Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

13,397

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

13,397 results for “sp. nov.”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

Fig. 6 in Echinoderes landersi Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 6. Boundary in China between distribution areas of Cuculus optatus and Cuculus saturatus during breeding season. The dashed line is the boundary that Johnsgard (1997) used to separate Cuculus optatus and Cuculus saturatus. The solid line is the boundary suggested by this study. a: Northern mainland China, b: Taiwan Island. Geographic base map is from Google Maps (Google, USA).

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 2 in Echinoderes landersi Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. Frequency distribution (A) and geographical distribution (B) of the note number per syllable in each syllable. The red arrow indicates the quartile. Geographic base map in (B) is from Google Maps (Google, USA).

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 4 in Echinoderes landersi Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 4. Frequency distribution (A) and geographical distribution (B) of syllable frequency. The red arrow indicates the quartile. Geographic base map in (B) is from Google Maps (Google, USA).

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 2. The 5 in Echinoderes landersi Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. The 5' UTR nucleotide sequence of the Mc1r gene. The maximum length of the 5'UTR is 588 bp. The first ATG codon is boxed. Transcriptional initiation sites are indicated by arrows. Consensus binding sites for SP-1 and AP-2 transcription factors are underlined. The parentheses refer to mouse (M) or rat (R). The CANNTG motifs based on reports from mouse experiments are heavily underlined.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 1 in Echinoderes landersi Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. Variation in coat color of black-bellied voles (Eothenomys melanogaster). (a) A black color form (Yu2045) sampled at Alishan, location I in the map (b) A brown color form (Yu2014) sampled at Wuling, location IV in the map (c) Alishan habitat (I in the map) with darker soil color (d) Wuling habitat (IV in the map) with lighter soil color (e) Map of Taiwan showing sites of sample collection: Alisan (I), Tataka (II), Guanwu (III), and Wuling (IV); the map inset shows the geographical location of Taiwan (red color) in East Asia.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 3 in Echinoderes galadrielae Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. Monthly feeding time variation on different food types. RF= Ripe Fruit, UF= Unripe Fruit, FL= Flowers, ML= Mature Leaves, YL= Young Leaves.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 1 in Echinoderes blazeji Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. This map illustrates the areas where blue marlin samples were taken. The triangle and ellipse symbols indicate sampling sites. EP, eastern Pacific; WNP, western North Pacific; SCS, South China Sea; EI, eastern Indian Ocean.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 3 in Echinoderes blazeji Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. Median joining network of 239 of blue marlin CR haplotypes. Each circle means a unique haplotype, and diameter is proportional to the individual number shading that haplotype.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 2 in Echinoderes blazeji Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree of 239 blue marlins based on CR sequences. Rooted phylogeny of 239 blue marlin CR sequences from maximum likelihood (ML) analysis and Bayesian (BA) analysis. Topologies of ML and BA analyses are similar; differences exist only in those relationships with weak statistical support. Numbers on branches are ML bootstrap values (Those below 70% are not shown) and solid circles on branch nodes indicate statistically robust nodes with posteriori probabilities from partitioned Bayesian analysis ≥ 0.95.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 4 in Echinoderes galadrielae Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 4. Immunoblots of tissues lysates of the control group, the hypoxic group and the restricted group on day 3. The relative protein abundance was detected by immunoblots of extracts from the 1st gill, the 4th gill and the labyrinth organ of T. microlepis. (A) NKA expression within each tissue was not significantly different among the three groups. (B) PCNA expression within each tissue was not significantly different among the three groups. (C) CAII expression was significantly different in the labyrinth organ between the control group and the hypoxic group (asterisk indicates a significant difference, Dunnett's test, P <0.05). 1st gill: first gill, 4th gill: fourth gill, LO: labyrinth organ.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 5 in Echinoderes galadrielae Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 5. Immunoblots of tissue lysates from the control group, the hypoxic group and the restricted group on day 14. The relative protein abundance was detected by immunoblots in the 1st gill, the 4th gill and the labyrinth organ of T. microlepis. (A) NKA expression within each tissue was not significantly different among the three groups. (B) PCNA expression was significantly higher in the 1st gill and the labyrinth organ in the restricted group compared to the control group (asterisk indicates a significant difference, Dunnett's test, P <0.05). (C) CAII expression within each tissue was not significantly different among the three groups. 1st gill: first gill, 4th gill: fourth gill, LO: labyrinth organ.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 3 in Echinoderes galadrielae Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. Gill morphology in T. microlepis was observed in the control group, the hypoxic group and the restricted group after 28 days. A, E, and I was the 1st gill; B, F, and J was the 2nd gill; C, G, and K was the 3rd gill; D, H, and L was the 4th gill, which had the larger vessels in the lamellar base. A-D show gills in the control group; E-H show gills in the hypoxic group; I-L show gills in the restricted group. Significant morphological changes were observed in the 4th gill in the restricted group after 28 days (L). The rest of the groups showed no apparent morphological modification among gills. F: filament, L: lamellar, RBC: red blood cell. Scale bar = 50 μm

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 2 in Echinoderes galadrielae Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 2. Lengths of the filaments and lamellae among gills from fish was recorded in the control group, the hypoxic group and the restricted group after 14 and 28 days. A-D shows the lengths of the filaments in gills 1 through 4 from the three groups. Within each gill, no significant difference among the three groups was found after 14 and 28 days. E-H shows the lengths of the lamellae in gills 1 through 4 from the three groups. There was a significant difference in the 1st gill in the restricted group after 14 and 28 days (Dunnett's test, P <0.05). Another difference was also observed in the 4th gill in the restricted group after 28 days (Dunnett's test, P <0.05).

