Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 7 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558

Figure 7 - Ultrametric (strict clock) maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree used in GMYC analysis of ITS2. Terminal names and abbreviations as in Fig. 5. Values above branches show Bayesian posterior probability support (nodes with PP < 0.4 not shown); values below branches show GMYC-support. Scale bar represents an artificial time scale with the root at time 1.

Figure 6 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558

Figure 6 - Ultrametric (strict clock) maximum clade credibility (MCC) tree used in GMYC analysis of COI. Terminal names and abbreviations as in Fig. 5. Samples from BOLD are marked with BOLD Sequence ID. Values above branches show Bayesian posterior probability support; values below branches show GMYC-support, i.e. support for the node as a GMYC-species among the alternative models of delimitation considered (95% confidence set). GMYC-support < 0.1 not shown. Splits of thick branches represent speciation events, splits of thin branches indicate within-species coalescent events and splits of red branches depend on the models considered (Table 6). Scale bar represents an artificial time scale with the root at time 1.

Figure 15 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558

Figure 15 - Comparison of the relative position of trichobothria (red arrows) on the elytra of Hydrobius. A Trichobothria positioned in the intervals between the 2nd and 3rd row of serial punctures, and between the 4th and 5th row. Typical positioning of trichobothria in Hydrobius arcticus, Hydrobius fuscipes fuscipes and Hydrobius fuscipes subrotundus, here represented by a specimen of Hydrobius fuscipes fuscipes B Trichobothria positioned in or very close to the 3rd and 5th row of serial punctures, which is characteristic of Hydrobius fuscipes rottenbergii.

Figure 3 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558

Figure 3 - The shape of the mesoventral process (character 2.2). Measured in lateral view as an angle (indicated by red lines). Image of Hydrobius fuscipes fuscipes.

Figure 5 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558

Figure 5 - Majority-rule consensus tree from time-free Bayesian analysis of the concatenated data. Branch support values are posterior probabilities. Samples are labeled with ID-numbers, identified morphotypes and country of origin. Specimens collected in sympatry are also labeled with locality name (Rinnleiret or Motzen). Scale bar indicates expected number of nucleotide substitutions per site. Branches with "\\" have been manually cut. Abbreviations for morphotypes: arc = arcticus, fus = fuscipes, rot = rottenbergii, sub = subrotundus.

Figure 12 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558

Figure 12 - Morphometric differences between 60 specimens of Hydrobius. a Differences between morphotype and effect of body size on paramere length. Both axes are in logarithmic scale. Independently fitted lines for each morphotype are shown, slopes not significantly different. Type specimens of Hydrobius fuscipes subrotundus and Hydrobius fuscipes rottenbergii are labeled b Box- and whisker-plot showing differences between morphotypes on the ratio length of paramere / length of penis. Top and bottom of boxes represent first and third quartile; dark bands represent the second quartile (median); whiskers show the maximum and minimum values not including outliers (white points). Black points represent type specimens.

Figure 2 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558

Figure 2 - Measurement of the relative position of trichobothria on the elytra (character 2.1). Dorsal view of anterior part of the elytra, showing how several trichobothria encountered posterior to the scutellum were measured. Each relative position of a trichobothrium was measured by dividing the length from the 3rd row of serial punctures to the trichobothrium (a) by the length from the 3rd row to the 2nd row (a+b). The same was done with trichobothria in or near the 5th row of serial punctures. Image of Hydrobius fuscipes fuscipes.

Figure 14 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558

Figure 14 - Comparison of the mesoventral process in Hydrobius. A Large and acute process found in all northern European variants of Hydrobius fuscipes, here represented by a specimen of Hydrobius fuscipes fuscipes B Small and blunt process characteristic of Hydrobius arcticus.

Figure 11 from: Fossen EI, Ekrem T, Nilsson AN, Bergsten J (2016) Species delimitation in northern European water scavenger beetles of the genus Hydrobius (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). ZooKeys 564: 71-120. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.564.6558

Figure 11 - Morphometric differences between 60 (in a) and 59 (in b) specimens of Hydrobius. Two characters are plotted against each other in each figure with convex hulls used to show overlap in the data between morphotypes. Type specimens and specimens of Hydrobius fuscipes subrotundus and Hydrobius fuscipes fuscipes collected in sympatry (Rinn = locality Rinnleiret (Norway) and Mot = Motzen (Germany)) are labeled. a Curvature of paramere tip plotted against width of paramere in dorsal view. X-axis is in logarithmic scale b Width of paramere in lateral view plotted against the ratio robustness of paramere in dorsal view. Y-axis is in logarithmic scale.

