Graph (ORKG) and ORKG Ask.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>4. RE25 Tutorial - Using SciKGTeX.pdf</td> <td>The practical exercise, with detailed step-by-step instructions on how to use the LaTeX package <a href="https://github.com/Christof93/SciKGTeX" target="_blank" rel="noopener">SciKGTeX</a> to create a FAIR-annotated publication and import it into the ORKG.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>5. RE25 Tutorial - Using the ORKG.pdf</td> <td>The practical exercise, with detailed step-by-step instructions on how to use the <a href="https://orkg.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ORKG </a>to describe publications regarding their scientific information and use these descriptions to create and publish an ORKG comparison.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>6. RE25 Tutorial - Using the ORKG Ask and ORKG CSV Import.pdf</td> <td>The practical exercise, with detailed step-by-step instructions on how to use <a href="https://ask.orkg.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ORKG Ask</a> and the <a href="https://orkg.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ORKG</a> CSV Import to describe publications regarding their scientific information and use these descriptions to create and publish an ORKG comparison.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>7. RE25 Tutorial - Reflection and Closing.pdf</td> <td>The summary, reflection, and closing of the tutorial with an outlook to the future of <a href="https://gitlab.com/TIBHannover/orkg/ExtracTable" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ExtracTable</a>.</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h2>2. Exercise Materials - All exercise materials used in the tutorial.</h2> <h3>2.1 SciKGTeX Materials</h3> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Folder</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>SciKGTeX_Example</td> <td> <p>The folder contains an example publication and all required SciKGTeX files for annotating the scientific information.</p> <p>Files:</p> <ol> <li>example.tex : LaTeX file of the example publication.</li> <li>scikgtex.lua : Required LaTeX package file for using SciKGTeX.</li> <li>scikgtex.sty : Required LaTeX package file for using SciKGTeX.</li> <li>project.zip : Zip file containing all above files for uploading as a project in Overleaf.</li> </ol> <p><em>Remark:</em> SciKGTeX is constantly being further developed. For the latest version of the required files, please refer to the corresponding <a href="https://github.com/Christof93/SciKGTeX" target="_blank" rel="noopener">GitHub project</a>.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>SciKGTeX_Solution</td> <td> <p>The folder contains an Overleaf project with the solution for a possible annotation of the example publication provided.</p> <p>Files:</p> <ol> <li>example.pdf : PDF with annotations embedded into the PDF's XMP metadata.</li> <li>example.tex : LaTeX file of the example publication with annotations.</li> <li>output.xmp_metadata.xml : XMP file generated by SciKGTeX to check the annotations created.</li> <li>scikgtex.lua : Required LaTeX package file for using SciKGTeX.</li> <li>scikgtex.sty : Required LaTeX package file for using SciKGTeX.</li> <li>project.zip : Zip file containing all above files for uploading as a project in Overleaf.</li> </ol> <p><em>Remark:</em> SciKGTeX is constantly being further developed. For the latest version of the required files, please refer to the corresponding <a href="https://github.com/Christof93/SciKGTeX" target="_blank" rel="noopener">GitHub project</a>.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h3>2.2 ORKG Materials</h3> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Folder</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>ORKG_Exemplary_Comparison</td> <td> <p>The folder contains a created ORKG comparison as a PDF and PNG file, consisting of 4 exemplary publications that were described with the ORKG template provided for the tutorial.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>ORKG_Exemplary_Publications</td> <td> <p>The folder contains 20 PDF files with short summaries of scientific findings on empirical research practices from 20 different publications of the IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference. The participants have received these PDFs to enter them in the ORKG and then create an ORKG Comparison.</p> <p><em>Remark:</em> We have provided the short summaries instead of the full publications to simplify the extraction process due to time constraints.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>ORKG_Template</td> <td> <p>The folder contains an overview of the ORKG template used in the tutorial as a PNG file and an N3 file of its RDF structure.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h3>2.3 ORKG Ask & ORKG CSV Import Materials</h3> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>File</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>empty_orkg_csv_file_for_orkg_csv_import.csv</td> <td> <p>The file contains an empty template for creating an ORKG CSV file for the ORKG CSV Import with own content.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>empty_orkg_csv_file_for_orkg_csv_import.xlsx</td> <td> <p> </p> The file contains an empty template for creating an ORKG CSV file for the ORKG CSV Import with own content. <p> </p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>orkg_ask_synthesized_answer_and_link_to search.txt</td> <td>The file contains the synthesized answer with references from ORKG Ask for the question "What is the state of the art in empirical research applied in requirements engineering?" with a link to the associated saved search.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>original_orkg_ask_export_for_orkg_csv_import.csv</td> <td> <p>The file contains the original content of an exported ORKG Ask result table that is revised in the tutorial to create an ORKG Comparison using the ORKG CSV Import.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>original_orkg_ask_export_for_orkg_csv_import.xlsx</td> <td> <p>The file contains the original content of an exported ORKG Ask result table that is revised in the tutorial to create an ORKG Comparison using the ORKG CSV Import.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>revised_orkg_ask_export_for_orkg_csv_import.csv</td> <td> <p>The file contains the revised content of an exported ORKG Ask result table that is used in the tutorial to create an ORKG Comparison using the ORKG CSV Import.</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>revised_orkg_ask_export_for_orkg_csv_import.xlsx</td> <td> <p>The file contains the revised content of an exported ORKG Ask result table that is used in the tutorial to create an ORKG Comparison using the ORKG CSV Import.</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <h1>Usage Notes</h1> <p>These materials are intended for use by the participants of the tutorial, the broader RE community, and everyone interested in open science. They are provided to support the long-term transition towards FAIR scientific information and to empower researchers to integrate open science infrastructures into their work.</p> <h1>License</h1> <p>The materials are released under <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license</a>, allowing for reuse and distribution in accordance with open science practices.</p>
Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Open Access Compliance Monitoring 2018