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 1 in Echinoderes galadrielae Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 1. The frequency of ABR in T. microlepis exposed to normoxia and hypoxia for 14 days. The frequency of ABR in the hypoxic group was significantly higher than that in the control group at days 1, 2, 4, 7, and 14 (asterisk indicates a significant difference between hypoxia and normoxia, t test, P <0.05). The frequency in the hypoxic groups increased to its highest level at day 1 and then gradually decreased to a stable level until the end of the 14-d experiment (Tukey's test, P <0.05).

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 3. 3D in Echinoderes galadrielae Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 3. 3D renderings of Smilosicyopus leprurus in (a) latera and (b) front views as well as Sicyopus zosterophorum in (c) lateral and (d) front views. Abbrevations: ART for anguloarticular; D for dentary; EPT for ectopterygoid; ME for mesethmoid; MPT for metapterygoid; M for maxilla; PAL for palatine; PM for premaxilla; Q for quadrate; SYM for symplectic; alp for anterior lateral process; amp for anterior media process; ap for ascending process.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 10 in Echinoderes blazeji Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 10. Dorsal view of embryonic development of Sepia pharaonis (stages. 19-30). (A-E) Morphological characteristics of embryos for stages 19-30 are illustrated in Table 1. st: stage. Scale bar = 2 mm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 9 in Echinoderes blazeji Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 9. Morphological changes of the internal yolk sac during late embryonic development of Sepia pharaonis. (A) The internal yolk sac of the embryo starts to develop at stage 20. (B) Two small Y-shaped buds protrude laterally from the back of the statocysts at stage 21. (C) Two apparent internal yolk pouches elongate backwards at stage 22. Arrow: gill. (D) Strong and enlarged internal yolk sac are like two thumb-shapes at stage 23. (E) Two laterally strong and enlarged internal yolk pouches meet together in the posterior at stage 24. (F) The internal yolk storage looks like an inverted shield with a can-shaped base and a triangle chief at stage 25. Increments of cuttlebone accumulate above the internal yolk storage. Red dashed circle: internal yolk sac. st: stage. Scale bar = 500 nm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 8 in Echinoderes blazeji Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 8. Morphological characteristics of eye development of Sepia pharaonis. (A) Annular optic sac (arrow) is translucent (st. 19). (B) The iris diaphragm (arrow) in the center of the optic sac starts to develop (st. 20). (C) The bean-shaped lens (arrowhead) and the iris (arrow) form (st. 21). (D) A thinly pigmented annular ring (arrow) is present (st. 22). (E) Corneal tissues (arrow) proceed to cover eyes where pigmentation of the retina continues (st. 23). (F) Retina is intensely pigmented, and the cornea (arrow) develops to cover the eyes (st. 24). Inset is the close-up of the cornea layer of the embryo fixed in Bouin's solution. (G) The eyes are enclosed by cornea and become opaque and dark-red (st. 25). Inset is the close-up of the cornea layer of the embryo fixed in Bouin's solution. (H) Lens protrude out toward the orbit, and the eyes appear totally dark (st. 26). Inset is the close-up of the cornea structure of the embryo fixed in Bouin's solution. It is a preliminary form of the W-shaped eye structure. st: stage. Scale bar = 250 nm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 5 in Echinoderes blazeji Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 5. Cell cleavages of embryonic development of Sepia pharaonis. The numerals beside the furrows indicate the successive order of cleavage, except those after the fifth step for simplicity. All of the images were taken from live embryos under the microscope, except that the inset of (J) (A- J) Morphological characteristics of embryos for stages 1-11 are illustrated in table 1. Asterisk in (E) and (G) represents the two independent blastomeres and a clear and empty zone, respectively. Inset in (J) is a direct view of a sunflower-shaped blastodisc with the homogenous blastomeres at central circle and the radial blastcones at margin at the animal pole of the embryo. st: stage. Scale bar = 300 nm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 4 in Echinoderes blazeji Grzelak & Sørensen 2022, sp. nov.

Fig. 4. Schematic profiles of embryonic development of Sepia pharaonis. Views from the animal pole of the embryos are shown from stages 1 to 17 and dorsal views from stages 18 to 30. st: stage.

opennotspecifiedDec 2022View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record