Figure 8 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Figure 8 - The patchiness of survey coverage in Europe illustrated by the distribution map of Plantago lanceolata taken from GBIF in 2016. This species is one of the commonest and most widespread in Europe, it should occur in almost all areas of this map, but in fact the data traces out the borders of countries and area who have published data on GBIF.

Figure 9 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Figure 9 - Information flows between EU BON and LTER Europe, as envisaged on the 3rd EU BON Stakeholder Roundtable in Granada on 9-11 December 2015.

Figure 6 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Figure 6 - Individual Metacat instances can be connected to DataOne which replicates public files. Thus the data is still available if a single instance goes offline. https://search.dataone.org/#data/page/0

Figure 5 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Figure 5 - PPBio has installed a Metacat instance for their researchers to upload and make publicly available the results of work related to biodiversity in the Western Amazon. https://ppbiodata.inpa.gov.br/metacatui/

Figure 3 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Figure 3 - The implementation of Darwin Core Archive in Plazi to transfer treatment data. Observation data described with Darwin Core terms.

Figure 4 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Figure 4 - The public data repository provided by the Knowledge Network for Biocomplexity (KNB). https://knb.ecoinformatics.org/#data/page/0

Figure 1 from: Smirnova L, Mergen P, Groom Q, De Wever A, Penev L, Stoev P, Pe'er I, Runnel V, Camacho A, Vincent T, Agosti D, Arvanitidis C, Bonet F, Saarenmaa H (2016) Data sharing tools adopted by the European Biodiversity Observation Network Project. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e9390. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e9390

Figure 1 - ARPHA consists of two integrated workflows: in ARPHA-XML, the manuscript is written and processed via the ARPHA Writing Tool, and in ARPHA-DOC, the manuscript is submitted and processed as document file(s).

Figures 27-34 from: Mašán P, Özbek HH, Fenďa P (2016) Two new species of Pachylaelaps Berlese, 1888 from the Iberian Peninsula, with a key to European species (Acari, Gamasida, Pachylaelapidae). ZooKeys 603: 71-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.603.9038

Figures 27-34 - Pachylaelaps (Longipachylaelaps) brevipilis. 27–30 Sperm induction structures, female, variant forms 31–34 Palptibial projections, male, variant views. Not to scale.

Figures 20-21 from: Mašán P, Özbek HH, Fenďa P (2016) Two new species of Pachylaelaps Berlese, 1888 from the Iberian Peninsula, with a key to European species (Acari, Gamasida, Pachylaelapidae). ZooKeys 603: 71-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.603.9038

Figures 20-21 - Pachylaelaps (Longipachylaelaps) brevipilis, female, with setal notation of some ventral setae and glandular poroids. 20 Dorsal idiosoma 21 Ventral idiosoma.

Figures 13-19 from: Mašán P, Özbek HH, Fenďa P (2016) Two new species of Pachylaelaps Berlese, 1888 from the Iberian Peninsula, with a key to European species (Acari, Gamasida, Pachylaelapidae). ZooKeys 603: 71-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.603.9038

Figures 13-19 - Pachylaelaps (Pachylaelaps) pyrenaicus. 13–16 Sperm induction structures, female, variant forms 17–18 Palptibial projections, male, variant forms 19 Chelicera, female, lateral view. Not scaled.

Figures 3-7 from: Mašán P, Özbek HH, Fenďa P (2016) Two new species of Pachylaelaps Berlese, 1888 from the Iberian Peninsula, with a key to European species (Acari, Gamasida, Pachylaelapidae). ZooKeys 603: 71-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.603.9038

Figures 3-7 - Pachylaelaps (Pachylaelaps) pyrenaicus, female. 3 Sperm induction structures 4 Ventral gnathosoma 5 Epistome 6 Chelicera, lateral view 7 Tarsus II, lateral view.