<p><strong>I. Executive summary</strong></p> <p>The Austrian Science Fund (FWF), which is Austria's main funding organisation for basic research, encourages and helps all project leaders and project staff members to make their peer-reviewed research results freely available on the Internet. Since 1 January 2016, open access has been mandatory for all peer-reviewed publications listed in final reports on FWF-funded projects. Any exceptions must be clearly indicated and justified. For projects that started after 1 January 2015, open access has been compulsory for all peer-reviewed publications.</p> <p>All principal investigators in FWF-funded projects are obliged to submit a final report within three months of completing their projects. In 2018 all in all 549 final reports were submitted to the FWF, 37 out of them couldn't report publications by now.</p> <p>The publications and other data mentioned in those reports are archived and analysed by the FWF. This report examines the state of compliance with open access requirements on the basis of final project reports submitted in the year 2018.</p> <p>Main findings:</p> <ul> <li>A total of 10.354 publications were listed in the final project reports submitted in 2018.</li> <li>Of those publications, 7.702 were conclusively identified as peer-reviewed.</li> <li>Regarding compliance with the FWF's Open Access Policy, the report shows that 92% of the peer-reviewed publications that arose from submitted final reports of FWF projects in 2018 are openly accessible (2015: 83%, 2016: 92%, 2017: 90%).</li> <li>The most frequently chosen option is <em>hybrid open access </em>(39%)<em>. </em>Since last year's report, the use of<em> </em><em>hybrid open access </em>has declined by 2% and <em>g</em><em>old open access </em>has increased by 4%. The share of <em>green open access </em>and <em>other open access </em>remained contant (20% and 16%).</li> <li>The majority of peer-reviewed publications submitted are journal articles (90%), 93% of which are openly accessible.</li> <li>The lowest rate of compliance with the FWF's Open Access Policy can be found in editions, contributions to edited volumes and monographs (65%).</li> <li>Although open access is not compulsory, 41% of non peer-reviewed publications are freely available through the internet.</li> <li>The absolute number of publications listed in final reports in 2018 includes 886 publications that are mentioned several times in different projects; however, those repetitions do not ultimately affect the relative share of open access publications (92%).</li> </ul> <p><strong>II. Bias</strong></p> <p>All publications were entered in the FWF’s database manually and with the utmost care when the final project reports were received. Nevertheless, it is not possible to rule out minor errors entirely. Moreover, some systematic problems need to be solved in the future; the FWF is currently preparing to implement a research information system in which FWF-funded researchers will be able to enter and update their research data on an ongoing basis.</p> <ul> <li>Due to the amount of data involved, it was not possible to check the current open access status of all publications twice. The last check was performed in January 2019.</li> <li>In some cases, the embargo period may have expired after submission, and publications labelled o<em>ther open access</em> in the FWF’s database may now be accessible through <em>green open access.</em></li> <li>Whenever the status "peer-reviewed" could not be clearly identified according to FWF guidelines, the publications were classified as non peer-reviewed.</li> <li>Openly available non peer-reviewed publications were entered as <em>other open access</em>.</li> </ul>
Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Publication Cost Data 2018
<p>The following data set provides information on the publication costs spent by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) via the programmes Peer-reviewed Publications (<a href="https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/research-funding/fwf-programmes/peer-reviewed-publications/">https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/research-funding/fwf-programmes/peer-reviewed-publications/</a>) and Stand-Alone Publications (<a href="https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/research-funding/fwf-programmes/stand-alone-publications/">https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/research-funding/fwf-programmes/stand-alone-publications/</a>) in 2018.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Increasing Documentation and Disclosure of Sickle Cell Trait Status: An Implementation Science Approach
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05387564. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Implementation Science to Enhance HIV Testing Services During Emergency Care in Kenya
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06747221. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
European Regulatory Science on Tobacco: Policy Implementation to Reduce Lung Diseases (EUREST-PLUS)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02773836. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
How Well do Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury Learn New Material Using Learning Styles in Online Science Classrooms?
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01417468. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Implementation Science to Reduce the Disparity in Tobacco Treatment Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illness
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05952401. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Hacettepe University COVID-19 Vaccinated's Health Cohort- Students of Health Sciences
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05104385. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering & Math) Familia Talk
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03766906. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Ecofisio, a Mobile Application for Assessment and Diagnosis Using Ultrasound Imaging for Undergraduate Health Science Students
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04138511. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.
The Clinical Efficacy of Next Science Wound Gel (NXTSC) in the Healing of Chronic Wounds
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02465073. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Effects of a Peer-mentoring Program on Undergraduate Students' Outcomes and Perspectives Related to a Career in Communication Sciences and Disorders
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07308821. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.
Translating Data Science to Palliative Care
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05942040. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
A Prospective Evaluation of the Catheter Science C3 "Umbrella Catheter."
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03353571. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Multiple-Family Group Intervention Programming to Improve Mental Health of Adolescents Living With HIV in Ghana: An Implementation Science Approach
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06701942. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 0. Publications: 2.
Supermarket Science: Multipronged Approaches to Increasing Fresh, Frozen and Canned Fruit and Vegetable Purchases
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02975232. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.
Blood Collection Sub-Study of Exact Sciences Protocol 2019-01: "Clinical Validation of an Optimized Multi-Target Stool DNA (Mt-sDNA 2.0) Test, For Colorectal Cancer Screening BLUE-C"
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04144751. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.