Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,170
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6,170 results for “european”
Figure 3 from: Wesener T, Voigtländer K, Decker P, Oeyen JP, Spelda J (2016) Barcoding of Central European Cryptops centipedes reveals large interspecific distances with ghost lineages and new species records from Germany and Austria (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha). ZooKeys 564: 21-46. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.7535
Figure 3 - Frequency distribution of pairwise intraspecific (blue) and interspecific (red) distances. All lineages of Cryptops parisi treated as one species, Cryptops parisi sensu lato. Basic table see Suppl. material 1.
Figure 2 from: Wesener T, Voigtländer K, Decker P, Oeyen JP, Spelda J (2016) Barcoding of Central European Cryptops centipedes reveals large interspecific distances with ghost lineages and new species records from Germany and Austria (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha). ZooKeys 564: 21-46. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.7535
Figure 2 - Maximum likelihood tree under the GTR+G+I model, 1000 bootstrap replicates. Colours and symbols correspond to Maps (Figs 1, 4). Country of origin given after specimen number: AT = Austria; DE = Germany; GB = Wales; HR = Croatia; IT = Italy; SL = Slovenia. Photograph shows a specimen of Cryptops parisi s.s. from Breckerfeld (photo A. Steiner), western Germany. For full data on all specimens, see Table 1.
Figure 1 from: Wesener T, Voigtländer K, Decker P, Oeyen JP, Spelda J (2016) Barcoding of Central European Cryptops centipedes reveals large interspecific distances with ghost lineages and new species records from Germany and Austria (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha). ZooKeys 564: 21-46. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.7535
Figure 1 - Distribution map of all successfully sequenced Central European specimens of Cryptops. Numbers refer to each specimen (see Table 1). Symbols and colours denote species. Blue rectangle = Cryptops parisi; red circle = Cryptops anomalans; green triangle = Cryptops hortensis; brown diamond = Cryptops croaticus; orange cross = Cryptops umbricus; light blue, orange, and yellow symbols mark undetermined Cryptops species.
Figure 5 from: Wesener T, Voigtländer K, Decker P, Oeyen JP, Spelda J (2016) Barcoding of Central European Cryptops centipedes reveals large interspecific distances with ghost lineages and new species records from Germany and Austria (Chilopoda, Scolopendromorpha). ZooKeys 564: 21-46. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.7535
Figure 5 - Frequency distribution of pairwise intraspecific (blue) and interspecific (red) distances. The three lineages of Cryptops parisi treated as different species. Basic table see Suppl. material 1.
Figure 4 from: Caterino MS, Tishechkin AK (2016) Spatial and environmental correlates of species richness and turnover patterns in European cryptocephaline and chrysomeline beetles. ZooKeys 557: 59-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.7087
Figure 4 - Female genitalia, Megalocraerus rubricatus. A 8th tergite, dorsal view B 8th sternite, ventral view C Bursa copulatrix (bc), common oviduct (co), spermatheca (st) and attached spermathecal gland (stg) D Ovipositor.
Figure 3 from: Caterino MS, Tishechkin AK (2016) Spatial and environmental correlates of species richness and turnover patterns in European cryptocephaline and chrysomeline beetles. ZooKeys 557: 59-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.7087
Figure 3 - Male genitalia, Megalocraerus rubricatus. A 8th tergite, dorsal view B 8th sternite, dorsal view C 8th tergite and sternite, lateral view, in situ D 9th and 10th tergites, dorsal view E 9th sternite, dorsal view F Aedeagus, dorsal view G Tegmen, lateral view.
Figure 6 from: Caterino MS, Tishechkin AK (2016) Spatial and environmental correlates of species richness and turnover patterns in European cryptocephaline and chrysomeline beetles. ZooKeys 557: 59-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.7087
Figure 6 - Aedeagi of Megalocraerus spp. A Megalocraerus mandibularis, dorsal view B Megalocraerus mandibularis, lateral view C Megalocraerus chico, dorsal view D Megalocraerus chico, lateral view E Megalocraerus madrededios, dorsal view F Megalocraerus madrededios, lateral view G unnamed Megalocraerus sp. from Rio de Janeiro, dorsal view H unnamed Megalocraerus sp. from Rio de Janeiro, lateral view.
Figure 1 from: Caterino MS, Tishechkin AK (2016) Spatial and environmental correlates of species richness and turnover patterns in European cryptocephaline and chrysomeline beetles. ZooKeys 557: 59-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.7087
Figure 1 - Generic characters of Megalocraerus. A Frons B Antenna C Mouthparts, ventral view (one maxilla and labial palpus omitted for clarity).
Figure 5 from: Caterino MS, Tishechkin AK (2016) Spatial and environmental correlates of species richness and turnover patterns in European cryptocephaline and chrysomeline beetles. ZooKeys 557: 59-77. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.7087
Figure 5 - A Dorsal habitus Megalocraerus mandibularis B Mandibles male Megalocraerus mandibularis C Dorsal habitus Megalocraerus chico.
Figure 2 from: Freijeiro A, Baselga A (2016) Spatial and environmental correlates of species richness and turnover patterns in European cryptocephaline and chrysomeline beetles. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 6. ZooKeys 597: 81–99. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.597.6792
Figure 2 - Partitioning of the variation (%) in species richness (a, b) and species composition (c, d) among groups of explanatory sets (A=area, E=environment and S=spatial variables) for European Cryptocephalinae (left column: a, c) and Chrysomelinae (right column: b, d).
Figure 1 from: Freijeiro A, Baselga A (2016) Spatial and environmental correlates of species richness and turnover patterns in European cryptocephaline and chrysomeline beetles. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 6. ZooKeys 597: 81–99. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.597.6792
Figure 1 - Patterns of variation in species richness (a, b), hierarchical clustering based in βsim (c, d) and mapping of 4 major clusters (e, f) for cryptocephalines (left column: a, c, e) and chrysomelines (right column: b, d, f). Colours correspond to the 4 major clusters. Countries' abbreviations follow those of Löbl and Smetana (2010).
Figure 3 from: Freijeiro A, Baselga A (2016) Spatial and environmental correlates of species richness and turnover patterns in European cryptocephaline and chrysomeline beetles. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 6. ZooKeys 597: 81–99. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.597.6792
Figure 3 - Distance decay of similarity with spatial distance in Northern Europe (solid dots, solid line) and southern Europe (hollow dots, dashed line) for cryptocephalines (a, blue), chrysomelines (b, red) and longhorn beetles (c, green). The density plots in (d) show the distribution of 1000 bootstrap replicates of the distance decay slopes (solid lines: northern Europe, dashed lines: southern Europe, colours corresponding to a, b, and c).
Figure 9 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558
Figure 9 - Male genitalia of Hydrobius morphotypes in dorsal view. A Hydrobius fuscipes fuscipes B Hydrobius fuscipes subrotundus C Hydrobius fuscipes rottenbergii D Hydrobius arcticus.
Figure 8 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558
Figure 8 - Species tree with the largest posterior probability from BPP v3.0 analyses conducted on Hydrobius specimens. Multi-locus data (COI, H3 and ITS2) used with Hydrobius convexus included as outgroup. Values above branches indicate range of split posterior probabilities, i.e. the probability for the node representing a speciation event, from four different prior-combinations. Values in red have split probabilities < 1.0. *Clade VII only delimited when specimens from Clade VII were a priori assigned as a potential species separate from Hydrobius arcticus and Hydrobius fuscipes rottenbergii.
Figure 17 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558
Figure 17 - Habitus of Hydrobius morphotypes in dorsal view. A Hydrobius arcticus B Hydrobius fuscipes rottenbergii C Hydrobius fuscipes fuscipes D Hydrobius fuscipes subrotundus.
Figure 16 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558
Figure 16 - Morphometric differences between morphotypes and effect of body size on Elytral Index (EI) of Hydrobius. EI = length of the elytra / maximum width of elytra. 113 specimens measured. Independently fitted lines for each morphotype are shown, slopes not significantly different. Type specimens and specimens of Hydrobius fuscipes subrotundus and Hydrobius fuscipes fuscipes collected in sympatry (Rinn = locality Rinnleiret (Norway), Mot = Motzen (Germany) and Ola = Öland (Sweden)) are labeled.
Figure 10 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558
Figure 10 - Male genitalia of Hydrobius morphotypes in lateral view. A Hydrobius arcticus B Hydrobius fuscipes rottenbergii C Hydrobius fuscipes fuscipes D Hydrobius fuscipes subrotundus.
Figure 13 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558
Figure 13 - Box- and whisker-plot showing morphometric differences between morphotypes of Hydrobius. Top and bottom of boxes represent first and third quartile; dark bands represent the second quartile (median); whiskers show the maximum and minimum values not including outliers (white points). a Shape of mesoventral process. Hydrobius arcticus is the only morphotype with a blunt process (indicated by the higher values) b Relative position of trichobothria in relation to the 3rd and 5th row of elytral serial punctures. The trichobothria of Hydrobius fuscipes rottenbergii are positioned closer to the serial punctures than in other morphotypes (indicated by lower values).
Figure 1 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558
Figure 1 - Measurements of Hydrobius male genitalia. a Paramere in lateral view. A: width of paramere (character 1.5). Curvature of paramere tip (character 1.6) = A+B b Genitalia in dorsal view. 1: Length of sclerotized part of penis. 2: Width of narrowest part of paramere (character 1.2). 3: Length of paramere (character 1.1). Robustness of paramere (character 1.3) = 3 / 2. Paramere length relative penis length (character 1.4) = 3/1. Images of Hydrobius fuscipes rottenbergii.
Figure 4 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558
Figure 4 - Measurement of Elytral Index (EI). 1 Length of elytra 2 Maximum width of elytra. EI (character 2.4) = 1 / 2. Image of Hydrobius fuscipes fuscipes.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.